Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A SAFA is an assessment of the sustainability performance of one or several entities forming
part of a value chain rooted in agriculture, forestry, fisheries or aquaculture.
It can address all entities from the site of primary production to that of final sales to the
consumer. SAFA can take the form of a self-evaluation for the use by primary producers, food
manufacturers and retailers in every part of the world.
Running a SAFA results in a “sustainability polygone” that presents the performance of each of
the
21 issues that are crucial to the environmental, social, economic and governance dimensions of
sustainability. This “traffic light” representation highlights where an activity performance is
unacceptable (red), limited (orange), moderate (yellow), good (light green) or at best (dark
green). The thick black line connects the scores between the sustainability issues, unlocking
areas of weaknesses. Thanks to this representation, an entity can quickly understand where it
stands in the sustainability landscape and where it may need to forge partnerships to improve its
performance.
SAFA's themes and corresponding sub-themes describe what sustainability means for those
issue areas. Within each sub-theme, SAFA has provided default indicators, which are mapped
according to their criteria here in the ITC map. However in addition to these default indicators, an
enterprise or group of enterprises may develop additional indicators in order to adapt SAFA to
their region, sector or value chain. Default indicators may not be deleted if relevant, but it is
encouraged that users add additional indicators to make the assessment more appropriate and
thorough.
Facts and Figures
Sustainable development has numerous definitions and its ecological, economic and social
principles received universal agreement at the 1992 Earth Summit. One of the summit’s major
outcomes, Agenda 21, includes a whole chapter (Chapter 14) on sustainable agriculture and rural
development. Today, 106 countries have National Sustainable Development Strategies and at
least 120 voluntary sustainability standards are being implemented by the food and agriculture
industry. However, developing and implementing an integrated approach to analysing different
sustainability dimensions as a coherent whole and integrating them in development or business
strategies remains a major challenge.
With a view to offer a fair playing field, FAO built on existing efforts and developed a universal
framework for Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems (SAFA). After 5 years
of participatory development, SAFA has been presented to FAO member countries on 18 October
2013.
Environment
This indicator refers to all the practices that aim to improve the physical, chemical and
biological properties of the soils used by a company. Depending on the soil conditions and
the local and natural climatic, terrain and geological characteristics
This indicator refers to the protection, in-situ conservation and rehabilitation of the genetic
diversity of domesticated plant and animal.
Ecosystem Enhancing Practices: Dark Green (best practices): Land-cover and land use change
to more structurally complex and species-diverse systems, such as agroforestry.
Social
adequate rest from work, overtime that is voluntary, and educational opportunity for themselves
and their immediate families. In addition, quality of life means that they have the time to produce
or procure and prepare healthy meals for themselves and their families that include fresh
produce and a culturally appropriate
in summary The company can effectively engage with stakeholders. The excellent performance
in this indicator will be evidenced through personalized engagement activities for the type of
stakeholder, resulting in a comprehensive and mutually satisfactory engagement that is
maintained over time.
Management
capacity of soils that are important aspects for their health and productivity. It has a strong
influence on the volatilization of gaseous compounds in the soil (including GHG emissions such
as nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide), water balance (also at regional level), soil packing and root
penetration, absorption of nutrients from the soil by plants and good soil aeration.
The physical soil properties, such as the soil texture, porosity and structure, reveal the grade of
nutrient and water holding capacity of the soils which are important aspects for its health and
productivity
Quality
Ethics
We observe below that the first is from Quality and Ethics charts that we have a participation
of 120%, we that the principles and anti-corruption and bribery criteria are 80% and
compliance with national, religious and international legislation is 40%.
Key Features
The BRC Global Standard for Food Safety can be applied to any food processing or packing
operation where open food is handled, processed or packed. This may range from primary
products such as fresh produce pack houses and slaughter houses through to processed foods,
canneries and high risk ready to eat products. In some sectors such as fresh produce, guideline
documents are available to assist with interpretation.
The standard is divided into 7 chapters:
1. Senior Management Commitment and Continual Improvement – For any food safety system to
be effective it is essential that the factory senior management are fully committed to its
application and continued development.
2. The Food Safety Plan (HACCP) – The basis for the Food Safety System is an effective
HACCP programme based on the requirements of the internationally recognised Codex
Alimentarius system
3. Food Safety and Quality Management System - This sets out requirements for the
management of food safety and quality, building upon the principles of ISO 9000. This includes
requirements for product specifications, supplier approval, traceability, and the management of
incidents and product recalls.
4. Site Standards – These define expectations for the processing environment including the
layout and maintenance of the buildings and equipment, cleaning, pest control and waste
management. This includes a specific section on managing foreign body controls.
5. Product Control – This includes requirements at the product design and development stage,
Allergen management and the expectations of Laboratories and product testing.
6. Process Control – This covers the establishment and maintenance of safe process controls,
weight/volume control and equipment calibration.
7. Personnel – This defines requirements for the training of staff and expectations on protective
clothing and personnel hygiene.
Quality
Ethics
The processes criteria are based on elements which are drawn from the ISEAL Credibility
Principles. The principles resulted from a year-long consultation with contributions from more
than 400 organisations from five continents. They represent the characteristics of standards and
certification schemes that are most likely to achieve positive social, environmental or economic
impacts, while decreasing negative impacts.