GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS ee (RAILWAY BOARD) No. 2010/Proj./Bangalore/Misc, New Delhi, dated 23.09.2013 ve / Managing Director, Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited, 3" floor, BMTC Complex K.H. Road, Shanthingar, Banglaore. ‘Sub: Design Basis Report for BMRCL. Ref : BMRCL's Letter No. BMRCLIC-42/3783 dated 07.09.2013. — 3:st0 60 The Competent Authority in consultation with ROSO has approved Design Basis Report of BMRCL subject to conditions mentioned below: (A) Considering plinth beam and parapet towards dead load in place of superimposed dead load is approved as a special case for Ph-| of BMRCL with following conditions: 4. This approval is being granted as a special case for Ph-| of BMRCL only as the structures have already been designed and constructed and should not be taken, as precedence in future 2. One span per km will be kept under watch under advice fo Ministry of Railways. Quarterly measurements of the span should be taken and in case of any adverse development in the structure, immediate safety measure as deemed fit shall be taken by Metro Railway. RDSO may advise the items to be kept under watch for such spans. 3. An annual report (more frequent if warranted) should be prepared by Metro Railway for such monitoring and the same should be submitted to RDSO and Railway Board alongwith comments of Metra Railway on the report 4, Metro Railway will ensure that weight of parapet and track plinth will remain same as assumed in design throughout the life of structure and same shall be incorporated in the maintenance manual. 5. The variation in remaining SIDL will not be more than 20% of what has been assumed in design ‘Approved copies of DBR (2 no.) are enclosed for taking necessary action. Oe AS} 9, DirectorfWorks Planning Railway Board 1. Executive Directov/UTHS, RDSO, Manak Nagar, Lucknow for information and 2 OaNy necessary action (along with 3 copies of approved DBR). Ae 2. Executive Director/Structure, RDSO, Manak Nagar, Lucknow for information. Ow NS Als You are requested to take necessary action’as stated in para (2) of the letter. ssQ{[VTny— Ne GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS: (RAILWAY BOARD) No, 2010/Proj,/Bangalore/Misc. New Delhi, date 5 .09.2013 Executive Director/UTHS, RDSO, Manak Nagar, Lucknow. Sub: Design Basis Report for JMRCL and BMRCL. Ref: (i) RDSO's Letter No. CBS/Metro dated 26.07.2013, (ii) RDSO's Letter No. CBS/Metro/JMRCL dated 30.07.2013. The Competent Authority has approved Design Basis Reports of JMRCL and BMRCL subject to conditions mentioned against each item:- (i) Value of Modular Ratio (m): Approval for taking value of modular ration (m) as 10 is granted as a special case for Ph+l of Jaipur Metro subject to the following: + This approval is being granted as a special case for Ph-| only as the structures have already been designed & constructed and should not be taken as precedence in future. + One span per km will be kept under watch under advice to Ministry of Railways, Quarterly measurements of the span should be taken and in case of any adverse development in the structure, immediate safety measure as deemed fit shall be taken by Metro Railway administration. RDSO may advise the items to be kept under watch for such spans, + An annual report (more frequent if warranted) should be prepared by Metro Railway for such monitoring and the same should be submitted to Ministry of Railways alongwith comments of Metro Railway on the report, (ii) Consideration of parapet and plinth beams as D.L. in place of SIDL: Considering plinth beam and parapet towards dead load in place of superimposed dead load is approved as a special case for Ph- | of JMRCL and Ph- | of BMRCL with following conditions: + This approval is being granted as a special case for Ph-I of Jaipur Metro and Ph-| of BMRCL only as the structures have already been designed and constructed and should not be taken as precedence in future. * One span per km will be kept under watch under advice to Ministry of Railways. Quarterly measurements of the span should be taken and in case of any adverse development in the structure, immediate safety measure as deemed fit shall be taken by Metro Railway. RDSO may advise the items to be kept under watch for such spans.* An annual report (more frequent if warranted) should be prepared by Metro Railway for such monitoring and the same should be submitted to RDSO and Railway Board alongwith comments of Metro Railway on the report. * Metro Railway will ensure that weight of parapet and track plinth will remain same as assumed in design throughout the life of structure and same shall be incorporated in the maintenance manual, * The variation in remaining SIDL will not be more than 20% of what has been assumed in design. (iii) Vertical Derailment Load: Approval of reduction in vertical derailment load proportionate to axle load is conveyed as a special case as the structures have already been constructed in JMRCL. ‘Stipulation of following conditions is proposed while approving such relaxation: + This approval is being granted as a special case only for Ph-l of JMRCL as the structures have already been designed and coristructed and should not be taken as precedence in future * In case of any derailment, the affected as well as adjacent spans shall be immediately checked for any damages. Detailed measurements should be taken as ‘soon as possible and advised to Ministry of Railways with comments from concerned Metro Railway. Keeping above condonations in view, RDSO may send six copies of agreed DBRs to Railway Board for issue. Member Engineering has desired RDSO to explore need for revision in Indian Railway Codal provision and Bridge Rules on above three issues in view of technical details and opinion of experts in the field submitted by Metro Railways. A report may be submitted in this regard, TK Gey DirectorWorks Planning Railway Board Copy to the following for information and necessary action- 1, Executive DirectoriBridges, RDSO, Manak Nagar, Lucknow. 2. Executive Director/Structures, RDSO, Manak Nagar, Lucknow. er Ce= sath) Borgel! vse BANGALORE METRO RAIL PROJECT RITES — PCI - PBI- SYSTRA BANGALORE METRO RAIL PROJECT BMRP STRUCTURAL DESIGN BASIS REPORT FOR PHASE I. VIADUCT AND STATION BRIDGE STRUCTURE. R0-May 2012 R1-Apr ~ 2013 (Revised based on RDSO suggestions) R2-Jun — 2013 (Revised based on RDSO suggestions) R3-Jun — 2013 (Revised based on RDSO suggestions) Approved by Railway Board vide letter. no. 2010/proj./Bangalore/Misc dated 09.2013, BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION 3" Floor, BMTC Complex, Shantinagar Bangalore - 560027 \\ ARMA N Frafpser © & 2° cniet ENOL0 Bear - 35 aaa, ‘Government of InizeMinstry of Raihvays Sign ager she ars tres Research Designs & Standards Ozaniation AOTS - 226011 Lucknow -226.01 PBK (0572) 2451200 ID (0522) 2es0115 Fax (0822) 2250600 Db (0522) 2465510 No. UTHS/24 Date : 09.09.2013 Sh. B.S.Sudhir Chandra Director (Project and Planning) Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd, B.M.T.C Complex, 3 Floor, K.H.Road, Shanthinagar, 7 Bangalore-560 027 Sub : Design Basis Report for JMRCL & BMRCL. Ref: (i) Rly. Bd.’s letter no, 2010/Proj./Bangalore/Misc. dated 05.09.2013. (fi) BMRCU’s letter no. BMRCL/DBR/C123/2013 dated 26.06.13. 1. Railway Board has approved Design Basis Reports of JMRCL & BMRCL subject to conditions mentioned in RB letter referred above. 2. Kindly submit six sets of DBR submitted by you vide letter: referred (ii) above, duly incorporating Railway Board letter at the beginning of the document. a DA: As above ae (S.K.Gupta) Director/UTHS wee. BTR SesGALORE METRO RAIL Pati RITES ~ PCI - PBI- SYSTRA ELEVATED VIADUCT AND STATION CONCOURSE/RAIL TRACK SUPPPORT STRUCTURE. BMRP STRUCTURAL DESIGN BASIS REPORT CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... a 1.1 Brief Description of the Project 4 1.2. Aim of this Design Basis Report. ea 2. SALIENT FEATURES OF THE PROJECT. 3. STRUCTURAL ISSUES 5) 5 5 3.2. Materials Parameters... 32.1 Cement 3.22 Concrete 3.2.2.1 Young’s Modulus... 3.2.2.2. Minimum Grade of Concrete & Cover. 3.2.23 Density. 3.2.24 Poisson’s Ratio- 3.2.2.5 ‘Thermal Expansion Coefficient- 3.2.3 Prestressing,Steel for Tendons (c1.4.6.1 (d) IRS CBC)- 3.2.3.1 Young’s Modulus (¢1.4.6.2.1 IRS CBC)... 3.23.3 Breaking Strength & 0.2% Proof Sena Jacking Force- 3.23.4 Density:.... 323.5 Other Parameters. 3.24 — Structural Steel 3.24.1 Introduction. 3.2.4.2 Structural Stee! for Miscellaneous Use (for roof, stairease and walkway) 3.2.42. General... 2 7 : 32422 Young's Modulus... 3.24.23 Tensile Strength / Yield 3.24.24 Density : 78.5 kN/m’.. 3.24.2.5 Poisson's Ratio: 0.30. 3.24.2.6 Thermal Expansion Coefficient: 3.2.4.3 Structural Steel for Composite Bridges.. 3.243.1 General... 3.2.43.2 Young’s Modulus: E= 200,000 MPa (cl. 3.2.43.3 Tensile Strength / Yield Strength.. 3.2.4.3.4 Density : 78.5 kN/m’ 3.2435 Poisson's Ratio: 0.30 53 IRS CBC). a 5 5 5 5 ae 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 a SL 7 71 7 7 io 8 5BANGALORE METRO x... PROJECT RITES — PCI - PBI - SYSTRA 3.2.43.6 ‘Thermal Expansion Coefficient: 3.2.4,3.7 Fabrication. : 325) 3.3 Time-Dependent Characteristics of Materials . 3.4. Clearances... 34l 34.2 343 3.5. Seismic Design... 3.6. Vertical Deflections at Mid-Span 3.73 373.1 3.14 3741 3.74.2 Centrifugal Fore. 3.75 3.8 Coefficient of Dynamic Augment (CDA) 3.9. Emergency walkway... 3.10 3 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.18 3.19 3.20 3.21 3214 3.21.2 3.22 3.23 3.23.1 3.232 3.24 3.25 3.25.1 3.26 3.26.1 3.262 3.263 3.26.4 3.27 a Reinforcement Steel (Reba). Clearance for Road Traffic. Clearance for Railway Line .. Clearance for Rolling stock. Superimposed Dead Loads. Vertical Train Live Load. Live Load Combinati Horizontal Train Live Load .. Braking and Traction... Footpath Live Load. “Temperature Effect... Differential Temperature Seitlement (1S 2911) LWR Forces... Derailment Loads Wind Loads .. Erection Load Gradient Effect Vibration Effect. Load Combinations Methodology. Design assumption for pier... SLS Check and ULS Check. SLS Check. ULS Check... g Crack Width Check Fatigue Check... RCC and PSC structures Steel Structures. Durability... Foundations Capacity... Design Assumptions for Pile Foundation. Bearing System and its Design Methodology . 3 = Bearing System [ELASTOMERIC UP TO 31 M ‘AND BEYOND THAT IS POT-CUM-PTFE] .. 16 Design of Elastomeric Bearings Et Design of Pot Bearing 7 Replaceability of Bearings Bt) : 7 Uplift. TTTPPP PTS OOP TTI3.29 4.3. IS: Codes. 4.4 FOREIGN STANDARDS 4.5 OTHER PUBLICATIONS .. Appendix : (SEGRE METRO RAIL PROJLCS* RITES ~ PCI - PBI- SYSTRA : 3.28 Construction Methods [SEGMENTAL CONSTRUCTION] 3.28.1 Deck — Simple Spans Box Girder 3.28.2 3.283 Drainage of Deck / Solid Pier 3.29.1 Solid pier. ss 3.29.2 Deck verennn 2 . DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS 4.1 Indian Railway Standards (IRS) 2 4.2 Indian Roads Congress (IRC) Standards (Latest Revision. Figure No.1 Figure No.2 eeBANGALO:. 31K RAIL PROJECT RITES — PCI - PBI — SYSTRA 1, INTRODUCTION 4.1 Brief Description of the Project 2 Bangalore islocated in the meridians of 12° N latitude and 77°3" E Longitude, spread over an area of 531sq. km. locatedat an_ altitude of 900m. The project comprises of two Corridors viz. East - West Corridor and North ~ South Corridor consisting of Elevated, At Grade and Underground sections. The phase | of the project is divided as follows:- Reach 1 Viaduct & Stations:-Cricket Statum to Baiyappanhalli consisting of 6 Stations Reach 2 Viaduct& Stations:- Mysore Road to Magadi Road consisting of 6 Stations Reach 3 Viaduct& Stations:-Yashwantpur to Swastik consisting of 7 Stations. Reach 3A Viaduct &Stations :-Ouer Ring Road to Peenya Village consisting of 3 stations. Reach 3B Viaduct &Stations :-Jalahalli to Heserghatta consisting of 3 stations. Reach 4 Viaduct & Stations:- K.R Road to R-V Road consisting of 5 Stations. Reach 4A Viaduct &Stations :-Banashankari to Puttenahalli consisting of 3 stations. 1.2 Aim of this Design Basis Report This design basis note is being prepared to standardize the design methodology for Reach 1,2, 3,3A.3B4 and 4AViaduet & Station Bridgestructures made of RCC.PSC and steel for the project. Station Bridge structures are structures on which Metro Rail will ply.It consists of fame work of columns and beams supporting Station Concourse and Station platform. The station bridge structure. shall be designed as per relevant IRS Codes. 2. SALIENT FEATURES OF THE PROJECT. Geometric Parameters of the Viaduct&Station are as follows:- ‘© Viaduct-Precast PSC segmental Single Box girder or Cas supporting 2 tracks with incline webs. © Station Concourse: Pre-cast RC beam or Pre-cast Prestressed I-Beam or U or T beam. © Station Platform:- Pre-cast Prestressed I-Beam or U or T beam for supporting 2 tracks and Pre- cast Prestressed I-Beam or U or T beam for platform. ‘© Pier column- Rectangular, circular and Double D shape columns with of flare for pier cap. ‘© Gauge adopted is Standard Gauge (1435 mm) Gradient of superstructure = variable (level to 4 %) [loads and forces on structures shal be worked out based on the actual gradient atthe particular pier under consideration] «© Horizontal alignment of superstructure comprises Straight, Transition and Curved stretches. Minimum design radius of curvature in plan is 120 m. © Centre to centre of track should be as per approved SOD ( In Phase-I, cfc of tracks = 4.2m throughout. This is adequate to take the extra clearances required in curves.) «Loading corresponding to Modern Rolling Stock (MRS). ‘Ballast less track. (Rebar provision for track concrete plinth integral with deck slab.) © The standard spans (cle of pier) will be 16m, 19m, 22m, 25m, 28m & 31m.-Subtracting or adding usual standard 3m each from the centre of span shall make these spans. Fig 2 gives the a eernses ofthe stondasel tox eitder segment sugerstructure. 7 situprestressed box girder for ib finishes until the start prprrpp ys 77 PsP ST. PASE eg ed.BANGALORE ivié YRALL PROJECT > RITES — PCI - PBI~SYSTRA 3. STRUCTURAL ISSUES 3.1 Units ‘The main units used for design will be: {t], [m], [mm], [KN], [KN/m?], [MPa], [°C], [rad] 3.2 Materials Parameters 3.2.1 Cement Ordinary Portland cement of 33 grade, 43 grade and 53 grade conforming to IS: 269, IS: 8112 and IS: 12269 respectively shall be used. For prestressed concrete, cement conforming to IRS:T-40 specification or 53 grade shall be used. For foundation and substructure, the Engineer may direct the OPC substitution by blast furnace slag cement conforming to IS 45S. In such a case, the cement shall meet the strength requirement of respective codes. 3.22 Conerete 3.2.21 Young’s Modulus Clause 5.2.2.1 of IRS- CBC-1997( up to A & C 13) should be followed, 3.2.2.2Modular Ratio: The following modular ratios shall be used based on Cl.5.2.6 of IRS-CBC (up to A & C13) For tensile reinforcement m; 280 / fy 420/ fy For compressive reinforcement m 3.2.2.3 Minimum Grade of Concrete & Cover. Minimum grade of concrete should be as per clause no.5.4.4 of IRS: CBC — 1997 (upto A&C Slip No.13). The cover should be as per clause 15.9.2 of IRS: CBC — 1997 (upto A&C Slip No.13) for exposure condition defined in el 5.4.1 of IRS: CBC ~ 1997 (upto A&C Slip No.13) 3.2.2.4 Density- Density of concrete shall be considered as per Table 1 of IS:875 (latest revision). 3.2.2.5 Poisson's Ratio- Poisson’s ratio for all concrete: 15 3.2.2.6 Thermal Expansion Coefficient- ‘The coefficient of expansion shall be taken as below: for reinforced concrete ; @=1L.7x 10%per 1°C (1.2.6.2 IRS Bridge rule) oRBANGALOR# <3 tL PROJECT RITES — PCI - PB] — SYSTRA _ aa oe 3.2.3. Prestressing Steel for Tendons (c1.4.6.1 (d) IRS CBC)- Prestressing steel will be conforming to IS:14268 , class 2 Low Relaxation uncoated stress relieved high tensile strands. 3.2.3.1 Young’s Modulus (cl.4.6.2.1 IRS CBO) E= 195,000 MPa 3.2.3.2 Prestressing Units Class-Il low relaxation uncoated stress relieved high tensile strands for cable 12K15 and 19K15 conforming to IS: 14268-1995 shall be used. 3.2.3.3 Breaking Strength & 0.2% Proof Strength, Jacking Force- Breaking strength and 0.2% proof strength will be taken as per IS 14268 -1995 for the relevant strand. Jacking force shall be as per C1.16.8.1 of IRS CBC-1997 (up to A & C 13). 3.2.3.4 Density: ‘Weight of strands shall be as per relevant clauses of 1S:14268. 3.23.5 Other Parameters Corrugated HDPE Duct as per clause 7.2.6.4.2.4 of IRS CBC shall be used. Anchorage set-in 6mm Co-efficient of Friction 0.17 / radian (c1.16,8.3 IRS CBC) Wobble factor 0,002 / m(cl.16.8.3 IRS CBC) Long term relaxation Should be as per cl.16.8.2.2 IRS CBC. 3.2.4 Structural Steel 3.2.4.1 Introduction Structural steel will be used for special composite bridges and for miscellaneous use such as railing, supporting utilities, coverings ete. 3.2.4.2 Structural Steel for Miscellaneous Use (for roof, staircase and walkway) 3.2.4.2.1 General “Three types of structural steel are proposed as per the following standards: ') IS: 4923 (latest) “Hollow steel sections for structural use with Yst 310” b)IS: 2062-2011 “Steel for General Structural Purposes”. )IS:1161 (latest) “Steel Tubes for Structural purpose”. ‘The hollow steel sections would be square (SHS) or rectangular (RHS). Other traditional rolled sections like plates, angles, channels, joists would also be used where necessary. base connections and connection with concrete shall be effected by internally threaded Jolt sleeves (hot dipped galvanized @ 300 gm/sqm) manufactured from TS:2062 Grade B > CPI PTI PTI IDLE PILI PPP Ppp ppsBANGALORE MET? 2 TEA ETE RITES — PCI - PBI — SYSTRA = ee lee mild steel. The sleeve shall receive hexagon-head bolt M20 (min) Class 8.8 as per 1S:1364 (Part 1) with galvanized spring washer. The connections within the steel structure would be effected essentially by direet welding of members with’ without gusset plates. The minimum thickness of metal for SHS/RHS sections for main chord members as well bracings shall be 4mm as applicable for steel tubes in clause 6.3 of IS: 806. For steel design and fabrication IS-800-2007and other IS codes shall be used. 3.2.4.2.2 Young's Modulus- E= 200,000 MPa 3.2.4.2.3 Tensile Strength / Yield Strength For Hollow steel sections (conforming to IS: 4923) * Tensile strength shall be 450 Mpa; * Yield strength shall be 310Mpa. For Structural Stee! (Conforming to IS: 2062-2011); * Tensile strength shall be 410 Mpa; * Yield strength shall be (For E250) 250Mpa (for {<20mm), 240Mpa (for 20mm 40mm) 3.2.4.2.4 Density 78.5 kN/m* 3.2.4.2.5. Poisson's Ratio: 0.30 3.2.4.2.6 Thermal Expansion Coefficient: e=11.7x 10° per 1°C (c1.2.6.2 IRS Bridge rule) 3.2.4.3. Structural Steel for Composite Bridges 3.2.4.3.1 General The connections between steel members will be either HSFG bolted or welded. Welded connections are preferable, The field weld shall not be allowed. Any welding done in shop shall be submerged arc welding as far as practical. IRS Steel Bridge Code 2003 and IRS Welded Bridge Code 1989 shall be followed for design, wherever applicable for Rail/pedestrian bridges. In addition IRS-Fabrication Specifications B1-2001 shall be followed for fabrication details. For designing HSFG bolts connections, the RDSO report no BS-111 shall be referred. 3.2.4.3.2 Young's Modulus: E= 200,000 MPa(cl.4.5.3 IRS CBC) 3.2.4.3.3 Tensile Strength / Yield Strength ‘Tensile strength/Yield strength shall conform to IS 2062. For high strength structural stéel SthaheBANGALORE Mabe. RITES — PCI - PBI—SYSTRA Structural Steel Conforming to IS 2062-2011 will be adopted. 3.2.4.3.4 Density : 78.5 KNim® 3.24.35. Poisson’s Ratio: 0.30 3.2.4.3.6 Thermal Expansion Coefficient: ©=11.7x 10% per 1°C (cl.2.6.2 IRS Bridge rule) 3.2.4.3.7 Fabrication For fabrication of steel confirming to IS ~ 2062 ( various grades of steel as per latest code), the following IRS Codes shall be used. 1. IRS Steel Bridge code 2. _ IRS Welded Bridge code 3. __ IRS Fabrication code (IRS-B1) 4, RDSO Report no.BS — 111 for HSFG Bolts. 3.2.5 Reinforcement Steel (Rebars) HYSD-TMT bars of minimum grade 500 conforming to IS: 1786 (latest version) (cl.4.5.1 IRS CBC)and IS 13920 shall be followed. 3.3 Time-Dependent Characteristics of Materials + Forcalculation of losses clause 16.8.2 & 16.8.3 of IRS CBC should be used. «© Clause 17 of IRS CBC shall be applicable for segmental construction. «Design should be done according to construction sequence to be adopted in field. 3.4 Clearances 3.4.1 Clearance for Road Traffic {As per relevant IRC , MimimumVertical Clearance of 5.50m at 0.5m (0.45m (width of the Im- high Jersey-type crash barrier) + 0.05 m (clearance between crash barrier and pier shaft) from pier shaft outer line. 500m som cm« “BANGALORE METROWRE2 RE ROZECT NTE RITES — PCI - PBI— SYSTRA a. 3.4.2. Clearance for Railway Line Indian Railways SOD shall be applicable. 3.4.3 Clearance for Rolling stock This shall be as per approved SOD of BMRCL. 3.5 Seismic Design Seismic analysis will be as per IRS : Bridge rules However, Seismic coefficient shall be estimated as per 1.219 of IRC:6-2010. 50% of Live load without CDA should be considered, while working out magnitude of seismic foree in transverse direction. Horizontal seismic forces due to live load on the bridge shall be ignored when acting in the direction of traffic. This isas per clause 2.12.6 of IRS Bridge Rules. For vertical seismic force, 100% live load without impact need to be considered as per IRS Bridge Rules. For load combination 2 (Seismic case) as per Table 12 of IRS CBC, a) 100% vertical live load with impact along with additional seismic force shall be considered. b) As per cl. 2.8.5 of IRS Bridge Rules, in transverse /longitudinal seismic condition, only 50% of gross tractive effor/braking force will be considered. ‘The vertical seismic coefficient shall be taken as 2/3" of horizontal seismic coefficient. 3.6 Vertical Deflections at Mid-Span Deflection shall satisfyclause no. 10.4.1, 11.3.4 and 13.3 of IRS:CBC-1997 (upto A&C-13). 3.7 Loads on the structure: 3.7.1 DeadLoad(DL): Dead load includes self-weight of structural components of the bridge/viaduect. 3.7.2, Superimposed Dead Loads The following items shall be considered as SIDL. a) Precast parapet* b) Concrete plinth for rails ©) Rails + pads @) Third rail & fixtures 2) Hil i Cables 2) Cable trough cell h) Cable trays i) Miscellaneous (OCS, signaling,station roof etc.) * Precast parapet which is integral part of the viaduct will be considered as Dead load for the purpose of analysis of the structure. The weight of the parapet will remain same throughout the life of the structure. This will be incorporated in the maintenance manual of BMRCL.SANGALORE METRO?) *RUJECT Be RITES — PCI - PBI—SYSTRA 3.7.3 Vertical Train Live Load The Train Live Load will be the “Modem Rolling Stock” type, with the following axle configurations: 1 21800 — one car 1 ig i? Ea b avi i : I i i All axle loads = 15 tons Maximum number of successive cars: 6 Configurati a=24m b=2.30m ¢=12.40m, (2a+2b+e=21.8m) Maximum number of axles will be loaded on the superstructure to arrive at maximum longitudinal foree, max shear and max BM. Since both the tracks will be supported by single box girder, hence superstructure, bearing and substructure will be checked for the live load combinations given in para 3.9.2.1. It shall be ensured that live load coming on structure is within loading envelope decided by BMRCL. It shall be also be ensured that loads’ other than passenger trains like track machines, eranes ete which may come on this structure should be within loading envelope decided by BMRCL. ‘ In case of maximum shear force, bending moment and longitudinal forces critical cases shall be considered. 3.7.3.1 Live Load Combinations Se LA: sed for Deck Torsion, Bearing Compression, Uplift, Shaft check, Foundation check LLL: used for shaft check, Foundation check, Shear Key check x} prprpprppporprprppprprrpyprr pp ppyp perry yy?=2INGALORE METRO RAié* HE : RITES — PCI - PBI — SYSTRA - LL3 :LL2 used for Shaft check, Foundation check 3.7.4 Horizontal Train Live Load 3.7.4.1 Braking and Traction Braking and Tractive forces shall be as per Modem Rolling stock characteristics duly approved by BMRCL. Since both the:tracks are supported on the single girder, hence tractive force of one track and braking force of another track will be taken to produce worst condition of loading. It shall be ensured by BMRCL in service that trains on both the tracks are not moving in the same direction. Same shall be incorporated in Operating manual of BMRCL. For longitudinal forces, provision of clause 2.8.4 of IRS: Bridge Rule-2008(upto A&C-42) should be followed, when the bridge carries more than one track on single superstructure. 3.7.4.2 Centrifugal Force ‘Centrifugal force shall be considered as per cl.2.5.3 of IRS-BR-2008 for design speed of 80 KMPH. 3.7.5 Footpath Live Load Footpath live load shall be adopted as 490 kg/m2 as per cl.2.3.2.1 of IRS: Bridge Rule- 2008(upto A&C-42). Foot path is only an emergency walkway.Walkway shall not be used when there is movement of train.It shall be ensured in service that No movement of trains shall take place on both tracks when live load is there on the footpath and same shall be incorporated in the Operating Manual of BMRCL. 3.8 Coefficient of Dynamic Augment (CDA) CDA for longitudinal and transverse analysis shall be as per IRS: Bridge Rules-2008 (upto A&C-42),2 BANGALORE METRO Rai. RITES — PCI - PBI— SYSTRA = 3.9 Emergency walkway 3.10 3.11 iz) Emergency Walkway on Viaducts Minimum emergency walkway width 550mm. Minimum intemal width of cable trough at bottom = 600 mm. The bottom of cable trough floor shall have a cross-fall of 2 % towards the track side and weep hole (50 mm dia.) at interval of 2 m. ‘The above widthsare in conformity with approved SOD of BMRCL. Temperature Effect The temperature effect shall be considered as per cl.2.6 of IRS Bridge rules&cl.215 of IRC 6: 2010 for Bangalore. Differential Temperature For PSC box section Temperature Gradient shall be as perC1.215.3 of IRC: 6-2010. Differential Settlement(IS 2911) Differential settlement between two adjacent viaduct piers will be: © 12mm for Long Tem Settlement;( based on C1.6.1.5 of IS 2911 Part 4) © 6mm for Short Term Settlement ( 50% of Long term) Or Where piles are supported on end bearing (socketed in rock), a differential settlement of 2 mm shall be considered. POPPPPPPPOPOPPPPprppppppppppppprprpprrp‘GAEORE METRO RAIL PROM RITES — PCI - PBI — SYSTRA z CRE “ORRBES 3.13 LWR Forces Provisions of UIC 774-3R (latest version) should be followed for rail-structure interaction using actual characteristics of track, fastenings, bridge etc. for analysis. LWR force should also be considered in appropriate load combinations as per IRS CBC (A &C no.13). 3.14 Derailment Loads Derailment loads shall be considered as per Appendix XXVIII of IRS: Bridge rules with standard gauge in place of Broad gauge. For ULS and Stability check, loading shall be proportioned as per maximum axle load. In addition, for derailment loads “Sacramento derailment criteria” is intended to be used. This criterion corresponds to the application of 40% of one coach weight applied horizontally as a 3m long uniform impact load on the Box girder top'flange. This derailment oad corresponds to an ULS load. For SLS combination (Group V), a 1/1.75 co-efficient shall be applied to the derailment load 3.15 Wind Loads Wind load will be considered as per cl 2.11 of IRS Bridge Rules. 3.16 Erection Load Erection forces and effets shall be considered as per clause 2.13 of IRS: Bridge Rules.The weight of all permanent and temporary material together with all other forces and effects which can operate on any part of erection shall be taken into account. 3.17 Gradient Effect ‘The load due to longitudinal gradient effect shall also be considered as applicable. 3.18 Vibration Effect Effect of vibration due to movement of metro train on station bridge structure will be taken into consideration, 3.19 Load Combinations Methodology ‘The ULS and SLS load combinations and partial safety factors for loads should be followed as per clause 11.2, clause 11.3 and Table 12 of IRS : CBC. 3.20 Design assumption for pier ‘The effective length of a pier for the purpose of slenderness ratio calculation will be taken as per cl 15.6.1.2 of IRS-CBC-1997 (up to A&C no13), 3.21 SLS Check and ULS Check The provisions IRS-CBC-1997 (with A & C 13)shall be applicable. 3.21.1 SLS Check ‘The provisions IRS-CBC-1997 (with A & C 13) vide cl .16.4.2.2, 16.4.2.3, 164.24 and 17.3.3 shall be applicable for Prestressed cast in situ and segmental construction. For General RCC construction (Beams,columns and slabs) , cl 10.2 shall govern the design. Di3.21.2 ULS Check Section Capacity check for RCC Beams (ULS) for the superstructre should conform fo TRS-CBC CL15-4. The design of RCC slabs shall conform to cl.15.5 of IRS-CBC. The design of columns shall conform to cl.15.6 of IRS-CBC. For PSC members cl.16.4.3 0 el 16.4.6 shall be applicable. Similary, el 174.2 shall govern the Composite construction. 3.22 Crack Width Check Crack width in reinforced conerete members will be checked for SLS combination G I Crack width will be as per § 15.9.8.2.1 of IRS CBC. Crack width shall not exceed the ‘sdmissible value given in § 10.2.1(a) of IRS CBC, based on the exposure condition defined incl 5.4.1 of IRS: CBC. For crack control in columns, cl.15.6.7 will be modified to the extent that actual axial load will be considered to act simultaneously. 3.23 Fatigue Check 3.23.1 RCC and PSC structures ‘The clause 13.4 IRS CBC-1997 (upto A&C-13) shall govern. 3.23.2 Steel Structures “The clause 3.6 IRS steel Bridge code-2003 (with correction slip 18) shall govern. 3.24 Durability Following specifications are intended to meet the durability requirements as per RS CBC-1997(upto A&C-13) + ~ Complete and adequate drainage; - Sufficient concrete cover: - Limiting crack width ~ appropriate conerete mixture design and good pouring, acceptable permeability and surface finishing etc., Exposure conditions as defined in el. 5.4.1 of IRS: CBCwill be decided by BMRCL & structure shall be designed accordingly. 3.25 Foundations Capacity 3.25.1 Design Assumptions for Pile Foundation The pile cap/piles system supported by horizontal and vertical soll spring resctions 5 Healized as» space frame. The forces applied by the pier are transferred to the bottom of pile cap for this purpose. For piles and pile caps, the following load combinations shall be considered, the IRS CBC 1997, Table 12: Combinations 1, Il and IV. pp ppppppppppeBAWSEFORL METRO RAIL PROY@2RET RITES = PCI - PBI — SYSTRA 5 The various specific assumptions made for the pile and pile cap design are as follows: a) 1.2m diameter bored cast-in-situ vertical piles have been contemplated for the foundation of piers, b) The vertical capacity of the pile shall be based on static formula given in IS: 2911 (Part- 1/Section-2)-2010. The lateral load capacity of pile shall be evaluated by using empirical formulae given in IS:2911 ( Part-1/ section-2) by limiting lateral deflection of 5 mm at its tip considering it as fixed headed pile under normal condition. The lateral deflection of 5 mm at pile tip shall be further reduced if so required in accordance with el 7.4. (C ) of I$ 2911 (Part 4), considering track/bridge interaction requirement. The capacity so evaluated will be used purely for the purpose of arriving at the upper bound of lateral load capacity. This deflection limitation will not be applicable in load combinations with seismic conditions for which the resulting stresses and capacity of the section would be the governing criterion. ©) The following limiting values shall not be exceeded for computation of safe load: (Results of sub-surface investigation will be used for adopting the "value of angle of internal friction @ and cohesion of soil, c. Gi) Angle of wall friction 6 shall be taken as equal to @ deg. Gii) Maximum overburden pressure at bottom of pile for calculation of shaft resistance and end bearing resistance shall belimited to 15 times the diameter of pile for B< or equal to 30° which may be increased to 20 times the diameter of the pile for @> or equal to 40°. (iv) The entire overburden shall be assumed fully submerged for the purpose of calculation of safe load. (v) Factor of safety to arrive at working load = 2.5. (vi) Bulk density corresponding to 100% saturation shall be calculated and used for working out submerged density of soil. (vii) For piles terminating in the granular stratum/ weathered rock a penetration of at least twice the diameter of the pile shaft should be given in to the granular stratum/ WR. 4) Initial load tests (not on working pile) shall be conducted first for determination of safe vertical and lateral loadsas per provisions given in IS 2911(Part-4) 1985. (Reaffirmed 2010). The safe load shall be taken as least of (a) load arrived at from the initial load test and (b) the calculated safe load based on static formula. Initial test shall be conducted for a load of 2.5 times the safe vertical load capacity based on static formula. ©) Soil stiffiness for lateral loads shall be taken from IS: 2911 (Part l/Section 2 Appendix C- 2010). Unconfined compressive strength shall be calculated from results from Geotechnical Investigation Report. Cohesion as calculated using unconsolidated undrained test with required modification of angle of internal friction will be used for working out unconfined compression strength. f) Available geotechnical reports conclude in non liquefaction potential of the soil. There is no historic recording of the phenomenon in the region. Despite this, the liquefaction potential issue will be studied with the latest codal guidelines. Liquefaction of soi) wil) be considered Sor the upper strata for loose and pool graded sand whose SPT values is less than 15 at 5m from. ground level and 20 at Wee esSEGRE METRO RAIL PRE: RITES — PCI - PBI— SYSTRA ground level (in accordance with IS:1893). In such condition, seismic will be also applied on pile cap and portal action of the pile group will be considered. When Dsy is less than 0.15mm, the SPT value to be considered for this purpose shall be assumed as (N measured + 7.5). Due cognizance would be given to the recommendations of the geo-technical consultants. (Bangalore is in Zone II) ) The working load capacity of pile for vertical and horizontal loads shall be checked by conducting routine tests during construction as per provisions given in IS 2911(Part-4) 1985, (Reaffirmed 2010) hh) Spacing between the piles shall generally be not be less than 3 times the diameter of pile in soil and 2.5 times the diameter when founded on rock. i) Computation of bending moments along the pile length due to forces applied at the pile cap level shall be based on a space frame model with actual stiffness of piles restrained by springs simulating the soil stiffness. In case upper strata of soil will have liquefaction potential, modifications in the soil springs will be introduced in the idealization. Or Computation of bending moment along the length of pile due to lateral forces acting at the pilecap level shall be calculated as per methodology given in [S:2911 (Part l/Section-2) i) Pile cap shall be designed as per cl 18.8.3 of IRS CBC 1997 (with upto date correction slips and revisions) based on truss analogy for pile group having piles upto 5 in numbers. For other pile groups, bending theory using the space frame model indicated above shall be employed for pile cap design. Or Pile cap shall be designed based on bending theory based on pile reactions. No support from soil below pile cap shall be considered. k)_ The top of pile cap shall be kept about 500mm below the existing ground level and weight of the earth cover will be applied on top of pile cap when unfavorable. The earth cover on pile cap for any favorable effect (stability, soil horizontal capacity etc.,) will be neglected 1) The structural design of the pile and pile cap shall be done based on SLS and ULS conditions. IRS CBC 1997 cl 15.6 shall be used for the piles. However, for crack control in piles, cl 15.6.7 will be modified to the extent that actual axial load will be considered to act simultaneously. For the pile cap reference will be made to cl. 15.4 and el 15.8.3. m) For pile carrying capacity, check shall be performed without any factorization of loads. 3.26 Bearing System and its Design Methodology 3.26.1 Bearing System [ELASTOMERIC UP TO 31 M AND BEYOND THAT IS POT-CUM- PTFE] Considering the span configuration and safety aspects of the structural system (in normal and seismic condition), it is proposed to adopt elastomeric bearing placed undemeath box girder for transfer of vertical forces and shear key (protruding above the pier head) for transfer of in-plane forces. E PPPPIPIPPLPP PPP PPP PPPPPPLPPPPPPPPPPPPPPLBANG2GRBRENETRO RAIL PROJEC PERKS RITES — PCI - PBI —SYSTRA = 3.26.2 Design of Elastomeric Bearings Elastomeric bearings shall be designed as per UIC 772 2-R. 3.26.3 Design of Pot Bearings Pot bearings shall be designed as per IRC: 83 Part-II. 3.26.4 Replaceability of Bearings While finalizing the proposed bearing system, it will be kept in mind that accessibility and replacement of each part of bearing are of paramount importance as the design life of bearings is shorter than that of-the structure. Keeping in view the above cited criteria, all the bearings and pier caps will be detailed for replacement in the future. Clause n0.15.9.11.4 IRS CBC-1997(upto A&C-13) should be followed for considering replaceability of bearings. 3.27 Uplift If found necessary, a hold-down device connecting the deck and the pier head would be placed in order to prevent the deck from overturning. The hold-down device may be integrated in the pot ~ bearing system or be a separate system constituted of bars embedded in pier-cap and the viaduct with appropriate details permitting translation/rotation. Other systems can also be foreseen. Due to the lack of appropriate guidelines in Indian codes, the design criteria for hold-down device (upward force limit requiring hold-down device, design formulas,) will be taken from the latest intemational practice (AASHTO codes ). 3.28 Construction Methods{SEGMENTAL CONSTRUCTION] 3.28.1. Deck — Simple Spans Box Girder Design of viaduct should be done in accordance with construction ‘methodology/Construction sequence to be adopted during execution. Design of segmental Bridge construction shall conform tocl.10.2.1 (b) ,16.4.4.6& 17 of IRS-CBC-1997 (upto A&C 13). Salient features of the precast segmental construction method technique as envisaged for the project under consideration are indicated below: “The superstructure shall be constructed "span by span" sequentially, starting at one end of a continuous stretch and finishing at the other end. Nos. of launching girders may be required so as to work on different stretches simultaneously to enable completion of the project in time. ‘The number of "breaks" in the stretch can be identified by obligatory spans and stations. The suggested method of erection will be detailed in drawings to be prepared. The launching girder (or, more accurately, the "assembly truss") is capable of supporting the entire dead (« in “assembly tru ee eeeBAN C2@2R EE METRO RAIL PROJEC RITES ~ PCI - PBI—SYSTRA governing weight of the segments will be of the order of 50 t. The launching girder envisaged will be slightly. greater than two span lengths. It must be able to negotiate curves in conjunction with temporary brackets. Transportation of segments from casting yard to the point of erection will be effected by appropriately designed low-bedded trailers (tyre-mounted). The segments can be lifted and erected using erection portal gantry moving on launching girder. Box girder segments shall be match cast at the casting yard before being transported to location and erected in position, Post-tensioned cables shall be threaded in-situ and tensioned from one end. It is emphasized that for precast segmental construction only one- end prestressing shall be used. The prestressing steel and_prestressing system steel accessories shall be subjected to an acceptance test prior to their actual use on the works. The tests for the system shall be as per FIP Recommendations as stipulated in the special specifications. Only multi-strand jacks shall be used for tensioning of cables. Direct and indirect foree measurement device (eg Pressure Gauge) shall be attached in consultation with system manufacturer. ‘The Contractor shall be responsible for the proper handling, lifting, storing, transporting and erection of all segments so that they may be placed in the structure without damage. Segments shall be maintained in an upright position at all times and shall be stored, lifted and/or moved in a manner to prevent torsion and other undue stress. Members shall be lifted, hoisted or stored with lifting devices approved on the shop drawings. Provision for emergency cable and future cable should be done as per IRS: CBC 1997(upto A&C -13). 3.28.2 Epoxy Bonded Joints and Shear Keys ‘The basis for adopting these provisions shall be IRS: CBC. However, for the provisions not covered in IRS: CBC, Clauses of IRC-SP-65-2005 shall be adopted. Note: Design of viaduct shall be done in correspondence to the effect of methodology adopted. ‘A minimum compressive stress of 3 kg / sq.cm shall be provided uniformly over the cross- section for the closure stress on the epoxied joint until the epoxy has set. The curing period for application of the compressive stress, method of mixing and application of epoxy and all related aspects including surface preparation shall be as per approved manufacturer's specifications. All aspects of grouting of cables shall be governed by IRS CBC 1997. The epoxy shall be special purpose proprietary material for the proposed usage with proven. past record. Selection shall be subject to the approval of the Engineer. St shail meat ‘he requirements of relevant provision of FIP (Intemational ae 9S Concrete). Ba PP PPP PPro prsETRO RAIL PROJECT 506485 RITES — PCI - PBI — SYSTRA z The temporary compressive stress during the curing period may be applied by approved external temporary bar prestressing (such as Macalloy or Dywidag bar systems or approved equivalent). Temporary bar shall then be attached to steel abutment provided over soffit slab and top of flange. Alternative method avoiding this temporary compressive stress will also be investigated, in order to avoid adverse impacts on aesthetics for bottom slab soffit due t0 temporary bars fixing system. eet 3.28.3 Pier Cap Pier cap shall be designed as corbels if shear span to effective depth ratio is less than I. In other case, it shall be designed as flexural member. 3.29 Drainage of Deck / Solid Pier 3.29.1 Solid pier The drain pipe will be located within the solid pier to avoid aesthetics problems.A manhole shall be provided in the superstructure at each pier location to inspect the pipes and clear blockage, if any.Provision shall be made for examination and cleaning drain pipe. 3.29.2 Deck For Drainage of Deck, the provisions of clause 10.4.1.1 & clause 15.22 IRS: CBC- 1997(upto A&C-13) shall be followed. The top of deck slab will be profiled so as collect the run-off water at two points by providing a cross slope of 2.5%. Two nos of drainage pipes at each end of box girder will be provided to collect the run-off and the same will be accommodated in the end diaphragm in the form of Y-shape. Disposal of run-off water is affected by a runner pipe inside the diaphragm provided at both end of girder and connected to down takes embedded in the pier. ‘The clear height inside the box shall be 1000mm to facilitate inspection. For drainage of deck the provisions of cl.10.4.1.1 and cl.15.2.2 of IRS-CBC 1997(up to A&C nol3) shall be followed,RITES — PCI = PBI O RAIL PROJECT %% YSTRA 4. DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS: ‘The IRS Codes shall be followed in principle. If provisions are not available in IRS, the order of preference shall be as follows. iv. correction slips shall be used in various stages of works. 4.1 Indian Railway Standards (IRS) Updated version of following codes with latest correction slips shall be followed. IRS- IRS- IRS- IRS- IRS- IRS- mp epee 4,2 Indian Roads Congress (IRC} Standards (Latest Revision) IRC Is Euro Code AASHTO. ‘The following codes with latest revisions including all addendums/notifications and Bridge Rules Concrete Bridge Code. Bridge sub structure and Foundation Code. Steel bridge Code Fabrication Code (B1) Welded Bridge Code IRC 5 1985 Standard Specifications and Code of. Practice for Road Bridges, Section I- General Features of Design IRC6: 2010 Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road Bridges, Section II — Loads and Stresses IRC 22: 2008 Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road Bridges, Section VI — Composite Construction for Road Bridges IRC 24: 2010 Standard Specifications and Code of practice for Road Bridges, Section V — Steel Road Bridges IRC 83: 1987 Standard Specifications and code of practice for Road Bridges, Section IX - Bearings Part I, 11 & IIL Bearings (Metallic , Elastomerie and POT & PTFE —PIPPPPPP PPPS OPP PP yp Bearings) IRC 87: 1984 Guidelines for the Design and Erection of False Work for Road Bridges IRC: SP-65 2005 Guidelines for De and Construction of Segmental Bridges TRC: 112 2011 Code of Practice for Concrete Road Bridges = ey 1 fbn |BANGALOREV%: ID: RITES — PCI - PBI = SYSTRA tAIL PROJECT ee 4.3 IS: Codes National Building Code SP 7: 18 226: 1S 269: 18 383: 18 432: Is 455: 15 456: Is 460; IS 516: I 650: Is 800: Is 814: IS 815: IS 823: Is 875: IS 1161: IS 1239, Is 1343: 1s 1732: IS 1786; Is 1791 IS 1834: IS 1888: Is 1892: 1S 1893:Part 1 1S 2062: 1S 2090: 1983 1975 1989 1970 1982 (Part 1) (Part 2) 1989 2000 1985 1959 1991 1984 1991 1974 1964 1987 1979 1990 (Part 1) (Part 2) 1980 1989 1985 1985 1984 1982 1979 2001 2011 1983 Bureau of Indian Standards. Structural steel (standard quality) 33 grade Ordinary Portland Cement. Coarse and fine aggregates from natural Sources for concrete Mild steel and medium tensile steel bars and hard-drawn, steel wire for conerete reinforcement Mild steel and medium tensile steel bars Hard-drawn steel wire Portland slag cement Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete Test si Method of test for strength of conerete Standard sand for testing cement es Code of practice for general construction in steel Covered electrodes for manual metal are welding of carbon and carbon manganese steel Classification coding of covered electrodes for metal are welding of structural steel Code of procedure for manual metal are welding of mild stee! Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures Steel tubes for structural purposes Mild steel tubes, tubulars and other wrought stee! fi Mild steel tubes Mild steel tubulars and other wrought steel pipe fittings Code of practice for Pre-stressed Concrete Dimensions for round and square steel bars for structural and general engineering purposes High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement. 18s Batch type conerete mixers Hot applied seating compound for joint in concrete ‘Method of load tests on soils Code of practice for sub surface investigations for foundations Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures Steel for general structural purposes High tensile stecl bars used in prestressed concrete /<BANGALOW RITES — PCI - PBI 18 2386: 18 2430: 18 2502: 182751 182911 Is 4082: 1 4326: 15 4656: 18 4736: Is 4826: Is 4925: Is 4926: 1s 5525: 1s 5529: 1S 5640: IS 5816: Is 5892: 1S 7208: Is 7293: I 7320: IS 7969: IS 8112: us ‘RAIL PROJECT ~*~ SYSTRA 1963 Methods of test for aggregate for concrete (Part 1) Particle size and shape (Part2) Estimation of deleterious materials and organic impurities (Part3) Specific gravity, density, voids, absorption and bulking (Part 4) Mechanical properties (Parts) Soundness (Part 6) Measuring mortar making properties of fine aggregates (Part 7) Alkali - aggregate reactivity (Part'8) _Petrographic examination 1969 Methods of sampling of ageregate for concrete 1963 Code of practice for bending and fixing of bars for concrete reinforcement 1979 Recommended practice for welding of mild steel plain and deformed bars used for reinforced construction 1979 Code of practice for design and construction of pile foundations (Part 1) Concrete piles3 Section 2 Bored cast in-situ concrete piles (Part4) Load test on piles 1996 “Recommendations on stacking and storage of construction materials at site 1993 Earthquake resistant design and construction of buildings —code of practice 1968, Form vibrators for concrete 1986 Hot-dip zine coatings on mild steel tubes 1979 Hot-dipped galvanised coatings on round steel wires 1968 Concrete batching and mixing plant 1976 Ready mixed concrete 1969 Recommendations for detailing of reinforcement in reinforced concrete works 1985 Code of practice for in-situ permeability tests 1970 Method of test for determining aggregate impact value of soft coarse aggregate 1970 Method of test for splitting tensile strength of concrete eylinders 1970 Concrete transit mixers and agitators 1974 Safety code for erection of structural steel work 1974 Safety code for working with construction machinery 1974 Concrete slump test apparatus 1975 Safety code for handling and storage of building materials 1989 43 grade ordinary Portland cement ro DES ke PPP PO PPP PP PP PPP PP pp pp pBANGALORE ME? RITES — PCI - PBI — SYSTRA Is 8142. 1994 Is 8500: 1991 Is 9013: 1978 Is 9103: 1979 Is 9284: 1979 1S 9417: 1989 IS 9595: 1996 IS 10262: 1982 IS 12269: 1987 1S 13920: 1993 1S 14268 1995 4.4 FOREIGN STANDARDS ASTM D-297 ASTM D-395 ASTM D-412 ASTM D-429 ASTM D-73 ASTM D-624 ASTM D-797 ASTM D-1149 ASTM D-1559 Method of test for determining setting time of concrete by penetration resistance Structural steel-micro alloyed (medium and high strength qualities) (Superseded by IS 2062-2006) Method of making, curing and determining compressive strength of accelerated cured concrete test specimens ‘Admixtures for concrete Method of test for abrasion resistance of concrete Recommendations for welding cold worked bars for reinforced concrete construction Recommendations for metal are welding of carbon and carbon manganese steels Recommended guidelines for conerete mix design 33 grade ordinary Portland cement Ductile detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures subjected to Seismic Forces Uncoated stress relieved low relaxation seven-ply strands for Pre stressed Concrete Methods for Rubber Product Chemical Analysis Compression set of vulcanised rubber Tension testing of vuleanised rubber Adhesion of vuleanised rubber to metal Accelerated ageing of vuleanised rubber by the oven method ‘Tear resistance of vulcanised rubber Young’s Modulus in flexure of elastomer at normal and subnormal temperature ‘Accelerated Ozone cracking of vuleanised rubber Test for resistance to plastic flow of bituminous mixtures using Marshall apparatus Note :- The above list is not exhaustive and shall be augmented during detailed design and construction of the viaduet 4.5 OTHER PUBLICATIONS Updated version of following publications shall be followed. Indian Standard Hand Book on Steel sections Part I * Indian Railways Manual on Design and Construction of well and pile foundations, * UIC 772—2R The International Union of Railways Publication. © UIC 774—3R Rail Structure interaction. ‘The design relating to fire safety and escape shall be in accordance with the requi NFPA 130 Standard for Fixed Guide way Systems. 23 of 25 2¥*5pa mai!CO i ll ee S7JO ve OULaIW BYOTWONVE: ON Old OULSI SYOTVONVE NOs HOOLS ONITION NYSGOW JO SAVOT 31Xv TVINNON oor o ES ou soy COE OHH agg EE eon “Uy Fen O008ZL WOH SBLEA Seen en 0400821 Wow Seer 4 sauen | i es a | corso coztoovet {COO a A cory ual career cozzoore | norsonez | °° Lost S103 { soci} ake Lost] ir Lost at Lost Losi Lowsig xtpuoddy me VaLSAS — [dd ~ 1d ~ SALTE LOM Od TIVE OULIN TAOTVONVESco se Towsty xpuoddy VULSAS ~ Idd - 1d ~ SALTY LIMOUd TVA OULAN ATOTVONVE