You are on page 1of 2

HUMAN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY

Hum[ Psychopharmacol[ Clin[ Exp[ 04\ 295Ð296 "1999#

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Letter to the Editor

Sirs the cognitive and psychomotor e}ects of acutely


Serotonin and information processin`] a phar! increasing serotonin concentrations in the central
macodynamic study on the effects of citalopram on nervous system "CNS#\ after administration of the
co`nitive and psychomotor function most selective SSRI\ citalopram\ in nine healthy
male subjects aged 19Ð23 years "mean2SD^
Psychopharmacological studies have shown an 14=224=5#[ All subjects received a single clinical
enhancement of sustained attention\ improved con! dose of either placebo or citalopram "19 mg#\ in a
trol of motor responses to sensory stimuli and double!blind placebo!controlled design[ Cognitive
improved e.ciency of information processing with and psychomotor tests were examined pre! and 0\
enhancement of serotonergic function "Hindmarch\ 1 and 3 h post drug administration[ The tests per!
0884#[ Serotonin re!uptake inhibitors "SSRI# such formed included the Critical Flicker Fusion test
as sertraline\ ~uoxetine\ ~uvoxamine\ paroxetine "CFF#\ which assesses the information processing
and citalopram exert their pharmacological actions capacity in the central nervous system\ and the
by inhibiting the re!uptake of serotonin "4!HT#\ Choice Reaction Time test "CRT#\ which measures
varying in their potencies of inhibition[ It has been psychomotor speed[ Citalopram improved psy!
suggested that within the SSRI class\ di}erent anti! chomotor responses to sensory stimuli and sus!
depressants a}ect cognition and psychomotor per! tained attention\ and information processing
formance di}erentially\ either neutrally or capacity with signi_cant decreases in movement
positively\ presumably dependent on their relative times of the CRT test "F  00=46\ p ³ 9=94#\ and
selectivity and potency for 4!HT re!uptake inhi! an increase in CFF threshold "F  00=33\ p ³ 9=90#
bition "Amado!Boccara et al[\ 0884#[ "see Table 0#[
The aim of the present study was to examine These _ndings are comparable with the

Table 0[ Maximum change for critical ~icker fusion thresholds and movement time "choice reaction time# relative
to baseline for placebo and citalopram

Critical ~icker fusion thresholds "Hz#

Drug condition Time point Mean2SD Maximum change F


relative to baseline

Placebo Base line 21=6324=4 Ð


Tmax 21=2825=12 −9=24
Citalopram Base line 21=1824=85 Ð
Tmax 22=6724=58 ¦0=38 00=33

Choice reaction time "movement time# "s#

Placebo Base line 9=3429=94 Ð


Tmax 9=3529=95 ¦9=90
Citalopram Base line 9=3329=93 Ð
Tmax 9=3629=93 −9=92 00=46

 p³9=90 compared to placebo ""¦# better than placebo "−# worse than placebo#[ Repeated measures ANOVA\ planned compari!
sons[

Copyright Þ 1999 John Wiley + Sons\ Ltd[


LETTER TO THE EDITOR 296

pharmacodynamic e}ects of the SSRIs sertraline and REFERENCES


paroxetine which have been both shown to increase Amado!Boccara I\ Gougoulis N\ Poirier Littre MF\ Gal!
CFF threshold and decrease CRT "Hindmarch and inowski A\ Loo H[ 0884[ E}ects of antidepressants on
Bhatti\ 0877^ Sherwood and Hindmarch\ 0882^ Kerr cognitive functions] a review[ Neurosci Biobehav Rev
et al[\ 0880#[ However\ the _ndings are contrary to 08"2#] 368Ð382[
the e}ects of other SSRIs\ ~uvoxamine and ~uox! Hindmarch I[ 0884[ The behavioural toxicity of the selec!
etine\ which were both shown to have neutral e}ects tive serotonin reuptake inhibitors[ Int Clin Psychiat
on CFF and CRT\ compared to placebo "Hind! 8"Suppl[ 3#] 02Ð06[
march\ 0884#[ The reason for this discrepancy may Hindmarch I\ Bhatti JZ[ 0877[ Psychopharmacological
be related to the relative potencies of the SSRIs for e}ects of sertraline in normal\ healthy volunteers[ Eur
inhibition of serotonin re!uptake[ The SSRIs that J Clin Pharmacol 24] 110Ð112[
Hyttel J[ 0883[ Pharmacological characterization of selec!
had positive e}ects\ have higher reported potencies
tive serotonin reuptake inhibitors "SSRIs#[ Int J Clin
for serotonin uptake inhibition "sertraline\ 9=08 nM^ Psychopharmacol 8"Suppl[ 0#] 08Ð15[
paroxetine\ 9=18 nM^ citalopram\ 0=7 nM than those Kerr JS\ Sherwood N\ Hindmarch I[ 0880[ The com!
that had neutral e}ects "~uvoxamine\ 2=7 nM^ ~uox! parative psychopharmacology of 4HT reuptake inhibi!
etine\ 5=7 nM "Hyttel\ 0883#[ Therefore the observed tors[ Hum Psychopharmacol 5] 202Ð206[
behavioural e}ect may be related to the relative Sherwood N\ Hindmarch I[ 0882[ A comparison of _ve
potency of the compounds for inhibition of 4!HT commonly prescribed antidepressants with particular
re!uptake and as a result the relative potencies of the reference to their behavioral toxicity[ Hum Psy!
compounds to increase 4!HT neurotransmission[ In chopharmacol 7] 306Ð311[
conclusion\ our _ndings suggest that increasing sero!
tonergic neurotransmission improved psychomotor
responses to sensory stimuli and sustained attention\
and information processing capacity\ and that this
e}ect is dependent on the relative potency of the
SSRI to inhibit re!uptake of serotonin[
PRADEEP J[ NATHAN
CON STOUGH
GEETHA SITERAM
Brain Sciences Institute\
Swinburne University of Technolo`y
Victoria 2011\
Australia

Copyright Þ 1999 John Wiley + Sons\ Ltd[ Hum[ Psychopharmacol[ Clin[ Exp[ 04\ 295Ð296 "1999#

You might also like