Estoesta, Francis Benedict G.

February 16, 2020

LAW-154

CASE SUMMARIES

CASE: City of Manila v. Chinese Community

FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Moday v. CA
FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Province of Camarines Sur v. CA

FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Paranaque v. VM Realty

FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: San Roque v. Heirs of Pastor

FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Masikip v. Pasig

FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Beluso v. Panay

FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Sindalan v. CA
FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Yusay v. CA
FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Manila v. Prieto

FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Casino v. CA
FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Garcia v. COMELEC

FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Subic Bay v. COMELEC

FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Gamboa v. Aguirre

FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Vergara v. Ombudsman

FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Newsounds Broadcasting v. Dy

FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Landbank v. Cacayuran

FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:

CASE: Legaspi v. Cebu

FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
:
CASE: Tupi v. Faustino
FACTS:
ISSUE:
RULING:
DOCTRINE
: