You are on page 1of 1

Religious Studies Review · VOLUME 42

· NUMBER 1
· MARCH 2016

THE HOMELESS JESUS IN THE GOSPEL OF MAT- readers sporadically encounter words or phrases typed in
THEW. By Robert J. Myles. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Phoe- bold font; these items consist of “subthemes ” that are then
nix, 2014. Pp. xiii 1 220. Cloth, $95.00. explained, but in a less formal manner than the items
Myles’s book challenges the oft-repeated idea that treated within excursuses. An index specifically for these
Jesus’s homelessness was a lifestyle choice corresponding excursuses and bolded items might have been beneficial,
with his mission. Instead, Myles contends, Jesus’s status though they can all be easily located by referring to the
as a displaced outsider was thrust on him, a consequence commentary’s comprehensive subject index.
of the social, economic, and political realities of his day. Michael Kochenash
Using ideological biblical criticism, Myles offers interpre- Claremont School of Theology
tations that disrupt readings of the text that “feed from ” a
neoliberal view of homelessness as the result of individu-
als choices. Myles examines passages in which Jesus is THE BIBLICAL TOUR OF HELL. By Matthew Ryan
portrayed as homeless, including the forced displacement Hauge. The Library of New Testament Studies, 485. Lon-
of Jesus’s family to Egypt and the statement in Mt 8:20 don: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2013. Pp. xiv 1 204. Paper,
that Jesus “has nowhere to lay his head.” In addition, $29.99.
Myles uses the lens of Jesus as deviant outsider to exam- This book places Luke 16:19– 31, the Parable of the
ine his proclamation of the kingdom, rejection in his Rich Man and Lazarus, in the context of the ancient Medi-
hometown, failed relationships with biological family terranean tour of the underworld. It is Hauge’s stated pur-
members, and his passion and crucifixion. Myles’s argu- pose “to explore the literary relationship between the
ment is thought-provoking and largely compelling. Homeric descent [of Odysseus into Hades] in Odyssey
Although some readers may be put off by his references to 11.1–640 and the ensuing tours of hell tradition and the
Marxism and the assertion that scholars ideas result from parable.” He concludes that the Lucan story is a direct imi-
a dominant ideology about homelessness, his careful tation of the Homeric one, stating “distinctive features” of
examination of references to migration, forced withdrawal, the parable “can best be explained in the light of the
and the roles of home and land provides new insight into author’s mimetic relationship to the Homeric model. ” The
the prevalence of displacement in the Gospel. Myles’s book has three major sections. Chapter 1 summarizes the
work seems especially timely today, when forced migra- treatment of parables in New Testament scholarship, par-
tion, refugee crises, and homelessness demand our atten- ticularly addressing the problem of genre in relation to the
tion and thoughtful response. Rich Man and Lazarus. Chapter 2 covers Greco-Roman pai-
Amy Richter deia, highlighting the importance and ubiquity of the
St. Mary’s Seminary and University Homeric epics in the period’s educational models. Chapter
3 addresses the parable itself, showing its connections to
other Greco-Roman tours of the underworld. The strength
THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO LUKE. By James R. of this book is its thorough treatment of the Greek and
Edwards. The Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Latin descensus tradition in relation to the parable, appeal-
Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2015. Pp. xxviii 1 831. ing to both philosophical and mythological texts. It shows
Cloth, $65.00. clearly that the parable is heir to this tradition, helping to
Edwards has written a thoughtful and lucid commen- identify and refine the cultural context of the Gospel.
tary on Luke’s Gospel that I expect will be a helpful Margaret Froelich
resource for pastors, teachers, and advanced students. He Claremont School of Theology
“provisionally” dates the Third Gospel to the late 70s CE
and affirms the belief that it was composed by Paul’s com-
panion Luke, a physician. One idiosyncrasy within this THE SNAG OF THE SWORD: AN EXEGETICAL
commentary is his theory concerning Luke’s sources: in STUDY OF LUKE 22:35-38. By Thomas Kattathara.
addition to Mark, he appeals to a Hebrew Gospel and a New Testament Studies in Contextual Exegesis, 8. Frank-
Double Tradition (Matthean posteriority, not Q). In exposit- furt: Peter Lang, 2014. Pp. ix 1 245. Cloth, $65.00.
ing Luke’s narrative, he makes frequent reference to This thoughtful volume arises out of the author’s
Luke’s intertextuality, primarily with regard to canonical reflection on Luke’s Gospel in the Indian context, particu-
and extracanonical Jewish and Christian writings, less fre- larly the violent persecution of the Christian church at
quently to classical Greek and Latin texts. Highlights Kandamahal, Orissa, India. This study asks how Christians
within this commentary include Edwards’s references to are to reconcile the nonviolent message of Jesus with his
how some Lukan pericopae were interpreted within the explicit instructions that the disciples should purchase
early church and his careful attention to issues of gram- swords (22:36). Kattathara appropriately rejects the sug-
mar and philology that are sometimes obscured by English gestion that the reference to a sword is metaphorical in
translations. In addition to twelve helpful excursuses, this context. Instead, Katthahara argues that Jesus was

42

You might also like