Sheet1

ANALYSIS OF TRIPS AND PASSENGER CO

2018 JUNE 2019 JUNE DIFFERENCE 2018 MAY 2019 MAY

TRIPS 1420 1234 186 1449 1016
PASSNGR 92514 75697 16817 85351 53585
R27 TOTAL KM 15337.5 13017.7 2319.8 15720.1 10723.75
REVENUE 963866 779125 184741 891665 556735
ERNG/KM 62.8437489813 59.851202593392 2.99254638786302 56.721331289 51.9160741345145

TRIPS 1365 1245 120 1387 1093

PASSNGR 80203 75177 5026 71069 62982
R26 TOTAL KM 13843.8 12498.25 1345.55 14120 11292.7
REVENUE 812615 740197 72418 717050 626056
ERNG/KM 58.69884 59.22405137 -0.52521145329 50.7825779036827 55.439000416

10.801056
10.54919
678.77887
631.38169

Page 1
 Sheet1

RIPS AND PASSENGER COUNT IN ROUTES

DIFFERENCE REMAKS
433 analysis of Route 26. But to have a
31766
clear picture on the reasons for
improved revenue we need to do further
4996.35000000001
analysis - trip wise and timing wise. So
334930
we need to factor in, if there is a normal
4.80525715472663 increase in the number of passengers
from May to June every year.
294 In case of Route
8087 27 there is degrowth in revenue per Km
2827.3 compared to LY. But the current year
May to June trend is positive. Primary
90994
interpretation is the revenue degrowth
-4.656422513 happened due to reduction in the

Page 2
Sheet1

Page 3