Professional Documents
Culture Documents
products thru the reaction of arenes with alkenes or alkyl halides (Friedel-Crafts Acylation). One
example of a Friedel-Crafts alkylation reaction is Benzene getting alkylated with ethyl bromide
in the presence of FeBr3 which would produce 1-ethyl benzene, FeBr3 and HBr. In this reaction
the Bromine in ethyl bromide would start to bond to the FeBr3 then the electrons in one of the
double bonds in the benzene would be used to bond to the carbon in the ethyl bromide that is
attached to the bromine. One of the bromines in FeBr4- then deprotonates the benzene at the
location where the ethyl group attached itself and the bromine that deprotonates breaks away
from the FeBr3 which leaves the product listed above. A Friedel-Crafts acylation is a reaction
between arenes and acyl chlorides or anhydride to synthesizes an acylated product (Friedel-
catalyst (Weldegirma). However, ferrocene does not require alumina (aluminum chloride) as a
catalyst because it has a high pie electron density which allows it to be acylated under milder
anhydride and phosphoric acid to produce acetyl ferrocene and acetic acid. In this the acid reacts
with the anhydride first to form the acylium cation, which will serve as the electrophile
(Weldegirma). When the acylium cation is formed it then reacts with the ferrocene to form acetyl
ferrocene. In this reaction one has to be careful not to add too much acid or anhydride because
they may over acylate and produce diacetylated ferrocene instead of the desired product.
Mechanism of the synthesis of Acetylferrocene
This can result from adding too much anhydride or too much H2PO4.
Procedures:
1. To a small test tube add 40 mg of ferrocene, followed by 0.35 ml of acetic anhydride and
2. Then warm the test tube in steam bath, make sure to agitate the content in the test tube to
8. Once the pH is neutral collect the product using a Hirsch funnel thru vacuum filtration.
11. Weight the product (Crude) and save a bit for melting point & TLC
12. Prepare a micro-column with wool at the bottom, 1 gram of Alumina, and a bit of sand on
15. Add hexane and begin eluting product from the column into a 50 ml beaker.
16. Label the beaker fraction 1, it should have orange- yellow content.
17. Prepare a 50:50 hexanes to ether solution and add it to the column.
18. Elute the product into a second beaker and label it fraction 2, it should be an orange-red
content.
21. Find weight, melting point, % yield, 1H NMR, & % recovery from crude product.
Table of Chemicals:
Chemicals Physical state Hazards Molecule
Solid with a molecular
very hazardous if
weight of 186.04
ingested, skin &
Ferrocene g/mole. Boils at
eye irritant, &
(C 10 H10 Fe) 249°C and melts at
hazardous if
173.5°C & is soluble
inhaled.
in cold water.
= 0.975 * 100
value. The melting point of our crude acetylferrocene was observed at around 130℃ which
makes sense because it went down from the starting material melting point, ferrocene 173℃,
which means it was no longer ferrocene. The product in this experiment has a lower melting
point than ferrocene so the fact that the crude melting point went down is good. The melting
point for acetylferrocene observed was 128℃ which is very far off the literature value of about
85℃. A possible side product in this experiment was diacetyl ferrocene which has a melting
point of about 128℃ which is what our observed value for the melting point of ferrocene was.
It’s possible that since we measured out less ferrocene than needed and added the correct amount
of anhydride and acid that we over acetylated the ferrocene and made diacetyl ferrocene instead
of the intended product. The percent yield for our crude product was 97.5% and that is a great
yield. The percent recovery from the crude to the final product was 100% but since 100%
efficiency is not yet possible because some materials are lost to the environment this 100% yield
could be due to the limitations of the scale used. The scale only goes to three decimal places and
values very rarely stay constant, that is too say it moves from40.256 to 40.258 to 40.253 for
example. The TLC helps to determine if the reaction is accruing as it is supposed to by showing
how each, ferrocene, crude, & acetyl ferrocene, move thru the plate. In the TLC plate ferrocene,
the starting material, is supposed to climb higher on the plate and the product, acetyl ferrocene,
lower down on the plate. The crude should be somewhere in between. So, by comparing the
starting to crude to product on the TLC one could make a good inference if the desired product
was achieved based on if the product is lower on the TLC as compared to the starting material or
if is the same level then the ferrocene was not converted. Problem 1 There are four observable
peaks and the first is at about 2.4 ppm and I think that this singlet belongs to the CH3 group in
the acetyl group attached to the ferrocene in the image the CH3 group is labeled as d. The reason
I chose the CH3 group for this first peak is because on top of the peak it says 3 which is
corresponding to how many protons are giving that same signal and the three protons in CH3 fit
that bill. The next peak is at about 4.3 ppm and has five protons giving the same signal and that
would match c in the image which is the five protons of the unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl ring.
The next peak is at about 4.6 ppm which has a two on it and this would belong to the two protons
labeled b. This is because they are more shielded than the two other protons which means a
lower ppm. The last peak also has a two on it and is at about 4.7 ppm which means the protons
are more deshielded than the last peak, so they are the ones labeled a. The acetyl group is
deshielding, so it moves the values further down field for the closer protons. Problem 2, based on
the melting point and the 1H NMR I would say that their product is crude. The melting point
observed of 75-78℃ is below the literature value of 85-86℃. The 1H NMR presented also has
inconsistencies that do not allow it to match that of acetyl ferrocene. While their first, third, and
fourth peaks matched those of acetyl ferrocene their second peak has 15 proton readings instead
of 5. Based on the NMR it looks like acylation occurred but something else happened that altered
the product.
Conclusion:
The main objective of the lab was to synthesize acetyl ferrocene by reacting ferrocene
with acetic anhydride thru Friedel-Crafts acylation reaction. Based on the data collected like the
melting points we concluded that the product made in this experiment was not acetyl ferrocene
but diacetyl ferrocene which was a possible side product. We probably used too much anhydride
which led to over acylation which resulted in diacetyl ferrocene being the product in our
experiment. Friedel-Crafts acylation reactions are very important in our bodies, DNA is one
example of things in our body that has an aromatic compound but since aromatics are so stable it
is difficult for it to react with anything else so one way our body works around it is thru Friedel-
Crafts acylation. The objective of the lab was not met because the data reveled that our product
Reference:
Weldegirma, S. Experimental Organic Chemistry: Laboratory Manual for CHM 2210L
Equipment.