(II) FACTS ON WHICH PETITIONER RELIES - AMENDMENT V

The State has violated the petitioner's Constitutional

Rights as per Amendments V and Fourteen. The State has no Corpus

Delicti or Injured Party, forfeiting the petitioner's Right to

Face Accuser. Evidence must be present to be charged and tried

by any court, officer or tribunal. The due process clauses of the

Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments protect the petitioner against

conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every

fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged.

The court and its officers are acting under colorable law

And pursuing against petitioner's 4th Amendment rights to cause

him abject loss and fear and to lose quality of life and the

benefit of privacy, property, and protection under the United

States Constitution.

Any application of the Bill of Rights to State action, as

opposed to federal action, is a form of substantive due process.

United States v. Carolene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144 (1938).

tailored to address the state interest.

The Supreme Court held in 1967 that “we cannot leave to the

States the formulation of the authoritative ... remedies designed

to protect people from infractions by the States of federally

guaranteed rights.”
 Or, to put it more simply, where an individual is facing

a (1) deprivation of (2) life, liberty, or property, (3)

procedural due process mandates that he or she be entitled to

adequate notice, a hearing, and a neutral judge.