Compliance Engineering Journal ISSN NO: 0898-3577

Applications of Manpower Levels for Business with Various

Recruitment Rates in an Eleven point State space through
Stochastic Models
Dr. R.Arumugam1, M.Rajathi2
1
Department of Mathematics, Periyar Maniammai Institute of Science & Technology,
Thanjavur-613 403, Tamilnadu, India
2
Department of Education, Periyar Maniammai Institute of Science & Technology,
Thanjavur-613 403, Tamilnadu, India
Email : arumugamr2@gmail.com, rajathiarumugam@pmu.edu

Abstract
Manpower is an important role within the human resource management. Recently, human
resources has affected mainly administrative tasks to creating crucial selections like deciding the
collection structure that most closely fits a company’s business model. Human resource leader hardly
ever work to fulfill their goals. However, the corporate leaders are ready to expose the worth of a
company along with working structure and therefore they must distribute their roles to the corporate
workers. This study aims, to search the steady rate of crisis and steady state of chances below varied
conditions applied with manpower under irregular conditions with full convenience and zero availability,
within the case of manpower, business and recruitment. The various state has been mentioned below the
different assumptions that the transitions’ from one state to another with different parameters.

Keywords: Manpower; Steady state; Crisis rate; Markov chain.

1. INTRODUCTION
Manpower planning is a vital employment and human resource essential for a company. Earlier
the human resource obligation has moved from a general sense from definitive endeavor to settling on
essential decisions, for instance, picking the social occasion structure that best suits an association’s
arrangement of activity. Some random models of manpower planning projected and studied extensively
within the past Bartholomew [1-2]. Approach to manpower issues are dealt in many alternative ways as
early as 1947, the study of probabilistic or random models of manpower system is extremely abundant
essential. Many probabilistic models of manpower systems are studied and projected generally with the
past Vajda et al. [3]. These models embrace many factors like accomplishment, training, promotion,
change and wastage. These factors are interlinked and this study becomes extremely essential because
of the increasing prices associated to accomplishment, training, promotion, change etc., Yadavalli and
Natarajan [4] studied a semi-markov model during which one grade system permits for wastage and
accomplishment. The time dependent behavior of random models of manpower system with the impact
of pressure on promotion was afterward studied by Yadavalli et al. [5]. Hence, the role of mathematical
modeling becomes certain to require right call at right time. Markov’s process is applied in examining
the structure of manpower systems in terms of the number of employees in every grade or age profile of
staff beneath a spread of conditions and evaluating policies for dominant manpower systems (for
example, Young and Almond [6], Young [7], Bartholomew [8] and Gani [9]. The limiting behavior of
associate increasing non-homogeneous Andre Markov system as sensible importance as shown by the
literature on manpower systems Vassiliou [10-12]. The limiting structure of the expected category sizes
was derived beneath sure conditions and therefore the relative limiting structure is shown to exist with a
special set of conditions. Mehlmann [13] and Vassiliou [14] studied the limiting behavior of the system
with Poisson accomplishment and discovered that the numbers within the numerous grades are
symptotically and reciprocally freelance. The big growth in technology presents enough scope for
anybody to qualify in any discipline and appearance for much money making employment that matches
1|Page

Volume 10, Issue 12, 2019 Page No: 384

Compliance Engineering Journal ISSN NO: 0898-3577

one. However, there are many theoretical literatures on Semi-Markov models Pyke [15-16]. Ginsberg
[17], Mehlmann [18], McClean [19-21 The workers may additionally leave giving correct notice prior to
and therefore the management may also shed employees in a very systematic and gradual manner
looking on its demand Rao [22-23] has thought-about a manpower planning model with the target of
minimizing the manpower value with the best accomplishment policies. Manpower planning ought to
be associate ancient art, whereas manpower issues have existed for hundreds of years. People, jobs, time
and cash are the essential components of a manpower system. Bartholomew [24] has provided a close
analysis of renewal models of manpower systems. A decision-maker should bear in mind of the
interactions among these four ingredients to formulate and appraise manpower policy. The earliest work
on this subject was that of Vassilliou et al. [25]. Andre Markov model are designed for wastage and
promotion in manpower system by Vassilou [26-27]. For n unit standby system might see
Ramanarayanan and Usha [28]. For associate application of Andre Markov chains in a very manpower
system efficiently and seniority and random structures of hierarchy size in manpower planning systems
one might see Setlhare [29]. The ways to calculate wastage (Dismissal, resignation and death) and
promotion intensities that build the proportions resembling some selected planning proposals are dealt
by Lesson [30]. Two unit stands by system has been studied by Chandrasekar and Natarajan [31]
confident limits beneath steady state. For three characteristics system involving machine, manpower and
cash one might see C. Mohan and R.Ramanarayanan [32]. The study of semi markov models for
manpower planning one might see the paper by Sally Meclean [33-34]. Random analysis of a
business with various levels in manpower and business has been studied by C. Mohan and P.Selvaraju
[35]. Random analysis of manpower levels moving business with varied accomplishment rates by
K.Harikumat et. al [36]. Coaching of manpower has long been recognized as a very important issue for
the potency of the workers and for the productive improvement. Further, once it’s thought about as a
criterion for promotion, it becomes significantly effective. Manpower planning models are dealt
comprehensive in Grinold and Marshal [37]. Applications of Manpower with various stages in Business
using stochastic models are studied R.Arumugam and M.Rajathi [38]. In any organization workers
anticipate for higher opportunities and jump to different organizations in explore for them. This
behavior affects the conventional routine work of the organization. Applications of Manpower levels for
business using six and eight point space in the stochastic models has been studied R.Arumugam and
M.Rajathi [39].

2. MARKOV MODEL WITH DIFFERENT STATES

In this paper, we have a tendency to contemplate three characteristics particularly business,
manpower and the recruitment. The things may be hardly on the market which totally available for
business, may fluctuate between complete availability to zero availability and therefore the enlisting
leads to full level to nil level. It explodes once the men become zero. This can be therefore as a result of
the specialists might take on the specialists might take the business together with them or people who
have brought smart can to the priority may bring the client’s off the concern. The business depends on
steady state chances and therefore, constraints to the availableness of men. The steady state chances of
the continual markov process connecting the transitions with totally different states are known for
presenting the value analysis. Numerical illustrations also are given.

3. ASSUMPTIONS
a. There are two levels of workforce or manpower particularly manpower is full and manpower is
zero.
b. There are two levels of business particularly,
i. Business is absolutely on the market with parameter ‘  ’
ii. Zero level of business with parameter ‘λ’
c. Once the workforce is full and business is full it is denoted by its changes to the parameter of the
distribution is once the workforce is full and business is zero. The same parameter changes to
with exponential distribution.
2|Page

Volume 10, Issue 12, 2019 Page No: 385

Compliance Engineering Journal ISSN NO: 0898-3577

d. The enlisting distribution with parameter is once the workforce is zero the business is vanished.
It changes to with exponential time and also the parameter.
e. Whereas workforce becomes zero, the business is non-existent and becomes zero.

4. SYSTEM ANALYSIS
The continuous time in markov chain in stochastic process X(t) determines the system with
eleven point state space as given below in the order of manpower, business and recruitment.
S  0 0 0, 0 0 1, 0 1 0, 0 1 1, 0 0 2, 1 0 0, 1 0 1, 1 0 2, 1 1 0, 1 1 1, 1 1 2   (1)
Where, the first co-ordinate refers to shortage / non-availability of manpower. Second co-
ordinate refers to the business and the third co-ordinate indicates the recruitment level. The continuous
time markov chain of the state space is given below which is a matrix of order eleven.
 M / B / R (0 0 0) (0 0 1) (0 1 0) (0 1 1) (0 0 2) (1 0 0) (1 0 1) (1 0 2) (1 1 0) (1 1 1) (1 1 2) 
 (0 0 0) 1  001  010 011 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 

 (0 0 1)  001 2  011 0  012 100 0 0 a 0 0 
 
 ( 0 1 0 )  010  011  3 0  012  110 0 0 0 0 0 
 (0 1 1) 011 0 0 4  012 111 0 0 120 0 0 
 
 ( 0 0 2 ) 0 002 0  012  5 0 0 b 112 0 0 
Q     ( 2)
(1 0 0) 0 0 110 0 102 6 101 0 b 0 0 
 
 (1 0 1) 0 101 0 110 a 0 7 102 0 0 0 
 (1 0 2)  0  0 0  a  0 0 0 
 102 112 112 8 
 (1 1 0) 110 0 0 111 112 a 0 0 9 0 0 
 
 (1 1 1) 112 0 120 0 0 0 a 0 0  10 0 
 (1 1 2) a 0 0 0 0 102 0 0 112 0  11 

Where,
1  (001  010  011  110)        (3) ,  2  (001 011 012  100)  (4)
 3  (010  011  110  012)        (5) ,  4  (011  012  111  120)        (6)
 5  (002 012  b  112)        (7) ,  6  (110  b 102  101)        (8)
 7  (101  110  a  102)        (9) , 8  (102 112 112  a)     (10)
 9  (110  a 111 112)        (11) , 10  (112 a 120)  (12)
11  (102  a  112)        (13)
The events of change in manpower, business and recruitment are self-determining, as that point
the individual infinitesimal generator of them are specified by,
 
Let    000  001  010  011  002  100  101  102  110  111  112 be the relentless state likelihood vector
matrix Q, at that point
 Q  0,  e  1 --------------- (14)
Using the equation (14), we get the steady state probabilities:
d0 100 d1 101
000  (15), 001         (16)
zdi zdi
d2 102 d0 100
010  (17) , 011        (18)
zdi zdi
d1 101 d2 102
002  (19), 100   (20)
zdi zdi

3|Page

Volume 10, Issue 12, 2019 Page No: 386

Compliance Engineering Journal ISSN NO: 0898-3577

d0 112 d1 112
101 (21), 102  (22)
zdi zdi
d2 112 d0 111
110  (23) , 111   (24)
zdi zdi
d1 111
112   (25)
zdi
Where, d 0  100 112  101 112   111 102 ; d 1   100  `102   101 112   102 111 ;
2
d 2   101 112   102 101   102 111 .  d  d
i 0  d1  d 2  and Z  a  b
i 0
The manpower is accessible and business is complexly accessible or nil. Manpower is deficient
or nil will prompt crisis state.
The following states are arising crisis,
{(0 1 1), (1 1 0), (1 1 1), (1 1 2)}
When there is full business or moderate business and the manpower is moderate or full, likewise the
recruitment is moderate or full. Presently the rate of crisis in the consistent state is given by
C    011  110  112  111  110  112  111  011 --------- (26)
Based on the steady state probability, we can obtain
111
C  100 d 0 101  d1 112  d 2 110   d 0 100 001  d1111100      (27)
2 
Z  d i 
 i 0 

5. NUMERICAL ILLUSTRATION AND STEADY STATE COST CALCULATION

Eleven Point State Space

Case (i)
The steady state probabilities and the rate of crisis are estimated by utilizing the equation (26) and (27)
individually.
Taking, a = 10, b = 8,   3,   5, 100  15,  102  3,  112  8,  111  5,
 101  7,  100  9, 101  2, 102  11, 100  7, 101  14, 102  10 , 100  12, 101  7,
102  5 ,  011  4 , 110  3 , 111  7 and 112  10.
we get  000  0.179031,  001  0.403117,  010  0.13042,  011  0.306911,  002  0.201558,
 100  0.06521,  101  0.255759,  102  0.28794,  110  0.13042,  111  0.127879, and
 112  0.14397.

The crisis rate is 4.380759

Case (ii)
If we assume that a and b values,
  6, 100  18,  102  5,  112  10,  111  7,

4|Page

Volume 10, Issue 12, 2019 Page No: 387

Compliance Engineering Journal ISSN NO: 0898-3577

 101  10,  100  13, 101  5, 102  15, 100  9, 101  18, 102  14 , 100  15, 101  9,
102  7 ,  011  8 , 110  6 , 111  10 and 112  13.
Table: 1 Relationship among a, b and C 

a 5 10 25 32 50
b 3 18 26 44 65
C - infinity 35.2420 10.0691 5.52815 3.70968 2.4516

Fig.1 Relationship among a, b and C 

Table 2 Relationship among a, b and C 

A 54 41 22 9 3
B 39 28 12 7 5
C – infinity 3.0315 4.0860 8.2922 17.6210 35.2420

Fig.2 Relationship among a, b and C 

At the point when the estimation of a and b increments and the comparing rat of crisis diminished.
Steady State Cost
The cost of relentless state are controlled by utilizing the formula,

5|Page

Volume 10, Issue 12, 2019 Page No: 388

Compliance Engineering Journal ISSN NO: 0898-3577

i j k
C ijk   ijk (c MP  c B  c R )
i j
Where, cMP represents manpower cost at the state i = 0 or i = 1, cB represents business cost at the
k
states j = 0 or j = 1 and cR represents the recruitment or enrollment or departure at the states k = 1 or k
= 2. We assume the various costs,
0 1 0 1 0 1
c MP  25 , c MP  15 , c B  29 , c B  15 , c R  30 and c R  42

Table 3 Relationship between Steady state probability and cost of the steady state
Steady state probability Cost of the Steady state
 000  0.179031 15.0386
 001  0.403117 38.6992
 010  0.13042 9.1294
 011  0.306911 25.1667
 002  0.20155 14.9152
 100  0.06521 5.47764
 101  0.25575 21.9952
 102  0.28794 18.4281
 110  0.13042 7.8252
 111  0.127879 9.2072
 112  0.14397 7.1985
Total cost 173.0809

Fig.3 Steady state cost when there is full business

Fig.4 Steady state cost when there is No business

6|Page

Volume 10, Issue 12, 2019 Page No: 389

Compliance Engineering Journal ISSN NO: 0898-3577

6. CONCLUSION
The above figure one and table one speaks to both a and b are expanding and the subsequent c-
infinity diminishing. Figure two and table two depicts that both a and b are diminishing and the crisis
rate expanding. Therefore, the example of the steady state cost represents there is no business amid the
period. Right when the business starts, there is compelling occurs in the enduring state cost.
From the above figure three and four, the sliding example of the predictable state cost illustrates
there is moderate business amid the period. Exactly when the business starts, there is an oscillation
which occurs in the steady state cost.
From the above idea, we found that the steady state cost expanding, when there is full business
additionally recruitment rate getting increased. At the point when there is no business, the steady state
cost gets increasing and the corresponding recruitment rate gets increasing. However, it is seen that if
there is full business and recruitment rate gets increasing but the steady state cost gets decreasing.

REFERENCES
[1] Bartholomew, D.J.(1967) Stochastic Models for Social Processes, 1st edition., New York, John
Wiley.
[2] Bartholomew, D.J.(1982) Stochastic Models for Social Processes, 3rd edition., Chichester, John
Wiley.
[3] Vajda, S. (1978) Mathematics of Manpower Planning. Chichester, Jhn wiley.
[4] Yadavalli, V.S.S., & Natarajan, R. (2001) A semi-Markov model of manpower system,
Stochastic Analysis and Applications, Vol.19 (6), pp.1077-1086.
[5] Yadavalli, V.S.S., Natarajan, R. and Udayabhaskaran, S. (2002) Time dependent Behaviour of
Stochastic Models of manpower system-impact of pressure on promotion, Stochastic Analysis
and Applications, Vol.20(4), pp.863-882.
[6] Young, A. and Almond, G. (1961) predicting Distributions of Staff. Computer Journal, Vol.3
(4), pp. 246-250.
[7] Young, A. (1971) Demographic and ecological models for Manpower Planning, In:
Bartholomew, D.J. and Morris, B.R.(ed). Aspects of Manpower Planning. The English
University Press Ltd, pp.75-97.
[8] Bartholomew, D.J., and Forbes, A.F. (1979) Statistical Techniques for Manpower Planning.
John Wiley.
[9] Gani, J, (1973). On the age structure of some Stochastic Processes. Bulletin of International
Statistical Institute, Vol. 45, pp. 434-436.
[10] Vassiliou, P.-C.G. (1981a) On the limiting behavior of non – homogeneous Markov chain
model in Manpower systems. Biometrika, Vol.68(2), pp.557-561.
[11] Vassiliou, P.-C.G. (1981b) Stability in a non – homogeneous Markov chain model in Manpower
systems. Journal of Applied Probability, Vol.18, pp.924-930.
[12] Vassiliou, P.-C.G. (1981a) Asymptotic of behavior Markov System. Journal of Applied
Probabilty., Vol.19, pp.851-857.
[13] Mehlmanu, A. (1977) Markovian Manpower models continuous time. Journal of Applied
Probability, Vol.41. pp.249-259.

7|Page

Volume 10, Issue 12, 2019 Page No: 390

Compliance Engineering Journal ISSN NO: 0898-3577

[14] Vassiliou , P,. –C.G. (1982b) On the limiting behavior of a non-homogeneous Markovin
Manpower model with independent Poisson input. Journal of Applied Probability, Vol.19,
pp.433-438.
[15] Pyke, R.(1961a) Markov renewal processes: definitions and preliminary properties. Annals of
Mathematical Statistics, Vol.32, pp.1231-1242.
[16] Pyke, R.(1961b) Markov renewal processes with finitely many states. Annals of Mathematical
Statistics, Vol.32, pp.1243-1259.
[17] Ginsberg, R.B.(1971) Semi-Markov processes and mobility. Journal of Mathematical Sociology,
Vol. 1, pp.233-262.
[18] Mehlmann, A. (1979) Semi-Markovin Manpower models in continuous time. Journalof Applied
Probability, Vol. 4, pp.416-422.
[19] McClean, S.I. (1978) Continuous-time stochastic models of a multi- grade population Journal of
Applied Probability, Vol.15, pp 26-37.
[20] McClean,S.I (1980) Semi Markovian models in Continuous-time Journal of Applied Probability,
Vol.16, pp 416-422.
[21] McClean, S.I. (1986) Semi Marko models for Manpower, In Janssen, J(ed.). Semi-Markov
models : Theory and Applications, Plenum: New York , pp.283300.
[22] Rao, P.P. (1990) A Dynamic Programming Approach to determine Optimal Manpower
Recruitment Policies. Journal of Operations Research Society , Vol.41, pp.983-988.
[23] Rao, C.R (1973) Linear Statistical Inference and its application.New York, John Wiley& Sons.
[24] Bartholomew , D.J (1973) Stochastic Models for Social Processes, 2nd edition Chichester, John
Wiley.
[25] Vassiliou , P.C.G. (1976). A higher order markovin model for prediction of wastage in
Manpower system , Operat. Res. Quart.27.
[26] Vassiliou, P.C.G, (1978) “A higher order non-linear Markovin model for promotion in
Manpower systems “, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, A141(1), pp. 86-94.
[27] Vassiliou P.C.G., Georgiou, A.C. & Tsantas, N.(1990) Control of asymptotic Variability in non-
homogeneous Markov Systems. Journal of Applied Probability, Vol,28, pp. 756-766.
[28] R.Ramanarayanan , K.Usha, unit warm stand by system with Erlang failure and general repair
and its dual, IEEE Trans. on Reliability, R-28,No.2(1979), 173-74.
[29] K. Setlhare, Modeling of an intermittently busy Manpower system, In Proceedings at the
Conferences held in Sept, 2006 at Gabarone, Botswana(2007).
[30] G.W. Lesson , Wastages and Promotion in desired Manpower structures , J. Opl.
Res.Soc.,33(1982), 433-443.
[31] Chandraswkar, Natrajan (1997), Two unit stand by system with confidence linits under steady
state.
[32] C.Mohan, R.Ramanarayanan, An analysis of Manpower , Money and Business with Random
Environment, International Journal of Applied Mathematics, Vol,23, No.5 (2010), 927-940.
[33] McClean, S.I. (1976) A comparison of the lognormal and tranition models of wastage. The
statistician, Vol.25(4), pp.281-294.

8|Page

Volume 10, Issue 12, 2019 Page No: 391

Compliance Engineering Journal ISSN NO: 0898-3577

[34] McClean, S.I. (1991) Manpower planning Models and their estimation, European Journal of
Operational Research, Vol.51, pp.179-187.
[35] C.Mohan, P.Selvaraju, Stochastic Analysis of a Business with Varying Levels in Manpower and
Business, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research , ISSN 0973-4562 Vol.10
No.53(2015).
[36] K.Harikumar, R.Ramanarayanan, Stochastic Analysis of Manpower Levels of Business with
Varying Recruitment Rates, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 8, 2014.
[37] Grinold, R.C. and Marshall, K.T(1977) Manpower planning models, New York,
a. North–Holland.
[38] Arumugam R, Rajathi M. Applications of Manpower with various stages in Business using
stochastic models, International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering and Research. 2017;
Issue.1,pp. 95-100.
[39] Arumugam R, Rajathi M. Applications of Manpower levels for business using six and eight
point space in the stochastic models, International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering and
Research. 2017; Vol.2 Issue6, pp. 56-60.

9|Page

Volume 10, Issue 12, 2019 Page No: 392