1 The title should be accurate, unambiguous, specific, and

2 complete. Do not contain infrequently-used abbreviations.

3 Number of word in title is no more than 12 words.
4
5 Author 1, Author 2 & Author 3*
6 Affiliation of Author 1 (department, university or organization, city, state/province)
7 Affiliation of Author 2 (department, university or organization, city, state/province)
8 Affiliation of Author 3 (department, university or organization, city, state/province)
9 *Corresponding author (Name, Affiliation, Email, Telephone)
10
11 ABSTRACT
12The abstract should not exceed 200 words, should be one paragraph and should be free of
13references and abbreviations. It should indicate cleary the scope and main conclusions of the
14paper. The abstract should not exceed 200 words, should be one paragraph and should be free
15of references and abbreviations. It should indicate cleary the scope and main conclusions of
16the paper. The abstract should not exceed 200 words, should be one paragraph and should be
17free of references and abbreviations. It should indicate cleary the scope and main conclusions
18of the paper. The abstract should not exceed 200 words, should be one paragraph and should
19be free of references and abbreviations. It should indicate cleary the scope and main
20conclusions of the paper. The abstract should not exceed 200 words, should be one paragraph
21and should be free of references and abbreviations. It should indicate cleary the scope and
22main conclusions of the paper.
23Keyword : keywords 1, Keywords 2, Keywords 3, Keywords 4, Keywords 5.
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 INTRODUCTION
34 The introduction should be accessible to a wide variety of scientists by avoiding the
35use of jargon and concepts not familiar to non-specialists. It should outline the time period
36covered and the scope of the review, including the importance of and rationale behind your
37article. The introduction should include only a few background references. The introduction
38should be accessible to a wide variety of scientists by avoiding the use of jargon and concepts
39not familiar to non-specialists. It should outline the time period covered and the scope of the
40review, including the importance of and rationale behind your article. The introduction
41should include only a few background references. The introduction should be accessible to a
42wide variety of scientists by avoiding the use of jargon and concepts not familiar to non-
43specialists.
44 The introduction should be accessible to a wide variety of scientists by avoiding the
45use of jargon and concepts not familiar to non-specialists. It should outline the time period
46covered and the scope of the review, including the importance of and rationale behind your
47article. The introduction should include only a few background references. The introduction
48should be accessible to a wide variety of scientists by avoiding the use of jargon and concepts
49not familiar to non-specialists. It should outline the time period covered and the scope of the
50review, including the importance of and rationale behind your article.
51
52 MATERIALS AND METHODS
53 The materials and methods should give essential details, including statistical analysis
54and experimental desain. The materials and methods should give essential details, including
55statistical analysis and experimental desain. The materials and methods should give essential
56details, including statistical analysis and experimental desain. The materials and methods
57should give essential details, including statistical analysis and experimental desain.
58
59 RESULTS AND DISSCUSSION
60 Please highlight differences between your results or findings and the previous
61publications by other researchers. The discussion should spell out the major conclusions of
62the work along with some explanation or speculation on the significance of these conclusions.
63The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail.
64Please highlight differences between your results or findings and the previous publications by
65other researchers. The discussion should spell out the major conclusions of the work along
66with some explanation or speculation on the significance of these conclusions. The results
 67should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail.
68 Table 1 Position
69 Please highlight differences between your results or findings and the previous
70publications by other researchers. The discussion should spell out the major conclusions of
71the work along with some explanation or speculation on the significance of these conclusions.
72The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail.
73Please highlight differences between your results or findings and the previous publications by
74other researchers. The discussion should spell out the major conclusions of the work along
75with some explanation or speculation on the significance of these conclusions. The results
76should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail.
77 Figure 1 Position
78 Please highlight differences between your results or findings and the previous
79publications by other researchers. The discussion should spell out the major conclusions of
80the work along with some explanation or speculation on the significance of these conclusions.
81The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail.
82Please highlight differences between your results or findings and the previous publications by
83other researchers. The discussion should spell out the major conclusions of the work along
84with some explanation or speculation on the significance of these conclusions. The results
85should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail.
86
87 CONCLUSIONS
88 The conclusions section should summarise the topics discussed and describe future
89directions, including the author′s opinions, as appropriate. The conclusions section should
90summarise the topics discussed and describe future directions, including the author′ s
91opinions, as appropriate. The conclusions section should summarise the topics discussed and
92describe future directions, including the author′ s opinions, as appropriate.
93
94 REFERENCES
95Sulfahri, Amin, M., Soemitro, B.S & Murni S. 2017. Comparison of Biomass Production
96 from Algae Spirogyra hyalina and Spirogyra peipingensis. Biofuels. 8(3) : 359-366.
97Sulfahri, Ni’matuzahroh & Manuhara, S.W. 2012. Optimization of the Bioconversion of
98 Spirogyra hyalina Hydrolysates to Become Ethanol Using Zymomonas mobilis.
99 Journal of Applied Envoronmental and Biological Science. 2(8) : 374 – 379.
100Hogg, S. 2005. Essential Microbiology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., England.
101
102 TABLE AND FIGURE
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113 Figure 1. Figures should be high quality (1200 dpi for line art, 600 dpi for grayscale and 300
114 dpi for color, at the correct size).
115
Content 1 Content 2 Content 3 Content 4
Xxxxxxxxxxx 34.221 34.221 34.221
Yyyyyyyyyyy 23.221 23.221 23.221
Zzzzzzzzzzzz 36.221 36.221 36.221
116Table 1. Tables should present new information rather than duplicating what is in the text

117

118