Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hiring and Keeping the Best People. (1992). Harvard Business School Press – Boston ( 135 to 142)
STRATEGIC STAFFING: A Practical Toolkit for Workforce Planning by Thomas P. Bechet (229 to 236, 237-252)
STAFFING ORGANIZATIONS Seventh Edition by Herbert G., Timothy A. Judge and John D. (639-43)
https://mobilityexchange.mercer.com/Insights/article/Attracting-and-Retaining-Globally-Mobile-Talent-6-
Things-I-Learned
Losing a good contributor is a big headache and produces nothing but negative thoughts and extra work. But don’t let those
negative thoughts color your parting with the employee. In some cases you should not even use the word parting. Leading firms
now have regular “alumni” programs that:
Some women drop out while their children are infants but are ready to return a few years later. Others leave for
what appear to be great career moves, only to be disappointed and disillusioned. Rehires can be a valuable asset for
your company.
. Here are a few things you can do to increase the number of employee rehires:
Cure the problems that made them leave in the first place..
Keep the lines of communication open between your firm and the best of its departed
employees.
Make re-employment as easy as possible.
What good is it to hire people quickly if those people do not have the skills that are
needed to implement your business plans or leave to take another job soon after they
come to work for you?
Another set of measures is needed to measure the results of your staffing process fully.
Clearly, we need to have some way of measuring whether we are hiring, promoting,
redeploying, and retaining not just people in general, but the right people in particular.
Many organizations try to define the ‘‘right people’’ (or ‘‘good hires’’) in terms of skill,
tenure, or performance. A good hire might be one who stays at least three years and
achieves higher than average performance ratings. But these proxies are difficult to define
and even more difficult to measure on an ongoing basis.
Tracking Progress
The critical benefit of measurement and metrics comes not at the end of the
process, but in tracking progress along the way. If you evaluate progress measures
at key milestones, you will still have the opportunity to adjust what you are doing,
thus increasing the probability that your overall staffing needs will be met
efficiently and effectively.
Often, it is necessary to develop and evaluate several options that have different cost and
timing implications. In other cases, it is necessary to review staffing plans from a big
picture perspective and draw some overall conclusions before the most effective plans and
actions can be identified.
Total staffing costs for any given planning period are the sum of the maintenance and
transition costs for that period.
It is not enough to look at just maintenance costs or just transition costs, you must look at the total.
Since transition costs are usually one-time charges and maintenance costs are ongoing, a scenario that is cheaper in
the near term might quickly become more expensive to maintain in the long run.
Consequently, you should decide which staffing plan scenario to implement only after you have considered the
long-term maintenance costs of each.
Remember that these decisions should not be based on cost considerations alone. Timing is also a key consideration.
These analyses and questions are meant to provide the user with a better understanding of some of the big
picture issues and implications of the staffing plans that are developed.
Two main categories of suggestions have been provided.
The first set of suggestions should be applied when a single staffing plan or scenario has been developed.
The second set should be applied when comparing one staffing plan or scenario to another (e.g., to
identify major differences between the plans).
First, define the best staffing plans for each scenario to be considered. It is sometimes
helpful to establish one scenario as a base case and compare others to it.
Review your results and models following the process described for a single scenario.
Once you are sure that your initial models are as accurate as possible, begin the
comparison of one scenario with another. Here are some comparisons you may wish to
consider:
Clearly, the potential benefits of expatriate assignments for both companies and individuals are tremendous.
Proper expatriate selection will help reinforce corporate integrity, values, and culture (with the right
corporate representatives in place), improve the multinational’s return on investment (of the expensive
human capital investment), and avoid assignment failure.
“Expatriates who remain in their assignments until the end of the term (attendance),meet the performance
standards, and adjust to the new culture (satisfaction, well-being) are considered as the most successful
ones”. Also, selection instruments with predictive validity in the domestic context may have less predictive
power in international selection procedures due to the very specific requirements of an international job,
such as language proficiency, adaptability, and cross-cultural awareness
ü New hire turnover is not rare for organisations today, especially in a highly turbulent and competitive
marketplace. However, when organisations start to lose their top quality candidates to competitors early in
their tenure, it is a possible sign that something serious is going wrong.
ü Organisational effectiveness depends on the performance of a company’s human capital. To reduce the risk
of employees taking flight organisations need to evaluate their recruitment strategy.
ü . Over the course of the staffing process it is possible to develop quantitative indicators that show how
effectively and efficiently the staffing system is operating.
Human resources metrics are data that can help you assess whether your people activities are
generating the results you want. They also help you monitor productivity and performance of your
HR team. Recruiting KPIs (or metrics) measure how effective and efficient your recruitment
process is.
opened a specific position at Day 1. Then, if your best candidate accepted your job
offer on Day 25, and they applied on Day 10, your time to hire is 25-10 = 15
Time to Hire= Day candidate accept the offer – day candidate entered
the pipeline
= 500
Cv’s Referred:
Recruitment Agency = 150. Hired: 4
Newspaper = 300. Hired: 2
Recruitment Yield Ratio per source = 4 . * 100 = 2.6
HR Planning
Pre-hiring Documents
Test Development
Screening
Advertisement
Recruitment
43 Offer Letter