Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Review
Reviewed Work(s): Begegnung mit Paul Celan: Erinnerung und Interpretation by Edith
Silbermann
Review by: Jerry Glenn
Source: Modern Austrian Literature, Vol. 28, No. 2 (1995), pp. 139-140
Published by: Association of Austrian Studies
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24648444
Accessed: 16-01-2020 00:47 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Association of Austrian Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Modern Austrian Literature
This content downloaded from 202.96.31.9 on Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:47:12 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Book Reviews 139
the New Historicists threw out the baby with the bath water; they
accepted the liberal interpretation of these authors' reform
minded and elitist critique of mass culture at face value and
concluded that their novels should be understood as a form of
social coercion, duping the middle class reading public into a
belief in the existence of democratic freedoms that were in fact
being eroded by the very mass culture of which these novels were
a formidable part.
Jumping into the ideological fray with the intent of re
covering the cultural criticism of these novelists for a progressive
cause defined by the reference to Adorno and Benjamin, Suchoff
offers interpretations of Dickens' Little Dorrit (Ch. II), Melville's
White Jacket and Moby Dick (Ch. III), and Kafka's The Castle
(Ch. IV). Given Suchoffs thesis, the potential direction of his
analysis proves to be more promising than what he actually offers
us. I would be willing to grant him his rather heavy reliance on
already existing interpretations of these novels if his correction
of New Historicism would at least acknowledge the differences
between 19th and 20th century sensibilities. Instead, contem
porary American notions of middle class, gender relations, and
diversity are superimposed on these novels in an unnuanced and
oftentimes counterfactual manner. In the Afterword, Suchoff
might argue with Adorno that dialectical thought is "the attempt
to see the new in the old," but a subtle thinker like Adorno could
not have possibly meant by this phrase that the old is identical
with the new.
Kathy Brzovic
Los Angeles, CA
This content downloaded from 202.96.31.9 on Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:47:12 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
140 MODERN AUSTRIAN LITERATURE
Jerry Glenn
University of Cincinnati
This content downloaded from 202.96.31.9 on Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:47:12 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms