You are on page 1of 4

REVIEW

CURRENT
OPINION Metabolic diseases and cancer risk
Malin H. Faulds and Karin Dahlman-Wright

Purpose of review
Metabolic disease and cancer are two of the leading causes of death worldwide. This review focuses on
the potential increased relative risk for the development of cancer in a population with a rapidly increasing
incidence of metabolic disturbances.
Recent findings
A large number of recent epidemiological and prospective studies link metabolic syndrome-associated
diseases to an increased risk for development of, as well as mortality from, several types of cancer. In
patients diagnosed with metabolic disorders, the incidence of gastrointestinal, glandular and reproductive
tract cancers is significantly higher compared to the general population. In line with that, hyperglycemia
has recently been shown to be an independent risk factor for overall cancer incidence.
Summary
Disorders connected to the metabolic syndrome have been shown to have profound impacts on the
incidence and progression of cancer. Continued efforts to make lifestyle interventions, such as weight loss
and increased physical activity in the general population, are clearly warranted as a contribution to efforts
aimed at decreasing the development of and mortality from cancer. Progression in this field requires a
better understanding of the underlying mechanisms behind the cancer-promoting effects associated with
disturbed energy balance.
Keywords
cancer, diabetes, hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, obesity

INTRODUCTION Recent studies investigated the association


Metabolic diseases affect more than 230 million between postmenopausal breast cancer and the
people worldwide and are expected to almost double metabolic syndrome based on two studies from
in the coming 25 years. It is currently the fourth Italy and Switzerland. The metabolic syndrome
leading cause of death by disease. The metabolic was defined as the presence of at least three meta-
syndrome refers to a group of inter-related meta- bolic disturbances. Importantly, the risk of develop-
bolic abnormalities that include hyperglycemia, ing breast cancer was significantly higher for women
&

insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, obesity and with the metabolic syndrome (relative risk 1.75) [1 ].
low-grade inflammation with an associated risk of The results also showed an increased incidence of
developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 breast cancer for individual risk components, such
diabetes (T2D). as T2D (relative risk 1.33), hypertension (relative risk
Cancer affects people of all ages but the overall 1.08) and hyperlipidemia (1.26).
risk of developing cancer increases rapidly over a life
span. In 2007, cancer accounted for around 13% of INSULIN RESISTANCE AND CANCER RISK
all human deaths worldwide. Insulin resistance is a pathological condition in
which insulin is less effective in lowering glucose

METABOLIC DISEASE AND CANCER RISK


Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Novum, Karolinska Institutet,
Metabolic diseases and cancer are influenced by Huddinge, Sweden
many factors including genetic and environmental Correspondence to Karin Dahlman-Wright, Department of Biosciences
factors. Several epidemiological studies have shown and Nutrition, Novum, Karolinska Institutet, S-141 83 Huddinge, Sweden.
that certain types of cancer, especially cancer of the Tel: +46 8 52481160; fax: +46 8 7745538; e-mail: Karin.Dahlman-
gastrointestinal and urinary tracts and of the female Wright@ki.se
reproductive system, are more common in indi- Curr Opin Oncol 2012, 24:58–61
viduals with metabolic disorders. DOI:10.1097/CCO.0b013e32834e0582

www.co-oncology.com Volume 24  Number 1  January 2012

Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Metabolic diseases and cancer risk Faulds and Dahlman-Wright

in tumor cells is differently regulated compared to


KEY POINTS normal cells. Normal cells convert glucose to
 Several aspects of the metabolic syndrome are common pyruvate and ATP is formed within the Krebs cycle
risk factors for developing cancer. in the mitochondria. Tumor cells convert pyruvate
into lactic acid and instead utilize glucose for syn-
 Silencing of insulin signaling is a novel strategy for thesis of building blocks for cell construction. This
cancer therapy.
leads to an overproduction of lactic acid, despite
 High levels of fasting glucose and T2D are independent full accessibility to oxygen, a phenomenon called
risk factors for cancer. the Warburg effect. The excess of lactic acid lowers
the pH of the extracellular matrix, which is a caus-
 Adipose tissue dysfunction and subsequent
inflammation are risk factors for several types of ative factor for death of surrounding tissues. The
cancer. activity of collagenases is known to increase with
lowered pH, which will, in turn, facilitate tumor cell
migration. The altered activity of several enzymes
involved in glucose metabolism is responsible for the
concentrations, which results in reduced glycogen Warburg effect in neoplastic cells, like for example
synthesis and storage and high levels of circulating hexokinase-2, which is the rate-limiting enzyme in
glucose. Metabolic pathways activated by insulin glycolysis and has been shown to have a 200 times
signaling are involved in multiple cellular events higher activity in proliferating tumor cells.
and are known to inhibit oxidation of fatty acids Another factor important for the increased
and induce glucose expenditure in cancer cells. glucose metabolism in cancer cells is the occurrence
Several studies have used silencing of insulin of the pyruvate kinase Tumor M2-PK, which is a
signaling as a strategy for novel cancer therapy key enzyme in the altered metabolism observed
[2]. High concentrations of insulin activate the in tumor cells. Tumor M2-PK is present at high
insulin receptor, which stimulates cell growth and concentrations in tissue, plasma and other body
cell division. fluids of individuals with malignant disease [8].
Several in-vitro, animal and human epidemio- The M2-PK isoenzyme is specific for proliferating
logical studies demonstrate that cancer development cells, including cancer cells, fibroblasts, embryonic
is promoted by high concentrations of insulin and cells and adult stem cells, and appears as either a
insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) acting through the tetramer or a dimer. When M2-PK is in a tetrameric
insulin/IGF axis [3]. For example, pancreatic cancer state, glucose is used for energy production. How-
strongly correlates with high postprandial insulin ever, M2-PK occurs mainly as a dimer in tumor
levels. In observational studies of colorectal cancer cells and, thus, energy is obtained from glutamine
patients, high levels of the proinsulin C-peptide, breakdown. This will cause an excess of glucose
insulin, IGF-I and reduced levels of IGF-binding and will ultimately lead to cell damage via formation
protein-1 (IGFBP-1) have been reported [4]. Elevated and accumulation of glycation end-products. These
C-peptide levels and low IGFBP-1 levels have been compounds can further trigger degenerative changes
linked to a higher death risk after colorectal cancer in cells, change signaling pathways and lead to
surgery [5]. additional carcinogenic mutations [9].
The incidence of breast cancer in individuals When glycation end-products are taken up into
diagnosed with insulin resistance is also signifi- the intracellular space, an inflammatory process is
cantly greater than in healthy women with a relative started, which will stimulate neutrophils and, as a
risk of 3.6 for developing malignant tumors [6]. consequence, increase production of oxygen free
radicals [10]. The processes initiated by the excess
of carbohydrates can cause chronic inflammatory
GLUCOSE METABOLISM AND CANCER diseases and an increased risk of cancer mutations.
RISK The glycation end-products are not only depending
Large prospective studies show that high level of on the excess glucose resulting from carbohydrate
fasting glucose is an independent risk factor for metabolism disorders but are also a result of a high
cancer [7]. Cancer cells need increased energy due sugar consumption [11], as well as other dietary
to their substantial growth capacity and use various components [12].
substrates, such as glucose, for energy production. The outcome of impaired glucose metabolism
Glucose concentrations in tumor cells are ensured on cancer mortality has recently been studied in
by increased levels of the membrane-bound glucose data from 17 European cohorts (DECODE, Diabetes
transporters (GLUTs), especially the isoforms GLUT1, Epidemiology: Collaborative analysis of Diagnostic
GLUT3 and GLUT12. However, glucose metabolism criteria in Europe). The relative risk of death for

1040-8746 ß 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins www.co-oncology.com 59

Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Cancer biology

cancer patients in prediabetic and diabetic states was for metastasis than nondiabetic patients. T2D was
1.13 and 1.71, respectively, for male patients and also associated with a two-fold increase in mortality
1.11 and 1.43, respectively, for female patients. within a 5-year period [21]. There have also been
Overall, mortality increased linearly with increasing several reports on the increased incidence of endo-
&
blood glucose concentration [13 ]. metrial cancer in T2D patients. A case-control
Another prospective study found a significant study from Italy displayed an odds ratio (OR) of
role for glucose metabolism in breast cancer occur- 2.18 for development of cancer in the endometrium
&
rence as high circulating glucose levels in women in diabetic patients [22 ].
increased the risk for breast tumors with 63% com- Diabetic patients may also have an increased risk
&
pared to women with low circulating glucose [14 ]. for cancer in the urinary tract but evidence from
prospective studies is scarce. A multiethnic cohort
study with a 10-year follow-up in the USA showed
DIABETES AND CANCER RISK that individuals with T2D display a relative risk of
There is growing evidence that T2D is a risk factor 1.25 for developing urothelial cancer [23] and
for the development of several types of cancer. another American study showed a 2.2 relative blad-
A primary care cohort from Germany concluded that der cancer risk for diabetic patients, a risk that was
T2D and T2D medications were highly associated significantly higher in patients that had been diag-
& &
with risk for, as well as mortality from, cancer [15 ]. nosed with diabetes for the longest duration [24 ].
Recent epidemiological investigations show
that carcinomas frequently appear in patients diag-
nosed with T2D, including cancer in the pancreas, ADIPOSE TISSUE DYSFUNCTION AND
liver, bile ducts, colon, endometrium and breast. CANCER RISK
An Israeli study involving T2D patients and The relationship between obesity, especially visceral
healthy controls showed increased risk of cancer obesity, and many cancer types has been confirmed
of the reproductive system (relative risk 1.96) and in several epidemiological studies. However, the
digestive system (1.41) in women. Male diabetic conclusions derived from these studies remain
patients did not have increased cancer risks; instead controversial [25]. In studies using the combined
a 47% decrease of prostate cancer was found [16]. evaluations of body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-
A Swedish epidemiological study examined hip circumference ratio with cancer incidence,
the risk of overall cancer among hospitalized T2D the responsible mechanisms seem to be mainly
patients compared to the general population. A risk those of metabolic disorders, resulting from obesity
increase was found for a plethora of malignant [26]. Another study shows that obese, postmeno-
cancers; gastrointestinal tract cancers, endometrial, pausal women have a 50% higher risk of breast
cervical, ovarian, lung, kidney, pancreas and hep- cancer than their leaner counterparts. This has also
&
atocellular carcinoma [17 ]. been confirmed using an animal model that mimics
Studies of a large cohort of US Army veterans with postmenopausal obesity in combination with breast
diabetes, however, show a slightly different result. cancer progression, when obesity significantly
&
The overall cancer risk was slightly lower than in the increased tumor weight and angiogenesis [27 ].
control group except for liver, pancreatic, bile ducts, Excess adipose tissue and its dysfunction lead to a
colon, rectal and kidney cancer. Leukemia and mel- range of related syndromes, like insulin resistance
anoma risks were also somewhat enhanced [18]. with associated hyperinsulinemia [28]. Obesity is
The relationship between T2D and pancreatic strongly linked to chronic inflammation within adi-
cancer has been widely confirmed. A novel study pose tissue. The normal processes in adipose tissues
analyzed 35 cohort studies and concluded that are usually disturbed in the great majority of obese
T2D is associated with a significantly increased people, in whom the fat accumulation and tissue size
risk of developing pancreatic cancer in both enlargement will cause enhanced protein synthesis
males and females (summary of relative risks 1.94) and disturbed post-translational processing within
and that diabetes is both an early manifestation, as the endoplasmic reticulum. This could, in turn, cause
&
well as a causative factor, of pancreatic cancer [19 ]. It abnormal intracellular signaling, insulin resistance,
has also very recently been shown that 70% of newly free radical production and activate the adipocytes to
diagnosed pancreatic cancer patients had T2D [20]. secrete adipokines, which trigger inflammation and
Epidemiological studies have also shown enhance production of inflammatory cytokines and
a connection between T2D and breast cancer. chemokines [29]. The adipose tissue infiltration is
A retrospective cohort study recently showed that further increased by macrophages.
diabetic patients with estrogen receptor negative A link between inflammation and cancer
breast cancer had a more than two-fold higher risk development was found by Rudolf Virchow already

60 www.co-oncology.com Volume 24  Number 1  January 2012

Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Metabolic diseases and cancer risk Faulds and Dahlman-Wright

7. Stocks T, Rapp K, Bjorge T, et al. Blood glucose and risk of incident and
in 1863 upon discovery of leukocytes in neoplastic fatal cancer in the metabolic syndrome and cancer project (me-can): analysis
cells. Many epidemiological studies have correlated of six prospective cohorts. PLoS Med 2009; 6:e1000201.
8. Hitosugi T, Kang S, Vander Heiden MG, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation
infections or chronic inflammatory diseases with inhibits PKM2 to promote the Warburg effect and tumor growth. Sci Signal
tumor development. The mechanisms behind this 2009; 2:ra73.
9. Wuenschell GE, Tamae D, Cercillieux A, et al. Mutagenic potential of DNA
association are currently not fully elucidated but glycation: miscoding by (R)- and (S)-N2-(1-carboxyethyl)-2’-deoxyguanosine.
include healing and reconstruction processes within Biochemistry 2010; 49:1814–1821.
10. Alexiou P, Chatzopoulou M, Pegklidou K, Demopoulos VJ. RAGE: a multi-
inflamed tissues, stimulated angiogenesis and pro- ligand receptor unveiling novel insights in health and disease. Curr Med Chem
motion of cancer cell development and oncogene 2010; 17:2232–2252.
11. Tappy L, Le KA, Tran C, Paquot N. Fructose and metabolic diseases:
activation by pro-inflammatory cytokines. Studies new findings, new questions. Nutrition 2010; 26:1044–1049.
also show that direct impairment of DNA by reactive 12. Uribarri J, Woodruff S, Goodman S, et al. Advanced glycation end products in
foods and a practical guide to their reduction in the diet. J Am Diet Assoc
oxygen and nitrogen leads to genome instability 2010; 110:911–916; e12.
and carcinogenic mutations [30,31]. 13. Zhou XH, Qiao Q, Zethelius B, et al. Diabetes, prediabetes and cancer
& mortality. Diabetologia 2010; 53:1867–1876.
This study indicates that T2D is associated with an increased risk of cancer death,
particularly death from liver cancer. Mortality from all cancers is rising linearly with
CONCLUSION increasing glucose concentrations.
14. Sieri S, Muti P, Claudia A, et al. Prospective study on the role of glucose
The number of people with excess body weight & metabolism in breast cancer occurrence. Int J Cancer 2011 doi: 10.1002/ijc.
26071 [Epub ahead of print].
is rapidly increasing worldwide. Overweight and The results of this study add to the existing epidemiological evidence that
obesity with associated metabolic abnormalities hyperglycemia and insulin resistance increase breast cancer risk.
15. Baur DM, Klotsche J, Hamnvik OP, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and medica-
and diseases, such as T2D, constitute in addition & tions for type 2 diabetes mellitus are associated with risk for and mortality from
risk factors for a broad spectrum of cancers. cancer in a German primary care cohort. Metabolism 2010 [Epub ahead of
print].
Recent epidemiological studies show associ- These results suggest that T2D and medications for diabetes increase cancer
ations between obesity/T2D and an increased tumor risk and mortality.
16. Chodick G, Heymann AD, Rosenmann L, et al. Diabetes and risk of incident
incidence. The increased levels of circulating glucose cancer: a large population-based cohort study in Israel. Cancer Causes
and triglycerides also contribute to sustaining tumor Control 2010; 21:879–887.
17. Hemminki K, Li X, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Risk of cancer following
growth. Thus, combating obesity is a priority in & hospitalization for type 2 diabetes. Oncologist 2010; 15:548–555.
society for reducing the incidence of, and reducing This study, covering approximately one half of Swedish T2D patients, shows
an elevated risk for several cancers after hospitalization for T2D.
the mortality from, various kinds of cancer. 18. Atchison EA, Gridley G, Carreon JD, et al. Risk of cancer in a large
cohort of U.S. veterans with diabetes. Int J Cancer 2011; 128:635–
643.
19. Ben Q, Xu M, Ning X, et al. Diabetes mellitus and risk of pancreatic cancer:
Acknowledgements & a meta-analysis of cohort studies. 2011 [Epub ahead of print].
Findings from this meta-analysis strongly support that T2D is associated with an
None. increased risk of pancreatic cancer in both males and females and that T2D is both
an early manifestation and a causative factor of pancreatic cancer.
20. Krechler T, Zeman M, Vecka M, et al. Leptin and adiponectin in pancreatic
Conflicts of interest cancer: connection with diabetes mellitus. Neoplasma 2011; 58:58–64.
This work was supported with grants from the Center for 21. Schrauder MG, Fasching PA, Haberle L, et al. Diabetes and prognosis in
a breast cancer cohort. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2011; 137:975–983.
Biosciences. 22. Rosato V, Zucchetto A, Bosetti C, et al. Metabolic syndrome and endometrial
None declared. & cancer risk. Ann Oncol 2011; 22:884–889.
This study indicates a direct association between various metabolic syndromes
associated components, apart from being overweight, with the risk of endometrial
cancer.
23. Woolcott CG, Maskarinec G, Haiman CA, et al. Diabetes and urothelial
REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED cancer risk: The Multiethnic Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiol 2011
READING [Epub ahead of print].
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have 24. MacKenzie T, Zens MS, Ferrara A, et al. Diabetes and risk of bladder
been highlighted as: & cancer: evidence from a case-control study in New England. Cancer
& of special interest 2011; 117:1552–1556.
&& of outstanding interest These findings support an association between bladder cancer incidence
Additional references related to this topic can also be found in the Current and T2D, and further suggest that the risk may be greater among patients taking
World Literature section in this issue (p. 112). oral hypoglycemics and those with diabetes of longer duration.
25. Key TJ, Spencer EA, Reeves GK. Symposium 1: overnutrition: consequences
1. Rosato V, Bosetti C, Talamini R, et al. Metabolic syndrome and the risk of breast and solutions. Obesity and cancer risk. Proc Nutr Soc 2010; 69:86–90.
& cancer in postmenopausal women. Ann Oncol 2011 [Epub ahead of print]. 26. Bluher M. The distinction of metabolically ‘healthy’ from ‘unhealthy’ obese
This study supports a direct association between MetS and postmenopausal individuals. Curr Opin Lipidol 2010; 21:38–43.
breast cancer risk. 27. Gu JW, Young E, Patterson SG, et al. Postmenopausal obesity promotes
2. Courtney KD, Corcoran RB, Engelman JA. The PI3K pathway as drug target in & tumor angiogenesis and breast cancer progression in mice. Cancer Biol Ther
human cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:1075–1083. 2011; 11:910–917.
3. Godsland IF. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia in the develop- These findings support the hypothesis that postmenopausal obesity promotes
ment and progression of cancer. Clin Sci (Lond) 2009; 118:315–332. tumor angiogenesis and breast cancer progression.
4. Le Marchand L, Wang H, Rinaldi S, et al. Associations of plasma C-peptide 28. Bluher M. Adipose tissue dysfunction in obesity. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes
and IGFBP-1 levels with risk of colorectal adenoma in a multiethnic popula- 2009; 117:241–250.
tion. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19: 1471–1477. 29. Boden G. Endoplasmic reticulum stress: another link between obesity and
5. Wolpin BM, Meyerhardt JA, Chan AT, et al. Insulin, the insulin-like growth insulin resistance/inflammation? Diabetes 2009; 58:518–519.
factor axis, and mortality in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer. 30. Colotta F, Allavena P, Sica A, et al. Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh
J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:176–185. hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis 2009; 30:1073–
6. Abbasi M, Tarafdari A, Esteghamati A, et al. Insulin resistance and breast 1081.
carcinogenesis: a cross-sectional study among Iranian women with breast 31. Sgambato A, Cittadini A. Inflammation and cancer: a multifaceted link. Eur Rev
mass. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2010; 8:411–416. Med Pharmacol Sci 14:263–268.

1040-8746 ß 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins www.co-oncology.com 61

Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

You might also like