The Impact of

Augmented Reality on
Pre-Service Educational
Leaders’ Self-Efficacy
Sarinporn “Yam” Chaivisit
INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the study is to

explore whether or not AR learning
materials assist pre-service
educational leaders’ self-efficacy,
regarding learning educational
ethics and law.
RESEARCH PROBLEM

How can we provide rich

experiences that can help
pre-service educational leaders
learn to deal with ethical dilemmas?
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
1. To what extent can the AR application promote pre-service educational leaders’
perspectives of self-efficacy in educational ethics?
○ H0: They will not increase after learning with the assistance of AR materials.
○ H1: They will increase after learning with the assistance of AR materials.
2. How do pre-service educational leaders perceive the AR lessons and their effects
on self-efficacy?
3. To what extent do the quantitative results regarding self-efficacy agree with the
interview findings on pre-service educational leaders’ experiences with the AR
app?
 LITERATURE INFORMING STUDY

ETHICAL DILEMMAS SELF-EFFICACY CASE STUDIES

School administrators are often Impacts learners’ goals and effort Prepare students to deal
faced with ethical dilemmas in facing academic performance with real-world situations
(Greenfield, 1991). (Bandura, 1977). (Gilbert et al., 2018).

CTML
Presents the cognitive
process relevant to learning in
a multimedia environment
(Mayer, 2001).
AR
Promotes authentic case studies
by allowing users to see both
virtual and real-world objects
(Azuma, 1997).
 METHODOLOGY
Convergent Parallel
Mixed-Methods
“purpose of this design is to best
understand or develop more complete
understanding of the research problem by
obtaining different but complementary
data.”
CONTEXT FOR THE STUDY

PARTICIPANTS
Ph.D. students in the educational
leadership program who are enrolled in the
Educational Law class at a university
(classified as Research I) in the
South-Central region of the United States.

RESEARCH DESIGN
Data will be collected and analyzed
through the perspectives of
Self-efficacy theory.
 AR DESIGN METHODOLOGY

Zappar Studio

Amazon Surmerian
Figure 3.1. A screenshot of AR case scenario handout Figure 3.2. A screenshot of AR interface
DATA COLLECTION & PROCEDURES

Figure 3.3. A procedure diagram

 DATA ANALYSIS

QUAN QUAL
Analyzes quantitative Analyzes qualitative data
data using descriptive using thematic analysis
and inferential statistics

MERGE
Findings will be
compared to literature
related to CTML and
self-efficacy theories
 Procedures Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

1. Seek committee
approval for proposal PROPOSED
2. Get IRB approval
TIMELINE
3. Develop AR app

Plan A 4. Collect data

5. Analyze data

6. Complete writing

7. Defend

Procedures Feb Mar Apr Summer Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

1. Seek committee
approval for proposal

2. Get IRB approval

Plan B 3. Develop AR app

4. Collect data I-Corps

5. Analyze data

6. Complete writing

7. Defend
 CREDITS: This presentation template
was created by Slidesgo, including
icons by Flaticon, and infographics &
images by Freepik

THANK YOU

CREDITS: This presentation template was created by Slidesgo,

including icons by Flaticon, and infographics & images by Freepik