Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2: July 2018
Abstract
This paper analyses Jim Bugental’s scholar-practitioner work as means
of guiding clients to reinvigorate their existential identities. It explores
literature spanning Bugental’s career, arguing that existential-humanistic
psychotherapy, a term he coined, is a powerful means to aid clients in
manoeuvring the course of their lives because of its focus on universal
existential concerns.
Key Words
Bugental, existential-humanistic psychotherapy, being
Introduction
Existentially-based psychotherapies assume that all human beings are
fluid, meaning-making creatures. Dias (2010: p 15) defined existential
therapy as, ‘The application of principles in existentialism psychology
in a therapeutic context to problems of living’. Existential-humanistic
psychotherapy considers problems of living – existential concerns –as
seen through a humanistic lens.
Early psychiatrists practicing the existential framework predominantly
doubted how traditional psychoanalytic techniques could substantively
ameliorate their patients’ concerns based on what May (1958: p 5) called
the Freudian ‘measuring stick’; more valuable was the patient’s self-reported
lived experience. Case studies by Bugental (1976) and Schneider and May
(1995), for example, suggest that those who seek existential-based psychotherapy
desire, on some level, to become conscious of the hidden forces guiding
their lives. Bugental’s poignant collection of case studies in The Search
for Existential Identity, particularly, exhibited that the possible struggles
with existential angst which clients often experience could be understood
and resolved using an existential approach rather than from a psychoanalytic
approach. His transparent tenor as a practicing clinician and fluidity in
writing emulated the core of existential-humanistic thought and the universal
struggle of humans to understand their natural condition.
The existential-humanistic approach to psychotherapy is foremost
philosophical; more precisely, it is existential. Colman (2015: p 264)
defined existentialism as ‘A philosophical movement inspired by
phenomenology… It stresses the existence of the individual person as a
free agent who is burdened with personal responsibility and whose existence
finger for the moon. The products of subjectivity are not the subjectivity’.
He then asked, ‘What then is our subjectivity? Here we can speculate,
propound dogma, wax poetic or philosophic, but we cannot specify …
To specify is to objectify; to objectify subjectivity is to destroy its very
nature’. Humans do not derive meaning from what they do, what they
achieve, what titles they hold or what others think about them. They only
become alive in the inner awareness that is grounded in subjectivity
(Bugental, 1976).
Existential Identity
Bugental repeatedly underlined the subjective experience of the client in
the present moment, inviting him or her to utilize introspection and somatic
awareness to amplify the existential encounter; this is the first step of
what Bugental (1999) referenced as the art of searching or a search process
that all clients eventually undergo if grappling with existential themes in
psychotherapy. Dow (2009) noted that searching involves deliberate
calling forth of one’s awareness of what is alive inside of us at any given
moment. He reinforced that by focusing on potentially unsettling existential
themes including death, self and isolation can drive one away from his
or her comprehension of reality:
The self ’s vitality is hampered by suppressing awareness of death
and associated existential angst, but the very notion of self, and
especially the centrality of that notion to our awareness, is itself
seen as symptomatic of a reflexive contraction away from reality.
(p 234)
If one takes adequate measures of the radii that extend non-stop outward
from themselves into his or her external world, the psychic suppression
discussed by Dow become clearer. Like the spider whose filaments construct
a web-world, so are human beings enmeshed in a world within and beyond
themselves, including emotions like love, hate, desire, dependence, nurturance
or even curiosity. In today’s globally connected, digital culture, the extent
of humanity’s connectedness can feel outright dizzying while simultaneously
be taken for granted. Humans, by welcoming themselves into and being
embraced by a host culture, open up floodgates that metaphorically drown
out the self at its most naked state. Bugental iterated how external influences
can propel one towards self-objectification and attribution of his or her
identity on all that is interpersonal and beyond the intrapsychic; the outcome
can result in existential anxiety in some form:
If I allow my identity to become bound up with objective thing-
ness, then I am exceedingly vulnerable to external circumstances
and contingencies. Identity based on what I have done, how I
as the number of variables one might consider could be endless. One can
never know all the details of his or her lived experience; they are immeasurable
and the process to access it all, in the face of the infinite nature of the
self in the experience is impossible. One can, however, know the simple
big picture of life, particularly his or her life. Bugental attempted to
accomplish simplicity with clients, iterating the interludes of phenomenological
encounter:
We are flames, not buildings – nor are we pigeons, rats or
monkeys. We are changing, not constant. We are not marble
statues but alive beings growing – it is to be hoped –toward
maturity. We are the despair of those who want sure predictions.
We are music that must be played in its own pattern.
(1999: p 61)
Musical notes act alone, not aiming for a final point at the end of a
song. Interludes cascade in unbroken silence, bringing depth to each
note. Conjoined by these interludes, notes in union produce melody and
resonance for the listener. Bugental stressed in the above quotation that
real therapeutic breakthrough occurs by attentiveness to the interludes, or
words unspoken. In other words, what the client states is not necessary;
how he or she says words and when are crucial. Marble statues cannot
grow, only decay. Human perception in its ever-changing form increases
if presented in the context of fertile soil for the organic sprouting of previously
unconsidered projections of one’s self and the world to emerge. The
existential-humanistic trained psychotherapist understands how malleable,
unique and existentially unfinished is each client. All clients are ontological
works in progress never fully realized. As a fellow traveler and
zealous advocate for the client’s livelihood and existential sustenance, the
psychotherapist closely monitors the ever-changing self that is presented
in the therapy room.
incurs inner and outer action; to Bugental (1965), all life occurs in a
dichotomy of relationship. One is alone as well as connected to others:
What is reality? Reality, existentially, is being thrown into a
world we cannot comprehend with the task of creating ourselves
even as we discover ourselves and our world … Reality is
endlessly coming up against the walls of our aloneness.
(p 41)
Reality relies on the observed and observer; most critically, as Bugental
inferred, an observing must occur. Observing is static, not stagnant. One’s
phenomenological experience by default revises in each moment, initiating
an existential imperative to choose his or her present actions to the exclusion
of incalculable others. No personal narrative remains as is; exposure to
stimuli invariably influences one’s current self-schema. New therapy clients
seeking assistance by a mental health practitioner trained in the existential-
humanistic perspective, about which Bugental prolifically wrote and intensely
implemented, face a peculiar chagrin. Rarely do analytic approaches of
the cognitive-behavioural devote – indeed demand – strident fixated attention
to one’s central most core, her or his fabric of being-in-the-world as Heidegger
(1927/2008) accounted. Searching for the client’s lost existential identity
is not simplistic or easy, despite a therapist’s concerns targeted at fundamentals
of the human condition.
Central to existential-humanistic psychotherapy are the conceptualization
of, and clinical techniques for, dealing with client resistance. Clients are not
viewed as resistant to the therapy itself or the psychotherapist but quite
literally to sustaining full presence with themselves and their world. In
Psychotherapy Isn’t What You Think, Bugental (1999a) coined the
phrase self-and-world-construct to describe the pattern of resistances and
coping mechanisms humans use. His metaphor of a space suit depicts
this: an astronaut’s space suit is necessary for survival and, at the same time,
is limiting.
Authentic Endings
As a paragon of the art and expression of inner sensing and relational
candour, Bugental’s (2009) influence proves far-reaching in the field of
existential-humanistic psychology. Empowering clients to explore authentic
presence with their world and his intuitive understanding of the integral
element of interpersonal interaction in psychotherapy and their practice
of self-inquiry, he stressed the search for authenticity (Bugental, 1965).
The search for authenticity is one’s welcome clasp to the existential
provocation to fully accepting oneself as is, beyond pretences, defences
or self-limitations.