Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/268414211
CITATIONS READS
0 746
6 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Mihai Niculescu on 23 December 2016.
The centrifugal atomizing air compressors are utilized in the industrial gas turbine as auxiliary systems in order to
increase the combustion efficiency. This solution seems to be widely used by General Electric although there is
very little documentation available at large public. The authors have not found any material that investigates the
aerodynamics of the centrifugal atomizing air compressors. For this reason, the authors consider that it is useful to
share their experience with other researchers.
+ + + =S (1) ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ 2 ⎥
∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z ⎢ ρ uw ⎥ ⎢ ρ vw ⎥ ⎢ρ w + p⎥
where: ⎢⎣ ρ uI ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ ρ vI ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ ρ wI ⎥⎦
Nomenclature
area of cross-section normal to midspan
A Greek letters
surface of impeller (m2)
angle relative to tangential
b blade height (m) β direction (rad)
Cp static pressure recovery coefficient ∆t physical timescale (s)
e internal energy (J/kg) η polytropic efficiency
fe external acceleration (m/s2) ϕ flow coefficient
Fx, Fy, Fz vectors of convective components of flux κ thermal conductivity (W/(m.K))
G x, G y, G z vectors of diffusive components of flux µ dynamic viscosity (kg/(m.s))
I rothalpy (m2/s2) µt eddy viscosity (kg/(m.s))
Mu peripheral Mach ρ static density (kg/m3)
p static pressure (Pa) τ shear stress tensor (Pa)
P total pressure (Pa) Ω angular velocity (rad/s)
R Gas conconstant (J/(kg.K)) Subscripts
r distance from the rotational axis (m) 1 impeller inlet
S vector of source term 2 impeller exit
s tip clearance (m) 3 vaned diffuser inlet
T static temperature (K) 4 vaned diffuser outlet
t time (s) t turbulent
u, v, w Cartesian components of velocity (m/s) ts total-to-static
V absolute velocity (m/s) tt total-to-total
W relative velocity (m/s) Superscript
x, y, z Cartesian coordinates tot total (laminar + turbulent)
Mihai Leonida NICULESCU et al. Detailed Investigation of an Atomizing Air Compressor 3
be written as
S = ⎢⎢ ρ ( Ω 2 y − 2Ωu ) ⎥⎥ (6)
⎡ 0 ⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ τ xx
tot
⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥
⎢ τ xytot ⎥ ⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦
Gx = ⎢ ⎥ (4a)
⎢ τ tot
xz ⎥ The pressure is obtained from the equation of state,
⎢ tot ∂T ⎥ p = ρ RT (7)
⎢uτ xx + vτ xy + wτ xz + k
tot tot
⎥
⎢⎣ ∂x ⎥⎦
⎡ 0 ⎤ Numerical Simulation
⎢ τ tot ⎥
⎢ xy ⎥ The numerical simulations of the three-dimensional
⎢ τ yytot ⎥ viscous flow was carried out on an atomizing air impeller
Gy = ⎢ ⎥ (4b)
⎢ τ yz
tot
⎥ combined with three vaned diffusers, with Ansys CFX
⎢ tot ∂T ⎥ 10.0 [6] and a quasi three-dimensional in-house code.
⎢uτ xy + vτ yy + wτ yz + k
tot tot
⎥
⎢⎣ ∂y ⎥⎦
Table 1 Design
⎡ 0 ⎤ Property Atomizing impeller
⎢ τ tot ⎥ Gas Air
⎢ xz ⎥
⎢ τ yztot ⎥ Rotational speed 40 000 rpm
Gz = ⎢ ⎥ (4c) Mass flow rate 2.676 kg/s
⎢ τ zz
tot
⎥ Pressure ratio ≈ 1.5
⎢ tot ∂T ⎥
⎢uτ xz + vτ yz + wτ zz + k
tot tot
⎥ Number of blades 17
⎣⎢ ∂z ⎦⎥ Hub diameter
42 mm
According to the Boussinesq hypothesis, the shear at leading edge
stresses τtot may be written as Tip diameter
65.7 mm
at leading edge
2 ⎛ ∂u ∂v ∂w ⎞
τ xxtot = ( µ + µt ) ⎜ 2 − − ⎟ (5a) Outlet diameter 150 mm
3 ⎝ ∂x ∂y ∂z ⎠ Exit blade height 4 mm
2 ⎛ ∂v ∂u ∂w ⎞ Tip clearance at shroud 0.4 mm
τ yytot = ( µ + µt ) ⎜ 2 − − ⎟ (5b)
Hub blade angle at
3 ⎝ ∂y ∂x ∂z ⎠ 54 deg
leading edge
2 ⎛ ∂w ∂v ∂u ⎞
τ zztot = ( µ + µt ) ⎜ 2 − − ⎟ (5c) Tip blade angle at
41 deg
3 ⎝ ∂z ∂y ∂x ⎠ leading edge
Exit blade angle 55 deg
⎛ ∂u ∂v ⎞
τ xytot = τ yxtot = ( µ + µt ) ⎜ + ⎟ (5d) Inlet total pressure 12.273 bar
⎝ ∂y ∂x ⎠ Inlet total temperature 380.37 K
⎛ ∂u ∂w ⎞ Flow coefficient 0.0284
τ xztot = τ zxtot = ( µ + µt ) ⎜ + ⎟ (5e)
⎝ ∂z ∂x ⎠ Peripheral Mach 0.8
⎛ ∂w ∂v ⎞
τ yztot = τ zytot = ( µ + µt ) ⎜ + ⎟ (5f) The cross-section normal to midspan surface of cen-
⎝ ∂y ∂z ⎠ trifugal and mixed impeller looks like lateral surface of a
The Sutherland’s formula can be used to determine the frustum of a right circular cone (Fig. 2) cut by blades. We
dynamic viscosity µ as function of temperature, while the have tried several meridional geometries in order to
eddy viscosity µt is computed with a turbulence model. minimize the area gradient of surface normal to midspan
For gases, the external force fe due to the gravitational surface of impeller until we have obtained an acceptable
acceleration is very small, therefore it can be neglected. area distribution as shown in Figs. 3 and 4. We have paid
Moreover, we can assume that the thermal conductivity is a special attention to the chamber angle distribution (Fig.
the single heat source. If the Cartesian coordinate system 5) in order to minimize the secondary and leakage flows,
is rotating about z axis with constant angular-velocity Ω, which condition largely efficiency, pressure ratio and
source term S could be written as stable operation range of impellers.
4 Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Experimental and Computational Aerothermodynamics of Internal Flows
Radius (mm)
ω
βhub
βshroud
Chamber angle β (deg)
Leading Trailing
edge Dimensionless meridional distance
edge Leading Trailing
Dimensionless meridional distance
edge edge
Fig. 4 Dimensionless area distribution of cross-section normal
Fig. 5 Chamber angle distribution
to midspan surface, in the atomizing air impeller,
in the atomizing air impeller
computed with in house-code
amenable to convergence acceleration techniques. In or- The flow is assumed fully turbulent and it has simulated
der to reduce the computational cost, we employed a in Ansys CFX 10.0 with the shear-stress transport (SST)
physical timescale ∆t = 1/Ω = 0.23 ms, which has assured k-ω based model, which was developed by Menter [6-7]
a good convergence rate. Convective fluxes of the discre- in order to combine the advantages of the robust and ac-
tized equations are handled using a second order upwind curate formulation of the Wilcox k-ω model in the near-
scheme. The authors considered that the steady-state so- wall region with the free-stream independence of the k-ε
lution was achieved when the reduction of the root mean model in the far field. To achieve this, the k-ε model is
square of the norm of residuals was five decades. converted into a k-ω formulation.
Fig. 6 Isometric view of computational domain of atomizing Fig. 7 Isometric view of computational domain of atomizing
air compressor without vaned diffuser air compressor with vaned diffuser whose vane angle
at the leading edge is 23 deg
Fig. 8 Grid detail showing shroud modeling W/u2 near shroud, mid-channel
W/u2 at midspan, mid-channel
Wm/u2 at midspan, mid-channel
Relative velocity / u2
At the inlet, a uniform stagnation pressure (12.273 bar) cause any upstream velocity profile to mix out prior en-
and temperature (380.37 K) are imposed, turbulence in- tering the downstream machine component, the stage
tensity is 5%, turbulent viscosity ratio µt/µ is 10 and the approach models the loss that occurs as the flow is mixed
flow is normal to inlet. Downstream classical boundary between stationary and rotating components. The major
condition (uniform static pressure) is inadequate to lack of this approach is that it neglects transient interac-
simulate the atomizing air compressor due to the highly tion effects between blade rows.
non-uniform flow at the exit boundary. For this reason, The atomizing air impeller has studied in three con-
the mass flow rate is imposed at the outlet because this figurations: open, with no gap and with stationary shroud
boundary condition leads to a non-uniform static pressure and shrouded (with rotating shroud), in order to investi-
distribution at the outlet. All the walls have been assumed gate the importance of tip leakage on its performance as
adiabatic. shown in Figs. 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15. Also, we have
The interface between the impeller and vaned diffuser studied the atomizing air compressor with three different
(Fig. 7) is simulated with a version of mixing plane ap- vaned diffusers whose vane angle at the leading edge are
proach called stage [6] because the unsteady flow, 18, 23 and 28 deg relative to tangential direction and with
multi-blade-row CFD analysis are still prohibitive and the open impeller as shown in Figs. 16, 17, 18 and 19.
limited by the available computing resources. On mix- Because the flow is compressible at the impeller exit,
ing-plane, the momentum and energy fluxes are averaged the static pressure recovery coefficient Cp is defined as
tangentially to provide a spanwise profile of pressure, p − p2
Cp = (8)
momentum and energy. Stage averaging between blade P2 − p2
passages takes account for time average interaction ef-
to show the effect of the vaneless and vaned diffuser on
fects between them. Basing on the hypothesis that the
static pressure recovery as shown in Figs. 18 and 19.
relative motion between blade rows is sufficiently large to
Impeller total pressure ratio
Flow coefficient ϕ
Fig. 12 Streamlines at 95% span from the hub, in the open Fig. 13 Total pressure ratio of open and close impeller,
impeller, at design point, computed with Ansys CFX 10.0 at design speed, computed with Ansys CFX 10.0
Total-to-static polytropic efficiency
Total-to-total polytropic efficiency
Flow coefficient ϕ
Flow coefficient ϕ
Fig. 15 Total-to-static polytropic efficiency, at design speed,
Fig. 14 Total-to-total polytropic efficiency, at design speed,
computed with Ansys CFX 10.0
computed with Ansys CFX 10.0
Mihai Leonida NICULESCU et al. Detailed Investigation of an Atomizing Air Compressor 7
Fig. 16 Total pressure ratio of atomizing air compressor, at Fig. 17 Total-to-total polytropic efficiency of atomizing air
design speed, computed with Ansys CFX 10.0 compressor, at design speed, computed with Ansys CFX 10.0
Pressure static recovery coefficient Cp
P / P2
Radius / r2 Radius / r2
Fig. 18 Static pressure recovery coefficient of atomizing air Fig. 19 Total pressure loss, in vainless and vaned diffusers
compressor, at design speed, ϕ = 0.0257, of atomizing air compressor, at design speed, ϕ = 0.0257,
computed with Ansys CFX 10.0 computed with Ansys CFX 10.0