You are on page 1of 8

Water Research 124 (2017) 446e453

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Water Research
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/watres

A Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process for carbamazepine degradation at a


very low Fe(II)/PMS ratio and neutral pH: The mechanisms
Li Ling a, Dapeng Zhang a, Chihhao Fan b, *, Chii Shang a, c, **
a
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong
b
Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
c
Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Control & Treatment of Heavy Metal Pollution, The Hong Kong University of
Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: A novel Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process for degrading a model micropollutant, carbamazepine (CBZ), at a
Received 17 May 2017 low Fe(II)/PMS ratio and neutral pH has been proposed in this study, and the mechanisms of radical
Received in revised form generation in the system was explored. With a UV dose of 302.4 mJ/cm2, an initial pH of 7, and CBZ, PMS,
24 July 2017
Fe(II) and citrate at initial concentrations of 10, 100, 12 and 26 mM, respectively, the CBZ degradation
Accepted 25 July 2017
Available online 27 July 2017
efficiency reached 71% in 20 min in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process, which was 4.7 times higher than
that in either the citrate/UV/PMS or Fe(II)/citrate/PMS process. The enhanced CBZ degradation in the
Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process was mainly attributed to the continuous activation of PMS by the UV-
Keywords:
Photo-fenton-like AOPs
catalyzed regenerated Fe(II) from a Fe(III)-citrate complex, [Fe3O(cit)3H3]2-, which not only maintained
Ferric-citrate complexation Fe(III) soluble at neutral pH, but also increased 6.6 and 2.6 times of its molar absorbance and quantum
Carbamazepine removal yield as compared to those of ionic Fe(III), respectively. In the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process, the SOe4
PPCP produced from the fast reaction between PMS and the initially-added Fe(II) contributed 11% of CBZ
UV degradation. The PMS activation by the UV radiation and regenerated Fe(II) contributed additional 14%
Peroxymonosulfate and 46% of CBZ removal, respectively. The low iron and citrate doses and the fast radical generation at
neutral pH make the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process suitable for degrading recalcitrant organic com-
pounds in potable water.
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction rate constants of 108e1010 M1s1, and oxidizes target organic


compounds more selectively through electron transfer and
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) using ozone, hydroxyl hydrogen abstraction/addition under homogeneous as well as
radicals (HO) and UV radiation have been applied to treating a heterogeneous conditions (Neta et al., 1988; Wols and Hofman-
variety of recalcitrant contaminants in water and wastewater Caris, 2012; Ghauch et al., 2013, 2015; Ayoub and Ghauch, 2014;
(Ikehata et al., 2006; He et al., 2014; Oturan and Aaron, 2014; Xiao et al., 2015; Naim and Ghauch, 2016; Oh et al., 2016; Ghauch
Zuorro and Lavecchia, 2014). Recently, sulfate radical (SO-
4 ) has et al., 2017).
been proposed as an alternative to degrade aqueous refractory Although UV has been widely applied to activating perox-
organic contaminants, because of its high redox potential ydisulfate (PDS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS) for SO- 4 generation
(2.5e3.1 V) compared with those of HO at acidic (2.4e2.7 V) and (Eqs. (1) and (2)) (De Laat et al., 1999; Ou et al., 2008; Yang et al.,
alkaline (1.9e2.0 V) environment (Buxton et al., 1988; Neta et al., 2010; Wols and Hofman-Caris, 2012; Ghauch et al., 2017), both
1988). SO-
4 reacts with many refractory organic contaminants at the UV/PDS and UV/PMS processes are still considered energy- and
chemical-intensive, because the low light absorbance and quantum
yields of PDS and PMS limit the SO- 4 generation (Goldstein et al.,
* Corresponding author. Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, 2007; Guan et al., 2011; Fang and Shang, 2012). Meanwhile, the
National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. Fenton-related AOPs, including Fe(II)/PDS (Eq. (3)) and Fe(II)/PMS
** Corresponding author. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, the (Eq. (4)), have a higher radical generation than the UV-based ones
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong
due to their ability to activate the participating oxidants at a faster
Kong.
E-mail addresses: chfan@ntu.edu.tw (C. Fan), cechii@ust.hk (C. Shang). rate (Anipsitakis and Dionysiou, 2004). Between the

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.066
0043-1354/© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
L. Ling et al. / Water Research 124 (2017) 446e453 447

aforementioned two processes, the Fe(II)/PMS process has a pro- with chlorine to form trichloronitromethane (Hoigne  and Bader,
duction rate constant of 3.0  104 M1s1, which is about 1000 1988), which is a regulated disinfection by-product (Richardson
times higher than that of the Fe(II)/PDS process (Laat and Gallard, et al., 2007). On the contrary, citrate is a food additive with sour
1999; Rastogi et al., 2009b; De Luca et al., 2017), suggesting that taste thresholds around 120e570 mM (Hoehl et al., 2014), which
the Fe(II)/PMS process may be more capable of degrading target suggests the possible formation of Fe(III)-citrate complex up to
pollutants than the Fe(II)/PDS process. Heterogeneous micrometric 285 mM in a potable water treatment process.
Fe(0) has also shown its reactivity towards PDS (Ghauch et al., After understanding the limitations of Fe(II)/PMS process and
2013). However, the reactivity was still not comparable to that interactions among Fe(II), citrate, UV and PMS, an integrated novel
between Fe(II) and PMS. Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process is expected to degrade refractory
organic contaminants, including pharmaceutical and personal care
(1) products (PPCPs), solving the problems of iron sludge generation,
PMS over-consumption, and operating pH range. Carbamazepine
(2) (CBZ) is selected as a model pharmaceutical in this study, because

(3)

(4)

its reaction rate constants towards and degradation products by


The Fe(II)/PMS process was applied for the removal of diuron HO and SO- 4 have been well studied (Vogna et al., 2004; Ghauch
and polychlorinated biphenyls (Rastogi et al., 2009b; Tan et al., et al., 2011; Matta et al., 2011; Deng et al., 2013). The main objec-
2012), and it was characterized as a 2-stage process, including the tive of this study is thus to investigate the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS
1st-stage reaction between the initially-added Fe(II) and PMS, and integrated process and its application to degrading CBZ at a low
the 2nd-stage reaction between the regenerated Fe(II) and PMS Fe(II)/PMS ratio and neutral pH. The mechanisms of the radical
(Huang et al., 2016). In the 1st stage, the Fe(II) to PMS ratio was the generation, the degradation kinetics of CBZ, and the roles of PMS,
key factor affecting pollutant degradation. An Fe(II) to PMS ratio of Fe(II), UV radiation and citrate were confirmed. The concentrations
1:1 has been reported to effectively degrade aqueous organic pol- of HO and SO- 4 were calculated by competition kinetics, and the
lutants (Rastogi et al., 2009b). However, excessive Fe(II) in the obtained result was used to determine their respective contribu-
system can act as an in-situ quencher which consumes SO- 4, tions to the CBZ degradation.
causing the exhaustion of both Fe(II) and PMS (Rastogi et al.,
2009b). Although a decrease in the Fe(II)/PMS ratio improved the
over-consumption problem and generated less iron precipitates, a 2. Materials and methods
low Fe(II)/PMS ratio decelerated the PMS activation and reduced
the SO- Chemicals. Double deionized (DDI) water with 18.2 MU-cm
4 generation (Anipsitakis and Dionysiou, 2004). In the 2nd
stage, activation of PMS by the Fe(II) regenerated from Fe(III) was resistivity from Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, USA)
the critical reaction responsible for pollutant degradation. In order was used to prepare all the solutions in this study. Carbamazepine,
to assure the continuous supply of Fe(II), UV radiation was applied OXONE® (KHSO30.5, KHSO40.5K2SO4), ferrous sulfate, hydroxyl-
sometimes to facilitate the regeneration of Fe(II) from Fe(III) in the amine hydrochloride (NH2OHHCl), phenanthroline and ammo-
Fe(II)/PMS process. Few notable examples where UV radiation was nium acetate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Tri-sodium
used to trigger the regeneration process include: (1) the study by citrate, potassium iodide and sodium hydrogen carbonate were
Xu and Lu (2000), in which the Fe(II) generation as a by-product in purchased from VWR Chemicals. All chemicals were of reagent
the UV/Fe(III) process was observed, and (2) the study by Rao et al. grade and used as received without further purification. Sodium
(2016), in which UV radiation was used to facilitate ibuprofen hydroxide (0.2 N) and sulfuric acid solution (0.25 N) were used to
degradation by Fe(III)/PMS process (Xu and Lu, 2000; Rao et al., adjust the initial pH.
2016). Experimental setup. The light source was a bench-scale quasi-
In most cases, the Fe(II)/PMS process was required to operate at collimated beam UV irradiator consisting of four low-pressure Hg
pH less than 3.0 to prevent the formation of Fe(III) precipitates, UV lamps (254 nm, TUV G15T8, 15 W, Philips) housed inside a
which retarded the PMS catalytic reaction (Burbano et al., 2005; shuttered box with a collimated tube extending from the bottom. A
Stefansson, 2007). The Fe(III) precipitation at neutral pH can be 250-ml cylindrical glass reactor of 6.5 cm in height and 7.5 cm in
avoided by adding ligands, such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid inner diameter was placed under the collimated tube of the irra-
(EDTA), nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) and citrate, to form soluble diator. The reactor contains 150 mL solution with constantly rapid
Fe(III)/ligand complex (Hamm et al., 1954; Zhou et al., 2008; De mixing at the bottom at ambient temperature (22 ± 2  C). The
Luca et al., 2015). The addition of EDTA and NTA might not be a photon flux entering the solution was 0.252 mW/cm2, determined
wise choice in potable water treatment, because their permissible by the iodide-iodate chemical actinometry (Rahn et al., 2003). The
concentrations levels in potable water are rather limited (i.e., sub- optical path length of the solution in the reactor at 254 nm was
ppm levels) (WHO, 2003a; WHO, 2003b). Besides, they may react 3.2 cm determined by the photolysis rate of H2O2 (Ling et al., 2016).
The quasi-collimated beam reactor used in this study may not be
448 L. Ling et al. / Water Research 124 (2017) 446e453

applicable in real practice due to the low light utilization efficiency


comparing to UV immersed lamps, but it provides a more
uniformly-distributed UV irradiation and thus is more suitable for
our mechanism study (Fang et al., 2013; Ling et al., 2016).
The degradation kinetics of CBZ in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS
process was investigated by sequentially spiking a predetermined
concentration of CBZ, PMS and citrate in 150 mL DDI water. After
the pH adjustment, the solution was spiked with a given dose of
Fe(II) and immediately subjected to UV radiation. The concentra-
tions of CBZ, PMS, citrate and Fe(II) employed in the present study
were adopted from our previous publication in optimizing the
Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process using a response surface methodol-
ogy (Ling et al., 2017). An aliquot of 1 mL sample was taken at
predetermined time intervals (1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 min for the 20-min
reaction and 1, 5, 15, 30 and 60 s for the 60-sec reaction), quenched
with 40 mL methanol followed by CBZ concentration determination
using a high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC). In parallel
tests, exposures of CBZ to UV/PMS, Fe(II)/PMS, Fe(II)/UV/PMS, cit-
rate/PMS, citrate/UV, Fe(II)/citrate/PMS, and citrate/UV/PMS were
conducted using the similar approach.
The steady-state concentrations of the major oxidants in the
Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process were determined by a competition
kinetic method with the addition of probe compounds (i.e., benzoic
acid (BA) and nitrobenzene (NB)). Because BA reacts with both HO
and SO-4 , while NB only reacts with HO. The NB degradation ki-
netics can be used to calculate the steady state concentration of
HO, while the BA degradation kinetics can then be used to
calculate the steady state concentration of SO- 4 (Yang et al., 2014).
The experimental procedures were similar to those of the degra-
dation kinetics of CBZ, except for the addition of the probe com-
pounds. All the experiments were conducted in duplicates.
Analytical methods. Concentrations of CBZ were determined by
a reverse phase HPLC (VP series, Shimadzu) equipped with a Wa-
ters symmetry C18 column (4.6 mm  150 mm, 5 mM particle size;
Waters) and a UV detector using 286 nm wavelength. The flow rate
was 1 mL/min and the mobile phase was a mixture of DDI water Fig. 1. Degradation of CBZ in the UV/PMS, Fe(II)/PMS and Fe(II)/UV/PMS processes (a)
and acetonitrile (20/80, v/v %). Concentrations of BA and NB were without and (b) with citrate at CBZ, PMS, Fe(II) and citrate initial concentrations of 10,
100, 12 and 26 mM, respectively, at a UV intensity of 0.252 mW/cm2 and an initial
measured by the HPLC with UV detection at 227 nm and 262 nm,
pH ¼ 7.0 ± 0.1.
respectively (Fang et al., 2013; Xiang et al., 2016). An eluent of water
(pH 3, adjusted by phosphoric acid) and methanol (55:45, v/v %)
and DDI water and acetonitrile (50/50, v/v %) were used to separate process (Fig. 1a) followed 1st order kinetics and had a degradation
BA and NB at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min, respectively. PMS con- rate of 1.33  104 s1. With the addition of 26 mM citrate, the CBZ
centrations were determined via the UV spectrophotometric degradation rate remained unchanged (Fig. 1b). The no apparent
method with potassium iodide (Liang et al., 2008). Concentrations variation in CBZ degradation rate in the citrate/UV/PMS process,
of dissolved Fe(II) and total dissolved iron (Fe(II) and Fe(III)) were compared to that in the UV/PMS process, indicates that neither
measured by the 1,10-phenanthroline method after filtering sam- citrate can compete with CBZ for SO- 4 or HO nor it can produce
ples with 0.22 mm filters (Minisart®, hydrophilic) (Tamura et al., more reactive oxidation species (ROS) under UV radiation. In
1974). This method has a dissolved Fe(II) and total dissolved iron addition, the reaction rate constant between citrate and SO- 4 was
(Fe(II) and Fe(III)) detection limit of 0.5 mM. The concentration of 2  107 M1s1 (Xiao et al., 2015), which was 2 orders of magni-
dissolved Fe(III) is calculated by subtraction of the Fe(II) concen- tude lower than those of CBZ and many other recalcitrant organic
tration from the total dissolved Fe concentration. pollutants towards the resulting radicals, suggesting that citrate
was stable in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process.
3. Results and discussion As shown in Fig. 1, the CBZ degradation at 1 min in both the
Fe(II)/citrate/PMS and Fe(II)/PMS processes were comparable
3.1. Enhanced CBZ degradation in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process (about 13%). In both processes, the applied Fe(II) of 12 mM remained
soluble at pH 7 since the concentration of Fe(II) was much lower
Fig. 1 shows the degradation of CBZ in the UV/PMS, Fe(II)/PMS than its solubility under the experimental condition (Eq. (5))
and Fe(II)/UV/PMS processes (a) without and (b) with citrate at CBZ, (Sawyer et al., 2003):
PMS, Fe(II) and citrate initial concentrations of 10, 100, 12 and
26 mM, respectively, at a UV intensity of 0.252 mW/cm2 and an FeðIIÞ þ 2OH 4FeðOHÞ2 Ksp;FeðIIÞ ¼ 5:0  1015 (5)
initial pH of 7.0 ± 0.1. It should be emphasized that the Fe(II) dose
applied in the present study is about an order of magnitude lower However, in the Fe(II)/citrate/PMS system, only 3% (0.36 mM) of
than that in the Fe(II)-activated persulfate processes mostly- the dissolved Fe(II) formed Fe(II)-citrate complexes as calculated
reported in the literature (Anipsitakis and Dionysiou, 2004; using Eqs. (6) and (7), while 97% (11.64 mM) of the dissolved Fe(II)
Rastogi et al., 2009a, 2009b). The CBZ degradation by the UV/PMS remained in its ionic form:
L. Ling et al. / Water Research 124 (2017) 446e453 449

FeðIIÞ þ citrate4FeðIIÞ  citrate KFeðIIÞcitrate ¼ 1:2  103


(6)

½FeðIIÞ  citrate
ð½FeðIIÞ  ½FeðIIÞ  citrateÞð½citrate  ½FeðIIÞ  citrateÞ
¼ KFeðIIÞcitrate (7)

In these two processes, Fe(II) was the dominant species that


activates PMS (Eq. (4)) at the low Fe(II)/PMS ratio. In the Fe(II)/PMS
process, Fe(III), resulting from the reaction between Fe(II) and PMS,
formed hydroxide precipitates at pH 7 as the concentration of
Fe(III) was much higher than its solubility (Eq. (8)) (Sawyer et al.,
2003):

FeðIIIÞ þ 3OH 4FeðOHÞ3 Ksp;FeðIIIÞ ¼ 6:0  1036 (8)

The precipitated Fe(III) triggers the activation of PMS for radical


production and in turns caters to additional 11% CBZ degradation in
the Fe(II)/PMS process (Rastogi et al., 2009a). In the Fe(II)/citrate/
PMS process, most of the Fe(III) was in the soluble form of Fe(III)-
complex as calculated using Eqs. (9) and (10):

FeðIIIÞ þ citrate4FeðIIIÞ  citrate KFeðIIIÞcitrate ¼ 7:0  1011


(9)

½FeðIIIÞ  citrate
ð½FeðIIIÞ  ½FeðIIIÞ  citrateÞð½citrate  ½FeðIIIÞ  citrateÞ
¼ KFeðIIIÞcitrate (10)

Interestingly, no further CBZ degradation was observed in the


Fe(II)/citrate/PMS process after the first minute, indicating that the
Fe(III)-citrate complex was incapable of activating PMS to produce
ROS.
In Fig. 1, the citrate/PMS and citrate/UV processes showed no
CBZ degradation, while the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process exhibited
the highest CBZ removal efficiency (71%), which is about 5.0, 5.0,
2.6, 5.0 and 2.6 times higher than those by the UV/PMS, citrate/UV/
PMS, Fe(II)/PMS, Fe(II)/citrate/PMS and Fe(II)/UV/PMS processes,
respectively. The Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process also has a much Fig. 2. (a) Regeneration of Fe(II) in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS and Fe(II)/citrate/PMS
higher PMS decomposition (86 mM) compared to those of the cit- processes; and (b) Total dissolved Fe in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process. Conditions:
UV intensity ¼ 0.252 mW/cm2, [Fe(II)]0 ¼ 12 mM, [PMS]0 ¼ 100 mM, [citrate]0 ¼ 26 mM
rate/PMS (0 mM), citrate/UV/PMS (4 mM) and Fe(II)/citrate/PMS
and initial pH ¼ 7.0 ± 0.1.
(16 mM) processes (Figure S1). These results imply that there is a
synergistic enhancement in CBZ degradation by the Fe(II)/citrate/
UV/PMS process, whose removing capability is above the overall Therefore, the excess of Fe(II) observed in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS
performance estimated by the superposition principle considering process (8 times higher) was attributed to the Fe(II) regeneration
its subordinate processes. The reaction stoichiometric efficiency (% driven by UV radiation.
RSE), being the number of CBZ molecule degraded divided by the Fig. 2b compares the total dissolved Fe concentration in the
number of PMS molecule consumed, in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS Fe(II)/UV/PMS and Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS processes at pH 7. The
process reached 4.2%, which was at a similar level to that reported total dissolved Fe concentration in the Fe(II)/UV/PMS process was
by Ghauch et al. (2013). around 0.5 mM, while it remained completely soluble at 12 mM in
the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process after 20 min. Apparently, citrate
3.2. MechanismseFe(II) regeneration from Fe(III) prevented Fe(III) from precipitating by forming soluble Fe(III)-
citrate complex under the reaction conditions examined (Eqs. (9)
Fig. 2a shows the mass balance of total aqueous Fe(II) and Fe(III) and (10)).
(in both ionic and complex forms) in the Fe(II)/citrate/PMS and The impact of citrate and UV radiation on the regeneration of
Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS processes. In these two cases, the total dis- Fe(II) from Fe(III) was further investigated with experiments having
solved Fe concentration remained around 12 mM during the 20 min the initial Fe(III) concentration of 12 mM under UV radiation at pH 3
reaction, implying no Fe precipitation in the systems containing (in the presence and absence of citrate) and pH 7 (in the presence of
citrate. In the Fe(II)/citrate/PMS process, only 0.19 mM of Fe(II) ion citrate). As shown in Fig. 3, the photolytic regeneration of Fe(II)
was detected at 20 min after the reaction was initiated. In the Fe(II)/ from Fe(III) under these three conditions follows pseudo-first-order
citrate/UV/PMS process, UV radiation increased the Fe(II) concen- reaction kinetics, but their reaction rates varies significantly. At pH
tration gradually to 1.58 mM at 20 min. As discussed previously, the 3, dissolved ionic Fe(III) and Fe(III)-citrate complex have the com-
Fe(III) complexed with citrate cannot be reduced to Fe(II) by PMS. parable photolysis rates of 2  104 and 3  104 s1 as calculated
450 L. Ling et al. / Water Research 124 (2017) 446e453

Fig. 3. Regeneration of Fe(II) under UV radiation. Conditions: UV


Fig. 4. CBZ degradation in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process. Conditions: UV
intensity ¼ 0.252 mW/cm2, [Fe(III)]0 ¼ 12 mM, [citrate]0 ¼ 26 mM and initial
intensity ¼ 0.252 mW/cm2, [CBZ]0 ¼ 10 mM, [Fe(II)]0 ¼ 12 mM [PMS]0 ¼ 100 mM,
pH ¼ 7.0 ± 0.1 or 3.0 ± 0.1.
[citrate]0 ¼ 26 mM and initial pH ¼ 7.0 ± 0.1.
Fe(III): C initial pH 7 with citrate A initial pH 3 with citrate
: initial pH 3 without citrate ✕ total Fe
Fe(II) B initial pH 7 with citrate ◊ initial pH 3 with citrate
D initial pH 3 without citrate process might be assumed insignificant. Thus, by setting at a con-
stant PMS concentration of 100 mM in the calculation, the reaction
kinetic of Fe(II) may be calculated using Eq. (11),
from Fig. 3, respectively. At pH 7, Fe(III)-citrate complex is in the
form of [Fe3O(cit)3H3]2- with a higher photolysis rate of 1.32  103
s1 (Silva et al., 2009), which is 6.6 and 4.4 times faster than those d½FeðIIÞ  
¼ kFeðIIÞ;HSO5 ½FeðIIÞ HSO
5 (11)
of Fe(III) ions and the Fe(III)-citrate complex at pH 3, respectively. dt
The enhanced photolysis of [Fe3O(cit)3H3]2- might result from its As estimated, 95% of Fe(II) (11.4 mM) should be oxidized within
higher molar absorbance and quantum yield (4233.3 M1cm1, 1 s (detailed calculation shown in Text S1), suggesting that the
1.082, respectively), compared to those of ionic Fe(III) radical generation reaction triggered by the initially-added Fe(II) in
(1500 M1cm1, 0.412, respectively) and the Fe(III)-citrate complex the first stage terminates within 1 s. The calculated result was
at pH 3 (2241.7 M1cm1, 0.427, respectively). Therefore, the found consistent with the experimental observation as shown in
addition of citrate at pH 7 not only prevents the precipitation of Fig. 4.
Fe(III), but also enhances the molar absorbance/quantum yield of In the second stage, the complex formed between Fe(III) and
Fe(III) by forming [Fe3O(cit)3H3]2-, leading to the increase in the citrate (i.e., [Fe3O(cit)3H3]2-) regenerates Fe(II) under UV radiation
Fe(II) photolytic regeneration. Using the photolysis rate constant of (Eq. (12)) (Ou et al., 2008):
[Fe3O(cit)3H3]2- at pH 7, 19 mM Fe(III) was estimated being reduced
to Fe(II) in 20 min, suggesting that the added citrate of 26 mM was (12)
repetitively-used about 1.5 times, which increased the CBZ removal
substantially. It is noteworthy that the enhanced CBZ degradation followed by an immediate reaction with PMS to produce SO- 4 . The
and PMS decomposition in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process was reaction between the photo-regenerated Fe(II) and PMS contrib-
attributable to the enhanced regeneration of Fe(II) from Fe(III), and utes 46% of the CBZ degradation. In addition, the UV/PMS process
the regenerated Fe(II) activated PMS decomposition at the low producing SO- 4 and HO contributes another 14% of the CBZ
Fe(II) concentration in neutral environment. degradation (Wu et al., 2014). The overall CBZ degradation in the
second stage is about 60% and it follows pseudo-first-order kinetics
with a rate constant of 5.19  104 s1. Therefore, the CBZ degra-
3.3. Mechanismseradical involvement dation resulting from various mechanistic contributions in the
Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process exhibits the following order: the re-
Fig. 4 shows the CBZ degradation in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS action between the photo-regenerated Fe(II) and PMS in the 2nd
process at 1, 5, 15, 30, 60, 300, 600, 900 and 1200 s. The CBZ stage > the reaction of the UV activated PMS in the 2nd stage > the
degradation may be classified into two stages based on their reaction between the initially-added Fe(II) and PMS in the 1st stage.
degradation kinetics (see Scheme 1). The first stage is the rapid The concentrations of SOe 4 and HO in the second stage were
destruction of CBZ (i.e., the reaction occurs within 1 s), and the determined by competition kinetics using BA and NB as the probe
second stage is the steady degradation of CBZ from 1 to 1200 s. The compounds. Based on experimental data demonstrated in Fig. 5,
most important step in the first stage is the formation of SO-
4 driven the pseudo-first-order reaction rate constants of BA ðkapp;BA Þ, NB
by Fe(II) as shown in Eq. (4) (Brandt and Van Eldik, 1995; Rastogi
ðkapp;NB Þ and CBZ ðkapp:CBZ Þ in the second stage are calculated to be
et al., 2009b), which is fast enough to out-compete both the UV/
2.93  104 s1, 1.09  104 s1 and 5.19  104 s1, respectively.
PMS process (Eq. (2)) and the reaction between the regenerated
The steady-state concentrations of SOe
4
Fe(II) and PMS. With the initial Fe(II)/PMS ratio of 1:8.3, PMS was
considered relatively abundant, and its consumption in such a ( ) and
L. Ling et al. / Water Research 124 (2017) 446e453 451

Scheme 1. Proposed two-stage mechanism of CBZ degradation in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process.

respectively, and these calculated concentrations are used to model


pseudo-first-order reaction rate constant of CBZ ðk*app;CBZ Þ in the
second stage using Eq. (15):

(15)

As a result, ðk*app;CBZ Þ is calculated to be 4.78  104 s1, which is


within the stipulated range (less than 7%) compared to that obtained
using data presented in Fig. 5, indicating the adequacy of the calcu-
lated and . In the second stage of Fe(II)/citrate/UV/
PMS process, 80% of the total radical species is SOe
4 , and the
remaining 20% is HO. The CBZ degradation in the second stage is
attributed almost equally to both SOe
4 and HO, because

is only ¼ of . Since SO-


4 and HO are the major ROS in the

Fig. 5. Degradation of NB, BA and CBZ in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process. Conditions: process, the degradation products of CBZ in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS
UV intensity ¼ 0.252 mW/cm2, [BA]0 ¼ 1 mM, [NB]0 ¼ 1 mM, [CBZ]0 ¼ 10 mM, process should be similar to those studies of SO-4 - and HO- based
[Fe(II)]0 ¼ 12 mM, [PMS]0 ¼ 100 mM, [citrate]0 ¼ 26 mM and initial pH ¼ 7.0 ± 0.1. AOPs reported by Ghauch et al. (2011) and Deng et al. (2013).

4. Conclusions
HO ( ) can be further exemplified using Eqs. (13) and (14):
A novel Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process, capable of removing a
(13) model micropollutant at a low Fe(II)/PMS ratio (1:8.3) and neutral
starting pH, is proposed and evaluated in this study. The CBZ
(14) removal efficiency by the proposed process were 5.0, 5.0, 2.6, 5.0
and 2.6 times higher than those by the UV/PMS, citrate/UV/PMS,
where , 2, 3, 4 and 5 Fe(II)/PMS, Fe(II)/citrate/PMS and Fe(II)/UV/PMS processes,
respectively. The mechanism of the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process
are reaction rate constants between SOe
and BA
4 showed that the reactions between initially-added Fe(II) and PMS
(1.2  109 M1s1), HO and BA (5.9  10 M s ), HO and NB
9 1 1
(the first stage), between regenerated Fe(II) and PMS (the second
(1.8  1010 M1s1), SOe 9 1 1
4 and CBZ (1.92  10 M s ), and HO stage), and between UV radiation and PMS (the second stage)
9 1 1
and CBZ (8.8  10 M s ), respectively (Neta et al., 1988; Vogna contributed 11%, 46% and 14% to the CBZ degradation, respectively.
et al., 2004; Matta et al., 2011). The The reaction between the regenerated Fe(II) and PMS contributed
and the most to the enhanced CBZ removal in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS
13 14
process. The contributions of SOe
4 and HO to the degradation of
are calculated to be 2.21  10 M and 6.1  10 M, other recalcitrant organic compounds in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS
452 L. Ling et al. / Water Research 124 (2017) 446e453

process could be different depending on the reaction rate constants systems for persulfate activation: application to sulfamethoxazole degrada-
tion. Chem. Eng. J. 256, 280e292.
between the two radicals and organic compounds. In addition, the
Anipsitakis, G.P., Dionysiou, D.D., 2004. Radical generation by the interaction of
molar ratio between S2O2 8 and CBZ is around 20, which is 3-time transition metals with common oxidants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (13),
lower than those processes with high mineralization levels 3705e3712.
(~90%) reported in the literature (Monteagudo et al., 2015; Dura n Brandt, C., Van Eldik, R., 1995. Transition metal-catalyzed oxidation of sulfur (IV)
oxides. Atmospheric-relevant processes and mechanisms. Chem. Rev. 95 (1),
et al., 2016). However, the concentrations of CBZ in potable water 119e190.
are in ng/L to mg/L level (Mohapatra et al., 2014), suggesting that the Burbano, A.A., Dionysiou, D.D., Suidan, M.T., Richardson, T.L., 2005. Oxidation ki-
Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process may reach a high mineralization level netics and effect of pH on the degradation of MTBE with Fenton reagent. Water
Res. 39 (1), 107e118.
in real water. Buxton, G.V., Greenstock, C.L., Helman, W.P., Ross, A.B., 1988. Critical review of rate
The Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process has the potential to be applied constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl
to the treatment of aqueous PPCPs including CBZ in potable water radicals (OH/O-) in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 17 (2), 513e886.
De Laat, J., Gallard, H., Ancelin, S., Legube, B., 1999. Comparative study of the
treatment plants, wherein groundwater or surface water is used as oxidation of atrazine and acetone by H2O2/UV, Fe(III)/UV, Fe(III)/H2O2/UV and
the source water. For application to groundwater purification, the Fe(II) or Fe(III)/H2O2. Chemosphere 39 (15), 2693e2706.
Fe(II) concentration naturally present in groundwater usually De Luca, A., Dantas, R.F., Esplugas, S., 2015. Study of Fe(III)-NTA chelates stability for
applicability in photo-Fenton at neutral pH. Appl. Catal. B 179, 372e379.
ranges from 0.5 to 10 mg/L (9e179 mM) (WHO, 2003c). It can play an De Luca, A., He, X.X., Dionysiou, D.D., Dantas, R.F., Esplugas, S., 2017. Effects of
active role in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process and has great po- bromide on the degradation of organic contaminants with UV and Fe2þ acti-
tential in the treatment. For the treatment of surface water, addi- vated persulfate. Chem. Eng. J. 318, 206e213.
Deng, J., Shao, Y.S., Gao, N.Y., Deng, Y., Zhou, S.Q., Hu, X.H., 2013. Thermally activated
tion of Fe(II) in the very low quantities will ensure the compliance
persulfate (TAP) oxidation of antiepileptic drug carbamazepine in water. Chem.
of regulated iron threshold of potable water even in the presence of Eng. J. 228, 765e771.
the major ambient iron species (i.e., Fe(III), 0.7 ppm or 12.5 mM) in Duran, A., Monteagudo, J.M., Expo sito, A.J., Monsalve, V., 2016. Modeling the
rivers and lakes (WHO, 2003c). In fact, the ambient Fe(III) will also sonophoto-degradation/mineralization of carbamazepine in aqueous solution.
Chem. Eng. J. 284, 503e512.
increase the PPCP degradation through the enhanced Fe(II) regen- Fan, X.T., Sokorai, K.J., 2015. Formation of trichloromethane in chlorinated water
eration. Parallel studies conducted have also shown that the CBZ and fresh-cut produce and as a result of reaction with citric acid. Postharvest
degradation using this process will not be affected by the presence Biol. Technol. 109, 65e72.
Fang, J.Y., Shang, C., 2012. Bromate formation from bromide oxidation by the UV/
of NHþ 
4 (up to 5.0 ppm) and Cl (up to 300 ppm), and is reduced by persulfate process. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (16), 8976e8983.
about 13%, 34% and 28% in the presence of Br (up to 5.0 ppm), Fang, J.Y., Ling, L., Shang, C., 2013. Kinetics and mechanisms of pH-dependent
alkalinity (up to 180 ppm), and NOM (up to 1.0 ppm), respectively degradation of halonitromethanes by UV photolysis. Water Res. 47 (3),
1257e1266.
(Ling et al., 2017). The low impacts of aqueous constituents on the Ghauch, A., Baydoun, H., Dermesropian, P., 2011. Degradation of aqueous carba-
PPCP degradation in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process further mazepine in ultrasonic/Fe0/H2O2 systems. Chem. Eng. J. 172 (1), 18e27.
demonstrate its application potential to potable water treatment. Ghauch, A., Ayoub, G., Naim, S., 2013. Degradation of sulfamethoxazole by persul-
fate assisted micrometric Fe(0) in aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 228,
Another major advantage of the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process is 1168e1181.
the efficient utilization of PMS as compared with those in the Fe(II)/ Ghauch, A., Tuqan, A.M., Kibbi, N., 2015. Naproxen abatement by thermally acti-
citrate/PMS and UV/citrate/PMS processes, as only ~10% of PMS vated persulfate in aqueous systems. Chem. Eng. J. 279, 861e873.
Ghauch, A., Baalbaki, A., Amasha, M., El Asmar, R., Tantawi, O., 2017. Contribution of
remains unused in the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process (with a %RSE
persulfate in UV-254 nm activated systems for complete degradation of
of 4.2%), while ~84% and ~96% of PMS remains unused in the Fe(II)/ chloramphenicol antibiotic in water. Chem. Eng. J. 317, 1012e1025.
citrate/PMS and UV/citrate/PMS processes, respectively. The resid- Goldstein, S., Aschengrau, D., Diamant, Y., Rabani, J., 2007. Photolysis of aqueous
ual PMS needs to be removed by the addition of chemical re- H2O2: quantum yield and applications for polychromatic UV actinometry in
photoreactors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41 (21), 7486e7490.
ductants (such as sulfite) to reduce PMS to sulfate (Olmez-Hanci Guan, Y.H., Ma, J., Li, X.C., Fang, J.Y., Chen, L.W., 2011. Influence of pH on the for-
et al., 2014), which increases the overall operational cost. Besides, mation of sulfate and hydroxyl radicals in the UV/peroxymonosulfate system.
the Fe(II)/citrate/UV/PMS process inputs additional sulfate of no Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (21), 9308e9314.
Hamm, R.E., Shull Jr., C.M., Grant, D.M., 1954. Citrate complexes with Iron (II) and
more than 20.16 ppm (including sulfate from PMS decomposition Iron (III). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76 (8), 2111e2114.
and from additional sulfite as the oxidant quencher to remove the He, X.X., Zhang, G.S., de la Cruz, A.A., O'Shea, K.E., Dionysiou, D.D., 2014. Degrada-
remaining ~10% of PMS) in the treated water, and this concentra- tion mechanism of cyanobacterial toxin cylindrospermopsin by hydroxyl radi-
cals in homogeneous UV/H2O2 process. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (8),
tion is far less than the sulfate taste threshold of 250 ppm (WHO, 4495e4504.
2004), while the citrate concentration (26 mM) used in this pro- Hoehl, K., Schoenberger, G.U., Busch-Stockfisch, M., 2014. Stimulus and recognition
cess will not contribute to any issues related to the taste of the thresholds for the basic tastes in deionized water. Are the recommendations for
citric acid too high. Ernahrungs Umschau 61 (8), 130e136.
potable water. In addition, the low citrate concentration (26 mM) Hoigne , J., Bader, H., 1988. The formation of trichloronitromethane (chloropicrin)
used in this study shall not cause any detectable problem in THM and chloroform in a combined ozonation/chlorination treatment of drinking
and HAA formation (Fan and Sokorai, 2015). water. Water Res. 22 (3), 313e319.
Huang, Y., Wang, Z.H., Fang, C.L., Liu, W.Q., Lou, X.Y., Liu, J.S., 2016. Importance of
reagent addition order in contaminant degradation in an Fe(II)/PMS system.
Acknowledgements RSC Adv. 6, 70271e70276.
Ikehata, K., Naghashkar, N.J., El-Din, M.G., 2006. Degradation of aqueous pharma-
ceuticals by ozonation and advanced oxidation processes: a review. Ozone Sci.
We gratefully acknowledged Dr. Alok D. Bokare at the Hong Eng. 28 (6), 353e414.
Kong University of Science and Technology for his advice on pho- Laat, J.D., Gallard, H., 1999. Catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by Fe(III)
toactivity of Fe-citrate complex. This work was supported by the in homogeneous aqueous solution: mechanism and kinetic modeling. Environ.
Sci. Technol. 33 (16), 2726e2732.
Hong Kong Research Grants Council under grant number 618312.
Liang, C., Huang, C.F., Mohanty, N., Kurakalva, R.M., 2008. A rapid spectrophoto-
metric determination of persulfate anion in ISCO. Chemosphere 73 (9),
Appendix A. Supplementary data 1540e1543.
Ling, L., Sun, J.L., Fang, J.Y., Shang, C., 2016. Kinetics and mechanisms of degradation
of chloroacetonitriles by the UV/H2O2 process. Water Res. 99, 209e215.
Supplementary data related to this article can be found at http:// Ling, L., Zhang, D.P., Fang, J.Y., Fan, C.H., Shang, C., 2017. A novel Fe(II)/citrate/UV/
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.066. peroxymonosulfate process for micropollutant degradation: optimization by
response surface methodology and effects of water matrices. Chemosphere 184,
417e428.
References Matta, R., Tlili, S., Chiron, S., Barbati, S., 2011. Removal of carbamazepine from urban
wastewater by sulfate radical oxidation. Environ. Chem. Lett. 9 (3), 347e353.
Ayoub, G., Ghauch, A., 2014. Assessment of bimetallic and trimetallic iron-based Mohapatra, D.P., Brar, S.K., Tyagi, R.D., Picard, P., Surampalli, R.Y., 2014. Analysis and
L. Ling et al. / Water Research 124 (2017) 446e453 453

advanced oxidation treatment of a persistent pharmaceutical compound in amounts of iron (III). Talanta 21 (4), 314e318.
wastewater and wastewater sludge-carbamazepine. Sci. Total Environ. Tan, C., Gao, N., Chu, W., Li, C., Templeton, M.R., 2012. Degradation of diuron by
470e471, 58e75. persulfate activated with ferrous ion. Sep. Purif. Technol. 95, 44e48.
Monteagudo, J.M., Dura n, A., Gonza lez, R., Expo sito, A.J., 2015. In situ chemical Vogna, D., Marotta, R., Andreozzi, R., Napolitano, A., d'Ischia, M., 2004. Kinetic and
oxidation of carbamazepine solutions using persulfate simultaneously activated chemical assessment of the UV/H2O2 treatment of antiepileptic drug carba-
by heat energy, UV light, Fe2þ ions, and H2O2. Appl. Catal. B 176, 120e129. mazepine. Chemosphere 54 (4), 497e505.
Naim, S., Ghauch, A., 2016. Ranitidine abatement in chemically activated persulfate WHO, 2003a. Edetic acid (EDTA) in drinking-water background document for
systems: assessment of industrial iron waste for sustainable applications. Chem. development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality. In: Guidelines for
Eng. J. 288, 276e288. Drinking-water Quality; Geneva, Switzerland.
Neta, P., Huie, R.E., Ross, A.B., 1988. Rate constants for reactions of inorganic radicals WHO, 2003b. Nitrilotriacetic acid in drinking-water background document for
in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 17 (3), 1027e1284. development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality. In: Guidelines for
Oh, W.D., Dong, Z.L., Lim, T.T., 2016. Generation of sulfate radical through hetero- Drinking-water Quality; Geneva, Switzerland.
geneous catalysis for organic contaminants removal: current development, WHO, 2003c. Iron in drinking-water background document for development of
challenges and prospects. Appl. Catal. B 194, 169e201. WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality. In: Guidelines for Drinking-water
Olmez-Hanci, T., Arslan-Alaton, I., Dursun, D., 2014. Investigation of the toxicity of Quality; Geneva, Switzerland.
common oxidants used in advanced oxidation processes and their quenching WHO, 2004. Sulfate in drinking-water background document for development of
agents. J. Hazard. Mater. 278, 330e335. WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality. In: Guidelines for Drinking-water
Oturan, M.A., Aaron, J.J., 2014. Advanced oxidation processes in water/wastewater Quality; Geneva, Switzerland.
treatment: principles and applications. A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. Wols, B.A., Hofman-Caris, C.H.M., 2012. Review of photochemical reaction constants
44 (23), 2577e2641. of organic micropollutants required for UV advanced oxidation processes in
Ou, X., Quan, X., Chen, S., Zhang, F., Zhao, Y., 2008. Photocatalytic reaction by Fe water. Water Res. 46 (9), 2815e2827.
(III)ecitrate complex and its effect on the photodegradation of atrazine in Wu, X., Gu, X., Lu, S., Xu, M., Zang, X., Miao, Z., Qiu, Z., Sui, Q., 2014. Degradation of
aqueous solution. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 197 (2), 382e388. trichloroethylene in aqueous solution by persulfate activated with citric acid
Rahn, R.O., Stefan, M.I., Bolton, J.R., Goren, E., Shaw, P.S., Lykke, K.R., 2003. Quantum chelated ferrous ion. Chem. Eng. J. 255, 585e592.
yield of the iodideeiodate chemical actinometer: dependence on wavelength Xiang, Y.Y., Fang, J.Y., Shang, C., 2016. Kinetics and pathways of ibuprofen degra-
and concentration. Photochem. Photobiol. 78 (2), 146e152. dation by the UV/chlorine advanced oxidation process. Water Res. 90, 301e308.
Rao, Y.F., Xue, D., Pan, H.M., Feng, J.T., Li, Y.J., 2016. Degradation of ibuprofen by a Xiao, R.Y., Ye, T.T., Wei, Z.S., Luo, S., Yang, Z.H., Spinney, R., 2015. Quantitative
synergistic UV/Fe(III)/Oxone process. Chem. Eng. J. 283, 65e75. structureeactivity relationship (QSAR) for the oxidation of trace organic con-
Rastogi, A., Al-Abed, S.R., Dionysiou, D.D., 2009a. Effect of inorganic, synthetic and taminants by sulfate radical. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (22), 13394e13402.
naturally occurring chelating agents on Fe (II) mediated advanced oxidation of Xu, Y.M., Lu, H.Q., 2000. Degradation of the dye X-3B by UV/Fe(III)-generated hy-
chlorophenols. Water Res. 43 (3), 684e694. droxyl radicals in aqueous solution. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 136 (1),
Rastogi, A., Al-Abed, S.R., Dionysiou, D.D., 2009b. Sulfate radical-based ferrous- 73e77.
peroxymonosulfate oxidative system for PCBs degradation in aqueous and Yang, S., Wang, P., Yang, X., Shan, L., Zhang, W., Shao, X., Niu, R., 2010. Degradation
sediment systems. Appl. Catal. B 85 (3), 171e179. efficiencies of azo dye Acid Orange 7 by the interaction of heat, UV and anions
Richardson, S.D., Plewa, M.J., Wagner, E.D., Schoeny, R., DeMarini, D.M., 2007. with common oxidants: persulfate, peroxymonosulfate and hydrogen peroxide.
Occurrence, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of regulated and emerging J. Hazard. Mater. 179 (1), 552e558.
disinfection by-products in drinking water: a review and roadmap for research. Yang, Y., Pignatello, J.J., Ma, J., Mitch, W.A., 2014. Comparison of halide impacts on
Mutat. Res. 636, 178e242. the efficiency of contaminant degradation by sulfate and hydroxyl radical-based
Sawyer, C.N., McCarty, P.L., Parkin, G.F., 2003. Chemistry for Environmental Engi- advanced oxidation processes (AOPs). Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (4), 2344e2351.
neering and Science. McGraw-Hill Education, New York. Zhou, T., Li, Y.Z., Wong, F.S., Lu, X.H., 2008. Enhanced degradation of 2,4-dichlor-
Silva, A.M., Kong, X., Parkin, M.C., Cammack, R., Hider, R.C., 2009. Iron (III) citrate ophenol by ultrasound in a new Fenton like system (Fe/EDTA) at ambient
speciation in aqueous solution. Dalton Trans. 40, 8616e8625. circumstance. Ultrason. Sonochem. 15 (5), 782e790.
nsson, A., 2007. Iron (III) hydrolysis and solubility at 25 C. Environ. Sci. Technol.
Stefa Zuorro, A., Lavecchia, R., 2014. Evaluation of UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation process
41 (17), 6117e6123. (AOP) for the degradation of diazo dye Reactive Green 19 in aqueous solution.
Tamura, H., Goto, K., Yotsuyanagi, T., Nagayama, M., 1974. Spectrophotometric Desalin. Water Treat. 52, 1571e1577.
determination of iron (II) with 1, 10-phenanthroline in the presence of large

You might also like