Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Modularity Concept in Traditional Malay House (TMH) in Malaysia
Modularity Concept in Traditional Malay House (TMH) in Malaysia
ABSTRACT: This paper is trying to unveil the very important concept that the TMH poses, which is, the modularity
concept. In the latest development in construction industry, the modular system has become very important factor in the
process of industrialization of building. A case study on several selected TMH was carried out. The enquiry was focused on
the dimensioning system applied and adopted. TMH was divided into several components such as, structural element,
spaces, floor, walls (including door and window openings) and roofs. Data was tabulated in an observation list which then
analyzed. TMH fundamentally can be divided in several modular system, i.e. by spaces and components. Spaces like ‘rumah
ibu’, ‘serambi’, and ‘rumah dapur’ can be called as modular spaces. And components like walls, door and windows,
structural components and the roofs can be called modular components. These results are very critical because it is a
testimony to the indigenous skills and knowledge on modular system of construction existed in TMH for very long time and
has the potentials to be developed in the future. The result also acknowledged the problem of inconsistency in the
dimensioning system applied and adopted between one TMH to another. It shows that without a consistent dimensioning
system, the TMH cannot be standardized and this by it self contradicted from the concept of modularity.
1. INTRODUCTION
Traditional Malay House (TMH) in Malaysia is slowly becoming extinct. It is very rare a new TMH being built
throughout the country for normal living purposes other than for ceremonial or heritage exhibition purposes. Culture
and tradition is an identity to a society that needs to be preserved for future generation. Preserve is not untouchable.
Everything that live will go through an evolutionary process and TMH is not excluded. TMH has got many good
aspects, technically, socially and environmentally that need to be explored and adopted in the modern contemporary
built environment.
Much implicit information on TMH has been made explicit trough several researches carried out by some passionate
fellow to pave the way for the uncertain future of TMH. Researches on the aspects of theory, beliefs, spiritual and
cultural parts of TMH were quiet abandoned. On the other hand, technical aspects of TMH were rarely studied. It was
the intentioned of the author to study on the aspects of construction innovation of the TMH and what can be learnt for
future application of the concept of modularity that has existed in TMH for very long time. Prefabricated nature of
TMH will only require a right ingredient and proper management practice to give TMH a chance for modernisation and
industrialization.
2. CONCEPT OF MODULARITY
What is modularity? According to the Readers Digest Word Power Dictionary, a module is a unit that forms part of
something bigger, or one of a set of separate parts or units that can be joined together to make a machine, a piece of
furniture, a building, etc. And modular is of something, machines or buildings, consisting of separate parts or units that
can be joined together (Anne Wevell, 1996).
While in the dimensioning aspect, a module is a convenient unit of size which is used as an increment or coefficient in
dimensional coordination (Crocker, 1971). The latter definition is better suited to the intent and purpose of this research,
because the focus will finally be the dimensioning system of the TMH.
-1-
Figure 1. From St. Mark’s Square in Venice.
The rhythm of the arches in the Venetian arcades is based on the conscious use of
uniform intervals: modules (Nissen, 1972)
The principle of repetition is the core of what we call rhythm in architecture. In music, rhythm means the repetition of
tones in a fixed periodic measure, a simple regularity over which the musical fibre is woven. The rhythm concept has
been borrowed to denote the repetition of uniform dimensions, such as window sections, spans, heights or other
principal dimensions in the façade or plan of a building.(Figure 1)
Building can be divided into several elements i.e., physical, spatial and functional (Abidin, 1981). Physical elements are
constituted by the structure of the building, aesthetic, materials, colours and so on. Spatial elements are related to space
and the position, size, shape and so on. While the functional elements are related to the activities in the building which
may have direct influence to the actual design of the building, space planning as to meet all requirement for the building
to function as it supposedly to.
Physical elements in building can be broken down into three components. Three different types of components are
sections, units and compound units (Martin, 1965). Brick, block, tile, window pane, panel, door leaf, lintel, pipe and
pipe fitting are some of the examples of unit, a single thing that is complete by itself but can also form part of
something larger. A door with frame, window, lattice girder, roof truss, sink unit, refrigerator, and cupboard are some
examples of compound unit, a thing consisting of two or more separate things combined together. This demonstrated
that a unit and a compound unit can also be a module. Therefore any part of a building or building consisting such units
can be called ‘modular building’.
Traditional Malay House (TMH) can be classified as a vernacular architecture, is the architecture of the local
people, ‘architecture without architect’, of the Malay Peninsula before the colonialism period. TMH is categorized
by many different types but almost all of them shared common principles that attributed to TMH. All TMH were
built of timber as indigenous and abundantly found material, raised on stilt, consists of three main spaces, ‘rumah
ibu’, ‘rumah tengah’ and ‘rumah dapur’, and covered by a long roof with some regional variations. It evolved over
generations through their way of living, adapting to their needs, culture and environment (Yuan, 1987).
-2-
needs
culture
TMH
tradition environment
Constructed by the local craftsman with a high degree of user and community participation, TMH cultivates a
sense of responsibility and belonging to the society and built environment and is self-contained. The TMH are a
product of high creativity and craftsmanship of the Malays (Teh, 1994). The traditional houses in Malaysia are a
reflection of our history and cultural heritage. Thus their maintenance and use help to keep this common history
alive (Killmann, 1994).
The traditional Malay houses generally are built according to a clear pattern and order. A basic TMH have a
verandah “selasar” or “serambi”, a main room “rumah ibu” containing a sleeping area (s) and the kitchen “dapor”
at the back of the house (Figure 3) (Shah, 1988).
It has been mentioned that the Johor-Bugisnese assumed that the TMH resembles or a representation of cosmic
man (Teh, 1994)(Figure 4)
-3-
This believed might be the explanation for the reason of why the TMH is always symmetrical in design and highly
decorated on the façade treatment. The most decorated part of the house is the front that is on the serambi. Human
is very much symmetrical in nature with two eyes, nose, mouth, two legs and hands. The universe has become the
source of reference for decorative motives, includes plants, patterns, animals and so on. The concept of
anthropomorphism, the underlying belief system of the Malays, gives the characteristics to the architecture of
TMH(Ariffin, 2001). Anthropomorphism may be defined as an ‘attribution of human form or personality to god,
animal, etc.’ (Oxford English Dictionary, 1993). Modular design and repetitive rhythm of the front facade is the
product of underlying belief system of the Malays are corrected and perfected through the test of times.(Figure 5).
a a
b b b b b b
Figure 6. Rumah Tiang Enam- Figure 7. Rumah Tiang Enam - front elevation
Side elevation
-4-
Rumah ibu Rumah ibu Rumah ibu
Figure 8. The above diagram shows the application of three column addition module and bottom shows the application of
four column addition module.
Other types of addition and multiplication module are also employed such as selang, lepau, gajah menyusu,
parallel, courtyard and minangkabau addition (Ariffin, 2001; Yuan, 1987).
Human proportions and dimensions has been traditionally a basis of measurement throughout the world. This was
a result of human instinct to fulfil their fundamental needs of building their own indigenous house for shelter and
protection. Measurement based on the human body (usually the hands and arms of the carpenters, but on some
occasions of the women of the house) are used also by the Malays(Gibbs, 1987; Wardi, 1981). The longest unit of
measurement in human body is ‘depa’ – the dimension between the tips of the fingers of the horizontally out-
stretch arms often used to measure lengthy objects and wide spaces. The smallest unit is one ‘jari’ or the width of a
finger. One ‘jari’ or more is often used to measure smaller elements (Ariffin, 2001). (Figure 9).
-5-
The table 1 below is a conversion table of the ‘depa’ units to the metric equivalent. The table will be used as a
basis to search for the modular pattern existed in the TMH under study.
Table 1. The ‘depa’ units of measure and their metric equivalents(Ariffin, 2001)
This research therefore, is to study the modular pattern that the TMH poses and to relate to the current development in
modular concept in the construction industry which associated itself with modular design, prefabrication and
industrialisation (CIDB News). The research is divided into two aspects, i.e. 1. Modular component of the TMH and 2.
Modular spaces.
4. METHODOLOGY
This research requires a thorough study on the dimensioning system of TMH. Modular Coordination (MC) design rules
were adopted as a tool for measuring dimension and analysis (Table 2). MC is itself a tool for dimensional coordination
and standardization. MC is a method of sizing the dimensions of building components and of building on the basis of a
Basic Module. And international basic module is M, where M=100mm.(Crocker, 1971; Martin, 1965).Therefore, a
number of examples have been selected randomly from a pool of short listed TMH that has fulfilled all the attributes
required that determined the authenticity of the TMH such as, age, house type, roof form etc. A case study on four
houses was proposed. (Table 3)
-6-
roofs
House 1 House 2
-7-
House 4
House 3
The study was broken down according to the building elements i.e. Physical, spatial and functional. (Figure 10).
TMH
physical
functional
spatial
Building
component:
-frame Building
-floor spaces:
-wall -serambi
-roof -rumah ibu
-others -dapur
-selang
-others
The physical element of TMH comprises the following components: a. Plinth b. Frame c. Roof d. Floor e. Wall f.
Staircases g. Decorative elements.(See figure 11). Amongst all the elements, element e which is the wall panel or
building envelope play an important role to give different variations to the façade treatment to the TMH (Abidin,
1982). It was therefore the intention of this study to make implicit knowledge of TMH buiding façade treatment,
explicit. For this particular instant the front façade of the Serambi was analysed.
The front façade of Serambi was summarized and tabulated according to its modular and repetitive sizes. Also
included in the table a typical window and door size for that particular house (see table 4).
-8-
Figure 11. The physical elements of the TMH(Abidin, 1982)
-9-
Table 4. Front façade of the serambi for all the four houses
w D w
D w
w w w D w w
w w w w D w w
In TMH, serambi is always located at front of the house and there is where the main staircase leading to main door
is located, followed by rumah ibu and rumah dapur at the back. And that explained why the serambi is the most
celebrated and highly decorated space in TMH. Therefore, for this study, the serambi was selected, summarized
and tabulated as in table 5.
-10-
Table 5. Serambi spaces superimposed for proportional analysis
5. FINDINGS
The façade study revealed the sophisticated application of repetitive module of wall panelling and windows design on
TMH. A series of sizes had obviously been used and it varies from 375mm, 500mm, 610mm, 700mm, 850mm, 1100
and 1900mm. Table 6
It can be observed that the repetition of modular sizes of the structural grid, wall panelling and window occurred in
isolation (on one particular building only, within the four sample only) example, 610mm module for H1, 850mm
module for H2 and 500mm and 700mm for H3, for the wall panelling. But the conversion to depa measure, observed a
common repetitive module of 1h (hasta) is achievable for wall panel and windows. On the other hand, 1d (Depa) is a
module for the structural grid is also achievable. This observation acknowledged to a certain extend that the modular
panel for different TMH is not standardized but there existed a concept and pattern of modularity according to the
traditional system of measure in every TMH.
Another interesting observation was the outstanding modular panel for H4 as compared to the other houses especially
H2 and H3. The modular panel for H4 is totally independent from its structural grid, while the modular panel for H2
and H3 occurred within their structural grid. This observation will allow us to deduce that a modular wall panel can be
achievable in a non-modular structural grid or a non-coordinated between structural and non-structural grid (cross wall
or partition). This concept is parallel with the prefabricated construction where the structural components can be
independently with other building components especially the walls components.
The determinant of serambi space were said to be many, which includes the dulang theory, floor mats (tikar
Mengkuang), praying mats and ceremonial function (Ariffin, 2001). Whatever it may be, it will definitely closely relate
to the activities that are commonly carried out in the area such as resting, entertaining guests, sleeping, praying and so
on, and the space has to at minimal cost to serve the purpose. In the four sample houses selected we have observed that
there was a convenient pattern of modular serambi space throughout the houses.(Table 7)
-11-
Table 7. Modular spaces of Serambi
6. CONCLUSION
This research has demonstrated some very important concept existed in TMH technically. The concept of modularity
and repetitiveness in TMH has a lot to offer to the development of building construction especially on housing in
Malaysia. TMH is our long awaited tradition to be send down to next generation. The development of TMH towards the
future will not by passing modernization and industrialisation. Prefabrication will be the answer to modernisation and
industrialization of TMH. It is obviously the construction method which is based on the use of prefabricated
components that gains most from series of uniform dimensions (modular). The repetition of uniform sizes opens the
way for industrialization of production. The concept can be applied not only to TMH but also to the construction
industry as a whole.
REFERENCES
Abidin, W. B. b. W. (1981). The Malay House: Rationale and Change. MIT, Cambridge.
Abidin, W. B. b. W. (1982). The Malay House: learning from its elements, 'rules' and changes. Paper presented at the
Design Policy: Design and Society, Royal College of Art, London.
Anne Wevell, W. P. e. (1996). Reader's Digest Word Power Dictionary (1996 ed.). Hong Kong: The Reader's Digest
Association Far East Limited, Hong Kong.
Ariffin, S. I. (2001). Order in Traditional Malay House Form. Oxford Brookes University, U.K.
Crocker, A. E. (1971). Module and Metric: The theory and practice of dimensional co-ordination in metric. London:
Pall Mall Press.
Killmann, W., Sickinger,T. & Thong, H.L. . (1994). Restoring & Reconstructing The Malay Timber House. Kuala
Lumpur: Forest Research Institute Malaysia.
Martin, B. (Ed.). (1965). The Co-ordination of Dimensions for Building. London: Royal Institute of British Architects.
Nissen, H. (1972). Industrialized Building and Modular Design. London: Cement and Concrete Association.
Shah, R. B. S. b. R. A. (1988). The Terengganu Timber Malay House. Kuala Lumpur: Badan Warisan Malaysia.
Teh, A. H. N. W. H. W. (1994). Rumah Melayu Tradisi. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd.
Yuan, L. J. (1987). The Malay House: Rediscovering Mlaysia's Indigenous Shelter System. Pulau Pinang: Institut
Masyarakat.
-12-