This document appears to be a ballot for judging a British parliamentary debate competition. It includes sections to record information about the debate topics, participants on each side, and scores for various components of their performances including content, strategy, and manner of delivery. Judges are asked to provide numeric scores between 13-29 for different elements and to rank the overall performance of each team from first to fourth place.
This document appears to be a ballot for judging a British parliamentary debate competition. It includes sections to record information about the debate topics, participants on each side, and scores for various components of their performances including content, strategy, and manner of delivery. Judges are asked to provide numeric scores between 13-29 for different elements and to rank the overall performance of each team from first to fourth place.
This document appears to be a ballot for judging a British parliamentary debate competition. It includes sections to record information about the debate topics, participants on each side, and scores for various components of their performances including content, strategy, and manner of delivery. Judges are asked to provide numeric scores between 13-29 for different elements and to rank the overall performance of each team from first to fourth place.
Matter
27
–
29
Round:
____________
Room:
________________Judges’
Name:_______________________________________________
The
content
of
the
debate
Resolution:
________________________________________________________________________________________________
including:
argumentation,
examples,
logic,
clash
and
reasoning.
1st
Prop:
____________________________________________
1st
Opp:
____________________________________________
28
Average
PM:
______________________DPM:
____________________
LO:
______________________DLO:
____________________
Manner
27
–
29
_____________________
_____________________
_____________________
_____________________
How
the
debater
presented
the
speech
–
the
verbal
and
Speaker
Speaker
Speaker
Speaker
non
verbal
communication
Score
PM:
__________
Score
DPM:
_____________
Score
LO:
__________
Score
DLO:
_____________
that
made
the
speech
effective
or
not
effective.
28
Average
Team
Total:
_________________
Team
Total:
_________________
Strategy
13
–
15
Team
Rank:
_________________
Team
Rank:
_________________
Use
of
the
style,
points
of
Team
Ranking
from
1
to
4
–
With
1
being
first
place
Team
Ranking
from
1
to
4
–
With
1
being
first
place
information,
structure
of
speeches
including
time,
2nd
Prop:
___________________________________________
2nd
Opp:
___________________________________________
strategy
placements
of
clash
MG:
______________________Whip:
___________________
MO:
_____________________
Whip:
___________________
and
arguments.
14
Average
_____________________
_____________________
_____________________
____________________
Speaker
Speaker
Speaker
Speaker
Speaker
Scores
Score
MG:
__________
Score
Whip:
_____________
Score
MO:
__________
Score
Whip:
_____________
67
–
Poor
68
–
Work
Needed
Team
Total:
_________________
Team
Total:
_________________
69
–
Satisfactory
70
–
Average
Team
Rank:
_________________
Team
Rank:
_________________
71
–
Good
Team
Ranking
from
1
to
4
–
With
1
being
first
place
Team
Ranking
from
1
to
4
–
With
1
being
first
place
Legend
72
–
Excellent
PM:
Prime
Minister
73
–
Exceptional
DPM:
Deputy
Prime
Minister
LO:
Leader
of
the
Opposition
Total
Speaker
Scores
to
DLO:
Deputy
Leader
of
the
Opposition
MG:
Member
of
the
Government
Arrive
at
Team
Score!
MO:
Member
of
the
Opposition
UPDATED JULY 2013