NOTICE TO COURT AND ALL COURT OFFICERS

We the People of this still great country are Constitutionalists and require all public servants, including
judges, to abide by their oaths in the performance of their official duties, including those before the
court. This protects the American Citizens from government and court abuse.

Since the Constitution cannot conflict with itself, the limited powers delegated to government by the
Constitution can never supersede the powers of and Rights guaranteed in the Constitution to The
American People. “Authority” is an extremely important word and concept. Government and the
courts without Constitutional authority can conduct nothing lawful, and government has no authority to
disparage your Rights. Keep “authority” in mind as you review the following statements and
questions.

CHALLENGES TO THE COURT BEFORE PROCEEDINGS CAN START

1. A. Your Honor and the prosecutor have taken oaths of office to support and uphold the
Constitution of the united States of America and that of this state. Is that correct?

B. Pursuant to your oaths, you are required to abide by those oaths, in the performance of
your official duties, including those before this Honorable Court. Is that correct?

2. I, Jeffrey Louis Gonzales, hereby notify this Honorable Court that I am a living, breathing,
natural-born American Citizen, with, and claiming, all Rights guaranteed to me in the federal and state
Constitutions, and with my name properly spelled in upper and lower case letters, not as it appears on
the court documents.

Is there any objection to what I just stated?

3. This court abides by all the powers of and Rights guaranteed to American Citizens in the federal
and state Constitutions, including due process of law. Is that correct?

4. I am presumed innocent of all aspects of the alleged charges, presumptions and assumptions in,
by and of this court, unless proven guilty by a well-informed jury of my peers, beyond a reasonable
doubt, based solely on verified evidence and proof. Is that correct?

5. A. “Proof” consists of verified and demonstrated evidence, and not opinion, especially
opinion unsupported by fact, law and evidence. Is that correct?

B. “Beyond a reasonable doubt” consists solely of decisions and verdicts from a well-
informed jury of my peers based entirely on proof that absolutely and conclusively confirms guilt,
without any reservations or questions, whatsoever, from the jury. Is that correct?

6. Opinion from any witness or prosecuting attorney unsupported and unverified by fact, law and
proven evidence is simply opinion, and opinion, as previously established, is not proof or factual
evidence. Is that correct?

7. A. Since I am guaranteed a fair and impartial trial, how is that possible when you, the
presiding judge, the prosecuting attorney and all the witnesses against me work for and are paid by the
state that is the plaintiff in this case, and my opponent? In this situation, it is impossible for me to have
a fair trial. Is that correct?

B. Further, any data used against me is obtained from sources who, are also paid by the
state, the same plaintiff against me. At minimum, conflict of interest takes place.

8. Since I am presumed innocent of the charges and all aspects, presumptions and assumptions of
those charges and this court, I have challenged the jurisdiction of this court, which this court has not
proven, on the public record. Therefore, since I am presumed innocent of all aspects of the charges and
presumptions of the court, and since jurisdiction has not been proven, jurisdiction is simply a
presumption of this court, of which I am presumed innocent. Furthermore, no official Oath of Office
can be located anywhere, nor has one been put on the public record. Therefore, I move for dismissal of
all charges and/or warrants for lack of jurisdiction. Pursuant to the foregoing, and to numerous federal
and Supreme Court rulings, this case must be dismissed and any warrant recalled, with full prejudice,
and I hereby move for dismissal of all charges and this case, with full prejudice.

Failure to respond to this formal written notice, dated January 23, 2007, within 30 days in written
format with Proof of Service to the undersigned, constitutes and validates your fraud and failure to
honor your Oath of Office. Furthermore, all said charges, judgments, warrants and/or claims against
Jeffrey Louis Gonzales, is null and void, without force or effect or lawful power. Any further
harassment of Jeffrey Louis Gonzales by this court or any of its officers will be construed as intentional
harm, with malice and the conscious intent of inflicting both physical and mental harm to the
defendant-in-error in this matter. Copies of this document along with the attached documents will be
sent to the Office of Judicial Administrations, Washington DC in the event that justice is not reached.

Respectfully submitted,

All Rights Reserved

________________________________

Jeffrey L. Gonzales, American Citizen