Report on ERD Lab Assignments

For the partial fulfilment of course titled

“AMP527 Earthquake Resistant Design of RC Buildings”

Of

Masters of Technology
In

Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Submitted by

R.NARASIMHA RAJU VARMA

(MT17SDE015)

Department of Applied Mechanics

Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology
Nagpur 440 010 (India)
2018
 Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur (INDIA)
DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED MECHANICS

UNDERTAKING
This report has been prepared as per the requirement of partial fulfillment of
course entitled “AMP527 – Earthquake Resistant Design of RC Buildings” of second
semester of Master of Technology in “Structural Dynamics and Earthquake
Engineering”. The report is prepared by me in the Department of Applied
Mechanics, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur (INDIA),
under the supervision of Research scholar Mr. Onkar Kumbhar and professor
Dr. Ratnesh Kumar, Department of Applied Mechanics.

Date:

Place: Nagpur R.NARASIMHA RAJU VARMA

 CONTENTS

 Assignment 1 - Beam Design

 Assignment 2 - Effective length parameter for column

 Assignment 3 - Moment of Resistance

 Assignment 4 - Stress-strain curve of confined concrete

 Assignment 5 - P-M Interaction curve

 Assignment 6 - Moment of Curvature

 Assignment 7 - Load combinations

 Assignment 8 - Equivalent static method by NZS 11170.5

R 、 니 触 A 읽 川臨 良ヘ 丁 り づヘR ı
ų
\A

M e rl S b E o l T s n u T U r t l»y N M l ċ s

Scanned by CamScanner
 <
ł
L ' 9 '
9 8 2 =
Ąf
V

ÞE m
q Xs y )Ć 1
ı 8 0 ( P) L 8 0

"
" J

ー
イ ー 私 。 イ 户 みプ イ ダ て 中 V 째 如 く钿

\ \\ k k
2Ļ = « .
o m v w 8s l 0 - w ww ır

J ıh '
il . P c
i
p
Pû - łO
'
-
W

W P N c
c l

― ― し 呷 断 气 l y -

( r{ _

( U 0 6 - L
aJ W ) Lłq
卜心弘 叼。
W Ç)
r
=
1p
卜

o % uQ y p
-
=
ı
팅 (나丁 中
(
Ał
(AAd+ (Į

k H rq 8 ÇL I
Bl
卅 了 딩

■ Scanned by CamScanner
ı
 已イト 吋
」
。

7 0v x ıL -

Ą DL /}ecĻin C /
M to l ı 7 W
气ノ \ 亡

Àt \Ę i

イ 加
枷 7
萨'-
'
歹 h
-

\
=
2 o
，
v r vM
ı-
3， ー

Scanned by CamScanner
 产吖 共吖 イ ヂ 附 図 禾
叩刃 わ
져ヅ
乙 く
ト
エ

19 0 a +ĵ Q ţ N ) H y L9 °
0

lď
a g i l 9 7 F Į

lv ì g ・
o q l =
°
il

J 7 \
V
・ 세 一 飞 ダ ペ。气】

H f W aL I

Scanned by CamScanner
 5 =
to D S 4 s 48 w
.
l i3
>( Ån r v
-

コ乙 ヨ
키0 8 0 \나

w ・
% u g _
? đ d Ą @ ı Ħ ?-

ElE m 8 .
k
71 冲1
如이
1Ġ r l W

し
ノ ら
/

ノ
萨歹3 本寺 虹 孓 习り デ

严
Ġ L t
)

阳 断 勤 \ 卜 J .

Scanned by CamScanner
 唧 阳 外侧 ム 石 一 ， / n = Ġ q ￠f Ų . 3 '
ý#
仅 。。
― ―

44
国 4 *a ť a Ł
q l r) g 3 1
m = 5 81 3 3 4 =

卜耐 红
了 卜 厂ー ム ム刈 飞メじ ・
― ―

ゴ舸 "
・ ち)
ノ

0 88
h ı3 4m 2 0 0 D m k W
T .
-

斗 뼈一

@ E 1
。

w
t￠ 气 て
Ċ W t

J Y n
i T n Į s T > m o TL H 1
ı

t'Į : O ・ Ť D < 7 0 ıu r
.

■ 쇠 呻 。

Scanned by CamScanner
@ S
v
-
ò ,
z [
»4 1
24 3 q Ąı
o
Ţ

Scanned by CamScanner
M T \T s DÊ o I
,
E K D ￠R e c LN

AWiw L

Scanned by CamScanner
 S "
0 S L 3

2 8 0 8 11
G L 2

c
ı U l [o 7 77

l ıG e Bo ç
C
2

ß Đ

メし 以凸心艮 多以之
三
カ が 。 m W w % A
ー
サ ー

/þ L JÞ饩 J ĉ ， \
钮亂 。

刃 w 在痴
。
n
才

m 一 知 c融 ß M - 存 加 从 一 碌 ˜ ― ― ム
，

ó J» o

Scanned by CamScanner
 a . 6
バ哥
'
毛느 一
职 声 一
本

' a
G \ı
q ı 1 ,t + 2 'i c o 8 x ıo

叩 队 一
1 ノ日 し
夕

Scanned by CamScanner
R.NARASIMHA RAJU VARMA MT17SDE015

MOMENT OF RESISTANCE

For rectangular parabola curve

Intial calculations Iterations

d 655 mm X1 169.8936519 mm
Xlim 314.4 mm X' 72.81156508 mm
Ast bottom1963.495 mm2 Strain at Top steel 0.002572949 max. strain 0.002573
Asc top 981.7477 mm2 Strain at bottom steel 0.009993735 max. strain 0.0038
Stress in concrete 8.92 N/mm2
Stress in Top steel 347.1286942 N/mm2
stress in Main steel 361.0046585 N/mm2
Tension forceTu 708.8309894 KN
Compressive force in steel Cus 340.7927986 KN
Xnew 169.8936517 mm
Xavg 169.8936518 mm

Moment of resistance calculation

Compressive force in concrete Cu 368.038191 KN
Resultant of forces 70.67004847 mm
Lever arm of Cus 610 mm
Lever arm of Cu 584.3299515 mm
Moment of resistance 422.9393455 KN-m
R.NARASIMHA RAJU VARMA MT17SDE015

STRESS-STRAIN CURVE OF STEEL

INPUT
fy 415 N/mm2

For 0.87fy For fy For fym = 1.25fy

strain stress strain stress strain stress
0 0 0 0 0 0
0.001444 288.84 0.00166 332 0.002075 415
0.001634 306.8925 0.001864 352.75 0.002305 440.9375
0.001925 324.945 0.002168 373.5 0.002634 466.875
0.002415 342.9975 0.002671 394.25 0.003164 492.8125
0.00276 352.0238 0.003023 404.625 0.003529 505.7813
0.003805 361.05 0.004075 415 0.004594 518.75

STRESS STRAIN OF CONCRETE

fck 20 For 0.446fck For 0.67fck For fck

strain stress strain stress strain stress
0 0 0 0 0 0
Max strain 0.0035 0.00035 2.848825 0.00035 4.279625 0.00035 6.3875
0.0007 5.1513 0.0007 7.7385 0.0007 11.55
0.00105 6.907425 0.00105 10.37663 0.00105 15.4875
0.0014 8.1172 0.0014 12.194 0.0014 18.2
0.00175 8.780625 0.00175 13.19063 0.00175 19.6875
0.002 8.92 0.002 13.4 0.0021 19.95
0.00235 8.92 0.00235 13.4 0.00245 18.9875
0.0027 8.92 0.0027 13.4 0.0028 16.8
0.00305 8.92 0.00305 13.4 0.00315 13.3875
0.0035 8.92 0.0035 13.4 0.0035 8.75
R.NARASIMHA RAJU VARMA MT17SDE015

STRESS STRAIN CURVES FOR CONFINED CONCRETE

CASE A

FOR S = 135 mm
30.000

25.000

20.000
fc

MANDER's
15.000
KENT and PARK
10.000
MODIFIED KENT
5.000 IS CODE
0.000
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
Strain

FOR S = 160mm
30.000

25.000

20.000
fc

MANDER's
15.000
KENT and PARK
10.000
MODIFIED KENT
5.000
IS CODE
0.000
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025
Strain

CASE B

FOR S = 135 mm
30.000

25.000

20.000
fc

MANDER's
15.000
KENT and PARK
10.000
MODIFIED KENT
5.000 IS CODE

0.000
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035
Strain
R.NARASIMHA RAJU VARMA MT17SDE015

FOR S = 160 mm
30.000
25.000
20.000
fc

MANDER's
15.000
KENT and PARK
10.000
MODIFIED KENT
5.000
IS CODE
0.000
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025
Strain

CASE C

FOR S = 135 mm
30.000

25.000

20.000
fc

MANDER's
15.000
KENT and PARK
10.000
MODIFIED KENT
5.000
IS CODE
0.000
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03
Strain

FOR S = 160 mm
30.000

25.000

20.000
fc

MANDER's
15.000
KENT and PARK
10.000
MODIFIED KENT
5.000 IS CODE
0.000
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025
Strain
R.NARASIMHA RAJU VARMA MT17SDE015

CASE D

FOR S = 135 mm
30.000

25.000

20.000
fc

MANDER's
15.000
KENT and PARK
10.000 MODIFIED KENT

5.000 IS CODE

0.000
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
Strain

FOR S = 160 mm
35.000

30.000

25.000
fc

20.000 MANDER's

15.000 KENT and PARK

10.000 MODIFIED KENT

IS CODE
5.000

0.000
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04
Strain

COMMENTS :
1. We can observed that Mander’s model gives the maximum value of compressive stress
followed by modified Kent and Park model, Kent and Park model and IS 456:200
respectively.
2. As the stirrup spacing reduces the compressive strength decreases.
3. It also observed that as the amount of stirrups increases strength increases.
R.NARASIMHA RAJU VARMA MT17SDE015

P-M INTERACTION CURVES

M20+Fe415
2500

2000
COMPRESSIVE FOREC ( KN)

CASE A
1500
CASE B
CASE C
1000
CASE D
CASE E
500
CASE F

0
0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0
MOMENT (KN-M)

M25 Fe415
2500

2000
COMPRESSIVE FOREC ( KN)

CASE F
1500
CASE E
CASE D
1000
CASE C
CASE B
500
CASE A

0
0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0
MOMENT (KN-M)
R.NARASIMHA RAJU VARMA MT17SDE015

M20 Fe500
2000
1800
1600
COMPRESSIVE FOREC ( KN)

1400
CASE F
1200
CASE E
1000
CASE D
800
CASE C
600
CASE B
400
CASE A
200
0
0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0
MOMENT (KN-M)

Comments:
1. As grade of concrete increases the curve towards right and also when grade of
steel increases the curve shift towards right.
2. But it also depends on placing of bars and diameter of bars.
3. As diameter of bars increases, with constant area of steel the capacity
increases as we can observe in case A and case B.
4. If spacing is equal between given bars then its capacity is greater than unequal
spaced bars.
 MOMENT OF CURVATURE OF DIFFERENT CASES

Case1-(Top-2#20,Bottom-3#32)
450
400
350
Moment(kn-m)

300 Kent and Park

250
200 Modified Kent and Park
150 Is Code
100
50
0
0 0.00002 0.00004 0.00006 0.00008 0.0001
Curvature (Radians)

Case 2-(Top-3#16,Bottom-4#20)
300
250
Moment(Kn-m)

200
Kent and Park
150
Modified Kent and Park
100
Is Code
50
0
0 0.00005 0.0001 0.00015 0.0002 0.00025
Curvature(Radians)

Case 3-(Top-3#12,Bottom-4#25)
400
350
Moment (kn-m)

300
250 Kent and Park
200 Modified Kent and Park
150 Is Code
100
50
0
0 0.00002 0.00004 0.00006 0.00008 0.0001
Curvature(Radians)

COMMENTS:
1. We can observe that Modified kent and park curvaturte ductility is more
higher than kent and park and IS code.
2. As the reinforcement in tension side increases, the moment capacity of the
section increases.
3. Therefore confined concrete can more ductility than unconfined concrete.
 ￠工 りし 千 ı L 千 / 上 巨ーし I 丐 三丈
。
ï t ，
认 良
O D L 千
プ
，

I 2 D 一 平 卫 し
, I 2 十 / し
ヘ 0 月 仪 叶 1 ・ 了 巨ヱ
フ

ı
,
'
T D L + r Ť .
E L
ï W
. L I ・

r 6T D L t'
W
r T O L r
y
ı
,

łL Pし

ı2
・ 口(

2 口し 千 t , 2- 主
t O , š &
吗 1 卫 川 巳し。

t L , 千 lr 丐二门 十 1. 丐 已上喟

t 吓 りし
・ ıfj L L
, + 1 f
»

rW L !æ I T
・ ţ ・ L ,
LA
r w ・ L + 4 ・
ı
1 5

卜町 多し す ・丐
ı 里し べ 巴山了

r 百 PL 十 知了 ム O 闫丐 三ペ t 了て 니
・
ブ プ Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
 ı叮 っし
・ r 可 区之 十 か 叮 여二よ
乃 ト
声

ıÆ
・ L F / Ħ , L y O Ų
・

I, T
y D L 十 ö Ųf E ,
q + f'

ľ \ ・ L O円 し 千 ￠。 可 E

1 丐厂て) L 斗 ト イ O 吋丐 区し、
,

\ W L r t f5 6 + O ıŲ T
L
・
Ľ L
,

I 了わ し
・ \ 厂 置 し 0 ，나叮 飞 上
7
.
レ

「叮 の し
・ 十 0 나ず ら 나 十O ,
ı
ı叮 Į 之 。

t m L + O \q fĴ L 十 r

O 门 りし 十 \ 国
，
˜ 中 口 나 丐기乙し
，
。 O 日仪
, 十 十 I
,
˜
0 시 0 し 十 ı〒 三ペ O 나网
・
) ,
ー じ °ł여
・ 中 I 丁 巳 L
,

0 月 クし I げ飞 니 サ
・
ナ 0 山 呵 기 巳 し三
心，c lP し 十 ı

I〒瓦 L
,
z

O ,
e
1D L 4 0 t
ıı
Ħ -
r ・

0 月 りし 十 ı叮 、
中 0 了名上し
O t l P L ıT , _
Ù, Ųs
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
 4u h ļ 0 ・
h o ıh u T

1
・
m -
O' h 十 0 ıh s »

Ju O h s Ły
in h
-
'
J
- '
Q
t

0 'h ・ _
łh ı
'
4 0 ・h n

Scanned by CamScanner
t 仰 し
，
十 O 닉ぢ 飞 나
, ロ月百 イ뇨 ー ı ぢ石上哆*
,
ツ コ

「叮 刀 し
・ O 山呵 任ペ 千 Đı\ 叮 飞ぱ ー r・ 州
コ ˜

I び むし O 山ゲ 巴 グ雹 f 厂巳
・
し O
乃,
与 ，
-
z

Scanned by CamScanner
R.NARASIMHA RAJU VARMA MT17SDE015

ESA ASSIGNMENT

It is given that for various zones there is a minimum value of earthquake force which we
must consider or in other words the value of Ah should not be less than the given value

Sr. No Seismic Zone %

1 II 0.7
2 III 1.1
3 IV 1.6
4 V 2.4

And it is seen for the given case the values of Ah obtained by formula is more than the
minimum value.

Fig. 1 .Shows the base shear distribution in seismic zone II with important factor 1, R=5
and hard soil.

Fig. 2 .Shows the base shear distribution in seismic zone IV with important factor 1, R=5
and hard soil.
R.NARASIMHA RAJU VARMA MT17SDE015

Fig. 3 .Shows the base shear distribution in seismic zone II with important factor 1, R=5
and hard soil.

Fig. 4 .Shows the base shear distribution in seismic zone IV with important factor 1, R=5
and hard soil.

Fig. 5 .Shows the base shear distribution in seismic zone II with important factor 1, R=5
and hard soil.
R.NARASIMHA RAJU VARMA MT17SDE015

Building with RC structural walls

Fig. 6 .Shows the base shear distribution in seismic zone IV with important factor 1, R=5
and hard soil.

Fig. 7 .Shows the base shear distribution in seismic zone II with important factor 1, R=5
and hard soil.

Fig. 8 .Shows the base shear distribution in seismic zone IV with important factor 1, R=5
and hard soil.
EQUIVALENT STATIC METHOD USING NZS 1170.5-2004 CODE

Building dimensions : 9m x 6.5m

Height of building : 15 m
Storey height :3m
Location : Wellington, New Zealand
Soil class :B
Period Determination For The Equivalent Static Method §4.1.2.1

∑ ( ∗ )
T1= 2𝜋
∗∑ ( ∗ )

Where
di = the horizontal displacement of the centre of mass at level i, ignoring
effects of torsion
Fi = the displacing force acting at level i
g = acceleration due to gravity
i = the level under consideration of structure
n = number of levels in a structure
Wi = the seismic weight at level i

Seismic Weight And Seismic Mass §4.2

Wi = Gi + ∑  𝑄

Where
Gi = the permanent action (self-weight or dead action) at level i
 = 0.45 (earthquake imposed action (live load) average combination factor for
storage and other applications
𝑄 = the imposed action for each occupancy class on level i

Therefore for assumed building the Time period of structure is

T1 = 0.32307 sec in x-direction (from excel file).
C(T)=Ch(T)×Z×R×N(T,D) §3.1.1
Ch(T)= Spectral Shape factor
= 1.6×(0.5/T)0.35
For T<0.4s take Ch=1.89
Z = Hazard factor §3.1.4
= 0.4 for Wellington location from Table 3.3
R = Return period Factor
= 1.0 from Table 3.5
(Assuming Required annual probability of exceedance 1/500)
N(T,D)= Near Fault factor §3.1.6
= 1.0 §3.1.6.1
Therefore value is C(T)= 0.756

Horizontal Design Action Coefficient §5.2.1

For Ultimate Limit State
( )
Cα(T1) = ( ) §5.2.1.2

C(T1) = the ordinate of elastic site hazard spectrum

Sp= Structural Performance Factor §4.4.2
=0.7
μ =2 Structural Ductility Factor §4.4.2
Kμ= μ T1>0.7s
( )
= .
+1 T1<0.7s For soil classes A,B,C and D

=1.46 §5.2.1
. × .
Cα(T1)=( .
)

=0.3624 >= (Z/20+0.02)Ru

>=0.03
Horizontal Seismic Shear §6.2.1.2
V= Cd(T1) ×W1
 W1=Total Weight of Structure
Equivalent Static Horizontal Force §6.2.1.3
×
Fi=Ft+0.92×V×
∑ ( ×hi)

Ft = 0.08V at the top level and zero elsewhere

Floor hi Weight Wi*hi Dix Diy Dix^2 Diy^2 Wi*Dix^2 Wi*Diy^2 Fi

Level (m) (KN) (m) (m) (KN)
5 15 249.8 3747 0.000045 0.000063 2.03E-09 3.97E-09 5.06E-07 9.91E-07 290.5885
4 12 658.0 7896.06 0.000045 0.000063 2.03E-09 3.97E-09 1.33E-06 2.61E-06 396.3312
3 9 658.0 5922.05 0.000045 0.000063 2.03E-09 3.97E-09 1.33E-06 2.61E-06 297.2484
2 6 658.0 3948.03 0.000045 0.000063 2.03E-09 3.97E-09 1.33E-06 2.61E-06 198.1656
1 3 658.0 1974.02 0.000045 0.000063 2.03E-09 3.97E-09 1.33E-06 2.61E-06 99.08281
0 0 658.0 0 0.000045 0.000063 2.03E-09 3.97E-09 1.33E-06 2.61E-06 0
3539.8 23487.2 0.000270 0.000378 7.17E-06 1.40E-05

Table 1. Calculation of horizontal force distribution

Horizontal force distribution

15

12

9
Height(m)

6 distribution

0
0 100 200 300 400 500
Force(Kn)