ESTELA CALERO HERNÁDEZ. PRACTICE TEST 3.

INDEPENDENT WRITING TASK.

‘Two heads are better than one’. Two people can do a better job than one person.
Agree or disagree.

Two heads are better than one, and usually four eyes could see more than just two.
However, I think these topics about work in groups shoud be considered carefully
because they depend on implication and hard work from all the participants in a group.

On the one hand, I agree with that multiple perspective, which is very good to develop
any kind of issue. Wheter it's the approach to a film or book, or the analysis of scientific
problems, two or more people could bring different opinions and ideas that will increase
the profundization of the work. It's obvious that just one person can analyse situations in
one way, her or him own way, although other people will face analysis, works, etc.,
from their perspectives, their particular ways too, which could coincide or not with
those of others.

On the other hand, in my opinion, define roles in the group and objectives is very
important while working on groups. We could face a situation where not everyone in a
group is as interested as we are in the development of a work. I think that this situation
is very common in group asigned works at University or High School. We may end up
doing the work by ourselves without any participation of others in the group. There are
a lot of people who thinks that one in a group will be doing all the work so the rest can
just relax. And personally I find it annoying.

In conclusion, I think that a multiple perspective is very important while working

togheter as human beings in a society. If we have not only our ideas but those from
others our global point of view of a particular issue will be richer. However, I also
believe that we can´t forget that when we're working as a group, we're all required to
participate and contribute. Of course two heads are better than one, but those two heads
should be equivalent in terms of working. If not, maybe would be better just trying to do
all the job by ourselves without lazy participants.