Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In section 1 (“Introduction”), the editors suggest that this study is needed because “the
Qumran material is fundamentally modifying our understanding of many central
questions, such as the textual development of the Hebrew Scriptures, the formation of
the canon, and biblical interpretation in the Second Temple period” (p. 3). They call for
greater terminological clarity (p. 5), briefly outline the reality of changes to Scripture in
the manuscript evidence (p. 6), and suggest that scribes “should not be seen as merely
mechanical copyists” but as “theologically creative authors” (p. 7).
Hans Debel, in “Rewritten Bible, Variant Literary Editions and Original Text(s): Exploring
the Implications of a Pluriform Outlook on the Scriptural Tradition,” analyses the
significance of the Qumran finds on the search for an Urtext and the relationship of a
possible Urtext to the “rewritten” compositions (p. 67). He concludes that the search
for an Urtext is “an ill-fated undertaking” (pp. 84–85) and that the division between
variant literary editions and rewritten compositions needs to “dissolve into a ‘sliding
scale’ ” (p. 84).
In her article, “Talking about Rewritten Texts: Some Reflections on Terminology,” Molly
Zahn argues that the use of older terminology hinders the full appreciation of the
Qumran textual evidence. She discusses the viability of multiple terms such as
parabiblical, pseudo-X, Bible, apocryphon, and pseudepigraphon. She concludes with a
warning: we must avoid projecting our categories back onto the data. However, we
know little about the operative literary categories of the Second Temple period.
Section 3 (“Changed Texts”) commences with Sidnie White Crawford's article “The
Pentateuch as Found in the Pre-Samaritan Texts and 4QReworked Pentateuch.” Based
on her analysis of the pre-SP and rewritten texts, White Crawford concludes that “the
harmonistic/expansive text-type is not an accident in the Qumran collection, but part of
the Qumran community's repertoire of Pentateuchal texts” (p. 128).
In “The Legs and Wings of the Grasshopper: A Case Study on Changes in the Masoretic
Text and in the Old Greek Translation of the Book of Leviticus,” Kristin De Troyer sifts
through the textual, semantic, and interpretive issues present in MT Lev 11:21 by
appealing to the OG. She argues that the reading witnessed in the Schøyen manuscript
likely represents the OG and that, through textual correction in the LXX, this reading
eventually became a Qere in the MT (pp. 160–61).
In “Double Prophecy: The Pilgrimage of the Nations in Mic 4:1–5 and Isa 2:1–5,” Reinhard
Müller argues that these parallel prophetic texts likely originated in Micah and that the
vision was later added to Isaiah based on the textual evidence (p. 178). He suggests that
this vision was inserted into the beginning of the prophetic corpus because it
supplemented Isaiah's focus on the Zion tradition (pp. 187–8).
Juha Pakkala, in “The Quotations and References of the Pentateuchal Laws in Ezra-
Nehemiah,” attempts to describe the textual form of the Torah in the fifth–third
centuries B.C.E. using legal quotations in Ezra-Nehemiah. He notes that the authors of
Ezra-Nehemiah do not distinguish between the original law and its interpretation (p. 215)
and that these authors “were much less concerned about the exact or actual text of the
Pentateuch than what has been traditionally assumed in scholarship” (p. 219).
In “The Textual Connection Between 1QM 1 and the Book of Daniel,” Hanna Venonen
investigates the still-developing text of Daniel in light of 1QM 1. Her analysis is primarily
concerned with the meaning of 1QM and she suggests that the textual reworking of
column 1 had rendered the text incoherent (p. 242).
The final article in the volume is “A Deuteronomic Heritage in Tobit?” by Stuart Weeks.
He argues that Tobit is a “sophisticated composition” and that it is influenced by multiple
scriptural traditions including, but not limited to, the Deuteronomic corpus (p. 390). He
concludes that “if there is a Deuteronomic heritage in Tobit…it jostles for space
amongst other concerns” (pp. 402–3).
As with any volume of this size and scope, the quality of contributions and the relevance
of the topics to one's research interests are bound to be heterogeneous. Nonetheless,
this volume is important and makes a positive contribution to scholarship for multiple
reasons. First, the quality of the contributors instantly lends credibility to the overall
project. Second, few studies have been devoted to exploring the ramification of textual
pluriformity and how it influences the way in which scholars understand and talk about
the Hebrew Scriptures and the literature of Second Temple Judaism. This volume deals
extensively with this issue, and is therefore a welcome addition. Third, this collection
explores this issue by examining a broad swathe of Jewish literature including the
Hebrew Bible, Qumran literature and manuscripts, and the so-called “deuterocanonical”
works. For those with an interest in scribal habits, the history of the text of the Hebrew
Bible, and the legacy of the Deuteronomic corpus, among other interests, I strongly
recommend this volume.