Professional Documents
Culture Documents
07 08 PDF
07 08 PDF
Assessment, Durability, Monitoring and Retrofitting of Concrete Structures- B. H. Oh, et al. (eds)
ⓒ 2010 Korea Concrete Institute, Seoul, ISBN 978-89-5708-181-5
ABSTRACT: This paper presents the results of an experimental study wherein circular spirally-reinforced
concrete columns were subjected to accelerated corrosion while sustaining a constant service compressive
load. Two types of specimens were used in the experimental program: type CV, where vertical reinforcement
was corroded and isolated from non-confining spiral reinforcement, and type CS where spiral reinforcement
was corroded and isolated from the vertical reinforcement to study the effect of confinement. The cracking
initiation, pattern, and widening of the concrete cover were monitored for ten months, and relations obtained
between the crack widening and propagation and the elastic shortening of the column and steel mass loss were
established. The cracking pattern was found to be wider and in the form of longitudinal cracks along the verti-
cal bars in type CV columns, but more random and distributed over the surface and not as wide in type CS
columns.
− ∂w = on (2) ⎢ ⎥
1
⎜ g α − α ⎟h
⎛ ∞ ⎞
The relation between the amount of evaporable current was applied eonly
10
⎝ c the
to
1 c ⎠ vertical
−
1 reinforce-
water and relative humidity is called ‘‘adsorption ment for columns CV, while the electrical current
isotherm” if measured with increasing relativity wasThe material
applied onlyparameters
to the spiral and ksvg and forg1col-
kcvgreinforcement can
humidity and ‘‘desorption isotherm” in the opposite be calibrated
umns CS. Exceptionsby fittingwereexperimental
columns CVG data relevant
and CSG, to
case. Neglecting their difference (Xi et al. 1994), in free (evaporable) water content in concrete at
in which the entire reinforcement cage was subjected
the following, ‘‘sorption isotherm” will be used with various
to ages (Dicurrent.
an electrical Luzio & Cusatis 2009b).
reference to both sorption and desorption conditions.
Figure 6. Electrodes and LVDTs of the experimental system.
Corrosion damage started to become visible to-
By the way, if the hysteresis of the moisture wards the end of the second week of testing for all
2.2 Temperature evolution
isotherm would be taken into account, two different column specimens. All specimens showed initial
relation,
2.4 Strainevaporable water vs relative humidity, must
& deformation Note that, at early age, since
discolouring at random spotstheacross chemical the reactions
concrete
be used according to the sign of the variation of the
Strain gauges were placed on the steel tension rods
associated
cover surface, withwith cement
corrosionhydration
gel leakingand SF reaction
through ex-
relativity humidity. The shape of the sorption
in order to monitor the compression load applied to are exothermic,
isting cracks andthe temperature
voids in the concrete.field isTowards
not uniform the
isotherm for HPC is influenced by many parameters,
the columns. Each of the four rods had two strain for non-adiabatic systems even if the environmental
third week of testing, all column specimens started
especially those that influence extent and rate of the
gauges attached at its centre, with a total of 8 strain temperature
to show hairline is constant. Heat conduction
cracks. Specimens type CV showed can be
chemical reactions and, in turn, determine pore
gauge readings. In addition, three LVDTs were used described invertical
longitudinal concrete, at least
hairline for temperature
cracking along the loca- not
structure and pore size distribution (water-to-cement
to monitor the deformation in the columns. Two exceeding
tion of the 100°C vertical(Bažant & Kaplan
reinforcement. By the 1996),secondby
ratio, cement chemical composition, SF content,
LVDTs were used vertically to measure the total Fourier’s law, which reads
month, these cracks had an opening between 0.083
curing time and method, temperature, mix additives,
shortening of the columns as a result of the compres-
mm and 0.14 mm wide. Figure 7 plots the increase
etc.). In the literature various formulations can be
sive load, and the remaining LVDT was used hori-
inq =longitudinal
− λ ∇T crack widths over time for columns
(7)
found to describe the sorption isotherm of normal
zontally at column mid-height (placed at an expand-
CV. The figure shows the average crack width
concrete (Xi et al. 1994). However, in the present
able circular thin metal sheet wrapped around the
measured for each specimen. Crack width measure-
where atqareas is that
the appeared
heat flux, is the orabsolute
T spalling
paper the semi-empirical expression proposed by
column) to measure the circumferential expansion.
ments
temperature, and λ is the to be
heat conductivity; almost
in this
Norling6 Mjornell
Figure shows the (1997) is adopted
electrodes, becausehoseit
the perforated
spalling and were wider than 1 mm are not included
0.7 CVG
− ∂ = ∇•J
CV1
w
0.6
CV2
∂ t
0.5 CV3
CS1
CS2 ment, cracking propagation is considered to be di-
0.10 rectly related towhere of isreinforcement
∂we/∂h
the loss the slope of the sorption/
cross
section. The steelisotherm
mass loss (also
M duecalled moisture capac
CS3
to reinforcement
governing
corrosion is related equationcurrent
to the electrical (Equation 3) must be
I through
by appropriate
Faraday’s law as follows: boundary and initial conditi
0.05 The relation between the amount of e
I ⋅ t ⋅ Aw water and relative humidity is called ‘‘
M= [g]isotherm” if measured with increasing (1)
z⋅F
humidity and ‘‘desorption isotherm” in th
0.00
where, I = current case. Neglecting
(A); t = time their
(s); A difference
w = atomic
(Xi et al.
weight (55.85 g/mol); z = valency, which equals 2;will be
the following, ‘‘sorption isotherm”
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time (Months )
and F = Faraday’s reference to both sorption
constant (96500 and desorption
cou- c
Figure 8. Lateral cracking width over time in columns type CS. By the way, if the
lombs/equivalent mass). By substituting the corro- hysteresis of the
sion current density isotherm would current
i (electrical be takenperintosurface
account, two
Specimens type CS showed minor hairline cracks area of rebar) into Equation 1, the diameter reduction humi
relation, evaporable water vs relative
going laterally and scattered at various spots across x(t) of the reinforcing be usedbaraccording
after timetot thecan sign of the varia
be calcu-
the concrete cover. Although these cracks were con- lated from: relativity humidity. The shape of the
tinuously leaking corrosion rust product, they were isotherm for HPC is influenced by many p
too small and difficult to measure until about the Aw especially those that influence extent and
second month of testing. Towards that time, it be- x(t ) = ⋅ i ⋅ chemical
t reactions and, in turn, (2) determ
came possible to insert the 0.038 mm feeder blade in z ⋅ F ⋅ ρ structure and pore size distribution (water-
most of the cracks. Figure 8 shows the increase in ratio, cement chemical composition, SF
lateral crack widths over time for columns CS. Fig- where ρ = densitycuring of irontime
(7.85andg/cm
method,
3
). Bytemperature,
substitut- mix
ure 8 plots the average crack width obtained for ing the values of etc.). Aw, z,InF and
the literature various formulatio
ρ, and calculating the
specimens CSG and CS1 for a period of 10 months rate of thickness found reductionto describe
in mm/yrthe with sorption
i givenisotherm
in
and for specimens CS2 and CS3 for a period of 4 µA/cm2, the following concrete (Xi et al. 1994). However, in th
expression results:
months. As shown in the figure, these lateral cracks paper the semi-empirical expression pro
are a lot less wide than the vertical cracks observed x(t ) = 0.0116 ⋅ i ⋅ tNorling Mjornell (1997) is adopted (3) b
0 2 4 6 8 10
reinforcing
obtains bars. It can be seen from Figure 10 that
Time (Months )
crack widths increase approximately linear with time where kcvg and ksvg are material parameters. From the
for both column types. A similar trend has been pre-
∂w ∂h ∂w we (2000). maximum
Figure amount
11. Column of waterover
deformations per time
unitforvolume
columnsthat
CV.can
− e
viously observed by Rodriguez
+ ∇ • ( D ∇h ) = e α& +et∂al. α& + w& (3) fill all pores (both capillary pores and gel pores), one
∂h ∂t h ∂α c
∂α s n
can calculate K1 as one obtains
c s 0.35 CSG
0.7 CS1
where ∂we/∂h is CV theColumns
slope of the sorption/desorption 0.30 ⎡ ⎛
g α c∞ − α c ⎞⎟h ⎤⎥
Column Deformations (mm)...
10⎜
CS2 ⎢
isotherm
0.6 (also (notcalled
confined)moisture capacity). The w α s + 0.22α s G
− 0.188
CS3c s − ⎢1 − e ⎝ 1 ⎠
⎥
CS Columns
by appropriate
0.5
boundary
(confined) and initial conditions. 1
0.20
,
Circumf.
⎛
g αc − αc h
∞ ⎞
Liu∂Y.
• J Journal
=&∇ Weyers of Civil Engineering 27(5): 941-948.
R.E. 1998. Modeling the time-to-corrosion
(2) ciates Limited is gratefully⎣acknowledged. ⎦
t
cracking in chloride contaminated reinforcement concrete
structures. ACI Materials Journal 95(6): 675-681.
The water content w &canAragoncillo,
be expressed as Corrosion
the sum where the first term (gel isotherm) represents the
Rodriguez,
of rate
the and
J., Ortega,
evaporable
L. M.,
water w (capillary
J. 2000.
water, water physically bound (adsorbed) water and the second
vapor,
J. Fullea,
structural performance.
and J.adsorbed
Polimon, water)
e In C. Andrade, C. Alonso,
and the(eds),
& J. Rodriguez non-evaporable
Measurement
term (capillary isotherm) represents the capillary
(chemically
and Interpretationbound) water Corrosion
of the On-site wn (Mills 1966,
Rate: 191-213.
water. This expression is valid only for low content
Pantazopoulo
RILEM Publications& Mills 1995). It is reasonable to
S.A.R.L. of SF. The coefficient G1 represents the amount of
assume that the evaporable water is a function of water per unit volume held in the gel pores at 100%
relative humidity, h, degree of hydration, αc, and relative humidity, and it can be expressed (Norling
degree of silica fume reaction, αs, i.e. we=we(h,αc,αs) Mjornell 1997) as
= age-dependent sorption/desorption isotherm
(Norling Mjonell 1997). Under this assumption and c α c+ ks α s
G (α c α s ) = k vg (5)
by substituting Equation 1 into Equation 2 one 1
,
c vg s
obtains
where kcvg and ksvg are material parameters. From the
∂w ∂h maximum amount of water per unit volume that can
− e + ∇ • ( D ∇h) = ∂we ∂w
α&c + e α&s + w&n (3) fill all pores (both capillary pores and gel pores), one
∂h ∂t h ∂α ∂α can calculate K1 as one obtains
c s
where ∂we/∂h is the slope of the sorption/desorption ⎡
⎢ 10⎜
⎛
g α c∞ − α c ⎞⎟h ⎤⎥
isotherm (also called moisture capacity). The w α s + 0.22α s G
− 0.188
c s − ⎢1 − e ⎝ 1 ⎠
⎥