G55 Practice Sharing July 2019

Topics

l Image Quality: Live Comparison

l Product Presentation & Positioning
Image Quality: G55 (1.9.0 beta7) V.S. Affiniti 50
Linear: L12-3 V.S. X6-16L
Image Quality: G55 (1.9.0 beta7) V.S. Affiniti 50
Linear: L12-3 V.S. X6-16L
Image Quality: G55 (1.9.0 beta7) V.S. Affiniti 50
Linear: X6-16L
Image Quality: G55 (1.9.0 beta7) V.S. Affiniti 50
Convex: C6-2 V.S. F2-5C
Image Quality: G55 (1.9.0 beta7) V.S. Affiniti 50
Convex: C6-2 V.S. F2-5C
Image Quality: G55 (1.9.0 beta7) V.S. Affiniti 50
Convex: C6-2 V.S. F2-5C
Image Quality: G55 (1.9.0 beta7) V.S. Affiniti 50
Sector: S4-2 V.S. S1-6P
Image Quality: G55 (1.9.0 beta7) V.S. Affiniti 50
Sector: S4-2 V.S. S1-6P
Image Quality: G55 (1.9.0 beta7) V.S. Affiniti 50
Sector: S1-6P
Image Quality: G55 (1.9.0 beta7) V.S. Affiniti 50
Greatly improved:
• B-mode (Convex + Sector)
• Color Flow (Sector), Higher frame rate, Better & vivid color presentation
• CW spectrum

Pros:
• Linear, Covex (B & CF)

Cons:
• Sector CF, CW (noise)
Image Quality: G55 (1.9.0 beta7) V.S. Juniper
Product Presentation & Positioning:

• 21.5” + 4P is necessary
• Present image quality: On-site mage Comparison works much better than just
talking without comparsion
• Customized presets is necessary
• Be confident with 1.9, which meets most imaging requirements
• Price positioning
We Care What You Care