You are on page 1of 4

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 250 – 253

The ‘tulip sign’: a sonographic clue for in-utero diagnosis of


Blackwell Science Ltd

severe hypospadias
I. MEIZNER*, R. MASHIACH*, J. SHALEV*, Z. EFRAT* and D. FELDBERG*
*Ultrasound Unit, Women’s Health Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel

KEYWORDS: Hypospadias, Prenatal diagnosis, Ultrasound

ventral curvature of the penis or chordee which results


ABSTRACT
from a fibrous band occurring in the projected course of the
Objective To describe a unique sonographic sign for pre- urethra. The embryologic defect is a failure of closure of the
natal detection of severe penoscrotal hypospadias. urethral groove. In extreme cases, particularly if there is
associated bilateral testicular maldescent, the configuration
Methods Ultrasound findings of hypospadias diagnosed in
of the genitalia may be so ambiguous that an intersex state
the second trimester of pregnancy in seven patients were
results3.
compared with postnatal clinical features. All patients were
Determination of fetal sex and detection of external geni-
recruited from routine sonographic examinations performed
talia anomalies has become an integral part of targeted ultra-
for various obstetric indications.
sound examinations. Prenatal diagnosis of various types
Results In six of the seven cases with hypospadias, a severe of hypospadias has been reported previously4–12; however,
form of peno-scrotal hypospadias was found. In all six cases, differentiation between severe and mild hypospadias has not
a unique ultrasound feature was observed represented by been attempted. We present a specific sonographic indication
extreme ventral angulation of the penis, with or without of severe hypospadias (penoscrotal), diagnosed in six of
chordee, in a form resembling a tulip flower. This ‘tulip’ is seven patients with hypospadias, which we termed the ‘tulip
formed by the ventrally bent penis located between the two sign’.
scrotal folds. In all six patients, the postnatal pictures of the
newborns’ genitalia corresponded perfectly to the prenatal
PATIENTS AND METHODS
sonograms. Associated anomalies occurred in two cases,
with Nager syndrome in one case and mild renal hydroneph- The study population comprised patients who were referred
rosis in the other case. for routine ultrasonic assessment for various medical indica-
tions and in whom ultrasound findings indicative of hypo-
Conclusions The ‘tulip sign’ is a specific ultrasonic finding of
spadias were detected.
severe hypospadias. The recognition of this may help to dis-
These findings included: (i) absence of distal normal
tinguish between severe hypospadias and other genital
morphology of the penile shaft in the form of a bulbous tip;
abnormalities (e.g. ambiguous genitalia).
(ii) appearance of chordee in the form of ventral incurvation
of the penis; (iii) a small penile shaft with two echogenic lines
corresponding to small lateral folds belonging to the dermal
INTRODUCTION
remains of the prepuce (dorsal hood); and (iv) an anomalous
Hypospadias is an anomaly of the male urogenital tract with urinary stream during fetal micturition.
an incidence of between 0.2 and 4.1 per 1000 live births1,2. Ultrasound scans were performed either using a trans-
The term is derived from the Greek language and refers to a abdominal (2–5-MHz) transducer or a transvaginal (5–
rent (spadon) on the ventrum of the penis. The anomaly 9-MHz) probe (ATL Ultramark 9, HDI, ATL 5000; Advanced
occurs as a result of failure of complete development of the Technology Laboratories, Bothell, WA, USA).
anterior urethra. The urethra may terminate just proximal to The sonographic picture representing the ‘tulip’ flower
the glans (glandular hypospadias), at some point along the manifests as a ventrally bent penis located between the two
penile shaft (penile hypospadias), at the anterior margin of scrotal folds (Figures 1–5).
the scrotum (penoscrotal hypospadias), or in the perineum Ultrasound documentation of patients suspected of having
(perineal hypospadias). Associated with this defect is severe hypospadias was compared with postnatal clinical findings.

Correspondence: Dr I. Meizner, Ultrasound Unit, Women’s Health Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva 49100, Israel
(e-mail: imeizner@clalit.org.il)
Accepted 10-10-01

250 ORIGINAL PAPER


The ‘tulip sign’ Meizner et al.

Figure 1 Severe penoscrotal hypospadias detected at 30 weeks of Figure 2 Postnatal pictures of the newborn described in Figure 1. Notice
gestation. Notice the severely incurved penile shaft (arrow) in a sagittal the incurved penis between the scrotal folds (a) and the extremely low
view. The arrowhead aims at the scrotum (a). The ‘tulip sign’ is evident, location of the meatus opening (b).
marking the incurved penis between the two scrotal folds (b).

RESULTS
During the period between 1 May 1995 and 31 March 2001,
seven cases of the severe form of hypospadias were diagnosed
at the Ultrasound Unit of the Rabin Medical Center. A
description of all cases is presented in Table 1. In six of the
seven cases, the ‘tulip sign’ was easily recognized. In one
case, the diagnosis was made postnatally and with ‘tulip sign’
being observed when the video films were reviewed. In two
cases, associated anomalies were detected: one case of Nager
syndrome and one case with hydronephrosis. In two other
cases, bilateral undescended testis was also present.
Deliveries occurred at term in all seven cases, and all were
normal spontaneous deliveries. The ultrasound findings did
not play any role in the decision making regarding mode and
type of delivery. Figure 3 The ‘tulip sign’ diagnosed at 22 weeks of gestation. Notice the
severely downward deviation of the penile shaft (arrow) surrounded by
the scrotal rims.
DISCUSSION
The cause of hypospadias remains enigmatic. Most likely, the for the placental production of human chorionic gonado-
etiology is polygenic because of the higher familial incidence. tropin (hCG) in phase 3 organogenesis. It is also possible that
The condition is found more commonly in Whites than in a single placenta (as in monozygotic twins) is incapable of
Blacks, and is more common in Italian and Jews13. Interest- meeting the hCG requirements for masculinization of too
ingly, the incidence of hypospadias in monozygotic twins is male fetuses. Conflicting evidence is found in the literature
8.5-fold higher than in singletons14. The explanation for concerning an association between hypospadias and sea-
these findings may be the existence of two fetuses competing sonal variations14,15.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 251


The ‘tulip sign’ Meizner et al.

Figure 4 Hypospadias diagnosed at 28 weeks of gestation. The incurved


penile shaft is evident with a ‘squashed’ appearance of the penile end due
to excessive preputium (a). The ‘Tulip Sign’ is evident, with the incurved
penis located between the two scrotal folds (b).

Hypospadias is characterized primarily by dystopia of the


meatus, curvature of the penis and radical changes in the skin
covering the penis. As the opening of the urethral defect
develops more proximally, it is associated with a series of
changes determining the morphology of each anomaly. Sev-
eral classifications of hypospadias exist. However, the most
practical is the one proposed by Barcat16 according to meatal
location. This classification is more practical for clinical use:
(i) anterior hypospadias (glandular, coronal, anterior penile);
Figure 5 Postnatal pictures of the newborn appearing in Figure 4.
(ii) middle hypospadias (middle penile); and (iii) posterior Notice the incurved penis and the two scrotal halves when observed
hypospadias (posterior penile, penoscrotal, scrotal, perineal). from above (a) and below (b). The resemblance to the ‘Tulip’ flower is
The diagnosis of all but the most minor forms of hypo- striking. The meatus orifice is marked by the arrow (c).
spadias is self-evident on examination of newborn males. The
incomplete formation of prepuce with the excess of skin (dor-
sal hood) leads to an immediate recognition of the urethral tissue stretched like a cord between the meatus and glans, giving
defect. Only in the last decade have we been able to make the rise to bowstringing.
diagnosis of hypospadias with prenatal ultrasound. The (iii) A small penile shaft; this is not a diagnostic marker but
sonographic markers for prenatal diagnosis include the arouses suspicion of the presence of hypospadias.
following: (iv) It is possible, in the second trimester, to observe the two
parallel echogenic lines corresponding to lateral folds of the
(i) Absence of the normal pointed morphology of the penile dermal remains of the prepuce (dorsal hood). Depending on
shaft changing into a blunter bulbous tip, also described as a the location of the meatus and the degree of penile curvature,
squashed cone. This correlates with excess dorsal prepuce. these oblique raphes end at the apex of a small skin cone or
(ii) Various degrees of abnormal curvature of the penis, peaks of a cowl-shaped monk’s hood. They are sometimes
labeled chordee. This term implies a strand of connective described as cobra eyes.

252 Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology


The ‘tulip sign’ Meizner et al.

Table 1 Description of the prenatal and postnatal findings in the patient population

GA at diagnosis Mode and time Postnatal


(weeks) Ultrasound features Associated anomalies (weeks) of delivery findings

28 Extremely small incurved penis None Vaginal (39) Penoscrotal hypospadias


22 Small, caudally directed penis with Undescended testis Vaginal (41) Severe penoscrotal hypospadias
parallel lines
22 Ventral curvature of penis with Undescended testis Vaginal (40) Severe scrotal hypospadias
parallel lines
24 Small lateral preputial fold, Nager syndrome, mandibular facial Vaginal (40) Severe penoscrotal hypospadias,
incurved penis, ventral micturition dysostosis, absent first metacarpal Nager syndrome
30 Ventral curvature of penis None Vaginal (40) Penoscrotal hypospadias
22 Distal lateral folds, bifid scrotum Hydronephrosis Vaginal (42) Penoscrotal hypospadias
25 Abnormal configuration of penis None Vaginal (39) Penoscrotal hypospadias

All seven cases had a 46,XY karyotype. GA, gestational age.

(v) Ventral deflection of urinary stream may occur due to 3 Brooks M, Zietman A. Clinical Embryology. Boca Raton: CRC
dystopia of meatus. The stream is not linear but rather Press, 1998: 240
4 Cooper C, Mahoney BS, Bowie JD, Pope II. Prenatal ultrasound
fan-shaped. Color Doppler studies may help demonstrate
diagnosis of ambiguous genitalia. J Ultrasound Med 1985; 4:
the abnormal micturition. 433– 6
5 Benacerraf BR, Saltzman DH, Mandell J. Sonographic diagnosis of
The significance of the ‘tulip sign’ rests on the fact that it abnormal genitalia. J Ultrasound Med 1985; 8: 613– 7
represents the severe curvature of the penis in association 6 Bronshtein M, Riechler A, Zimmer EZ. Prenatal sonographic
signs of possible fetal genital anomalies. Prenat Diagn 1985; 15:
with penoscrotal transposition of a bifid scrotum. Thus, this
215– 9
sign indicates the most severe form of hypospadias. The 7 Deveza R, Munoz A, Torrents M, Comas C, Carrera M. Prenatal
configuration is analogous to the normal female anatomy diagnosis of isolated hypospadias. Prenat Diagn 1998; 18: 779 –88
with severe curvature of the clitoris that is caudally located 8 Hogdal C, Siegel J, Yoi A, Rirchie A. Prenatal diagnosis of Opitz
between the labia. Therefore, in certain cases, it is almost (BBB) syndrome in the second trimester by ultrasound detection of
hypospadias and hypertelorism. Prenat Diagn 1989; 9: 783 –93
impossible to distinguish sonographically between a normal
9 Samulian JC, Scorza WE, Gyzman ER, Ranzini AC, Vintzileos MA.
female gender anatomy and a male with severe penoscrotal Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of mid shaft hypospadias. Prenat
hypospadias. The ‘tulip sign’ may help to distinguish between Diagn 1996; 16: 276– 80
severe penoscrotal hypospadias and other forms of genital 10 Vinals F, Sepulveda W, Selman E. Prenatal detection of congenital
abnormalities, especially some forms of ambiguous genitalia. hypospadias in the Wolf-Hirschhorn (4p-) syndrome. Prenat Diagn
1994; 14: 1166– 9
The ‘tulip sign’ may also aid in counseling the worried par-
11 Preston Smith D, Felker RE, Noe N, Emerson D, Mercer B. Prenatal
ents. Establishment of a correct prenatal diagnosis will reas- diagnosis of genital anomalies. Urology 1996; 47: 114–7
sure the parents and encourage them to believe in a better 12 Sides D, Goldstein RB, Baskin L, Kleiner BC. Prenatal diagnosis of
prognosis, since surgical results (cosmetically and function- hypospadias. J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15: 741– 7
ally) are excellent with the use of one-stage hypospadias 13 Welch KJ. Hypospadias. In Ravitch MM, Welch KJ, Benson CD, eds.
Pediatric Surgery, 3 edn. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers;
repair at an early stage.
1979: 1353– 76
14 Roberts CJ, Lloyd S. Observations on the epidemiology of simple
hypospadias. BMJ 1973; 1: 765
REFERENCES
15 Castilla EE, Orioli IM, Lugarinho R, Dutra GP, Lopez-Camelo JS,
1 Leung TJ, Baird PA, McGilivray BC. Hypospadias in British Columbia. Campana HE, Spagnolo A, Mastroiacovo P. Monthly and seasonal
Am J Med Genet 1985; 21: 39 – 44 variation in the frequency of congenital anomalies. Int J Epidemiol
2 Kallen B, Bertolini R, Castilla E, Czeizel A, Knudsen LB, 1990; 19: 330
Martinez-Frias ML, Masroiacovo P, Mutchinick O. A joint interna- 16 Barcat J. Current concepts of treatment. In Horton, CE, ed. Plastic
tional study on the epidemiology of hypospadias. Acta Paediatr and Reconstructive Surgery of the Genital Area. Boston: Little,
Scand Supplement 1996; 324: Brown, 1990: 249– 63

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 253

You might also like