Professional Documents
Culture Documents
severe hypospadias
I. MEIZNER*, R. MASHIACH*, J. SHALEV*, Z. EFRAT* and D. FELDBERG*
*Ultrasound Unit, Women’s Health Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Correspondence: Dr I. Meizner, Ultrasound Unit, Women’s Health Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva 49100, Israel
(e-mail: imeizner@clalit.org.il)
Accepted 10-10-01
Figure 1 Severe penoscrotal hypospadias detected at 30 weeks of Figure 2 Postnatal pictures of the newborn described in Figure 1. Notice
gestation. Notice the severely incurved penile shaft (arrow) in a sagittal the incurved penis between the scrotal folds (a) and the extremely low
view. The arrowhead aims at the scrotum (a). The ‘tulip sign’ is evident, location of the meatus opening (b).
marking the incurved penis between the two scrotal folds (b).
RESULTS
During the period between 1 May 1995 and 31 March 2001,
seven cases of the severe form of hypospadias were diagnosed
at the Ultrasound Unit of the Rabin Medical Center. A
description of all cases is presented in Table 1. In six of the
seven cases, the ‘tulip sign’ was easily recognized. In one
case, the diagnosis was made postnatally and with ‘tulip sign’
being observed when the video films were reviewed. In two
cases, associated anomalies were detected: one case of Nager
syndrome and one case with hydronephrosis. In two other
cases, bilateral undescended testis was also present.
Deliveries occurred at term in all seven cases, and all were
normal spontaneous deliveries. The ultrasound findings did
not play any role in the decision making regarding mode and
type of delivery. Figure 3 The ‘tulip sign’ diagnosed at 22 weeks of gestation. Notice the
severely downward deviation of the penile shaft (arrow) surrounded by
the scrotal rims.
DISCUSSION
The cause of hypospadias remains enigmatic. Most likely, the for the placental production of human chorionic gonado-
etiology is polygenic because of the higher familial incidence. tropin (hCG) in phase 3 organogenesis. It is also possible that
The condition is found more commonly in Whites than in a single placenta (as in monozygotic twins) is incapable of
Blacks, and is more common in Italian and Jews13. Interest- meeting the hCG requirements for masculinization of too
ingly, the incidence of hypospadias in monozygotic twins is male fetuses. Conflicting evidence is found in the literature
8.5-fold higher than in singletons14. The explanation for concerning an association between hypospadias and sea-
these findings may be the existence of two fetuses competing sonal variations14,15.
Table 1 Description of the prenatal and postnatal findings in the patient population
(v) Ventral deflection of urinary stream may occur due to 3 Brooks M, Zietman A. Clinical Embryology. Boca Raton: CRC
dystopia of meatus. The stream is not linear but rather Press, 1998: 240
4 Cooper C, Mahoney BS, Bowie JD, Pope II. Prenatal ultrasound
fan-shaped. Color Doppler studies may help demonstrate
diagnosis of ambiguous genitalia. J Ultrasound Med 1985; 4:
the abnormal micturition. 433– 6
5 Benacerraf BR, Saltzman DH, Mandell J. Sonographic diagnosis of
The significance of the ‘tulip sign’ rests on the fact that it abnormal genitalia. J Ultrasound Med 1985; 8: 613– 7
represents the severe curvature of the penis in association 6 Bronshtein M, Riechler A, Zimmer EZ. Prenatal sonographic
signs of possible fetal genital anomalies. Prenat Diagn 1985; 15:
with penoscrotal transposition of a bifid scrotum. Thus, this
215– 9
sign indicates the most severe form of hypospadias. The 7 Deveza R, Munoz A, Torrents M, Comas C, Carrera M. Prenatal
configuration is analogous to the normal female anatomy diagnosis of isolated hypospadias. Prenat Diagn 1998; 18: 779 –88
with severe curvature of the clitoris that is caudally located 8 Hogdal C, Siegel J, Yoi A, Rirchie A. Prenatal diagnosis of Opitz
between the labia. Therefore, in certain cases, it is almost (BBB) syndrome in the second trimester by ultrasound detection of
hypospadias and hypertelorism. Prenat Diagn 1989; 9: 783 –93
impossible to distinguish sonographically between a normal
9 Samulian JC, Scorza WE, Gyzman ER, Ranzini AC, Vintzileos MA.
female gender anatomy and a male with severe penoscrotal Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of mid shaft hypospadias. Prenat
hypospadias. The ‘tulip sign’ may help to distinguish between Diagn 1996; 16: 276– 80
severe penoscrotal hypospadias and other forms of genital 10 Vinals F, Sepulveda W, Selman E. Prenatal detection of congenital
abnormalities, especially some forms of ambiguous genitalia. hypospadias in the Wolf-Hirschhorn (4p-) syndrome. Prenat Diagn
1994; 14: 1166– 9
The ‘tulip sign’ may also aid in counseling the worried par-
11 Preston Smith D, Felker RE, Noe N, Emerson D, Mercer B. Prenatal
ents. Establishment of a correct prenatal diagnosis will reas- diagnosis of genital anomalies. Urology 1996; 47: 114–7
sure the parents and encourage them to believe in a better 12 Sides D, Goldstein RB, Baskin L, Kleiner BC. Prenatal diagnosis of
prognosis, since surgical results (cosmetically and function- hypospadias. J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15: 741– 7
ally) are excellent with the use of one-stage hypospadias 13 Welch KJ. Hypospadias. In Ravitch MM, Welch KJ, Benson CD, eds.
Pediatric Surgery, 3 edn. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers;
repair at an early stage.
1979: 1353– 76
14 Roberts CJ, Lloyd S. Observations on the epidemiology of simple
hypospadias. BMJ 1973; 1: 765
REFERENCES
15 Castilla EE, Orioli IM, Lugarinho R, Dutra GP, Lopez-Camelo JS,
1 Leung TJ, Baird PA, McGilivray BC. Hypospadias in British Columbia. Campana HE, Spagnolo A, Mastroiacovo P. Monthly and seasonal
Am J Med Genet 1985; 21: 39 – 44 variation in the frequency of congenital anomalies. Int J Epidemiol
2 Kallen B, Bertolini R, Castilla E, Czeizel A, Knudsen LB, 1990; 19: 330
Martinez-Frias ML, Masroiacovo P, Mutchinick O. A joint interna- 16 Barcat J. Current concepts of treatment. In Horton, CE, ed. Plastic
tional study on the epidemiology of hypospadias. Acta Paediatr and Reconstructive Surgery of the Genital Area. Boston: Little,
Scand Supplement 1996; 324: Brown, 1990: 249– 63