Professional Documents
Culture Documents
to national
A unique feature of the system is that the regulated can choose their
regulator: state banks can shift to national charters and vice versa, state
member banks can shift to non- member status and vice versa 13 .
The justification for the dual banking system is that it is supposed to foster
change and innovation by providing alternative routes so that each bank can
seek charters and do business. It is claimed that a dual banking system is
more responsive to the evolving banking need of the economy than a single
system would be.
13
Ligia Georgescu Golosoiu, Business of Banking, Editura ASE, 2002
depositary institutions in its respective district and functions as a fiscal agent
of the U.S. government. The regional Federal Reserve Banks, one of each
federal district, are geographically dispersed throughout the country: New
York, Boston, St. Louis, San Francisco, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Chicago,
Kansas City, Richmond, Dallas, Minneapolis, Cleveland.
Class A and class B directors are elected by member banks in the District,
while class C directors are appointed by the System’s Board of Governors in
Washington.
1. Monetary policy
The Fed creates and executes monetary policy to influence monetary and
credit conditions and thereby contributes to the nation’s economic goal of
non- inflationary growth. Although the Fed uses three major tools to
implement policy, the most important is open market operations.
• Through open market operations, Fed buys and sells US Treasury
securities in the secondary market in order to produce a desired
level of banks reserves. The Fed adds extra credit to the banking
system when it buys Treasury securities from dealers, and drains
credit when it sells to the dealers.
• Discount window operations, a second monetary policy tool of the
Fed provides secured short-term loans to depository institutions
temporarily in need of funds. Each of the twelve district reserve
banks lends to depository institutions in its district, but only after
borrowers have exhausted their market sources of funds. Banks
borrow from window at the discount rate that is set by each
reserve bank, but requires the approval of the Board of Governors.
The rate is adjusted occasionally to reflect changes in the market
conditions and monetary policy objectives. Discount window
lending is often referred to as “lender of last resort” function of
the central bank.
• Reserve requirements establish the proportions of demand deposit
(checking) accounts and time deposits that must be held as non-
interest bearing reserves at Federal Reserve Banks or as vault
cash. An increase in reserve requirements would be regarded as an
attempt to restrict bank credit and restrain economic activity. A
reduction in the reserve ratio would be viewed as a stimulative
monetary policy move.
2. International operations
The New York Fed, representing the Federal Reserve System and the US
Treasury is responsible for intervening in foreign exchange markets to
achieve dollar exchange rate policy objectives and to counter disorderly
conditions in foreign exchange markets. Such transactions are made in close
coordination with the US Treasury and Board of Governors and most often
are coordinated with the foreign exchange operations of other central banks.
Dollars are sold in exchange for foreign currency if the goal is to counter
upward pressure on the dollar. If the objective is to counter downward
pressure, dollars are purchased through the sale of foreign currency.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York serves as fiscal agent in the United
States for foreign central banks and official international financial
organizations. It acts as the primary contact with the foreign central banks.
The services provided for these institutions include the receipt and payment
of funds in US dollars, purchase and sale of foreign exchange and Treasury
securities, the custody of almost $800 billion in currency, securities and
gold bullion held for over 200 foreign account holders, and the storage of
over $64 billion in monetary gold for about 60 foreign central banks,
governments and official international agencies (about one-third of the
world’s known monetary gold reserves).
4. Financial services
Government services
The Federal Reserve System performs various services for the US Treasury
and other government, quasi- government and international agencies. Each
year, billions of dollars are deposited to and withdrawn by various
government agencies from operating accounts in the US Treasury held by
the Federal Reserve Banks.
The Fed holds in its vaults, collateral for government agencies to secure
public funds that are on deposit with private depository institutions. In
addition, Reserve Banks receive for deposit to the Treasury’s accounts such
items as federal unemployment taxes, individual income taxes withheld by
payroll deduction, corporate income taxes, and certain federal excise taxes.
The Fed also issue and redeem instruments of the public debt such as bonds
and Treasury securities, make periodic payments of interest on outstanding
obligations of the US Treasury or federal agencies.
The Fed and about 7,800 institutions are linked electronically through the
Federal Reserve Communications System, a network through which
depository institutions can transfer funds and securities nationwide in a
matter of minutes. In addition, Federal Reserve Banks and their Branches
operate automated clearinghouses, computerized facilities that allow for the
electronic exchange of payments among participating depository
institutions 14 .
Financial institutions
Commercial banks- are the most widely diversified in terms of both
liabilities and assets.
Ranked in terms of assets size, these are the largest financial institutions.
Traditionally, their main source of funds has been demand deposits. This
situation has changed over the past twenty- five years; savings and time
deposits have become an even more important source of funds for
commercial banks.
Pension and retirement funds are also concerned with the long rather than
short run. Their inflow of money comes from working people concerning to
the retirement’s years. They invest in long-term corporate bonds, high- grade
common stocks, large-denomination time deposits and long-term mortgages.
Mutual funds are frequently stock market related institutions but there are
also mutual funds specializing in bonds of all kinds.
14
The Structure of the Federal Reserve System, www.fed.org
Savings and loan associations have acquired almost all their funds through
savings deposits and used them to make mortgage loans.
Credit unions- are organized as co-operatives for people with some sort of
common interest, such as employees of a particular company or members of
a labor union. Members buy shares that make them eligible to borrow from
the credit union.
The ECB’s capital amounts to EUR 5 billion15 . The NCBs are the sole
subscribers to and holders of the capital of the ECB. The subscription of the
capital is based on the basis of the EU member states’ respective shares in
the GDP and population of the Community. The Euro area NCBs have been
paid up their respective subscriptions to the ECB capital in full. The NCBs
of the non-participating countries have paid up 5% of their respective
subscriptions to the ECB’s capital as contribution to the operational costs of
the ECB. In addition, the NCBs of the member states participating in the
Euro area have provided the ECB with foreign reserve assets of up to an
amount equivalent to around EUR 40 billion. The contributions of each
NCB were fixed in proportion to its share in the ECB’s subscribed capital,
while in return each NCB was credited by the ECB with a claim in Euro
equivalent to its contribution.
It should be stressed that both Eurosystem and ESCB are not legal
persons 16 . According to the international public law, ECB is the core of the
complex structure of the Eurosystem. According to the national legislation,
each central bank of ESCB is a legal person. So each central bank form
Eurosystem perform the tasks entrusted by the ECB. These central banks
may run any other functions ouside the Eurosystem as long as they are not
interfering with its objectives. Thus, the national cemntral banks perform
financial operations on their name and exercise prudential supervision on
the national credit institutions. The central bank of the EU countries that
have not adopted euro are ESCB members with a special status.
According to the Article 122 of the Treaty, these countries are members
with derogation which implies that their central banks don’t have certain
rights and obligations within the ESCB. The central banks from these
15
www.ecb.int, Organisation of the European System of Central Banks
16
Piata Financiara, No 11/2002
countries (Denmark, Sweden, Great Britain) may conduct their own
monetary policies; they are not part of the unique monetary policy,
concerning its definition and implementation.
Standing facilities aim to provide and absorb overnight liquidity, signal the
general stance of monetary policy and bound overnight market interest rates.
Two standing facilities, which will be administrated in a decentralized
manner by the national central banks, are available to eligible counterparts
on their initiative:
- counterparts will be able to use the marginal lending facility to
obtain overnight liquidity from the national central banks against
eligible assets. The interest rate on the marginal lending facility will
normally provide a ceiling for the overnight market interest rate;
- Counterparts will be able to use the overnight deposit facility with
the national central banks. The interest rate on the deposit facility
will normally provide a floor for the overnight market interest rate.
Minimum reserves
Any minimum reserve system would be intended to pursue the aims of
stabilizing money market interest rates, creating (or enlarging) a structural
liquidity shortage and possibly contributing to the control of monetary
expansion. The reserve requirement of each institution would be determined
in relation to elements of its balance sheet. Only institutions subject to
minimum reserves may access the standing facilities and participate in open
market operations based on standard tenders 17 .
The first step on the road to European Integration was taken in 1951 with
the signing of theTreaty establishing the Euroepan Coal and Steel
Community. Then, in 1957, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg,
Germany, France and Italy signed the Treaties of Rome. One Treaty
introduced common economic policies, especially on agriculture and, in
1968, a custom union. The other was the Euratom Treaty on nuclear energy.
The Community gradually branched out into other areas. In 1986 the
European Single Act provided for the free movement of people, goods,
capital and services and established many new policies. In 1993, the Treaty
on European Union ( Maastricht Treaty) entered into force. It intoduced the
pillar structure: the European Community is the first pillar, foreign policy
the second, and justice and home affaires the third.
In 1997, the Treaty establishing the EC was amended once again, this time
at Amsterdam. Consumer policy, employment, growth and free movement
of people were amongst the most important issues dealt with.
Economic and monetary union (EMU) first came to the fore as a primary
objective of the EC in 1969. Each element in the term has a maximalist and
a minimalist meaning. Economic union implies that the member states will,
at most, cease to follow independent economic policies, and at least will
follow co-ordinated policies. Monetary union means, at most the adoption
of a single EU currency, at least the maintenance of fixed exchange rates
between the currencies of the member states.
The history of monetary integration began in 1968 with the Werner report,
which set out a blueprint for the stage-by-stage realisation of economic and
17
Ligia Georgescu-Golosoiu, Business of Banking, Ed. ASE 2002
monetary union. In 1979 the European Monetary System was established:
bilateral rates were determined between all currencies in the system, which
were allowed to fluctuate within pre-set margins around these rates. At the
center of the EMS was the ecu, a basket currency, made up of fixed
percentages of the participating national currencies. In 1989 the Delors
report laid the foundations for the euro and the Maastricht Treaty of 1992
provided a legal basis for EMU and the single currency.
The Maastricht Treaty provides for EMU in three stages: the first, beginning
on July 1, 1990, is mainly about the free movement of capital; the second,
starting on January 1, 1994 is concerned with preparations for the single
currency, including the setting up of the European Monetary Institute, which
is to be dissolved in the third stage, beginning on January 1, 1999. This last
stage will focus on the establishment of the European Central Bank and the
introduction of the single currency.
18
Stephen George & Ian Bache, Politics in the European Union, Oxford University Press
Inc., New York, 2002
Study-case: EURO replaced ECU, as it was easier to pronounce
Set up in 1978, ECU (European Currency Unit) was an abstract currency, a standard
legal tender used by those ones in Brussels, to calculate the budgetary contributions of
each member state. In fact, it represented a basket of currencies, adjusted periodically to
reflect the relative economic power of each state.
Over the time, ECU became more important in the international market: non-European
institutions joint the ECU game in the ’80. The outcome: ECU was ranged the fifth in
the top of the most used currencies for international transactions with a 6% market
share.
Used first only for European interbanking operations, ECU became one of the main
reserve currencies in the world; the European Central Banks deposited at the European
Cooperation Monetary Fund 20% of their gold and US dollars reserves, in the exchange
of ECU. ECU was easily accepted on international level, even without the help of a
powerful institution as Federal Reserve of USA, Bundesbank or Bank of Japan. Norway
wasn’t member of European Economic Community, but decided to relate the value of
its currency to ECU. Far away from Europe, the Japanese, the Americans, and other
important players of the economic market used ECU as financial instrument to fight
against the fluctuations of the yen and dollar. Great performance for a currency that
really didn’t exist!
ECU was on its way to achieve the status of a real currency. Luxembourg introduced
for a month ECU as a payment instrument and it was accepted by all the traders of the
country that used cards as Visa and Eurocard and eurocheques.
As a peak of this euphoria, Spain issued a gold currency with the ECU symbol, sold
very quickly when Spanish peseta was officially accepted in the mechanism of
exchange rates.
Hotels and restaurants, air companies and even shops started to accept credit cards in
ECU, paving the way for payments in ECU. A pool made by Ernst&Young among 209
European companies and 47 banks showed that ECU would have the chance to become
the principal currency in the world in 1997.
“Although the Community does not agree to set up a common currency, ECU will
become a unique currency”, said John Heimann, the president of Merrill Lynch Europe.
The Maastricht Treaty confirmed the launch of ECU for 1994. It was also a secret
competition for the name of this currency. Some people spoke about “Monnet” in the
honor of Jean Monnet which would have been the homonym of the French and English
terms. Others backed up the term “Francfort”, with powerful remainder of Carolingian
period and would have the merit to connect the France, Belgium, Luxembourg, and
Switzerland, since their currencies were based on franc, with the German city Frankfurt
(in French Francfort), where the Bundesbank and other German private banks are
located.
But ECU, disregarding all this scenario, was liked best by most of the people.
Don’t forget that ECU is the name given by the French to their golden and silver coins
while France was the biggest world power. Finally, as ECU was very difficult to be
pronounced in some languages of the Community, it was replaced by EURO. This
decision was taken in December 1995 at the Madrid European Council.
Convergence criteria
The main convergence criteria laid down by the Maastricht Treaty are as
follows: an inflation rate not more than 1.5% above the average rate of the
three Member States with the lowest inflation; a public budget deficit not
exceeding 3% of GDP; public debt of not more than 60% of GDP; a long-
term interest rate no more than 2 percentage points higher than the average
rate of the three Member States with the lowest inflation; and no currency
fluctuations outside the normal EMS margins for two years and no serious
stains or devaluations.
The secondary convergence criteria are integration of markets, balance of
payments, labour costs, price indices and ecu trends.
Not all the member states will be taking part in EMU from 1 January 1999
but all of them (except Denmark and the United Kingdom) have decided to
join as soon as possible. It was decided at the Brusells Council on May 1998
that Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy,
Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain would participate. The
bilateral exchange rates between their national currencies were set and the
members of the Executive Board of the ECB were appointed. The “ins”
concluded a Pact for Stability and Growth, while “pre- ins” agreed to work
harder towards convergence.
During the transition period (1 January 1999-31 December 2001) the ECB
started to operate, all new public issues were in euro, the financial markerts
and banks, for internal purposes might use euro, business also. In practice it
was possible to use euro for non-cash transactions only, but anyone might
open a bank account denominated in euro.
The euro was introduced as physical currency on 1 January 2002. The
period from 1 Janury 2002 to 30 June 2002 was a dual-circulation period
(euro and national currencies).
Study-case: The future tasks of National Bank of Romania within the ESCB
The National Bank of Romania will become a member of ESCB at the moment of
accession to the EU. Romania will be in the position to adopt Euro only after it has
complied with the convergence criteria stated in the Treaty. The task of NBR will differ
from one stage to another. There are to be no essential changes in the NBR activity since
the central bank will be an ESCB member with derogation during the period between
accession to EU and acceptance to the Euro area.
Consequently, the NBR governor will not attend the meeting of Governing Council, but
only the General Council, which has a consultative role. The NBR will keep on
maintaining the price stability and will have to look the currency exchange policy as an
issue of general concern. Therefore, Romania will have to participate to the exchange rate
mechanism of EU-MCE II. According to the circumstances, this participation may take
place immediately after accession or later.
National Bank of Romania will become a full member of ESCB only after Euro will
replace ROL. So NBR will no longer define the monetary policy, as our central bank will
implement the unique monetary policy established by the Governing Council. But the NBR
governor will be a member of this Council, thus being part of the decision-making process
related to the monetary policy. NBR will have the same task of prudential supervision,
issuing coins, having and establishing international relations with different institutions and
effecting any financial operations for various entities. NBR will also manage the official
reserves after the transfer of share-quota to the European Central Bank.
Euro-area banking system
General overview
The structural changes brought about by the adoption of a common currency
and a common monetary policy is exerting a profund impact on the area’s
financial sector. Faced with the combined pressures of globalization,
disintermediation, new technologies, and increased competition from non-
bank financial intermediaries, banks are designing strategies to thrive in this
new environment.
19
Agnes Belaisch, Laura Kodres, Joaquim Levy and Angel Ubide, Euro Area Banking at
the Crossroads, IMF Working Paper, 2001
§ Germany has the largest system in terms of number of credit
institutions-over 3.000-due to its large population and the diverse nature
of its banking system. France has fewer than half that many, followed by
Austria and Italy (with each containing slightly fewer than 1.000). Spain
ranks sixth after the Netherlands. Each of the remaining countries
contains fewer institutions by far.
§ To date, consolidation in the euro area is taken mostly two forms, (1)
mergers among relatively large private, commercial banks and among
bank and non-bank financial institutions; and (2) mergers within the
savings and cooperative banks, respectively. Consolidation has been
essentially limited, sometimes with implicit government guidance, to
within national borders and within their own type. Some commentators
have interpreted the governments’ guidance as an apparent desire to
limit ownership of some influencial institutions and to create a few
“national champions” in each country to compete in the European or
global market place.
§ Consolidation has accelerated recently at the top: more than half of the
30 biggest euro-area banks are the result of recent mergers and the
average size of the top five has doubled since 1995. Bank of
International Settlements (BIS) data show that some 500 mergers and
acquisitions took place in 1991-1992, valued at $17.5 billion, whereas
in 1997-1999 only 200 took place, at a value of about $100 billion- fewer
but of a much larger scale.
§ The degree of concentration at the top is particularly striking in the
smaller euro-area countries, where now just a handful of banks dominate
these banking sectors. Euro-area countries banking systems are
characterized by relatively few large banks, some of which are
considered global palyers, and an array of medium-sized and small
institutions. In almost all smaller countries, the top of five banks hold
more than 50% of the total banking system whether measured by total
assets, total loans, or total deposits. In a few countries, the concentration
is now even more pronounced. For example, in the Netherlands and
Belgium, two large banking groups have more than half of the banking
sector assets, respectively. The four biggest countries have less
concentrated banking sectors, although in France, the five banking
groups take in nearly 90 percent of all deposits. Notably, Germany has
the lowest level of concentration in the euro area almost regardlessof
how it is measured. France and Spain are relatively more concentrated.
Types of Euro Area Banking Institutions
1. Private commercial banks. Commercial or private banks are owned by
their shareholders. Such private-stock companies usually offer equity to the
public, but may be owned by private equity holders. They can distribute
profits to their shareholders, typycally in the form of dividents. These
owners generally have limited liability and exercise control through various
mechanisms, often through board of directors or supervisory bodies. Voting
rights, though, may be separable from share ownership.
On the contrary, the Fed shall pursue several goals. The Federal Reserve Act
states the following: „The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System and the Federal Open Market Committee shall maintain long run
growth of the monetary and credit aggregates commensurate with the
country’s long run potential to increase production, so as to promote
efficiently the goals of maximum employment, stable prices and moderate
long-term interest rates.” Despite this multitude of final objectives, the
monetary policy reaction function of the Fed seems to reveal a kind of
implicit inflation targeting. 20
Compared to other central banks, the Eurosystem has the highest degree of
independence. The EU Treaty and the Statutes of the ESCB are the legal
basis. Since this is international law, it can only be modified with unanimity
by all EU member states. In this respect, the position of the Fed is by far
weaker. The Federal Reserve System is considered to be an independent
20
Gunnar Heinsohn and Otto Steiger, The Eurosystem and the art of central banking,
Center for European Integration Studies, Working Paper, 2002
central bank. It is so, however, only in the sense that its decisions do not
have to be ratified by the president or anyone else in the executive branch of
government. The entire system is subject to oversight by the US Congress
because the Constitution gives to Congress the power to coin money and set
its value – a power that, in the 1913 act, Congress itself delegated to the
federal reserve. The Federal Reserve must work within the framework of the
overall objectives of economic and financial policy established by the
government, and thus the description of the System as „independent within
the government” is more accurate. Consequently, unlike for the Eurosystem,
the danger exists for the Fed that Congress could change the legal basis.
Thus, the ESCB has a more secure institutional foundation than the Fed,
which is a creation of Congress and whose structure can be changed at any
time.
Summary
§ Convergence criteria
- inflation rate: price stability
- public finances: budget discipline
• max. deficit 3% of GDP
• max. debt 60% of GDP
- exchange-rate stability
- convergence of interest rate
§ Stages of integration:
- free trade area
- customs union
- common market
- economic union
- monetary union.
§ Decision-bodies of ECB:
- Governing Council
- Executive Board
- General Council
21
Karlheinz and Franz Seitz, The Euro System and the Federal Reserve System compared:
facts and challenges, Center for European Integration Studies, Working Papers, 2002
§ Microeconomic benefits (euro):
- facilitates cross-border financial transactions
- makes travelling easier for consumers
- no time wasted changing money
- no more exchange charges
- easier to compare prices
2 What is the main body of the Fed and how is this elected?
References