You are on page 1of 7

E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y

Executive Summary: Standards of


Medical Care in Diabetesd2013

Current criteria for the Screening for type 2 (IFG) (E), or an A1C 5.7–6.4% (E)
diagnosis of diabetes diabetes in children should be referred to an effective on-
c A1C $6.5%. The test should be per- c Testing to detect type 2 diabetes and going support program targeting weight
formed in a laboratory using a method prediabetes should be considered in loss of 7% of body weight and in-
that is NGSP certified and standardized children and adolescents who are over- creasing physical activity to at least 150
to the Diabetes Control and Compli- weight and who have two or more ad- min/week of moderate activity such
cations Trial (DCCT) assay; or ditional risk factors for diabetes (see as walking.
c fasting plasma glucose (FPG) $126 Table 5 of the “Standards of Medical c Follow-up counseling appears to be
mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L). Fasting is de- Care in Diabetesd2013”). (E) important for success. (B)
fined as no caloric intake for at least c Based on the cost-effectiveness of diabetes
8 h; or Screening for type 1 prevention, such programs should be
c 2-h plasma glucose $200 mg/dL (11.1 diabetes covered by third-party payers. (B)
mmol/L) during an oral glucose toler- c Consider referring relatives of those c Metformin therapy for prevention of
ance test (OGTT). The test should be with type 1 diabetes for antibody test- type 2 diabetes may be considered in
performed as described by the World ing for risk assessment in the setting those with IGT (A), IFG (E), or an A1C
Health Organization, using a glucose of a clinical research study. (E) 5.7–6.4% (E), especially for those with
load containing the equivalent of 75 g BMI .35 kg/m2, aged ,60 years, and
anhydrous glucose dissolved in water; or Detection and diagnosis women with prior GDM. (A)
c in a patient with classic symptoms of of gestational diabetes c At least annual monitoring for the de-
hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis, mellitus velopment of diabetes in those with
a random plasma glucose $200 mg/dL c Screen for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes
prediabetes is suggested. (E)
(11.1 mmol/L); at the first prenatal visit in those with c Screening for and treatment of modifi-
c in the absence of unequivocal hyper- risk factors, using standard diagnostic able risk factors for CVD is suggested. (B)
glycemia, result should be confirmed criteria. (B)
by repeat testing. c In pregnant women not previously
Glucose monitoring
known to have diabetes, screen for c Patients on multiple-dose insulin
Testing for diabetes in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (MDI) or insulin pump therapy should
asymptomatic patients at 24–28 weeks of gestation, using a do self-monitoring of blood glucose
c Testing to detect type 2 diabetes and 75-g 2-h OGTT and the diagnostic cut (SMBG) at least prior to meals and
prediabetes in asymptomatic people points in Table 6 of the “Standards of snacks, occasionally postprandially, at
should be considered in adults of Medical Care in Diabetesd2013.” (B) bedtime, prior to exercise, when they
any age who are overweight or obese c Screen women with GDM for persistent suspect low blood glucose, after treat-
(BMI $25 kg/m2 ) and who have diabetes at 6–12 weeks postpartum, ing low blood glucose until they are
one or more additional risk fac- using the OGTT and nonpregnancy normoglycemic, and prior to critical
tors for diabetes (see Table 4 of diagnostic criteria. (E) tasks such as driving. (B)
the “Standards of Medical Care in c Women with a history of GDM should c When prescribed as part of a broader
Diabetesd2013”). In those without have lifelong screening for the de- educational context, SMBG results may
these risk factors, testing should be- velopment of diabetes or prediabetes at be helpful to guide treatment decisions
gin at age 45 years. (B) least every 3 years. (B) and/or patient self-management for
c If tests are normal, repeat testing at least c Women with a history of GDM found patients using less frequent insulin in-
at 3-year intervals is reasonable. (E) to have prediabetes should receive jections or noninsulin therapies. (E)
c To test for diabetes or prediabetes, the lifestyle interventions or metformin to c When prescribing SMBG, ensure that
A1C, FPG, or 75-g 2-h OGTT are ap- prevent diabetes. (A) patients receive ongoing instruction
propriate. (B) and regular evaluation of SMBG tech-
c In those identified with prediabetes, Prevention/delay of type 2 nique and SMBG results, as well as
identify and, if appropriate, treat other diabetes their ability to use SMBG data to adjust
cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk fac- c Patients with impaired glucose toler- therapy. (E)
tors. (B) ance (IGT) (A), impaired fasting glucose c Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
in conjunction with intensive insulin
c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c
regimens can be a useful tool to lower
A1C in selected adults (aged $25 years)
DOI: 10.2337/dc13-S004
© 2013 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly with type 1 diabetes. (A)
cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/ c Although the evidence for A1C lowering
licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details. is less strong in children, teens, and

S4 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2013 care.diabetesjournals.org


Executive Summary

younger adults, CGM may be helpful in c Most people with type 1 diabetes c For weight loss, either low-carbohydrate,
these groups. Success correlates with ad- should be educated in how to match low-fat calorie-restricted, or Mediterra-
herence to ongoing use of the device. (C) prandial insulin dose to carbohydrate nean diets may be effective in the short
c CGM may be a supplemental tool to intake, premeal blood glucose, and term (up to 2 years). (A)
SMBG in those with hypoglycemia un- anticipated activity. (E) c For patients on low-carbohydrate di-
awareness and/or frequent hypoglyce- c Most people with type 1 diabetes ets, monitor lipid profiles, renal func-
mic episodes. (E) should use insulin analogs to reduce tion, and protein intake (in those with
hypoglycemia risk. (A) nephropathy) and adjust hypoglyce-
A1C c Consider screening those with type 1 mic therapy as needed. (E)
diabetes for other autoimmune dis- c Physical activity and behavior modifi-
c Perform the A1C test at least two
eases (thyroid, vitamin B12 deficiency, cation are important components of
times a year in patients who are meet-
celiac) as appropriate. (B) weight loss programs and are most
ing treatment goals (and who have helpful in maintenance of weight loss. (B)
stable glycemic control). (E)
Pharmacological therapy for
c Perform the A1C test quarterly in pa-
hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes Recommendations for primary
tients whose therapy has changed or
c Metformin, if not contraindicated and prevention of type 2 diabetes
who are not meeting glycemic goals. (E)
if tolerated, is the preferred initial c Among individuals at high risk for
c Use of point-of-care testing for A1C
pharmacological agent for type 2 di- developing type 2 diabetes, structured
provides the opportunity for more
abetes. (A) programs that emphasize lifestyle changes
timely treatment changes. (E)
c In newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic that include moderate weight loss (7%
patients with markedly symptomatic body weight) and regular physical activity
Glycemic goals in adults
and/or elevated blood glucose levels or (150 min/week), with dietary strategies
c Lowering A1C to below or around 7% A1C, consider insulin therapy, with or including reduced calories and reduced
has been shown to reduce microvas- without additional agents, from the intake of dietary fat, can reduce the risk
cular complications of diabetes, and outset. (E) for developing diabetes and are therefore
if implemented soon after the di- c If noninsulin monotherapy at maximal recommended. (A)
agnosis of diabetes is associated with tolerated dose does not achieve or main- c Individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes
long-term reduction in macrovascular tain the A1C target over 3–6 months, should be encouraged to achieve the
disease. Therefore, a reasonable A1C add a second oral agent, a glucagon-like U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
goal for many nonpregnant adults is peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, or recommendation for dietary fiber (14 g
,7%. (B) insulin. (A) fiber/1,000 kcal) and foods contain-
c Providers might reasonably suggest c A patient-centered approach should be ing whole grains (one-half of grain
more stringent A1C goals (such as used to guide choice of pharmacologi- intake). (B)
,6.5%) for selected individual pa- cal agents. Considerations include c Individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes
tients, if this can be achieved without efficacy, cost, potential side effects, should be encouraged to limit their
significant hypoglycemia or other ad- effects on weight, comorbidities, hy- intake of sugar-sweetened beverages
verse effects of treatment. Appropriate poglycemia risk, and patient prefer- (SSBs). (B)
patients might include those with short ences. (E)
duration of diabetes, long life expec- c Due to the progressive nature of type 2 Recommendations for management
tancy, and no significant CVD. (C) diabetes, insulin therapy is eventually of diabetes
c Less stringent A1C goals (such as indicated for many patients with type 2 Macronutrients in diabetes management
,8%) may be appropriate for patients diabetes. (B) c The mix of carbohydrate, protein, and
with a history of severe hypoglycemia,
fat may be adjusted to meet the meta-
limited life expectancy, advanced mi-
Medical nutrition therapy bolic goals and individual preferences
crovascular or macrovascular compli-
General recommendations of the person with diabetes. (C)
cations, extensive comorbid conditions,
c Individuals who have prediabetes or c Monitoring carbohydrate, whether by
and those with long-standing diabetes
diabetes should receive individualized carbohydrate counting, choices, or
in whom the general goal is difficult to
medical nutrition therapy (MNT) as experience-based estimation, remains
attain despite diabetes self-management
needed to achieve treatment goals, a key strategy in achieving glycemic
education (DSME), appropriate glucose
preferably provided by a registered di- control. (B)
monitoring, and effective doses of
etitian familiar with the components of c Saturated fat intake should be ,7% of
multiple glucose-lowering agents in-
diabetes MNT. (A) total calories. (B)
cluding insulin. (B)
c Because MNT can result in cost-savings c Reducing intake of trans fat lowers LDL
and improved outcomes (B), MNT cholesterol and increases HDL choles-
Pharmacological and overall terol (A); therefore, intake of trans fat
approaches to treatment should be adequately covered by in-
surance and other payers. (E) should be minimized. (E)
Insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes Other nutrition recommendations
c Most people with type 1 diabetes should Energy balance, overweight, and c If adults with diabetes choose to use
be treated with MDI injections (three to obesity alcohol, they should limit intake to a
four injections per day of basal and c Weight loss is recommended for all moderate amount (one drink per day
prandial insulin) or continuous sub- overweight or obese individuals who or less for adult women and two drinks
cutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). (A) have or are at risk for diabetes. (A) per day or less for adult men) and

care.diabetesjournals.org DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2013 S5


Executive Summary

should take extra precautions to pre- c Psychosocial screening and follow-up c Patients with type 2 diabetes who have
vent hypoglycemia. (E) may include, but are not limited to, undergone bariatric surgery need lifelong
c Routine supplementation with anti- attitudes about the illness, expectations lifestyle support and medical monitor-
oxidants, such as vitamins E and C and for medical management and out- ing. (B)
carotene, is not advised because of lack comes, affect/mood, general and di- c Although small trials have shown gly-
of evidence of efficacy and concern re- abetes-related quality of life, resources cemic benefit of bariatric surgery in
lated to long-term safety. (A) (financial, social, and emotional), and patients with type 2 diabetes and BMI
c It is recommended that individualized psychiatric history. (E) 30–35 kg/m2, there is currently in-
meal planning include optimization of c Screen for psychosocial problems such sufficient evidence to generally recom-
food choices to meet recommended di- as depression and diabetes-related mend surgery in patients with BMI ,35
etary allowance (RDA)/dietary reference distress, anxiety, eating disorders, kg/m2 outside of a research protocol. (E)
intake (DRI) for all micronutrients. (E) and cognitive impairment when self- c The long-term benefits, cost-effectiveness,
management is poor. (B) and risks of bariatric surgery in in-
Diabetes self-management dividuals with type 2 diabetes should be
education and support Hypoglycemia studied in well-designed controlled
c Individuals at risk for hypoglycemia trials with optimal medical and lifestyle
c People with diabetes should receive
should be asked about symptomatic therapy as the comparator. (E)
DSME and diabetes self-management
support (DSMS) according to National and asymptomatic hypoglycemia at
each encounter. (C) Immunization
Standards for Diabetes Self-Manage-
c Glucose (15–20 g) is the preferred c Annually provide an influenza vaccine
ment Education and Support when
their diabetes is diagnosed and as treatment for the conscious individual to all diabetic patients $6 months of
needed thereafter. (B) with hypoglycemia, although any form age. (C)
c Effective self-management and quality
of carbohydrate that contains glucose c Administer pneumococcal polysaccha-

of life are the key outcomes of DSME may be used. If SMBG 15 min after ride vaccine to all diabetic patients $2
and DSMS and should be measured treatment shows continued hypogly- years of age. A one-time revaccination
and monitored as part of care. (C) cemia, the treatment should be re- is recommended for individuals .64
c DSME and DSMS should address
peated. Once SMBG glucose returns to years of age previously immunized
psychosocial issues, since emotional normal, the individual should con- when they were ,65 years of age if the
well-being is associated with positive sume a meal or snack to prevent re- vaccine was administered .5 years
diabetes outcomes. (C) currence of hypoglycemia. (E) ago. Other indications for repeat vac-
c Glucagon should be prescribed for all cination include nephrotic syndrome,
c DSME and DSMS programs are ap-
propriate venues for people with pre- individuals at significant risk of severe chronic renal disease, and other im-
diabetes to receive education and hypoglycemia, and caregivers or family munocompromised states, such as af-
support to develop and maintain be- members of these individuals should ter transplantation. (C)
haviors that can prevent or delay the be instructed on its administration. c Administer hepatitis B vaccination to

onset of diabetes. (C) Glucagon administration is not limited unvaccinated adults with diabetes who
c Because DSME and DSMS can result
to health care professionals. (E) are aged 19 through 59 years. (C)
c Hypoglycemia unawareness or one or c Consider administering hepatitis B vac-
in cost-savings and improved out-
comes (B), DSME and DSMS should be more episodes of severe hypoglycemia cination to unvaccinated adults with
adequately reimbursed by third-party should trigger re-evaluation of the diabetes who are aged $60 years. (C)
payers. (E) treatment regimen. (E)
c Insulin-treated patients with hypogly- Hypertension/blood
cemia unawareness or an episode of pressure control
Physical activity severe hypoglycemia should be advised
c Adults with diabetes should be advised
Screening and diagnosis
to raise their glycemic targets to strictly c Blood pressure should be measured at
to perform at least 150 min/week of avoid further hypoglycemia for at least
moderate-intensity aerobic physical every routine visit. Patients found to
several weeks, to partially reverse hy- have elevated blood pressure should
activity (50–70% of maximum heart poglycemia unawareness, and to re-
rate), spread over at least 3 days/week have blood pressure confirmed on a
duce risk of future episodes. (A) separate day. (B)
with no more than 2 consecutive days c Ongoing assessment of cognitive func-
without exercise. (A) tion is suggested with increased vigilance Goals
c In the absence of contraindications, for hypoglycemia by the clinician, c People with diabetes and hypertension
adults with type 2 diabetes should be patient, and caregivers if low cognition should be treated to a systolic blood
encouraged to perform resistance and/or declining cognition is found. (B) pressure goal of ,140 mmHg. (B)
training at least twice per week. (A) c Lower systolic targets, such as ,130
Bariatric surgery mmHg, may be appropriate for certain
Psychosocial assessment c Bariatric surgery may be considered for individuals, such as younger patients, if
and care adults with BMI $35 kg/m2 and type 2 it can be achieved without undue
c It is reasonable to include assessment of diabetes, especially if the diabetes or treatment burden. (C)
the patient’s psychological and social associated comorbidities are difficult to c Patients with diabetes should be trea-
situation as an ongoing part of the control with lifestyle and pharmaco- ted to a diastolic blood pressure ,80
medical management of diabetes. (E) logical therapy. (B) mmHg. (B)

S6 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2013 care.diabetesjournals.org


Executive Summary

Treatment acids, viscous fiber and plant stanols/ diabetes at low CVD risk (10-year CVD
c Patients with a blood pressure .120/80 sterols; weight loss (if indicated); and risk ,5%, such as in men aged ,50 years
mmHg should be advised on lifestyle increased physical activity should be and women aged ,60 years with no
changes to reduce blood pressure. (B) recommended to improve the lipid major additional CVD risk factors), since
c Patients with confirmed blood pressure profile in patients with diabetes. (A) the potential adverse effects from bleed-
$140/80 mmHg should, in addition to c Statin therapy should be added to life- ing likely offset the potential benefits. (C)
lifestyle therapy, have prompt initia- style therapy, regardless of baseline c In patients in these age-groups with
tion and timely subsequent titration of lipid levels, for diabetic patients: multiple other risk factors (e.g., 10-
pharmacological therapy to achieve year risk 5–10%), clinical judgment is
c with overt CVD (A)
blood pressure goals. (B) required. (E)
c without CVD who are over the age of
c Lifestyle therapy for elevated blood pres- c Use aspirin therapy (75–162 mg/day) as a
40 years and have one or more other
sure consists of weight loss, if overweight; secondary prevention strategy in those
CVD risk factors (family history of
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hyperten- with diabetes with a history of CVD. (A)
CVD, hypertension, smoking, dysli-
sion (DASH)-style dietary pattern in- c For patients with CVD and docu-
cluding reducing sodium and increasing pidemia, or albuminuria). (A) mented aspirin allergy, clopidogrel (75
potassium intake; moderation of alcohol c For lower-risk patients than the above mg/day) should be used. (B)
intake; and increased physical activity. (B) (e.g., without overt CVD and under the c Combination therapy with aspirin
c Pharmacological therapy for patients age of 40 years), statin therapy should (75–162 mg/day) and clopidogrel (75
with diabetes and hypertension should be considered in addition to lifestyle mg/day) is reasonable for up to a year
be with a regimen that includes either therapy if LDL cholesterol remains after an acute coronary syndrome. (B)
an ACE inhibitor or an angiotensin above 100 mg/dL or in those with
receptor blocker (ARB). If one class is multiple CVD risk factors. (C)
not tolerated, the other should be c In individuals without overt CVD, the Smoking cessation
substituted. (C) goal is LDL cholesterol ,100 mg/dL c Advise all patients not to smoke or use
c Multiple-drug therapy (two or more (2.6 mmol/L). (B) tobacco products. (A)
agents at maximal doses) is generally c In individuals with overt CVD, a lower c Include smoking cessation counseling
required to achieve blood pressure LDL cholesterol goal of ,70 mg/dL and other forms of treatment as a routine
targets. (B) (1.8 mmol/L), using a high dose of a component of diabetes care. (B)
c Administer one or more antihyperten- statin, is an option. (B)
sive medications at bedtime. (A) c If drug-treated patients do not reach Coronary heart disease
c If ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or diuretics the above targets on maximal tolerated screening and treatment
are used, serum creatinine/estimated statin therapy, a reduction in LDL Screening
glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and cholesterol of ;30–40% from baseline c In asymptomatic patients, routine
serum potassium levels should be is an alternative therapeutic goal. (B) screening for coronary artery disease
monitored. (E) c Triglyceride levels ,150 mg/dL (1.7 (CAD) is not recommended, as it does
c In pregnant patients with diabetes and mmol/L) and HDL cholesterol .40 not improve outcomes as long as CVD
chronic hypertension, blood pressure mg/dL (1.0 mmol/L) in men and .50 risk factors are treated. (A)
target goals of 110–129/65–79 mmHg mg/dL (1.3 mmol/L) in women are
are suggested in the interest of long- desirable (C). However, LDL choles- Treatment
term maternal health and minimizing terol–targeted statin therapy remains c In patients with known CVD, consider
impaired fetal growth. ACE inhibitors the preferred strategy. (A) ACE inhibitor therapy (C) and use as-
and ARBs are contraindicated during c Combination therapy has been shown pirin and statin therapy (A) (if not
pregnancy. (E) not to provide additional cardiovascu- contraindicated) to reduce the risk of
lar benefit above statin therapy alone cardiovascular events. In patients with a
Dyslipidemia/lipid and is not generally recommended. (A) prior myocardial infarction, b-blockers
management c Statin therapy is contraindicated in should be continued for at least 2 years
Screening pregnancy. (B) after the event. (B)
c In most adult patients with diabetes, c Avoid thiazolidinedione treatment in pa-

measure fasting lipid profile at least tients with symptomatic heart failure. (C)
Antiplatelet agents c Metformin may be used in patients with
annually. (B)
c Consider aspirin therapy (75–162 mg/ stable congestive heart failure (CHF) if
c In adults with low-risk lipid values
day) as a primary prevention strategy in renal function is normal. It should be
(LDL cholesterol ,100 mg/dL, HDL
those with type 1 or type 2 diabetes at avoided in unstable or hospitalized
cholesterol .50 mg/dL, and trigly-
increased cardiovascular risk (10-year patients with CHF. (C)
cerides ,150 mg/dL), lipid assessments
risk .10%). This includes most men
may be repeated every 2 years. (E)
aged .50 years or women aged .60
years who have at least one additional Nephropathy screening and
Treatment recommendations and major risk factor (family history of treatment
goals CVD, hypertension, smoking, dyslipi- General recommendations
c Lifestyle modification focusing on the demia, or albuminuria). (C) c To reduce the risk or slow the pro-
reduction of saturated fat, trans fat, and c Aspirin should not be recommended gression of nephropathy, optimize glu-
cholesterol intake; increase of n-3 fatty for CVD prevention for adults with cose control. (A)

care.diabetesjournals.org DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2013 S7


Executive Summary

c To reduce the risk or slow the pro- Screening c The presence of retinopathy is not a
gression of nephropathy, optimize blood c Adults and children aged $10 years contraindication to aspirin therapy for
pressure control. (A) with type 1 diabetes should have an cardioprotection, as this therapy does
initial dilated and comprehensive eye not increase the risk of retinal hemor-
Screening rhage. (A)
examination by an ophthalmologist or
c Perform an annual test to assess urine
optometrist within 5 years after the
albumin excretion in type 1 diabetic Neuropathy screening and
onset of diabetes. (B)
patients with diabetes duration of $5 treatment
c Patients with type 2 diabetes should
years and in all type 2 diabetic patients c All patients should be screened for
have an initial dilated and compre-
starting at diagnosis. (B) distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DPN)
hensive eye examination by an oph-
c Measure serum creatinine at least an-
thalmologist or optometrist shortly starting at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
nually in all adults with diabetes re- and 5 years after the diagnosis of type 1
after the diagnosis of diabetes. (B)
gardless of the degree of urine albumin diabetes and at least annually thereafter,
c Subsequent examinations for type 1
excretion. The serum creatinine should using simple clinical tests. (B)
and type 2 diabetic patients should be
be used to estimate glomerular filtra- c Electrophysiological testing is rarely
repeated annually by an ophthalmolo-
tion rate (GFR) and stage the level needed, except in situations where the
gist or optometrist. Less frequent exams
of chronic kidney disease (CKD), if clinical features are atypical. (E)
(every 2–3 years) may be considered
present. (E) c Screening for signs and symptoms of
following one or more normal eye ex-
Treatment ams. Examinations will be required cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy
c In the treatment of the nonpregnant more frequently if retinopathy is pro- (CAN) should be instituted at diagnosis
patient with modestly elevated (30– gressing. (B) of type 2 diabetes and 5 years after the
299 mg/day) (C) or higher levels c High-quality fundus photographs can diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Special
($300 mg/day) of urinary albumin detect most clinically significant di- testing is rarely needed and may not
excretion (A), either ACE inhibitors or abetic retinopathy. Interpretation of affect management or outcomes. (E)
the images should be performed by a c Medications for the relief of specific
ARBs are recommended.
c Reduction of protein intake to 0.8–1.0 trained eye care provider. While retinal symptoms related to painful DPN and
g/kg body wt per day in individuals photography may serve as a screening autonomic neuropathy are recom-
with diabetes and the earlier stages of tool for retinopathy, it is not a sub- mended, as they improve the quality of
CKD and to 0.8 g/kg body wt per day stitute for a comprehensive eye exam, life of the patient. (E)
in the later stages of CKD may improve which should be performed at least
initially and at intervals thereafter as Foot care
measures of renal function (urine al-
bumin excretion rate, GFR) and is recommended by an eye care pro- c For all patients with diabetes, perform

recommended. (C) fessional. (E) an annual comprehensive foot exami-


c When ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or diu- c Women with pre-existing diabetes who nation to identify risk factors predic-
retics are used, monitor serum creati- are planning pregnancy or who have tive of ulcers and amputations. The
nine and potassium levels for the become pregnant should have a com- foot examination should include in-
development of increased creatinine or prehensive eye examination and be spection, assessment of foot pulses,
changes in potassium. (E) counseled on the risk of development and testing for loss of protective sen-
c Continued monitoring of urine albu- and/or progression of diabetic reti- sation (LOPS) (10-g monofilament
min excretion to assess both response nopathy. Eye examination should oc- plus testing any one of the following:
to therapy and progression of disease is cur in the first trimester with close vibration using 128-Hz tuning fork,
reasonable. (E) follow-up throughout pregnancy and pinprick sensation, ankle reflexes, or
c When eGFR is ,60 mL/min/1.73 m ,
2 for 1 year postpartum. (B) vibration perception threshold). (B)
evaluate and manage potential com- c Provide general foot self-care education
plications of CKD. (E) to all patients with diabetes. (B)
c Consider referral to a physician Treatment c A multidisciplinary approach is rec-
experienced in the care of kidney c Promptly refer patients with any level ommended for individuals with foot
disease for uncertainty about the eti- of macular edema, severe nonproliferative ulcers and high-risk feet, especially
ology of kidney disease, difficult diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), or any those with a history of prior ulcer or
management issues, or advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) amputation. (B)
kidney disease. (B) to an ophthalmologist who is knowl- c Refer patients who smoke, have LOPS
edgeable and experienced in the man- and structural abnormalities, or have a
Retinopathy screening and agement and treatment of diabetic history of prior lower-extremity com-
treatment retinopathy. (A) plications to foot care specialists for
c Laser photocoagulation therapy is in- ongoing preventive care and lifelong
General recommendations dicated to reduce the risk of vision loss surveillance. (C)
c To reduce the risk or slow the pro- in patients with high-risk PDR, clini- c Initial screening for peripheral arterial
gression of retinopathy, optimize gly- cally significant macular edema, and in disease (PAD) should include a history
cemic control. (A) some cases of severe NPDR. (A) for claudication and an assessment of
c To reduce the risk or slow the pro- c Anti–vascular endothelial growth fac- the pedal pulses. Consider obtaining
gression of retinopathy, optimize blood tor (VEGF) therapy is indicated for di- an ankle-brachial index (ABI), as many
pressure control. (A) abetic macular edema. (A) patients with PAD are asymptomatic. (C)

S8 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2013 care.diabetesjournals.org


Executive Summary

c Refer patients with significant claudica- c Pharmacological treatment of hyperten- Less frequent examinations may be ac-
tion or a positive ABI for further vascular sion (systolic or diastolic blood pressure ceptable on the advice of an eye care
assessment and consider exercise, med- consistently above the 95th percentile professional. (E)
ications, and surgical options. (C) for age, sex, and height or consistently
.130/80 mmHg, if 95% exceeds that Celiac disease
Assessment of common value) should be considered as soon as c Consider screening children with type 1
comorbid conditions the diagnosis is confirmed. (E) diabetes for celiac disease by measuring
c ACE inhibitors should be considered tissue transglutaminase or antiendo-
c For patients with risk factors, signs,
for the initial treatment of hypertension, mysial antibodies, with documentation
or symptoms, consider assessment following appropriate reproductive
and treatment for common diabetes- of normal total serum IgA levels, soon
counseling due to its potential tera- after the diagnosis of diabetes. (E)
associated conditions (see Table 14 of togenic effects. (E) c Testing should be considered in chil-
the “Standards of Medical Care in c The goal of treatment is a blood pres-
Diabetesd2013”). (B) dren with growth failure, failure to gain
sure consistently ,130/80 or below weight, weight loss, diarrhea, flatu-
the 90th percentile for age, sex, and lence, abdominal pain, or signs of
Children and adolescents height, whichever is lower. (E) malabsorption or in children with fre-
c As is the case for all children, children quent unexplained hypoglycemia or
with diabetes or prediabetes should be Dyslipidemia deterioration in glycemic control. (E)
encouraged to engage in at least 60 min Screening c Consider referral to a gastroenterolo-
of physical activity each day. (B) c If there is a family history of hyper- gist for evaluation with possible en-
cholesterolemia or a cardiovascular doscopy and biopsy for confirmation of
Type 1 diabetes event before age 55 years, or if family celiac disease in asymptomatic children
Glycemic control history is unknown, then consider with positive antibodies. (E)
c Consider age when setting glycemic obtaining a fasting lipid profile on c Children with biopsy-confirmed celiac
goals in children and adolescents with children .2 years of age soon after disease should be placed on a gluten-free
type 1 diabetes. (E) diagnosis (after glucose control has diet and have consultation with a dietitian
been established). If family history is experienced in managing both diabetes
Screening and management not of concern, then consider the first and celiac disease. (B)
of chronic complications in lipid screening at puberty ($10 years
children and adolescents of age). For children diagnosed with Hypothyroidism
with type 1 diabetes diabetes at or after puberty, consider c Consider screening children with type

Nephropathy obtaining a fasting lipid profile soon 1 diabetes for thyroid peroxidase and
c Annual screening for microalbuminuria,
after the diagnosis (after glucose con- thyroglobulin antibodies soon after
with a random spot urine sample for trol has been established). (E) diagnosis. (E)
c For both age-groups, if lipids are ab- c Measuring thyroid-stimulating hormone
albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), should
be considered once the child is 10 normal, annual monitoring is reason- (TSH) concentrations soon after diagnosis
years of age and has had diabetes for able. If LDL cholesterol values are within of type 1 diabetes, after metabolic control
5 years. (B) the accepted risk levels (,100 mg/dL has been established, is reasonable. If
c Treatment with an ACE inhibitor, ti-
[2.6 mmol/L]), a lipid profile repeated normal, consider rechecking every 1–2
trated to normalization of albumin ex- every 5 years is reasonable. (E) years, especially if the patient develops
cretion, should be considered when Treatment symptoms of thyroid dysfunction, thyro-
elevated ACR is subsequently con- c Initial therapy may consist of optimiza- megaly, or an abnormal growth rate. (E)
firmed on two additional specimens tion of glucose control and MNT using a
from different days. (E) Step 2 American Heart Association Transition from pediatric to
(AHA) diet aimed at a decrease in the adult care
Hypertension amount of saturated fat in the diet. (E)
c As teens transition into emerging
c Blood pressure should be measured at c After the age of 10 years, the addition
of a statin in patients who, after MNT adulthood, health care providers and
each routine visit. Children found to families must recognize their many
have high-normal blood pressure or and lifestyle changes, have LDL cho-
lesterol .160 mg/dL (4.1 mmol/L) or vulnerabilities (B) and prepare the de-
hypertension should have blood pres- veloping teen, beginning in early to
sure confirmed on a separate day. (B) LDL cholesterol .130 mg/dL (3.4
mmol/L) and one or more CVD risk mid adolescence and at least 1 year
c Initial treatment of high-normal blood
factors is reasonable. (E) prior to the transition. (E)
pressure (systolic or diastolic blood c Both pediatricians and adult health
pressure consistently above the 90th c The goal of therapy is an LDL cholesterol
value ,100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L). (E) care providers should assist in pro-
percentile for age, sex, and height) in- viding support and links to resources
cludes dietary intervention and exer- Retinopathy for the teen and emerging adult. (B)
cise, aimed at weight control and c The first ophthalmologic examination
increased physical activity, if appro- should be obtained once the child is
priate. If target blood pressure is not $10 years of age and has had diabetes Preconception care
reached with 3–6 months of lifestyle for 3–5 years. (B) c A1C levels should be as close to normal as
intervention, pharmacological treat- c After the initial examination, annual rou- possible (,7%) in an individual patient
ment should be considered. (E) tine follow-up is generally recommended. before conception is attempted. (B)

care.diabetesjournals.org DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2013 S9


Executive Summary

c Starting at puberty, preconception screening test for CFRD is not recom- c Scheduled subcutaneous insulin with
counseling should be incorporated in mended. (B) basal, nutritional, and correction com-
the routine diabetes clinic visit for all c During a period of stable health, the ponents is the preferred method for
women of childbearing potential. (C) diagnosis of CFRD can be made in achieving and maintaining glucose con-
c Women with diabetes who are con- cystic fibrosis patients according to trol in non–critically ill patients. (C)
templating pregnancy should be eval- usual glucose criteria. (E) c Glucose monitoring should be initiated
uated and, if indicated, treated for c Patients with CFRD should be treated in any patient not known to be diabetic
diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, with insulin to attain individualized who receives therapy associated with
neuropathy, and CVD. (B) glycemic goals. (A) high risk for hyperglycemia, including
c Medications used by such women should c Annual monitoring for complications high-dose glucocorticoid therapy, ini-
be evaluated prior to conception, since of diabetes is recommended, beginning tiation of enteral or parenteral nutri-
drugs commonly used to treat diabet- 5 years after the diagnosis of CFRD. (E) tion, or other medications such as
es and its complications may be con- octreotide or immunosuppressive med-
traindicated or not recommended in ications (B). If hyperglycemia is docu-
pregnancy, including statins, ACE in- Diabetes care in the hospital mented and persistent, consider treating
hibitors, ARBs, and most noninsulin c All patients with diabetes admitted to
such patients to the same glycemic goals
therapies. (E) the hospital should have their diabetes as patients with known diabetes. (E)
c Since many pregnancies are un- clearly identified in the medical record. c A hypoglycemia management protocol
planned, consider the potential risks (E) should be adopted and implemented
and benefits of medications that are c All patients with diabetes should have
by each hospital or hospital system. A
contraindicated in pregnancy in all an order for blood glucose monitoring, plan for preventing and treating hy-
women of childbearing potential and with results available to all members of poglycemia should be established for
counsel women using such medi- the health care team. (E) each patient. Episodes of hypoglycemia
cations accordingly. (E) c Goals for blood glucose levels:
in the hospital should be documented
c Critically ill patients: Insulin
in the medical record and tracked. (E)
therapy should be initiated for c Consider obtaining an A1C on patients
Older adults
treatment of persistent hyperglyce- with diabetes admitted to the hospital if
c Older adults who are functional, cog- the result of testing in the previous 2–3
nitively intact, and have significant life mia starting at a threshold of no
greater than 180 mg/dL (10 mmol/L). months is not available. (E)
expectancy should receive diabetes c Consider obtaining an A1C in patients
care with goals similar to those de- Once insulin therapy is started, a
glucose range of 140–180 mg/dL with risk factors for undiagnosed di-
veloped for younger adults. (E) abetes who exhibit hyperglycemia in
c Glycemic goals for some older adults
(7.8–10 mmol/L) is recommended
for the majority of critically ill the hospital. (E)
might reasonably be relaxed, using in- c Patients with hyperglycemia in the
dividual criteria, but hyperglycemia patients. (A)
c More stringent goals, such as 110–
hospital who do not have a prior di-
leading to symptoms or risk of acute agnosis of diabetes should have ap-
hyperglycemic complications should 140 mg/dL (6.1–7.8 mmol/L)
may be appropriate for selected propriate plans for follow-up testing
be avoided in all patients. (E) and care documented at discharge. (E)
c Other cardiovascular risk factors patients, as long as this can be ach-
should be treated in older adults with ieved without significant hypoglyce-
mia. (C) Strategies for improving
consideration of the time frame of
c Critically ill patients require an in- diabetes care
benefit and the individual patient.
travenous insulin protocol that has c Care should be aligned with components
Treatment of hypertension is indicated
in virtually all older adults, and lipid demonstrated efficacy and safety in of the Chronic Care Model (CCM) to
and aspirin therapy may benefit those achieving the desired glucose range ensure productive interactions between
with life expectancy at least equal to the without increasing risk for severe a prepared proactive practice team and
time frame of primary or secondary hypoglycemia. (E) an informed activated patient. (A)
c Non–critically ill patients: There c When feasible, care systems should
prevention trials. (E)
c Screening for diabetes complications
is no clear evidence for specific support team-based care, community
should be individualized in older blood glucose goals. If treated with involvement, patient registries, and
adults, but particular attention should insulin, the premeal blood glucose embedded decision support tools to
be paid to complications that would targets generally ,140 mg/dL (7.8 meet patient needs. (B)
mmol/L) with random blood glu- c Treatment decisions should be timely
lead to functional impairment. (E)
cose ,180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L) and based on evidence-based guide-
are reasonable, provided these tar- lines that are tailored to individual
Cystic fibrosis–related gets can be safely achieved. More patient preferences, prognoses, and
diabetes stringent targets may be appropri- comorbidities. (B)
c Annual screening for cystic fibrosis– ate in stable patients with previous c A patient-centered communication
related diabetes (CFRD) with OGTT tight glycemic control. Less strin- style should be employed that in-
should begin by age 10 years in all gent targets may be appropriate corporates patient preferences, assesses
patients with cystic fibrosis who do not in those with severe comorbidi- literacy and numeracy, and addresses
have CFRD (B). Use of A1C as a ties. (E) cultural barriers to care. (B)

S10 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2013 care.diabetesjournals.org

You might also like