Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ALINA DIANA PANAINTE, NELA BIBIRE*, GLADIOLA TANTARU, MIHAI APOSTU, MADALINA VIERIU, VASILE DORNEANU
“Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Analytical Chemistry Department, 16 University Str.,
700115, Iasi, Romania
A new Vis spectrophotometric method was developed for the assay of bisoprolol in pharmaceutical
preparations using bromocresol green in hydrochloric acidic medium. The reaction product showed a
maximum absorbance at 402 nm proportional with the concentration of bisoprolol. The optimum conditions
for the reaction were established. The developed method was validated. The method showed a good
linearity in the concentration range of 7 – 80μg/mL (correlation coefficient r = 0.9998). The detection limit
(LOD) was 1.78 μg/mL and the quantification limit (LOQ) was 5.41 μg/mL. The precision and the accuracy
were determined; mean recovery was 100.11% in the 98.35-101.57% concentration range.
Keywords: bisoprolol, bromocresol green, spectrometric method, validation.
100 mL volumetric flask using distilled water. A 20 μg/mL product at 402 nm. This value was used for all the
solution was obtained through dilutions. Various determinations.
concentrations were obtained through dilution with distilled As can be seen in figure 3, bisoprolol and bromocresol
water. Then 1 mL sample was processed according to the green presented maximum absorbance peaks at 275 nm
working procedure. and 615 nm, respectively. The specific absorption
coefficient of bisoprolol was A 1%1cm,402nm=250 and the
Assay procedure specific absorption coefficient of the reaction product was
1 mL 0.1 M hydrochloric acid and 1 mL 0.01% (w/v) A1%1cm,402nm =960.
bromocresol green aqueous solution were added to 1.0 Comparing the spectra from figure 4, it was observed
mL of bisoprolol fumarate solution with a concentration that the proposed method was selective because it had
between 7-80 μg/mL. The complex was then extracted the ability to separate the corresponding signal of
using chloroform. Ten minutes later the absorbance was bisoprolol.
measured at 402 nm, using as reference a blank sample The excipients used in the pharmaceutical formulation
prepared in the same conditions. did not interfere with the maximum absorption of
bisoprolol.
Results and discussions The stoichiometric ratio of the reaction product was
From the analysis of the absorption spectra (fig. 2), a investigated by Job’s continuous variation method. For that
maximum absorbance was observed for the reaction study, 1 . 10-2 M bromocresol green and bisoprolol solutions
Table 2
LINEARITY STUDY
Table 3
VALIDATION PARAMETERS
Table 4
STUDY OF THE PRECISION AND
OF THE ACCURACY OF THE
METHOD
Table 5
ASSAY OF BISOPROLOL IN
PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
Table 6
COMPARISON WITH OTHER
SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHODS
LOD=3.3 x Standard error / Slope = 1.78 μg/mL precision. Standard addition method was used to evaluate
LOQ=10 x Standard error / Slope = 5.41 μg/mL the accuracy of the method. The concentrations of the
For a 40 μg/mL sample ten determinations were done samples were calculated using the equation of the
under the same experimental conditions for the study of calibration curve (table 4). It was observed that the relative
the suitability of the system. The relative standard deviation standard deviation was lower than 2% and thus the method
(RSD = 0.67 %) showed that the system was precise. was precise. Because the recovery was 100.11% it was
Three different concentration solutions of bisoprolol concluded that the method was also accurate.
were used thrice for the determination of the precision The evaluation of robustness was done by changing the
and accuracy of the method. The method precision was instrument, and varying the volume of bromocresol green
investigated through its repeatability and intermediate and the concentration of hydrochloric acid. Reproducibility
of the results confirmed the robustness of the method.
REV. CHIM. (Bucharest) ♦ 65 ♦ No. 8 ♦ 2014 http://www.revistadechimie.ro 919
The proposed method has been applied for the analysis 6.PRITCHETT, A.M., REDFIELD, M.M., Mayo. Clin. Proc., 77, 2002, p.
of bisoprolol in tablets. For each sample three 839.
determinations were done. The results listed in table 5 7. FRISHMAN, W.H., Am. J. Med., 121, 2008, p.933.
showed that the bisoprolol content (mg/tablet) was ranging 8.FRISHMAN, W.H., N. Engl. J. Med., 305, 1981, p. 505.
within the limits imposed by 10 th Edition Romanian 9.CAUDRON, E., LAURENT, S., BILLAUD, E.M., PROGNON, P., J.
Pharmacopoeia – [29]. Excipients were found not to Chromatogr. B, 801, 2004, p. 339.
interfere in the analysis. 10. SUZUKI, T., HORIKIRI, Y., MIZOBE, M., NODA, K., J Chromatogr.,
The new method was compared with other 619, 1993, p. 267.
spectrophotometric methods. It was observed that the 11. BUHRING, K.U., GARBE, A., J. Chromatogr. B, 382, 1986, p. 215.
results were similar to those already published (table 6). 12. POIRIER, J.M., PEREZ, M., CHEYMOL, G., JAILLON, P., J.
Chromatogr. B., 426, 1988, p. 431.
Conclusions 13. PESTE G., BIBIRE N., APOSTU M., VLASE A., ONISCU C., J. Biomed.
A new spectrophotometric method was developed for and Biotech., 2009, ID 736327.
the assay of bisoprolol using bromocresol green as reagent 14. BRAZA, A.J., MODAMIO, P., LASTRA, C.F., Biomed. Chromatogr.,
in acidic medium. The proposed method was based on 16, 2002, p. 517.
the formation of a specific colored product. The reaction 15. BHATT, J., SUBBAIAH, G., KAMBLI, S., SHAH, B., PATEL, M., SAXENA,
product extracted in chloroform showed a maximum A., J Chromatogr. B., 852, 2007, p. 374.
absorbance peak at 402 nm. The specific absorption 16. TUTUNJI, M.F., IBRAHIM, H.M., KHABBAS, M.H., TUTUNJI, L.F., J.
coefficient of bisoprolol and that of the corresponding Chromatogr. B., 877, 2009, p. 1689.
reaction product were: and . 17. LI, S., LIU, G., JIA, J., LIU, Y., PAN, C., YU, C., et al. J. Chromatogr.
The analytical method was optimized and validated by B., 847, 2007, p.174.
establishing the linearity domain (in the concentration 18. PESTE, G., ONISCU, C., VLASE, A., Rom. Biotech. Lett., 15, 2010,
range 7 - 80 μg/mL), the correlation coefficient (r = 0.9998), p. 5140.
the detection limit (1.78 μg/mL), precision (RSD = 1.06) 19. HERNARDO, M.D., PETROVIC, M., FERNANDEZ-ALBA, A.R.,
and the accuracy (mean recover y = 100.11). The BARCELO, D., J. Chromatogr. A., 1046, 2004, p. 133.
experimental results concerning the recovery of bisoprolol 20. DING, L., ZHOU, X., GUO, X., SONG, Q., HE, J., XU, G., J. Pharm.
in tablets were in accordance with those obtained using and Biomed. Anal., 44, 2007, p. 520.
the reference substance. 21. HERCEGOVA, A., SADECKA, J., POLONSKY, J., Acta. Pol. Pharm.,
The main advantage of the new method consists in its 55, 1998, p.167.
enhanced sensibility, in comparison with other UV 22. GHERMAN, S., ZAVASTIN, D., SPAC A., DORNEANU, V., Rev. Chim.
spectrophotometric methods. The new method was (Bucharest), 64, no. 11, 2013, p. 1224.
simple and easy to perform and it may be used for quality 23. ULU, S.T., KEL. E., Opt. Spectrosc., 112, 2012, p. 864.
control or for routine analysis of pharmaceutical products 24. AYAD, M., ABDELLATEF, H., HOSNY, M., SHARAF, Y., Asian. J. Pharm.
when cheap and fast measurements are essential. Clin., 2013, 6, no. 1, p. 92.
25. *** International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical
Acknowledgements: This research was financially supported by the Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use.
European Social Fund within project POSDRU/107/1.5/S/78702. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline, Validation of Analytical
Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R1). Complementary Guideline
References on Methodology, London, 1996.
1.LIGENLI, T.F., KILICASLAN, F., KIRILMAZ, A., UZUN, M., Cardiol., 26. BALAN, A.M., ZBANCIOC, GH., BENTEA, E., CARJA, I., UNGUREANU,
106, 2006, 106, p.127. M., TUCHILUS, C., MANGALAGIU, I.I., Rev. Chim. (Bucharest), 60, no.
2.MCGAVIN, J.K., KEATING, G.M., Drugs, 62, 2002, p. 2677. 10, 2009, p. 1021.
3.HÄUSLER, G., SCHLIEP, H.J., SCHELLING, P., BECKER, K.H., 27. GUDRUMAN (PANAINTE), A.D., BIBIRE N., TANTARU, G., APOSTU,
KLOCKOW, M., MINCK, K.O., ENENKEL, H.J., SCHULZE, E., M., VIERIU, M., DORNEANU, V., Rev. Chim. (Bucharest), 64, no. 4 ,
BERGMANN, R., SCHMITGES, C.J., J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol., 8, no. 2013, p. 393.
11, 1986, p. 2. 28. OPREAN, R., ROZET, E., DEWÉ, W., BOULANGER, B., HUBERT, P.,
4.FRISHMAN, W.H., ALWARSHETTY, M., Clin, Pharmacokinet., 41, 2002, Ghid de validare a procedurilor analitice cantitative, Ed. Medicalã
p. 505. Universitara ”Iuliu Hatieganu”, Cluj Napoca, 2007, p. 57.
5.SCHNABEL, P., MAACK, C., MIES, F., TYROLLER, S., SCHEER, A., 29. *** Farmacopeea Romana, Ed.a X-a, Ed. Medicala, Bucuresti, 1993,
BÖHM, M. J., Cardiovasc. Pharmacol., 36, no. 4, 2000, p. 466. p. 28