An FIR provides essential initial information to the police about a cognizable offense. It can be written or oral, including provided over the phone. The FIR needs to include the key details of the incident but does not require a fully detailed explanation. Upon receiving information about a cognizable crime, the officer in charge must immediately make an entry in the register and begin an investigation without delay. If the information is provided orally, it must be recorded and read back to the informant. Jurisdiction cannot be a reason to refuse recording an FIR. There should be no delay in registering an FIR.
An FIR provides essential initial information to the police about a cognizable offense. It can be written or oral, including provided over the phone. The FIR needs to include the key details of the incident but does not require a fully detailed explanation. Upon receiving information about a cognizable crime, the officer in charge must immediately make an entry in the register and begin an investigation without delay. If the information is provided orally, it must be recorded and read back to the informant. Jurisdiction cannot be a reason to refuse recording an FIR. There should be no delay in registering an FIR.
An FIR provides essential initial information to the police about a cognizable offense. It can be written or oral, including provided over the phone. The FIR needs to include the key details of the incident but does not require a fully detailed explanation. Upon receiving information about a cognizable crime, the officer in charge must immediately make an entry in the register and begin an investigation without delay. If the information is provided orally, it must be recorded and read back to the informant. Jurisdiction cannot be a reason to refuse recording an FIR. There should be no delay in registering an FIR.
Although the definition of FIR is no given in the Cr.P.C. however it
may be as follows:-
i) It is information which is given at the first stage to the Police
Officer In- charge of the Police station.
ii) Information must relate to a cognizable offence.
iii) It is on the basis of this information that investigation into the
offence commences.
v)The FIR could be in any type i.e. written or oral. It can also be given on telephone. Sunil v/s State of MP, 1997.
It is essential that a detailed explanation of the happening should
be given in FIR. In a case of Navratan Mahanto v/s State of Bihar-1980, the court observed that the prosecution cannot be dismissed merely on the basis that FIR does not contains the complete explanation of happening as only gist of the happening in factual position needs to be mentioned.
Section 154 says- As soon as the Officer-in-charge receives
information of commission of a cognizable offence entry to this effect shall & immediately be made in the Register maintained for this purpose without delay.
If any information is given orally, it should be recorded and then
to read and obtained the signature of the person giving information.
In a case of State of A.P v/s P. Ramulu, 1993, the court observed
that FIR cannot be refused to be recorded on the ground that the offence was committed not within the jurisdiction.
There should be no delay in registering FIR (Gnash Bhawan Pated