Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Discuss briefly the differences movement of the tooth when using high force
compared to low force magnitude.
Orthodontic movement of teeth is based on the observation that if prolonged light pressure
is applied to a tooth, tooth movement will occur as the bone around the tooth remodels.
Bone is selectively removed in some areas and added in others. The tooth moves through
the bone carrying its attachment apparatus with it, as the socket of the tooth migrates.
Because the bony response is mediated by the periodontal ligament (PDL), tooth movement
is primarily a PDL phenomenon.
In order for the teeth to produce any orthodontic movement you need to have, tooth, PDL,
bone, a force that will be sustained for a certain period of time.
Forces applied to the teeth can also affect the pattern of bone apposition and resorption at
sites distant from the teeth.
Remodelling and recontouring of the bony socket and the cementum of the root is also
constantly being carried out, during physiological movement of the bone and the teeth
as a response to normal function:
o New alveolar bone is formed by osteoblasts and cementoblasts.
o Bone and cementum are removed by specialized osteoclasts and cementoclasts.
During masticatory function, the teeth and periodontal structures are subjected to
intermittent heavy forces. Tooth contacts last for 1 second or less; forces are quite heavy,
ranging from 1 or 2 kg while soft substances are being chewed to as much as 50 kg against a
more resistant object. When a tooth is subjected to heavy loads of this type, quick
displacement of the tooth within the PDL space is prevented by the incompressible tissue
fluid. Resistance provided by tissue fluids allows normal mastication, with its force
applications of 1 second or less, to occur without pain.
The response to sustained force against the teeth is a function of force magnitude:
o Heavy forces lead to rapidly developing pain, necrosis of cellular elements within the
PDL, and the phenomenon of “undermining resorption” of alveolar bone near the
affected tooth.
o Lighter forces are compatible with survival of cells within the PDL and a remodelling
of the tooth socket by a relatively painless “frontal resorption” of the tooth socket.
The biologic control mechanisms lead from the stimulus of sustained light force to the
response of alveolar bone remodelling that allows tooth movement. Two possible
control elements, biologic electricity and pressure–tension in the PDL that affects blood
flow, are contrasted in the two major theories of orthodontic tooth movement:
The electricity and chemical messenger theories are neither incompatible nor mutually
exclusive, and it appears that both mechanisms may play a part in the biologic control of
tooth movement, but chemical messengers play a dominant role.
Effects on the response to orthodontic force:
The heavier the sustained pressure the greater should be the reduction in blood
flow through compressed areas of the PDL, up to the point that the vessels are totally
collapsed and no further blood flows.
The optimum force levels for orthodontic tooth movement should be just high enough to
stimulate cellular activity without completely occluding blood vessels in the PDL.
The amount of force delivered to a tooth and the area of the PDL over which that force is
distributed are important in determining the biologic effect.
The PDL response is determined not by force alone, but by force per unit area, or pressure.
Because the distribution of force within the PDL, and therefore the pressure, differs with
different types of tooth movement.
Optimum forces for orthodontic tooth movement
Type of movement Force (gm.)
Tipping 35-60
Bodily movement (translation) 70-120
Root up-righting 50-100
Rotation 35-60
Extrusion 35-60
Intrusion 10-20
The key to producing orthodontic tooth movement is the application of sustained force,
which does mean that the force must be present for a considerable percentage of the time,
certainly hours rather than minutes per day. 4 to 6 hours to produce a response correlates
rather well with the human response to removable appliances. If a removable appliance is
worn less than 4 to 6 hours per day, it will produce no orthodontic effects. Above this
duration threshold, tooth movement does occur.
Heavy continuous forces are to be avoided, heavy intermittent forces, although less
efficient, can be clinically acceptable.
The more perfect the spring in the sense of its ability to provide continuous force, the more
careful the clinician must be that only light force is applied.
References:
Proffit, W. R., Fields, H. W., & Sarver, D. M. (2007). Contemporary orthodontics (6th edition). St. Louis,
Mo: Mosby Elsevier.