You are on page 1of 8

interest and privies interest is directly

CONTRACTS affected. (Art. 1421,


Civil Code).

Classes of Defective Contracts (g) referred to as (g) referred to as


---------------------------------------------------------
relative or conditional nullity absolute nullity
VOID/INEXISTENT CONTRACTS

RULE: In the case of Liguez v. Lopez, 102 Phil. 577, the Supreme
UNENFORCEABLE VOID
Court, thru Mr. Justice J.B.L. Reyes, stated that there are two
kinds of VOID contracts: (a) there is a contract but it (a) no contract at all
cannot be enforced by a
DEFINITION: INEXISTENT CONTRACTS [essential formalities are not court action
complied with]
- refer to agreements which lack one or some or all of (b) cannot be assailed by (b) generally, effects are not
the elements (i.e., consent, object, and cause) or do third parties produced at all (2004)
not comply with the formalities which are essential for
the existence of a contract.
- (like those where essential formalities are not complied Distinguish briefly but clearly between Inexistent contracts and
with; example: a donation of land in a private annullable contracts.
instrument; this produces no effect whatsover). INEXISTENT CONTRACTS are considered as not having been
entered into and, therefore, void ob initio. They do not create
DEFINITION: VOID CONTRACTS [illegal or illicit ones] any obligation and cannot be ratified or validated, as there is
- are those which, no agreement to ratify or validate.
- because of certain defects,
- generally produce no effect at all. On the other hand, ANNULLABLE or VOIDABLE CONTRACTS are
- They are considered as inexistent from its inception valid until invalidated by the court but may be ratified.
(from the very beginning)
- (like a donation made because of an immoral As to defect, in the former, one or more requisites of a valid
condition, such as illicit sexual intercourse). contract are absent. In the latter, all the elements of a contract
- (Here, in some way, the donation produces are present except that the consent of one of the contracting
some effect in that he who gave the parties was vitiated or one of them has no capacity to give
donation cannot get back what he has consent.
given.)
---------------------------------------------------------
CHAPTER 9 Void and Inexistent Contracts
the right to set up the defense of illegality
RULE:
[cannot] be waived. Article 1409. The following contracts are
inexistent and void from the beginning:
VOIDABLE VOID

(1) Those whose cause, object or purpose is


(a) may be ratified (a) cannot be ratified.
contrary to law, morals, good customs, public
(b)produces effects 'til (b) generally, effects are not order or public policy;
annulled produced at all (2) Those which are absolutely simulated or
fictitious;
(c) defect is due to (c) the defect here is that
ordinarily,
(3) Those whose cause or object did not exist at
the time of the transaction;
incapacity or vitiated public policy is militated (4) Those whose object is outside the commerce
consent against of men;
(5) Those which contemplate an impossible
(d) valid 'til annulled (d) cannot be cured by
prescription service;
(6) Those where the intention of the parties
(f) defense may be invoked (f) defense may be availed relative to the principal object of the contract
of
cannot be ascertained;
only by the parties (those
(7) Those expressly prohibited or declared void
by anybody, whether he is a
principally or subsidiarily party to the contract or not, by law.
liable), or their successors in - as long as his
• __

These contracts cannot be ratified. Neither can law in force at the time it is executed.
the right to set up the defense of illegality be - RULE: But the right of a party under such a contract
waived. cannot be affected by a subsequent law removing
--------------------------------------------------------- or eliminating such right.
- EXAMPLE: Thus, where at the time the contract was
VOID/INEXISTENT CONTRACTS entered into there was as yet no statute fixing a
ceiling on rentals and prohibiting the landholder
2 CLASSES OF INEXISTENT CONTRACTS from demanding an increase thereof,
- the landholder has a right to demand
RULE: Nos. 2 and 3 refer to contracts which are inexistent. - an increase to the limit authorized by law.
(Cabatan vs. Court of Appeals, 95 SCRA
DEFINITION: INEXISTENT CONTRACTS [essential formalities are not 323 [1980].) See comments and examples
complied with] under Articles 1306, 1352, and 1353.
- refer to agreements which lack one or some or all of
the elements (i.e., consent, object, and cause) or do
not comply with the formalities which are essential for object is outside the
CONTRACTS WHOSE:(4)
the existence of a contract. commerce of men;
- (like those where essential formalities are not complied
with; example: a donation of land in a private
Article 1347: The object should be within
instrument; this produces no effect whatsover).
the commerce of men;
- in other words, it should be
- REQUISITE: [appropriability] susceptible of
appropriation and
(2) SIMULATED CONTRACTS
- REQUISITE: [transmissibility] transmissible from one
person to another.
RULE: absolutely simulated or fictitious;
- EXCEPTION: All rights which are not
(a) If absolutely simulated, the contract is void for utter lack of intransmissible may also be the
consent. object of contracts

(b) If relatively simulated, the hidden or intended contract is OBJECTS OUTSIDE THE COMMERCE OF MEN
generally binding. (Onglengco v. Ozaeta, 70 Phil. 43).
(1) those things
- which are such by their very nature [sacred things,
(3) NON-EXISTING CAUSE OR OBJECT res nullius [nobody's property]
- such as common things like the air or the
RULE: did not exist at the time of the transaction; sea,
- “could not come into existence - and
- because the object may - property belonging to the public
- legally be a future thing.” (See Arts. 1347, 1461, Civil domain;
Code; Lawyer’s Journal, Jan. 31, 1951).
(2) those
Paragraph 3 speaks of contracts “whose cause or object did - which are made such
not exist at the time of the transaction.” - by special prohibitions established by
- This is not exactly correct because there can be law,
valid contracts involving future property; example: - such as poisonous substances, drugs, arms,
sale of future or after-acquired property explosives, and contrabands;

--------------------------------------------------------- (3) those rights which


VOID/INEXISTENT CONTRACTS - are intransmissible because either
- they are purely personal in character,
5 CLASSES OF VOID CONTRACTS - such as those arising from the
relationship of husband and
RULE: It must be observed, however, that Nos. 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 wife, like jus consortium,
refer to contracts which are void - or from the relationship of paternity and
filiation,
- like patria potestas,
CONTRACTS WHOSE: (1) cause,object or purpose is - or
contrary to law, morals, good customs, public - they are honorary or political in
order or public policy; character,
- such as the right to hold a
DE LEON: The contract of the parties must conform with the

2
• __

public office and the right of ARTICLE 1378


suffrage. RULE: Doubt as to the Principal Object

RULE: Thus, in this jurisdiction, it has been held that the contract shall be null and void
communal things, such as public plazas, sidewalks, streets,
rivers, fountains and other things for public use cannot be
RULE: DOUBT in such a way that it cannot be
sold or leased because they are by their very nature
outside the commerce of men
known what may have been the intention or
will of the parties

Example: X promised to give Y this (___________).


CONTRACTS THAT: (5) contemplate an impossible - Since the object is unknown,
service; - it is clear that there could not have been any
meeting of the minds.
RULE:Impossible things or services cannot be the
object of contracts. [Article 1348]
- Thus, if the parties enter into a contract with respect CONTRACTS: (7) expressly prohibited or declared
to an impossible thing: void by law.
- like a mythical bird or animal
- or with respect to an impossible service like EXAMPLE: In the case of Jose C. Aquino, et al. v. Pilar Chaves
a trip to some distant planet or galaxy, Conato and the Workmen’s Compensation Commission, L-
- RESULT: the contract is void or inexistent. 18333, Dec. 29, 1965, it was held that under Sec. 7 of Act 3428,
as amended (The Workmen’s Compensation Law), any
contract, devise of any sort, or waiver intended to exempt the
ABSOLUTE IMPOSSIBILITY RELATIVE IMPOSSIBILITY
employer from all or part of the liability created by said Act is
which arises from the very which arises from the null and void.
nature or essence circumstances or
RULE: Where the illegality of the contract
qualifications
- proceeds from an express prohibition or declaration
by law,
of the act or service itself, of the obligor
- and not from any intrinsic illegality,
- the contract is not illegal per se. 3
rendering him incapable of
(EPG Construction Co. vs. Vigilar, 354 SCRA 566 [2001]; Dept.
executing the act or
of Health vs. C.V. Cachuela, 475 SCRA 218 [2006]; see Art.
service,
1416.) Below are examples of contracts which are prohibited
or declared void by law.
renders the contract void allows the perfection of the
a) Contracts upon future inheritance except in cases
contract,
expressly authorized by law. (Art. 1347.)
- although the
fulfillment thereof is
(b) Sale of property between husband and wife except when
hardly probable
there is a separation of property. (Art. 1490.)
When the impossibility is Thus, as a consequence, in
(c) Purchase of property by persons who are specially
permanent, however, as in a contract of partnership
disqualifi ed by law (like guardians, agents, executors,
the case of a person who is where one of the partners
administrators, public offi cers and employees, judges,
unable to perform the obligates himself to
lawyers, etc.) because of their position or relation with the
service which he has contribute to the common
person or property under their care. (Art. 1491.)
contracted because of fund an amount which is
total blindness, the contract beyond his means, the ---------------------------------------------------------
is void.16 contract is not void
because the impossibility
Article 1410. The action or defense for the
may disappear. declaration of the inexistence of a contract does
not prescribe.
---------------------------------------------------------
CONTRACTS WHERE: (6) the intention of the parties VOID/INEXISTENT CONTRACTS
relative to the principal object of the contract
cannot be ascertained; action or defense for the declaration of the
inexistence
DOES NOT PRESCRIBE

3
• __

Article 1411. When the nullity proceeds from the


RULE: The action or defense for the declaration of its illegality, illegality of the cause or object of the contract,
inexistence, or absolute nullity does not prescribe. (see Art. and the act constitutes a criminal offense, both
1410.);
parties being in pari delicto, they shall have no
RULE: Action or defense imprescriptible. — action against each other, and both shall be
- If a contract is void, a party thereto can always bring a prosecuted. Moreover, the provisions of the Penal
court action to declare it void or inexistent; and a party Code relative to the disposal of effects or
against whom a void contract is sought to be
instruments of a crime shall be applicable to the
enforced, can always raise the defense of nullity,
despite the passage of time. things or the price of the contract.
- The defect being permanent and incurable, the action
or defense does not prescribe. (see Constantino vs. This rule shall be applicable when only one of the
Estenzo, 65 SCRA 675 [1975]; Tipton vs. Velasco, 6 Phil.
parties is guilty; but the innocent one may claim
67 [1906]; Trigal vs. Tobias, 2 SCRA 1154 [1961]; Ruiz vs.
Court of Appeals, 79 SCRA 525 [1977].) M
what he has given, and shall not be bound to
comply with his promise. (1305)
RULE: Since a void contract has no effect at all, it is, therefore, ---------------------------------------------------------
unnecessary to bring an action to declare it void. It is well within
VOID CONTRACTS
the right of a party to unilaterally cancel and treat as avoided a
void contract. (G. Razon, Inc. vs. Philippine Ports Authority, 151
SCRA 233 [1988].) In fact, such action cannot logically exist. PARI DELICTO RULE / ILLEGAL CONTRACTS DEFENSE

RULE: However, an action to declare the non-existence of the


(THERE IS CRIMINAL OFFENSE)
contract can be maintained and in the same action, the
plaintiff may recover what he has given by virtue of the
contract. (Rongavilla vs. Court of Appeals, 294 SCRA 289 [1998].) RULE: illegality of the cause or object
It is better that a judicial declaration of nullity be secured not RULE: the act constitutes a criminal offense
only to give peace of mind to the parties but also to avoid the RULE: both parties being in pari delicto
taking of the law into their own hands.
--------------------------------------------------------- EFFECT: they shall have no action against each
other
EFFECT: both shall be prosecuted

RULE: illegality of the cause or object


RULE: the act constitutes a criminal offense
RULE: when only one of the parties is guilty

guilty party

EFFECT: no action against the other


EFFECT: shall be prosecuted
ILLEGAL CONTRACTS
--------------------------------------------------------- innocent one
VOID CONTRACTS
EFFECT: innocent one may claim what he has
given
DEFINITION: VOID CONTRACTS [illegal or illicit ones]
- are those which,
shall not be bound to comply with his
EFFECT:

- because of certain defects,


promise.
- generally produce no effect at all. ---------------------------------------------------------
- They are considered as inexistent from its inception
(from the very beginning)
Article 1412. If the act in which the unlawful or
- (like a donation made because of an immoral forbidden cause consists does not constitute a
condition, such as illicit sexual intercourse). criminal offense, the following rules shall be
- (Here, in some way, the donation produces observed:
some effect in that he who gave the
donation cannot get back what he has
given.) (1) When the fault is on the part of both
--------------------------------------------------------- contracting parties, neither may recover what he

4
• __

has given by virtue of the contract, or demand the ---------------------------------------------------------


performance of the other's undertaking; VOID CONTRACTS
(2) When only one of the contracting parties is at
fault, he cannot recover what he has given by PARI DELICTO RULE (EXCEPTION) / ILLEGAL
reason of the contract, or ask for the fulfillment of CONTRACTS DEFENSE (EXCEPTION)
what has been promised him. The other, who is
not at fault, may demand the return of what he
RECOVERY OF USURIOUS INTEREST ALLOWED
has given without any obligation to comply his
promise. (1306) DEFINITION: USURIOUS INTEREST
--------------------------------------------------------- - Any rate of interest in excess of the maximum allowed
under the Usury Law is usurious (see comments under
VOID CONTRACTS
Art. 1175.)

PARI DELICTO RULE / ILLEGAL CONTRACTS DEFENSE RULE:Interest paid in excess of the interest allowed
by the usury laws may be recovered by the debtor
(THERE NO CRIMINAL OFFENSE)
with interest thereon from the date of the
RULE:
payment.
RULE: unlawful or forbidden cause
RULE: doesnot constitute a criminal offense RULE: Thus, in Angel Jose Warehousing Co. vs. Chelda55 the
RULE: When the fault is on the part of both Supreme Court declared that, in reality, there is no confl ict
contracting parties between the Civil Code and the Usury Law. Under the latter, in
Sec. 6, the debtor may recover the whole interest paid. Under
EFFECT:neither may recover what he has given by the Civil Code, in Art. 1413, “interest paid in excess of the interest
virtue of the contract allowed by the usury laws may be recovered by the debtor, with
EFFECT: nor demand the performance of the interest thereon from the date of payment.” When the Code
speaks of “interest paid in excess of that allowed by the usury
other's undertaking;
law,’’ it means the whole USURIOUS INTEREST

EXAMPLE: Thus, if the loan is P1,000.00, with interest of 20% per


annum or P200 per year, and the borrower paid P200, the whole
RULE: unlawful or forbidden cause
P200 is the usurious interest. The only change effected, therefore,
RULE: does not constitute a criminal offense
by Art. 1413 of the Civil Code is not to provide for the recovery of
RULE: When only one of the contracting parties is
the interest paid in excess of that allowed by law, which the
at fault Usury Law already provided for, but to add that the same can
be recovered “with interest thereon from the date of payment.”
THE ONE at fault, ---------------------------------------------------------
Article 1414. When money is paid or property
recover what he has
EFFECT: THE ONE AT FAULT CANNOT:
given by reason of the contract delivered for an illegal purpose, the contract may
EFFECT: THE ONE AT FAULT CANNOT: ask for the be repudiated by one of the parties before the
fulfillment of what has been promised him purpose has been accomplished, or before any
damage has been caused to a third person. In
The other, who is not at fault such case, the courts may, if the public interest
will thus be subserved, allow the party
may demand the
EFFECT: THE ONE NOT AT FAULT CAN:
repudiating the contract to recover the money or
return of what he has given
EFFECT: without any obligation to comply his
property.
promise. ---------------------------------------------------------
VOID CONTRACTS

EXCEPTIONS TO PARI DELICTO [Where


PARI DELICTO RULE (EXCEPTION) / ILLEGAL
both parties cannot recover] CONTRACTS DEFENSE (EXCEPTION)
---------------------------------------------------------
Article 1413. Interest paid in excess of the interest BEFORE PURPOSE / BEFORE DAMAGE
allowed by the usury laws may be recovered by
the debtor, with interest thereon from the date of MAY RECOVER
the payment.

5
• __

REQUISITES (WHAT KIND OF CONTRACT?)


PARI DELICTO RULE (EXCEPTION) / ILLEGAL
(1) money is paid or property delivered for an CONTRACTS DEFENSE (EXCEPTION)
illegal purpose
MERELY PROHIBITED CONTRACTS
RULE:(a) before the purpose has been
accomplished MAY RECOVER

RULE: (b) before any damage has been caused to a Illegal Per Se Merely Prohibited
third person
Illegal per se contracts are Merely prohibited contracts
RULE: (c) The court considers that public interest will those forbidden because of are those forbidden because
thus be subservedby allowing recovery public interest. of private interests.

allow the party repudiating the contract to


EFFECT:
recover the money or property. RULE: (a) agreement is not illegal per se
RULE: (b) the prohibition by the law is designed
---------------------------------------------------------
Article 1415. Where one of the parties to an illegal for the protection of the plaintiff
RULE: (c) if public policy is thereby enhanced
contract is incapable of giving consent, the
courts may, if the interest of justice so demands EFFECT: [he may] recover what he has paid or
allow recovery of money or property delivered by delivered.
the incapacitated person.
---------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
Article 1417. When the price of any article or
VOID CONTRACTS
commodity is determined by statute, or by
authority of law, any person paying any amount in
PARI DELICTO RULE (EXCEPTION) / ILLEGAL excess of the maximum price allowed may
CONTRACTS DEFENSE (EXCEPTION) recover such excess.
---------------------------------------------------------
LEGAL INCAPACITY
VOID CONTRACTS

MAY RECOVER
PARI DELICTO RULE (EXCEPTION) / ILLEGAL
CONTRACTS DEFENSE (EXCEPTION)
REQUISITES (WHAT KIND OF CONTRACT?)

(1) illegal contract CONTRACT BEYOND CEILING PRICE

MAY RECOVER
Where one of the parties to an illegal
RULE: (a)
contract is incapable of giving consent
price of any article or commodity is
RULE: (a)
RULE: (b) if the interest of justice so demands determined by statute, or by authority of law

EFFECT:allow recovery of money or property person paying any amount in excess of


RULE: (b)
delivered by the incapacitated person. the maximum price allowed

--------------------------------------------------------- EFFECT: may recover such excess.


Article 1416. When the agreement is not illegal
---------------------------------------------------------
per se but is merely prohibited, and the
Article 1418. When the law fixes, or authorizes the
prohibition by the law is designed for the
fixing of the maximum number of hours of labor,
protection of the plaintiff, he may, if public policy
and a contract is entered into whereby a laborer
is thereby enhanced, recover what he has paid or
undertakes to work longer than the maximum
delivered.
thus fixed, he may demand additional
---------------------------------------------------------
compensation for service rendered beyond the
VOID CONTRACTS time limit.

6
• __

--------------------------------------------------------- VOID CONTRACTS


VOID CONTRACTS
PARI DELICTO RULE (EXCEPTION) / ILLEGAL
PARI DELICTO RULE (EXCEPTION) / ILLEGAL CONTRACTS DEFENSE (EXCEPTION)
CONTRACTS DEFENSE (EXCEPTION)
DIVISIBLE CONTRACTS
CONTRACT BEYOND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF HOURS
OF LABOR MAY BE ENFORCED
RULE: If indivisible the whole contract is void, even if only some
terms are illegal.
MAY DEMAND ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION

RULE: (a) divisible contract,


RULE: (a)When the law fixes, or authorizes the
fixing of the maximum number of hours of labor
RULE: (b)if the illegal terms can be separated
RULE: (b) a contract is entered into from the legal ones

EFFECT: the latter [legal parts] may be enforced.


RULE: (c)whereby a laborer undertakes to work
longer than the maximum thus fixed
NOTE: He who wants to enforce a contract must show how
EFFECT:he may demand additional compensation much of the cause is legal; otherwise, if partly legal and partly
for service rendered beyond the time limit. illegal, it will result in the contract being considered as wholly
void. (Lichauco v. Martinez, 6 Phil. 594).

--------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------
Article 1419. When the law sets, or authorizes the Article 1421. The defense of illegality of contract
setting of a minimum wage for laborers, and a is not available to third persons whose interests
contract is agreed upon by which a laborer are not directly affected.
accepts a lower wage, he shall be entitled to ---------------------------------------------------------
recover the deficiency.
VOID CONTRACTS
---------------------------------------------------------
VOID CONTRACTS ILLEGAL CONTRACTS DEFENSE (EXCEPTION)

PARI DELICTO RULE (EXCEPTION) / ILLEGAL RULE: defense of illegality of contract


CONTRACTS DEFENSE (EXCEPTION)
RULE: isnot available
CONTRACT BELOW MINIMUM WAGE - to third persons whose interests are not
directly affected.
---------------------------------------------------------
MAY RECOVER
Article 1422. A contract which is the direct result
of a previous illegal contract, is also void and
RULE: (a)When the law sets, or authorizes the
inexistent.
setting of a minimum wage for laborers
---------------------------------------------------------
RULE: (b) contract is agreed upon VOID CONTRACTS

RULE: (c) by which a laborer accepts a lower wage ILLEGAL CONTRACTS DEFENSE
EFFECT: he shall be entitled to recover the
deficiency.
RULE: (a) A contract which is the direct result
---------------------------------------------------------
Article 1420. In case of a divisible contract, if the RULE: (b) of a previous illegal contract
illegal terms can be separated from the legal
ones, the latter may be enforced. EFFECT: is also void and inexistent.
--------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------

7
• __

You might also like