Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RULE: In the case of Liguez v. Lopez, 102 Phil. 577, the Supreme
UNENFORCEABLE VOID
Court, thru Mr. Justice J.B.L. Reyes, stated that there are two
kinds of VOID contracts: (a) there is a contract but it (a) no contract at all
cannot be enforced by a
DEFINITION: INEXISTENT CONTRACTS [essential formalities are not court action
complied with]
- refer to agreements which lack one or some or all of (b) cannot be assailed by (b) generally, effects are not
the elements (i.e., consent, object, and cause) or do third parties produced at all (2004)
not comply with the formalities which are essential for
the existence of a contract.
- (like those where essential formalities are not complied Distinguish briefly but clearly between Inexistent contracts and
with; example: a donation of land in a private annullable contracts.
instrument; this produces no effect whatsover). INEXISTENT CONTRACTS are considered as not having been
entered into and, therefore, void ob initio. They do not create
DEFINITION: VOID CONTRACTS [illegal or illicit ones] any obligation and cannot be ratified or validated, as there is
- are those which, no agreement to ratify or validate.
- because of certain defects,
- generally produce no effect at all. On the other hand, ANNULLABLE or VOIDABLE CONTRACTS are
- They are considered as inexistent from its inception valid until invalidated by the court but may be ratified.
(from the very beginning)
- (like a donation made because of an immoral As to defect, in the former, one or more requisites of a valid
condition, such as illicit sexual intercourse). contract are absent. In the latter, all the elements of a contract
- (Here, in some way, the donation produces are present except that the consent of one of the contracting
some effect in that he who gave the parties was vitiated or one of them has no capacity to give
donation cannot get back what he has consent.
given.)
---------------------------------------------------------
CHAPTER 9 Void and Inexistent Contracts
the right to set up the defense of illegality
RULE:
[cannot] be waived. Article 1409. The following contracts are
inexistent and void from the beginning:
VOIDABLE VOID
These contracts cannot be ratified. Neither can law in force at the time it is executed.
the right to set up the defense of illegality be - RULE: But the right of a party under such a contract
waived. cannot be affected by a subsequent law removing
--------------------------------------------------------- or eliminating such right.
- EXAMPLE: Thus, where at the time the contract was
VOID/INEXISTENT CONTRACTS entered into there was as yet no statute fixing a
ceiling on rentals and prohibiting the landholder
2 CLASSES OF INEXISTENT CONTRACTS from demanding an increase thereof,
- the landholder has a right to demand
RULE: Nos. 2 and 3 refer to contracts which are inexistent. - an increase to the limit authorized by law.
(Cabatan vs. Court of Appeals, 95 SCRA
DEFINITION: INEXISTENT CONTRACTS [essential formalities are not 323 [1980].) See comments and examples
complied with] under Articles 1306, 1352, and 1353.
- refer to agreements which lack one or some or all of
the elements (i.e., consent, object, and cause) or do
not comply with the formalities which are essential for object is outside the
CONTRACTS WHOSE:(4)
the existence of a contract. commerce of men;
- (like those where essential formalities are not complied
with; example: a donation of land in a private
Article 1347: The object should be within
instrument; this produces no effect whatsover).
the commerce of men;
- in other words, it should be
- REQUISITE: [appropriability] susceptible of
appropriation and
(2) SIMULATED CONTRACTS
- REQUISITE: [transmissibility] transmissible from one
person to another.
RULE: absolutely simulated or fictitious;
- EXCEPTION: All rights which are not
(a) If absolutely simulated, the contract is void for utter lack of intransmissible may also be the
consent. object of contracts
(b) If relatively simulated, the hidden or intended contract is OBJECTS OUTSIDE THE COMMERCE OF MEN
generally binding. (Onglengco v. Ozaeta, 70 Phil. 43).
(1) those things
- which are such by their very nature [sacred things,
(3) NON-EXISTING CAUSE OR OBJECT res nullius [nobody's property]
- such as common things like the air or the
RULE: did not exist at the time of the transaction; sea,
- “could not come into existence - and
- because the object may - property belonging to the public
- legally be a future thing.” (See Arts. 1347, 1461, Civil domain;
Code; Lawyer’s Journal, Jan. 31, 1951).
(2) those
Paragraph 3 speaks of contracts “whose cause or object did - which are made such
not exist at the time of the transaction.” - by special prohibitions established by
- This is not exactly correct because there can be law,
valid contracts involving future property; example: - such as poisonous substances, drugs, arms,
sale of future or after-acquired property explosives, and contrabands;
2
• __
RULE: Thus, in this jurisdiction, it has been held that the contract shall be null and void
communal things, such as public plazas, sidewalks, streets,
rivers, fountains and other things for public use cannot be
RULE: DOUBT in such a way that it cannot be
sold or leased because they are by their very nature
outside the commerce of men
known what may have been the intention or
will of the parties
3
• __
guilty party
4
• __
PARI DELICTO RULE / ILLEGAL CONTRACTS DEFENSE RULE:Interest paid in excess of the interest allowed
by the usury laws may be recovered by the debtor
(THERE NO CRIMINAL OFFENSE)
with interest thereon from the date of the
RULE:
payment.
RULE: unlawful or forbidden cause
RULE: doesnot constitute a criminal offense RULE: Thus, in Angel Jose Warehousing Co. vs. Chelda55 the
RULE: When the fault is on the part of both Supreme Court declared that, in reality, there is no confl ict
contracting parties between the Civil Code and the Usury Law. Under the latter, in
Sec. 6, the debtor may recover the whole interest paid. Under
EFFECT:neither may recover what he has given by the Civil Code, in Art. 1413, “interest paid in excess of the interest
virtue of the contract allowed by the usury laws may be recovered by the debtor, with
EFFECT: nor demand the performance of the interest thereon from the date of payment.” When the Code
speaks of “interest paid in excess of that allowed by the usury
other's undertaking;
law,’’ it means the whole USURIOUS INTEREST
5
• __
RULE: (b) before any damage has been caused to a Illegal Per Se Merely Prohibited
third person
Illegal per se contracts are Merely prohibited contracts
RULE: (c) The court considers that public interest will those forbidden because of are those forbidden because
thus be subservedby allowing recovery public interest. of private interests.
MAY RECOVER
PARI DELICTO RULE (EXCEPTION) / ILLEGAL
CONTRACTS DEFENSE (EXCEPTION)
REQUISITES (WHAT KIND OF CONTRACT?)
MAY RECOVER
Where one of the parties to an illegal
RULE: (a)
contract is incapable of giving consent
price of any article or commodity is
RULE: (a)
RULE: (b) if the interest of justice so demands determined by statute, or by authority of law
6
• __
--------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------
Article 1419. When the law sets, or authorizes the Article 1421. The defense of illegality of contract
setting of a minimum wage for laborers, and a is not available to third persons whose interests
contract is agreed upon by which a laborer are not directly affected.
accepts a lower wage, he shall be entitled to ---------------------------------------------------------
recover the deficiency.
VOID CONTRACTS
---------------------------------------------------------
VOID CONTRACTS ILLEGAL CONTRACTS DEFENSE (EXCEPTION)
RULE: (c) by which a laborer accepts a lower wage ILLEGAL CONTRACTS DEFENSE
EFFECT: he shall be entitled to recover the
deficiency.
RULE: (a) A contract which is the direct result
---------------------------------------------------------
Article 1420. In case of a divisible contract, if the RULE: (b) of a previous illegal contract
illegal terms can be separated from the legal
ones, the latter may be enforced. EFFECT: is also void and inexistent.
--------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------
7
• __