Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Conversion of Non-Van Der Waals Solids To 2D Transition-Metal Chalcogenides
Conversion of Non-Van Der Waals Solids To 2D Transition-Metal Chalcogenides
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1904-x Zhiguo Du1, Shubin Yang1*, Songmei Li1, Jun Lou2, Shuqing Zhang3, Shuai Wang1, Bin Li1,
Yongji Gong1, Li Song4, Xiaolong Zou3 & Pulickel M. Ajayan2*
Received: 2 March 2019
Two-dimensional (2D) atomic-layer crystals have demonstrated many M–X bonds and metallic M–A bonds17,18. Because the M–A bonds are
unique physical and chemical properties as well as broad applications more chemically active than the M–X bonds, A species in MAX phases
in electronics2, sensors5, catalysts9 and batteries10,11. Generally, 2D struc- can be extracted using highly reactive solvents (hydrogen fluoride and
tures such as graphene, boron nitride and transition-metal sulfides can strong bases)16,19, allowing few-layer-thick 2D transition-metal carbides,
be produced via a top-down approach, that is, by directly exfoliating carbonitrides and nitrides—called MXenes—to be created. These 2D
the vdW counterparts through mechanical3, liquid-phase1 and electro- nanocrystals are usually terminated with defects and surface termina-
chemical procedures2. In this manner, various vdW materials—such tions of -OH, -O, -F or -Cl20–22. Owing to the very close atomic packing
as metal oxides12, hydroxides13 and topological insulators14—can also and strong chemical bonds in non-vdW solids, it remains a challenge
be synthesized, enriching the 2D family of materials. In these 2D vdW to convert them to 2D nanocrystals with abundant exposed surfaces
nanocrystals, the elemental compositions, stoichiometric ratios and and identified phases.
structural phases are usually inherited from their parent bulk counter- Here we demonstrate an efficient strategy that enables us to convert
parts, although 2D nanocrystals with phase-specific structures such a family of non-vdW bulk solids such as MAX phases to 2D transition-
as 1T and 2H phases are difficult to synthesize selectively6,7. Here we metal chalcogenides with well-defined phases. As depicted in Fig. 1a,
demonstrate an efficient topological conversion of non-vdW solids under chalcogen-containing vapours (HyZ, where Z represents sulfur,
such as transition-metal carbides and nitrides under chalcogen vapours selenium or tellurium and y is 0 or 2) at high temperatures, non-vdW
to 2D vdW transition-metal chalcogenide layers with identified 2H/1T MAX phases and transition-metal borides, silicides and carbides (Sup-
phases, good stability at high temperatures (<1,373 K) and achieving plementary Fig. 1) have high activities. In particular, the active M–A
high-throughput production of monolayers. We anticipate that the bonds in MAX phases react easily with chalcogen-containing gases,
resultant transition-metal chalcogenide layers with favourable fea- resulting in products of AZ and MZ compositions. Such reactions must
tures would have broad applications for electronics, energy storage produce an AZ intermediate product at high vapour pressure, which
and conversions. would allow rapid evaporation rates, thus boosting the continuous
In the past decade, some unusual 2D nanocrystals have emerged from reaction into the bulk of the reactant material. Thermodynamically,
non-vdW solids such as haematite15 or bulk layered transition-metal if the reaction temperature were high enough, all the post-transition-
carbides and nitrides16, namely MAX phases, greatly increasing the num- metal A (Si, Al, Sn, Ge) species in MAX phases could be transformed to
ber of 2D material compositions accessible. In particular, the non-vdW metal chalcogenide gases (Supplementary Figs. 2–5), which facilitates
MAX phases—where M represents a transition-metal element, A usually the conversion of MAX phases to 2D nanostructures. As an example,
represents an element from groups 13–16 of the periodic table and X based on temperature–vapour pressure relationships (Fig. 1b and
is carbon or nitrogen—have predominantly mixed covalent or ionic Supplementary Fig. 6)23,24, germanium chalcogenides (GeS, GeSe)
Key Laboratory of Aerospace Advanced Materials and Performance of Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China. 2Department of
1
Materials Science and NanoEngineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA. 3Shenzhen Geim Graphene Center and Low-Dimensional Materials and Devices Laboratory (LDMD), Tsinghua-
Berkeley Shenzhen Institute (TBSI), Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China. 4National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, University of Science and
Technology of China, Hefei, China. *e-mail: yangshubin@buaa.edu.cn; ajayan@rice.edu
Nb Mo Ge Sn N Si Se 0.00
SnSe
Fig. 1 | Schematic illustration of the conversion of non-vdW solids to 2D vdW represents an early-transition-metal element, A is an element from groups
transition-metal chalcogenides. a, Non-vdW solids such as MAX phases are 13–16, X is C, N, B or Si, and Z refers to S, Se and Te, associated with volatile AZ
progressively transformed to 2D transition-metal chalcogenides via a products. b, Temperature–vapour pressure relationships for various AZ
topological conversion reaction (MAX + HyZ (gas) → MZ + AZ), in which M substances.
have higher vapour pressures than other chalcogenide materials spacing of 0.28 nm, in good agreement with the spacing between the
(SiS, Al2S3, SnS) at 1,073 K; from this we expect Ge-containing MAX (100) facets of 2H MoS2 (ref. 2).
phases to be easily converted to 2D transition-metal chalcogenides To identify the interior structure of the resultant MoS2, we conducted
with vdW layers (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 7). According to the an ultrathin sectioning experiment. Many nanosheets with thicknesses
Clausius–Clapeyron equation25 (see equation (1) in Methods), upon from 0.4 nm to 4 nm are visible (Supplementary Fig. 11), indicating the
increasing the temperature further to more than 1,100 K, other Si-, co-existence of monolayers, bilayers and few layers in the sample. To
Sn- and Al-containing MAX phases should also serve as precursors inhibit the restacking of already-expanded 2D MoS2 and improve the
for the generation of 2D transition-metal chalcogenides (Supple- fraction of monolayers, the converted samples were rapidly transferred
mentary Fig. 8), owing to the increased vapour pressures of the prod- to a low-temperature zone during our synthetic process. Thus, the frac-
ucts at higher reaction temperatures. Using this principle, we have tion of monolayer MoS2 can be improved to 31% from 9% based on our
synthesized 13 transition-metal chalcogenides (Supplementary standard conversion (Supplementary Figs. 12–16). Remarkably, when
Tables 1 and 2), including 7 binary chalcogenides (based on the Ti-, we directly converted thin non-vdW solid MXene-Mo2CTx in H2S gas,
Nb-, Mo- and Ta-containing MAX phases and MXenes), 5 heteroatom- the fraction of monolayer MoS2 was up to about 91% (Supplementary
doped chalcogenides with selected 2H phase or 1T phase and one Fig. 17). Raman spectra of the accordion-like MoS2 (Supplementary
composite (based on quaternary MAX phases). This demonstrates that Figs. 18 and 19) show two typical peaks at 379 cm−1 and 405 cm−1, cor-
our synthetic protocol is versatile, enabling the efficient conversion responding to the in-plane E2g1 and out-of-plane A1g vibrational modes
of a large number of non-vdW bulk solids to 2D transition-metal chal- of 2H MoS2 (Supplementary Fig. 67)2, respectively. On the basis of ther-
cogenides. Notably, although the resulting 2D structures are derived modynamic considerations, by enhancing the reaction temperatures
from bulk MAX phases, their compositions and stoichiometric ratios to more than 1,100 K, accordion-like TiSe2 could also be derived from
are very different from the parent compositions and are also differ- MAX-Ti3SiC2 by substituting H2S with selenium vapour (Fig. 2f–h, Sup-
ent from other products commonly derived from MAX phases, such plementary Figs. 20–24), owing to the high vapour pressure of the SiSe
as MXenes16,26. product at such high temperatures (Supplementary Fig. 4). An atomic-
resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image
of TiSe2 (Fig. 2h) reveals the 1T superlattice with metal sites located at
2D transition-metal chalcogenides (2H/1T) the centres of octahedral units. Such transformations suggest that our
As a proof of concept, we produced 2D transition-metal dichalcogenide synthetic protocol can be generalized to convert non-vdW solids to vdW
(TMD)-MoS2 nanocrystals via engineering MAX-Mo2GeC under hydro- 2D nanocrystals with identified 2H/1T phases and high-throughput
gen disulfide gas at 1,073 K (Fig. 2a; see Methods). X-ray diffraction pat- production of monolayers (Supplementary Figs. 25–36).
terns reveal the disappearance of Mo2GeC peaks in the product (Fig. 2b).
Instead, a series of diffraction peaks at 14.1°, 32.7°, 39.5° and 58.3° are
well indexed to the (002), (100), (103) and (110) facets of hexagonal 2D heteroatom-doped chalcogenides (2H/1T)
MoS2 (according to Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards More than 70 ternary MAX phases27 and some new quaternary MAX
( JCPDS) Card No. 37-1492), demonstrating the complete conversion and phases28 such as (W2/3Y1/3)2AlC29 and (Ti1/2Nb1/2)2AlC30 have been explored,
removal of Ge-layers from MAX-Mo2GeC during our synthetic process. suggesting that it may be feasible to produce a series of transition-metal
The resulting product exhibits uniform structure with largely extended chalcogenides with multi-compositions via our topological conversion
spacing in the whole scanning electron microscope image (Fig. 2c and approach. One possibility is to produce accordion-like Y-doped WS2
Supplementary Fig. 9), similar to those reported for expanded graphite with the 2H phase (Fig. 3a, b and Supplementary Figs. 37–39) based
and MXenes16. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Fig. 2d and on a (W2/3Y1/3)2AlC precursor. After conversion with fast quenching,
Supplementary Fig. 10) and high-resolution TEM (Fig. 2e) confirm highly expanded accordion-like Y-doped WS2 can be obtained, in which
clearly the highly exfoliated nanocrystals with a uniform interplanar the fraction of monolayers is up to 27% (Supplementary Figs. 40–45).
(002)
(100)
(103)
(110)
(102)
(008)
(105)
(006)
(203)
(004)
(107)
Intensity (a.u.)
TMD-MoS2
MAX-Mo2GeC
1 μm
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
2T (º)
H2S d e
Hexagonal MoS2
MAX-Mo2GeC
d (100) = 0.28 nm
100 nm 2 nm
f g h
TMD-TiSe2
1 μm 200 nm 1 nm
Fig. 2 | Structural characterization of 2D transition-metal chalcogenides accordion-like MoS2. f, Crystalline structure of 1T TiSe2. g, Scanning electron
derived from MAX phases. a, Schematic illustration of the conversion of MAX- microscope image and sectional TEM image (inset) of accordion-like TiSe2,
Mo2GeC to accordion-like MoS2 under H2S gas at 1,073 K. b, X-ray diffraction indicating its highly expanded structure. h, Atomic-resolution STEM image of
patterns of MAX-Mo2GeC and accordion-like MoS2. c–e, Scanning electron TiSe2 layers and the corresponding atomic configuration (inset) of the 1T
microscope (c), sectional TEM (d) and high-resolution TEM (e) images of phase. Purple and green balls represent Ti and Se atoms, respectively.
High-resolution elemental mapping images (Fig. 3f) reveal that Y spe- transfer (Supplementary Fig. 69). Moreover, the increase of defect
cies are mainly monoatomically dispersed into the layers, associated scattering by Y dopants would also reduce the electrical conductivity.
with a few Y clusters, possibly accounting for the many Y–S bonds pre- Thus, the electrical conductivity of Y-doped WS2 is experimentally
sent (Supplementary Fig. 46). A typical 2H structure is visualized in an measured to be 2.31 × 10−3 S cm−1, much lower than that of pure WS2
aberration-corrected TEM image (Fig. 3c), consistent with X-ray diffrac- (8.13 × 10−2 S cm−1) (Supplementary Table 3). This is in contrast to those
tion (Supplementary Fig. 38) and Raman analysis (Fig. 3h), indicating reported for d orbital electron-enriched metal (Re, Nb)-doped MoS231,32
that the heteroatoms remain stable within the host 2D transition-metal and our Nb-doped TiSe2 (Supplementary Figs. 47–50), exhibiting sub-
chalcogenide structure. To further verify the Y–S bonds in Y-doped stantial improvements in the electrical conductivities (Supplementary
WS2, we conducted X-ray absorption near-edge fine structure (XANES) Figs. 51, 70 and Supplementary Table 3).
spectroscopy measurements. In the case of Y-doped WS2, the absorp-
tion edge in Y K-edge XANES spectra (Fig. 3i) is close to that of yttrium
sulfide, suggesting that the Y is in the sulfide state. The Fourier trans- 2D heteroatoms (Y, P) co-doped WS2 (1T)
form spectra resulting from the analysis of Y-doped WS2 by extended While engineering the quaternary MAX phase (W2/3Y1/3)2AlC, other
X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy (Fig. 3j) show vapours such as phosphorus could be easily and simultaneously
a dominant peak at 2.2 Å, indexed to the Y–S bonds in comparison introduced into the synthetic system, creating both Y and P co-doped
with yttrium sulfide. Theoretically, the energy of 2H WS2 is much lower WS2 (Supplementary Figs. 52–56). As illustrated by the Raman spec-
than its 1T phase (>0.6 eV per formula unit). With increasing Y doping tra (Fig. 4d), for Y, P co-doped WS2 there are three dominant peaks
levels, the energy differences between 2H and 1T phases noticeably at 130 cm−1 ( J1), 258 cm−1 ( J2) and 406 cm−1 ( J3), corresponding to the
decrease, but it remains difficult to reverse the relative stability (Sup- vibration modes of the 1T phase6,33, as well as two peaks at 348 cm−1
plementary Fig. 68). Owing to the substitution of W (valency +4) in and 414 cm−1, indexed to the E2g1 and A1g peaks of the 2H phase, respec-
WS2 by low-valence Y (+3), the charge densities near the Fermi level tively. The presence of the 1T phase in real space can be visualized
tend to be localized around Y atoms, thus going against electron via aberration-corrected STEM images (Fig. 4a and Supplementary
0.27 nm
(100)
1 nm
d e f g
500 nm 1 nm 1 nm 1 nm 1 nm
HAADF W Y S
H2S
h Y-doped WS2 i j Y-doped WS2
Bulk WS2 Y2S3
Intensity (a.u.)
E2g1 A1g Y–S
Y-doped WS2
Y2S3
Y2O3
MAX-(W2/3Y1/3)2AlC
200 250 300 350 400 450 500 17,050 17,100 17,150 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Raman shift (cm–1) Energy (eV) Radial distance (Å)
Fig. 3 | Structural characterization of 2D heteroatom-doped transition- annular dark-field (d) images of Y-doped WS2 layers. e–g, Elemental mapping
metal chalcogenides with 2H phase derived from quaternary MAX phases. images of W (e), Y (f) and S (g) species in Y-doped WS2 layers. h, Raman spectra
a, Schematic illustration of the conversion of quaternary MAX-(W2/3Y1/3)2AlC to of Y-doped WS2 and bulk WS2. i, j, Y K-edge XANES spectra (i) and Fourier
Y-doped WS2. b, Typical scanning electron microscope image of Y-doped WS2, transform spectra ( j) of Y K-edge EXAFS for Y-doped WS2, demonstrating the
showing the expanded structure. c, d, High-resolution TEM (c) and high-angle presence of Y–S bonds in Y-doped WS2.
a b d Y-doped WS2
W Y, P co-doped WS2
Y
J1
S
J2
Intensity (a.u.)
E2g1 A1g
Y, P co-doped
1T
WS2
c 14 Line 1
J3
Intensity (a.u.)
Lin 12 W W W W W
e1
10
S S S S S S S S
8 S S
6
0.5 nm 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 100 200 300 400 500
Position (nm) Raman shift (cm–1)
e Y, P co-doped WS2 f g
Y, P co-doped WS2 Exfoliated WS2
3
Y2O3 YP Y-doped WS2
P4S10
Y2S3 2 Y, P co-doped WS2
P–Y
Fourier transform, k3F(k)
YP
Y–O
Y–P 1
Intensity (a.u.)
Current (μA)
P–S
Y–S
0
10
5
Current (nA)
1
0
–5
–2
–10
–1.0 –0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
Potential (V)
–3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 2,120 2,140 2,160 2,180 2,200 2,220 –1.0 –0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
Radial distance (Å) Energy (eV) Potential (V)
Fig. 4 | Structural characterization and electrical properties of 2D highlighted arrow in a. d, Raman spectra of Y, P co-doped WS2. e, Fourier
heteroatom (Y and P) co-doped WS2 with 1T phase derived from quaternary transform spectra of Y K-edge EXAFS. f, P K-edge XANES spectra for Y,
MAX-(W2/3Y1/3)2AlC. a, Atomic-resolution STEM image and its corresponding P co-doped WS2. g, Current versus voltage curves of Y, P co-doped WS2, Y-doped
fast Fourier transform patterns (inset). b, Atomic configuration of Y, WS2 and exfoliated WS2.
P co-doped WS2, exhibiting the 1T phase. c, Line intensity profile along the