1) Number of providers who have agreed to be included in the side-by-side
comparison. a. Number of providers who have agree to pay commission for leads generated by CaribCompare Justification: For the MVP to be a success the first hurdle which has to be overcome is the inclusion of the providers of financial services in particular personal loans. Without the commissions which will be earned from providing high quality leads which can be translated into active loans there is no revenue stream and thus no MVP.
2) Number of logins per day
a. Male b. Female c. Occupation d. Age e. Income f. Loan Size g. Credit rating Justification: Understanding who our customers are is essential to product development as this knowledge will allow for more qualitative and quantitative research. This research will provide essential information in customers’ needs, customer behaviour and potential opportunities as well as weaknesses.
3) Marketing spend per sales distribution channel ( facebook / Instagram/radio) VS
Number of leads Justification: Based on the business model shared this metric is one of the most important to bottom-line / profitability. As the model is based on the return earned from providing quality leads to financial services providers understanding the per unit cost of acquiring these leads is essential as this will inform the financial decisions of this company.
4) Number of loans approved by providers from leads supplied by CaribCompare Vs
Number of leads. Justification: Quality is the corner stone of this business model. If we as a company succeed in attracting and supplying 100 leads only to have the financial service provider to reject 90% of these applications for loans this will not communicate a sufficient level of confidence in the service that we aim to provide. As such this is a very CRITICAL metric.
5) NPS Score for each provider
a. Poorly ranked services attribute of these providers i. Interest Rate ii. Non –interest rate related attribute Justification: In addition to consistently supplying quality lead, part of generating value for the providers of financial services will be to highlight the weaknesses in their product design as well as their service delivery. This metric will act as the barometer by which our customers rank their satisfaction with the providers’ product and service. 6) Number of Alliances between providers and CaribCompare Justification: One of the company’s ultimate goals should be to align itself with established institutions to offer our mutual customers the most competitive product offering in the market. The more alliances which are initiated the stronger will be the CaribCompare brand as such I propose this metric to be a quasi-measure of brand strength.