Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.sciencedirect.com
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
a
Pôle pharmaceutique, CHU Pontchaillou, 2, rue Henri-Le-Guilloux, 35033 Rennes cedex 9,
France
b
Laboratoire de toxicologie biologique et médico-légale, CHU Pontchaillou, 2, rue
Henri-Le-Guilloux, 35033 Rennes cedex 9, France
c
Pôle pharmaceutique, hôpital Sud, CHU de Rennes, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35203 Rennes
cedex 2, France
d
UF biomarqueurs, CHU Pontchaillou, 2, rue Henri-Le-Guilloux, 35033 Rennes cedex 9, France
e
Laboratoire de pharmacie galénique, biopharmacie et pharmacie clinique, faculté des
sciences pharmaceutiques et biologiques, université Rennes-1, 2, avenue du Pr-Léon-Bernard,
35043 Rennes cedex, France
KEYWORDS Summary
Phenylephrine Introduction. — We present formulation and stability evaluation of a 2% (w/v) phenylephrine
hydrochloride; hydrochloride biocompatible eye drop solution, routinely prepared in hospital pharmacy under
Eye drop; aseptic conditions, for retinal examination of neonates and premature infants.
Premature infant; Materials and methods. — Eye drop solution was formulated by dissolution of phenylephrine
Biocompatibility; hydrochloride and disodium hydrogen phosphate as buffering agent in sterile water for injection
Stability study; and sodium chloride for injection as isotonic agent. The previous solution was sterile filtered
Mass spectrometry through under aseptic conditions, in an iso class 5 air quality clean room under horizontal
laminar airflow hood. Physical stability (visual inspection, osmolality measurements), chemical
stability (pH measurement, phenylephrine assay by liquid chromatography coupled with an
∗ Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: gilles.dollo@univ-rennes1.fr, gilles.dollo@chu-rennes.fr (G. Dollo).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2014.06.006
0003-4509/© 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Dreno C, et al. Formulation and stability study of a pediatric 2% phenylephrine
hydrochloride eye drop solution. Ann Pharm Fr (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2014.06.006
+Model
PHARMA-366; No. of Pages 6 ARTICLE IN PRESS
2 C. Dreno et al.
ultra-high resolution and accurate mass) and sterility evaluation of phenylephrine eye drop
solution stored at ambient temperature were studied during 60 days.
Results and discussion. — The formulated eye drop solution had a pH of 6.90 ± 0.05 and an
osmolality of 285 ± 2 mOsm/kg. Throughout the 60 days study the solutions remained clear
without any precipitation or color modification, sterility was maintained, pH and osmolality
were not significantly modified and no significant loss of product was detected using liquid
chromatography coupled with an ultra-high resolution and accurate mass instrument suggesting
the lack of degradation.
Conclusion. — These results indicate that 2% phenylephrine hydrochloride eye drop solutions
were physically, chemically and microbiologically stable for at least 60 days when stored in
type I amber glass vials at room temperature, allowing the compounding of higher batch sizes.
© 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Phenylephrine hydrochloride (Fig. 1) is a sympathomimetic, produce maximal dilation of the pupil for examination of the
alpha-adrenergic agonist drug. Following instillation in the peripheral retina [1,2].
eye, phenylephrine acts locally as a rapid and potent vaso- In Rennes University Hospital Department of Pediatrics,
constrictor and mydriatic agent, by constricting ophthalmic 10 to 15 dilations are performed weekly, for retinal exami-
blood vessels and radial muscle of the iris. Phenylephrine nation of neonates and premature infants. Several systemic
hydrochloride is commonly used in association with anti- side effects of topical phenylephrine have been reported
cholinergic agents such as tropicamide or cyclopentolate to in neonates and children undergoing retinopathy of pre-
maturity screening, such as increased blood pressure [3],
pulmonary edema [4] and grand mal seizure [5].
Other side effects such as paralytic ileus, necrotiz-
ing enterocolitis and feeding intolerance were significantly
increased when anti-cholinergic drug tropicamide or
cyclopentolate was associated to phenylephrine [6].
As systemic side effects in children may be significantly
underreported, it is strongly recommended to adopt strate-
gies for reducing systemic absorption and toxicity of ocular
phenylephrine, for example to use the lowest available
concentration of topical drug, to occlude the nasolacrimal
Figure 1. Chemical structure of phenylephrine hydrochloride. passage after topical instillation by gently but firmly pressing
Structure chimique du chlorhydrate de phényléphrine. the tear duct against the nose immediately after instillation
Please cite this article in press as: Dreno C, et al. Formulation and stability study of a pediatric 2% phenylephrine
hydrochloride eye drop solution. Ann Pharm Fr (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2014.06.006
+Model
PHARMA-366; No. of Pages 6 ARTICLE IN PRESS
Formulation and stability of 2% phenylephrine hydrochloride eye drop solution 3
for at least one minute, to close the patient’s eyelid and to were purchased from Becton-Dickinson (Le Pont-de-Claix,
remove excess solution with absorbent tissue after instilla- France). Methanol, acetonitrile and water were obtained
tion to avoid cutaneous or oral absorption [6]. from Fisher Scientific (Illkirch, France). Formic acid and
In France, phenylephrine hydrochloride eye drops are normetanephrine (internal standard) were purchased from
only available at the concentration of 5 and 10% but these Sigma Aldrich (Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France). All chemi-
strengths are not recommended for children because of the cals, reagents and solvents were of LC/MS quality grade.
higher risk of systemic side effects in comparison to the 2.5%
strength that is available in several countries. Due to the
lack of marketed pediatric dosage, nurses in pediatric units Formulation and preparation of phenylephrine
often dilute in the ward the adult strength product with a eye drops
different solvent and this can lead to the drug inactivation
or to a bacterial contamination of the dosage form. Among The eye drops were formulated and prepared in Rennes
the optional missions of French Hospital Pharmacies, stan- University Hospital Pharmacy. Firstly a 2% (w/v) phenyle-
dardized preparation compounding allows to face the lack of phrine hydrochloride solution was formulated by dissolution
industrial products. Among the few pediatric phenylephrine of phenylephrine hydrochloride (4 g) and disodium hydro-
eye drops prepared by French Hospital Pharmacies, the bio- gen phosphate as buffering agent (from 0 to 2000 mg) in
compatibility is not optimum for instillation to premature about 80 ml of sterile water for injection in a 200 ml ster-
infant as seen with alkaline pH values around 9 (higher ile graduated flask. Then sodium chloride 0.9% for injection
than the stability pH of phenylephrine hydrochloride, thus as isotonic agent was added (from 0 to 200 ml) and sterile
limiting the shelf life to 8 days) as seen with the presence of water for injection was used to make it up to the fixed vol-
preservatives such as sodium borate and boric acid (which ume (200 ml). After selection of the best solution by means
are not indicated in children under 3 years) and as seen of biocompatibility (Table 1), phenylephrine hydrochloride
with hypertonic eye drop solutions [7]. The aim of this work eye drops were prepared in accordance with French Good
was to formulate a biocompatible and stable 2% phenyle- Manufacturing Practice for Hospital Pharmacies [8].
phrine hydrochloride eye drop solution with a longer shelf In the initial step, the 2% phenylephrine hydrochloride
life than existing preparations, in order to provide value- solution was obtained by mixing appropriate drug and excip-
added hospital preparation of high pharmaceutical quality. ients quantities according to the previous paragraph. The
Physico-chemical stability of phenylephrine eye drop solu- previous 2% (w/v) phenylephrine solution was then rapidly
tion stored at ambient temperature in sterile amber glass sterile filtered through a 0.22-m pore size syringe filter, in
vials and sterility of the preparation were evaluated dur- a 10-ml sterile amber borosilicate type I glass bottle under
ing 60 days. An original and specific liquid chromatography aseptic conditions, in an iso class 5 air quality clean room
coupled with an ultra-high resolution and accurate mass under horizontal laminar airflow hood. Eye drop bottles were
instrument was used for phenylephrine hydrochloride assay. closed with a pharmaceutical grade butyl rubber stopper and
sealed with a crimped aluminium seal. A polyethylene plas-
tic dropper tip was connected just before administration by
the nurse.
Methods To evaluate the stability of phenylephrine eye drops,
three batches consisting of 40 bottles each were prepared
Materials and reagents and stored at room temperature (20—25 ◦ C) for up to 60
days. Six bottles were withdrawn from each batch on days
Phenylephrine hydrochloride and disodium hydrogen phos- 0, 2, 7, 14, 30, 45 and 60 to perform physical and chemical
phate were supplied from Inresa Pharma (Barthen- stability as well as sterility evaluation at each time point
heim, France), sterile water for injection and sterile for each batch. All bottles withdrawn for phenylephrine
sodium chloride 0.9% for injection were purchased from hydrochloride assay were kept at −80 ◦ C until analysis at the
Macopharma (Tourcoing, France). Cellulose acetate syringe end of the two months study period. No study was performed
filter (Minisart® , diameter 28 mm, pore size 0.2 m) with a prolonged contact of the eye drop solution with the
were purchased from Sartorius Stedim (Aubagne, France) rubber stopper because rubber stopper is of pharmaceutical
and 60 ml Luer lock syringes used for sterile filtration grade, vials storage is controlled by pharmacy (all vials are
Table 1 Result of the biocompatible phenylephrine hydrochloride eye drop formulation screening.
Résultat de la recherche d’une formulation biocompatible de collyre de chlorhydrate de phényléphrine.
Phenylephrine HCl (g) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Water for injection (ml) 200 200 — 140 140 140 140 130 130 130 143
NaCl 0.9% (ml) — — 200 60 60 60 60 70 70 70 57
Na2 HPO4 (mg) 2000 1000 0 2000 1000 100 60 50 40 30 0
pH 7.86a 7.74a 5.59a 7.84a 7.68a 7.07a 7.05a 7.04a 6.90 6.81 5.62a
Osmolality (mOsm/kg) 340a 259 462a 424a 337a 272 267 286 285 282 260
Compatibility (yes/no) No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No
a Do not meet product requirement, i.e. 6.0 < pH < 7.0 and 250 < osmolality < 330 mOsmol/kg.
Please cite this article in press as: Dreno C, et al. Formulation and stability study of a pediatric 2% phenylephrine
hydrochloride eye drop solution. Ann Pharm Fr (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2014.06.006
+Model
PHARMA-366; No. of Pages 6 ARTICLE IN PRESS
4 C. Dreno et al.
stored vertically) and vials are dispensed to unit just before scan, m/z of compounds were targeted as qualifiers. Reten-
administration to patient. tion times were 1.72 and 1.84 min for phenylephrine and
normetanephrine, respectively. This LC-HR-MS method was
Physical stability validated for selectivity, repeatability and reproducibility.
Samples were considered stable if drug concentration was
Physical stability was assessed by visual inspection (color higher than 90% of the initial concentration which is the limit
variation, apparition of precipitate. . .) and osmolality set up by the U.S. Pharmacopeia [9].
measurements were performed using the freezing point
depression technique with an advanced instruments model Sterility evaluation
3250 (Advanced Instruments, Norwood, MA, USA).
Eye drop sterility was tested on day 0, 30 and 60 using
Chemical stability Bactec® system, (Becton-Dickinson), i.e. direct inoculation
of the content of one vial of phenylephrine eye drops (5 ml)
pH measurement was performed using a phenomenal pH into standard aerobic and 5 ml into anaerobic liquid media
1000L meter (VWR international SAS, Pessac, France). The and detection of bacterial growth based on CO2 fluorimet-
pH meter was calibrated using standard buffer solutions ric detection. Both liquid media were incubated for 14 days
before measuring the pH of phenylephrine hydrochloride eye and bacterial growth was checked daily. The requirements
drop solutions. for sterility were met only when no bacterial growth was
The phenylephrine contents of the solutions were observed.
determined by liquid chromatography-high resolution-mass
spectrometry (LC-HR-MS). Analyses were performed on a Statistical analysis
Thermo Scientific Q ExactiveTM (San Jose, USA) mass spec-
trometer including an Accela pump (Thermo Scientific, San Analysis between different times was performed with a
Jose, USA). An HESI-II ion source was used for the ioniza- non-parametric Friedman test with Dunns post hoc test for
tion of target compounds. Data acquisition, peak integration comparisons. All analyses were performed using Prism soft-
and calibration were performed using Xcalibur® 2.1 software ware (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). For each
(ThermoScientific, San Jose, CA, USA). analysis, two-sided P-value less than 0.05 were considered
LC separation was performed using a gradient on a HILIC statistically significant.
Nucleodur column (100 × 2 mm, 1.8 m). The mobile phases
used were 10 mM ammonium acetate buffer containing 0.1%
(v/v) formic acid (solvent A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% (v/v) Results and discussion
formic acid (solvent B). The mobile phase was delivered at a
flow rate of 300 l/min using the following stepwise gradient Table 1 presents the results of the formulation screening. An
elution program: initial conditions of 30:70 (A:B) run from interesting formulation in the premature infant is an isotonic
70:30 (A:B) at 2 minutes, run from 30:70 (A:B) at 2.2 minutes eye drop solution, i.e. osmolality around 290 mOsmol/kg,
and conditions 30:70 (A:B) maintained to 3 minutes at a flow with a neutral pH close to the physiological pH of tears
rate of 400 l/min for equilibration. All prepared samples around 7.4. Phenylephrine hydrochloride is reported to have
were kept at 10 ◦ C in the autosampler until full loop injection a pH stability interval ranging from 3.5 to 7.0 [10], for other
into the LC-HR-MS system in a thermostated column at 40 ◦ C. authors the drug is stable below pH 7.3 [11]. Above pH 7.0,
The MS conditions were as follows: HESI in positive mode, degradation occurs involving the side chain with loss of the
capillary temperature: 300 ◦ C; spray voltage: 4500 V; sheath secondary amine function and the reaction is accelerated
and auxiliary gas (nitrogen) flow rate: 40 and 10 psi (arbitrary by the presence of phenylephrine base [10]. For that reason
units), respectively. we did not compromise drug stability and chose a neutral pH
Tuning parameters were optimized by direct infusion of just below 7.0, e.g. 6.9, by using disodium hydrogen phos-
phenylephrine at the concentration of 1 mg/l in the mobile phate as buffering agent. The eye tolerates a wide range of
phase into the ionization probe at a flow rate of 5 l/min pH from 3.5 to 9. Although phenylephrine is a weak base that
in ESI positive mode. Data were acquired simultaneously in is more ionized at a lower pH than 6.9, a neutral pH must be
full scan with high resolution acquisition and in targeted- preferred for the formulation because at this pH phenyle-
MS2 mode. For full scan acquisition, resolution was set at phrine is mainly present under its ionized form avoiding any
35,000 FWHM. The C-trap capacity was set at 106 charges base transformation and degradation, and because of its bio-
and the maximum injection time at 200 ms. The mass range compatibility in preterm infants. Table 2 shows the chosen
was made from 60 to 240 m/z. For targeted-MS2 mode, res- formula.
olution was set at 17,500 FWHM and the AGC target was
set at 5.105 charges and the maximum injection time was
50 ms and isolation width 2.0 m/z. The measured accurate Table 2 Two percent phenylephrine hydrochloride eye
m/z values of the protonated species were 168.1017 and drop components.
166.0874 for phenylephrine and normetanephrine, respec- Composition du collyre de chlorhydrate de phényléphrine à 2 %.
tively, corresponding to a loss of H2 0. Quantitation was Phenylephrine hydrochloride 4g
performed by extracting the exact mass of each of the Disodium hydrogen phosphate 40 mg
protonated fragment using a 5 ppm extraction window. Frag- NaCl 0.9% 75 ml
ments accurate mass were 109.0650 and 134.0598 m/z for Sterile water for injection qs 200 ml
phenylephrine and normetanephrine, respectively. In full
Please cite this article in press as: Dreno C, et al. Formulation and stability study of a pediatric 2% phenylephrine
hydrochloride eye drop solution. Ann Pharm Fr (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2014.06.006
+Model
PHARMA-366; No. of Pages 6 ARTICLE IN PRESS
Formulation and stability of 2% phenylephrine hydrochloride eye drop solution 5
Conclusion
These results indicate that 2% phenylephrine hydrochloride
eye drop solutions were physically, chemically and microbi-
ologically stable for at least 60 days when stored in amber
glass vials at room temperature. Compared with existing
extemporaneously compounded hospital preparations, the
shelf life was increased to 60 days allowing the compound-
ing of batch size of 40 or higher, and allowing to wait for the
result of the sterility test, respecting a quarantine period
before pharmaceutical releasing and dispensing of the prod-
uct.
Please cite this article in press as: Dreno C, et al. Formulation and stability study of a pediatric 2% phenylephrine
hydrochloride eye drop solution. Ann Pharm Fr (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2014.06.006
+Model
PHARMA-366; No. of Pages 6 ARTICLE IN PRESS
6 C. Dreno et al.
Please cite this article in press as: Dreno C, et al. Formulation and stability study of a pediatric 2% phenylephrine
hydrochloride eye drop solution. Ann Pharm Fr (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2014.06.006