You are on page 1of 60

Climate in Peril

A popular guide to the latest IPCC reports


SWEDISH ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY

This is a joint publication of GRID-Arendal and SMI books, produced A climate neutral publication
with the generous support of the Norwegian Pollution Control Au-
thority and the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. The production and transport of each copy of this book-
let has released about 1.31 kilogrammes of CO2-equiva-
lent into the atmosphere. This is about the amount of
CO2 released when driving an offroader (burning 14
litres per 100 km) for 3 kilometres. Factors taken into
consideration for this calculation are shipping, travel for
coordination and fundraising, paper, printing and energy
consumption of office and computer use.
UNEP/GRID-Arendal
Postboks 183, N-4802 Arendal, Norway The use of sustainably produced paper and plant-
www.grida.no based ink helped to lower the climate impact.

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)


United Nations Avenue, P.O. Box 20552, Nairobi, Kenya
www.unep.org

Printed at Birkeland Trykkeri, Norway


Copyright©2009 GRID-Arendal
ISBN: 978-82-7701-053-3 In order to compensate for the total amount of 10.5
tonnes of CO2 eq generated by the project, we pur-
This publication is distributed through SMI books and can be or- chased the according amount of carbon offsets with
dered from www.earthprint.com the help of the Swiss foundation myclimate. The money
(253 EUR) will be invested in a Gold Standard project.
Special thanks to Audun Garberg, Elisabeth Ørving, Christoffer
Grønstad and Marit Håseth Pettersen of SFT for their competent
support in reviewing the drafts.

This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part in any form for educational or non-
profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holders, provided acknowl-
edgement of the source is made. UNEP, SMI and GRID-Arendal would appreciate receiving
a copy of any material that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication UNEP promotes
may be made for resale or for any commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permis-
sion in written form from the copyright holders. The use of information from this publication environmentally sound practices
concerning proprietary products for advertising is not permitted.
globally and in its own activities. This pub-
Disclaimer: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this pub-
lication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United lication is printed on fully recycled paper, FSC
Nations Environment Programme nor GRID-Arendal concerning the legal status of any
country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers
certified, post-consumer waste and chlorine-free.
or boundaries. Mention of a commercial company or product does not imply endorsement
by the cooperating partners. We regret any errors or omissions that may unwittingly have
Inks are vegetable-based and coatings are water-
been made. Moreover, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the decision or based. Our distribution policy aims to reduce UNEP’s
the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme or GRID-Arendal, nor does
citing of trade names or commercial processes constitute endorsement. carbon footprint.
Climate in Peril
A popular guide to the latest IPCC reports
Disclaimer: This guide tries to remain faithful to the sense of the work of the IPCC and its Climate Change 2007 Synthesis Report of the Fourth Assess-
ment, while simplifying the language and structure. The full responsibility for the accuracy of the content rests with the editors of this guide. Readers may
remember the IPCC’s helpful warning that “while the Synthesis Report is a largely self-contained document, it needs to be viewed in the context of the other
volumes of Climate Change 2007 and it is recommended that for further details the contributions of the three Working Groups be consulted, published in
the volumes “Climate Change 2007 – The Physical Science Basis”; “Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability” and “Mitigation of Climate Change”, as well as
“Climate Change 2007 Synthesis Report”.

6 Robust findings and key uncertainties


8 Present changes, causes and observed impacts
24 Projected climate change and its impacts
41 Adaptation and mitigation
54 Sustainable development, environmental protection and climate change
55 Key vulnerabilities, impacts and risks – longterm perspectives

Text Carto-graphics
Alex Kirby Viktor Novikov, GRID-Arendal/GENFSEC
Matthias Beilstein
GRID-Arendal/GENFSEC editorial team
Christina Stuhlberger English editing of graphics
Claudia Heberlein Harry Forster, Interrelate Grenoble

Senior expert and initiator of the publication Layout


Svein Tveitdal, Klima 2020 GRID-Arendal
Foreword

In 2007 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate The main purpose of this short guide is to help bridging
Change (IPCC) shared the Nobel Peace Prize with the gap between science and policy and to increase
former US Vice President Al Gore for their work to public awareness about the urgency of action to com-
provide policy makers and the general public around bat climate change and its impacts. This booklet is in-
the world with the best possible science base for tended for those who do not have the time – and may
understanding and combating the increasing threat not have the scientific expertise – to read the entire
from climate change. But as the messages from the Synthesis Report from the IPCC.
scientists are becoming increasingly explicit, the
gap between the need for action they project and Special thanks to Svein Tveitdal of Klima 2020 and
the climate policy the world leaders put in place is former director of Grid-Arendal, for the initiative for
steadily increasing. this booklet and his valuable contribution to the con-
tent. We would also like to express our gratitude to the
One illustration is the trend in emissions of green- Swedish Environment Protection Agency and Earth-
house gases. According to the IPCC global emissions Print Ltd for additional financial support.
would need to peak between 2000 and 2015 in order
to limit the global temperature increase to between 2 Arendal and Oslo, February 10, 2009
and 2.4ºC compared to pre-industrial times. In 2007,
when ideally the emissions should have peaked, the
world instead experienced a new record in annual
emission increase. For each day we fail to twist de- Peter Prokosch, Ellen Hambro,
velopment towards a low-carbon society, the damage Director, Director General,
to the world’s ecosystems become more severe, and GRID-Arendal Norwegian Pollution
the costs of mitigation and adaptation increases. Control Authority (SFT)

How to Use This Guide


This guide, while it aims to present the substance and the Although the guide is intended for lay readers, not climate
sense of the IPCC’s original Synthesis Report, is designed scientists, inevitably it uses some scientific terms. Readers
to be read as a narrative. So it tells the story in a simplified will find a fuller explanation of some of them in the short Glos-
language while taking the liberty of shortening or enhancing sary at the end of the guide: they appear in the text in italics.
specific parts where it appears useful and illustrating the text In their assessment reports, the IPCC uses commonly used
with additional graphics. You will always find the source of the terms with a very specific meaning. In order to simplify the
data mentioned if it differs from the IPCC’s own. The guide language, this guide abandon these specialized terms. The
covers the six original topic headings as in the Summary for IPCC also uses several terms which are likely to be self-ex-
Policymakers but the order in which they are presented here planatory: they include high agreement/medium agreement
differs from the IPCC publication. It starts by spelling out what and high evidence/medium evidence. The term “agreement”
the IPCC knows and what it considers as key questions. refers to agreement found within the scientific literature.

 Climate in Peril
Introduction

In 2007 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate concern to policymakers, and draws as well on other
Change published its Fourth Assessment Report (fol- IPCC reports. Its range of policy-relevant questions is
lowing earlier assessment reports in 1990, 1995 and structured around six topic headings:
2001). The report – AR4 for short – consists of four
volumes, published under the title Climate Change 1. Observed changes in climate, and the effects of
2007. One volume was devoted to each of the IPCC’s past changes
three Working Groups: 2. Natural and human causes of climate change and
their relation to observed changes
Working Group I (WG I) assesses the physical sci- 3. Projected future climate change and its impacts
entific aspects of the climate system and climate 4. Options to adapt to climate change and to mitigate
change; it; what responses are possible by 2030
Working Group II (WG II) assesses the vulnerabil- 5. The long-term perspective; how fast and how deep
ity of socio-economic and natural systems to climate greenhouse gas cuts will need to be to limit global
change, negative and positive consequences, and temperature increases to a given level; why climate
options for adapting to it; and concerns are intensifying
Working Group III (WG III) assesses options for miti- 6. Robust findings and key uncertainties.
gating climate change through limiting or preventing
greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing activities The IPCC is a scientific intergovernmental body set
that are working to remove them from the atmosphere. up by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO)
and by the United Nations Environment Programme
The fourth volume that completed AR4 is the Syn- (UNEP) in 1988. It was established to provide decision-
thesis Report. It summarizes the findings of the other makers and others interested in climate change with
three volumes and specifically addresses issues of an objective source of information. The IPCC does not
conduct any research. Its role is to assess on a com-
How the IPCC is organized prehensive, objective and transparent basis the lat-
est scientific, technical and socio-economic literature
IPCC Plenary
Open to WMO and UNEP member countries
relevant to the understanding of the risk of human-
induced climate change, its observed and projected
impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation.
IPCC Bureau IPCC
Co-chairs and vice-chairs of the working groups Secretariat IPCC reports should be neutral with respect to policy,
elected by the Plenary for the period of one assessment
report (5-6 years). Currently 30 members.
based at WMO
Geneva
although they need to deal objectively with policy rele-
vant scientific, technical and socio-economic factors.
Working Working Working Task They should aim to reflect a range of views, expertise
Group I Group II Group III force
and wide geographical coverage. The IPCC continues
Scientific Impacts Mitigation on
Basis Vulnerability National GHG to be a major source of information for the negotia-
Adaptation Inventories
tions under the UNFCCC (United Nations’ Framework
Technical Support Unit Technical Support Unit Technical Support Unit Technical Support Unit
Convention on Climate Change).


Robust findings
and key uncertainties
Robust findings
Observed changes Warming is un ambiguous, as demonstrated by observations such as:
in climate, their effects - rises in global average air and sea temperatures and average sea levels,
- widespread melting of snow and ice;
and their causes
Observed changes in many biological and physical systems are consistent with warming:
- many natural systems on all continents and oceans are affected;
70% growth of greenhouse gas emissions in terms of the global warming potential between 1970 and 2004;
Concentrations of methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O) are now far higher than their
natural range over many thousands of years before industrialization (1750);
Most of the warming over the last 50 years is "very likely" to have been caused by anthropogenic increases in
greenhouse gases.

Causes Global GHG emissions will continue to grow over decades unless there are new policies to reduce climate
and projections of change and to promote sustainable development.
future climate changes Warming of about 0.2°C a decade is projected for the next two decades (several IPCC scenarios).
and their impacts Changes this century would "very likely" be larger than in the 20th.
Greater warming over land than sea, and more in the high latitudes of the northern hemisphere.
The more the planet warms, the less CO2 it can absorb naturally.
Warming and rising sea levels would continue for centuries, even if GHG emissions were reduced and
concentrations stabilized, due to feedbacks and the time-lag between cause and effect.
If GHG levels in the atmosphere double compared with pre-industrial levels, it is “very unlikely” that average
global temperatures will increase less than 1.5°C compared with that period.

Responses to Some planned adaptation to climate change is occurring, but much more is needed to reduce vulnerability.
climate change Long term unmitigated climate change will "likely" exceed the capacity of people and the natural world to adapt.
Many technologies to mitigate climate change are already available or likely to be so by 2030. But incentives
and research are needed to improve performance and cut cost.
The economic mitigation potential, at costs from below zero to US$100 per tonne of CO2 eq, is enough to offset
the projected growth of global emissions or to cut them to below their current levels by 2030.
Prompt mitigation can buy time to stabilize emissions and to reduce, delay or avoid impacts.
Sustainable development and appropriate policy-making in sectors not apparently linked to climate help to
stabilize emissions.
Delayed emissions reductions rincrease the risk of more severe climate change impacts.

 Climate in Peril
Key uncertainties
Limited climate data coverage in some regions. Observed changes
Analysing and monitoring changes in extreme events, for example droughts, tropical cyclones, extreme in climate, their effects
temperatures and intense precipitation (rain, sleet and snow), is harder than identifying climatic averages, and their causes
because longer and more detailed records are needed.
Difficult to determine the effects of climate change on people and some natural systems, because they may
adapt to the changes and because other unconnected causes may be exerting an influence.
Hard to be sure, at scales smaller than an entire continent, whether natural or human causes are influencing
temperatures because (for example) pollution and changes in land use may be responsible.
There is still uncertainty about the scale of CO2 emissions due to changes in landuse, and the scale of methane
emissions from individual sources.

It is uncertain how much warming will result in the long term from any particular level of GHG concentrations, Causes
and therefore, and projections of
it is uncertain what level - and pace - of emissions cuts will be needed to ensure a specific level of GHG future climate changes
concentrations. and their impacts
Estimates vary widely for the impacts of aerosols and the strength of feedbacks, particularly clouds, heat
absorption by the oceans, and the carbon cycle.
Possible future changes in the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets are a major source of uncertainty about
rising sea levels
Projections of climate change impacts beyond about 2050 are heavily
dependent on scenarios and models.

Limited understanding of how development planners factor climate into their decisions. Responses to
Effective adaptation steps are highly specific to different political, financial and geographical circumstances, climate change
making it hard to appreciate their limitations and costs.
Estimating mitigation costs and potentials depends on assumptions about future socio-economic growth,
technological change and consumption patterns.
Not enough is known about how policies unrelated to climate will affect emissions.

Robust findings and key uncertainties 


Present changes, causes
and observed impacts
Observed changes in climate
and their effects
Warming of the climate system is beyond argument, Temperature rise
as shown by observations of increases in global av- Of the last 12 years (1995–2006), 11 are among the 12
erage air and ocean temperatures, the widespread warmest since records began in 1850. The warming
melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea trend over the previous century was reported as 0.6ºC
levels. In the following paragraphs, some of the most in the IPCC’s Third Assessment Report (TAR) pub-
striking changes that are already taking place are de- lished six years earlier in 2001: it is now 0.74ºC. The
scribed and illustrated. temperature increase is widespread across the world
but is most marked in the northern Polar Regions.
Warming of the climate system has been detected on
Trends in global average surface temperature
the Earth’s surface and up in the atmosphere, as well
Differences in temperature Estimated actual as in the upper few hundred metres of the oceans.
from 1961-1990 global mean The land has warmed faster than the seas.
Mean value, °C temperature, °C
0.6 14.6 Average Northern Hemisphere temperatures after
1950 have been higher than during any other 50-year
0.4 14.4
Temperature change 1970 - 2004
0.2 14.2

0.0 14.0

- 0.2 13.8

- 0,4 13.6

- 0,6 13.4
1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
-1.0 -0.2 0.2 1.0 2.0 3.5°C
Source: US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2008.
Source: IPCC, 2007.

 Climate in Peril
period in the last 500 years. These rising temperatures
Global mean sea level
unavoidably have an influence on very diverse natural
phenomena that we so far have taken for granted. Change of sea level
in centimetres

Evidence of a warming world includes shorter freezing + 20
seasons of lake and river ice, decreases in the extent
of permafrost, and rising soil temperatures. But the
main changes observed scientifically, but also noticed
more and more by the people all over the world are + 10
summarized in the following paragraphs.

Sea level rise


1870 level
Sea levels across the globe have risen in a way con- 0
sistent with the warming – since 1961 at an average Tide gauge observation
of 1.8 millimetres per year, and since 1993 at 3.1 66 and 95% confidence limits

millimetres per year. Scientists are not sure whether Satellite altimetre observations
to attribute this last decade’s higher rise to a varia- - 10
tion from one decade to another, or whether it marks 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
1870 2005
a longer-term trend. The total global rise in the 20th
Source: Hugo Ahlenius, GRID-Arendal 2008, updated from Church and White 2006.
century amounted to 17 centimetres. The expansion

What causes the sea level to change?


Terrestrial water storage,
extraction of groundwater,
builing of reservoirs, Surface and deep ocean
changes in runoff and ciruclation changes and storm surges
seepage into aquifers Water stored on land
as glaciers and icecaps
Lowered surface level
breaks off or melts and
in river delta regions, Higher temperatures cause becomes ocean water
land movements and the water to expand
tectonic displacements

Source: Philippe Rekacewicz (GRID-Arendal) Vital Climate Graphics 2002, based on: David Griggs,
in Climate Change 2001, Synthesis report, contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Present changes, causes and observed impacts 


of water as it warms, and the melting of glaciers, ice ern Europe and northern and central Asia, but de-
caps and the polar ice sheets are all contributing to clined in the Sahel, the Mediterranean, southern Africa
the rise. and parts of southern Asia. The IPCC concludes that
it is likely that the global area affected by drought has
Melting snow and ice increased since the 1970s.
Decreases in snow and ice extent are also consistent
with warming. Satellite data recorded since 1978 show Cold days, nights and frosts have become less fre-
the annual average Arctic sea ice extent has shrunk quent over most land areas in the past 50 years, and
by 2.7 per cent each decade, with larger decreases in hot days and nights more frequent. The IPCC consid-
summer. Mountain glaciers and average snow cover ers that it is likely that heat waves have become com-
have declined in both hemispheres. moner over most land areas, that heavy precipitation
events (thunderstorms, for instance) have increased
Extreme weather events over most areas, and that since 1975 extreme high
From 1900 to 2005 precipitation (rain, sleet and snow) sea levels have increased worldwide – in addition to
increased significantly in parts of the Americas, north- the rise in average sea levels.

Global glacier mass balance Minimum sea ice extent


Northern hemisphere ice cover anomalies
Annual deviation Cumulative loss Million square kilometres
Hundred thousand Hundred thousand
1.5
million tonnes million tonnes
1 1.0
1992
Increase
0.5
0 0
1966 to 1990 mean
0.0
-1 - 20
-0.5

-2 - 40 -1.0
Loss
-1.5
-3 - 60
-2.0
-4 - 80
-2.5
All time record low in September 2007
-5 -3.0
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2003 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
1978 2008
Source: IPCC, 2007. Source: US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2008.

10 Climate in Peril
Decline in permafrost Increase in dry areas globally
Deviation in the extent of frozen ground Dry areas in % of total area Spatial coverage: 75N-60S
in the Northern hemisphere 40%
Million square kilometres
2.0 35%
1.5
Increase 30%
1.0
0.5 25%
0.0
- 0.5 20%

- 1.0
Decline 15%
- 1.5
2005
- 2.0 10%
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Source: IPCC, 2007. Source: IPPC, 2007.

Changes in annual precipitation between 1901 and 2004

-20 indicates a 20 % reduction over the course of a century compared to the average calculated for the period from 1961 to1990

Sources: Atlas Environnement du Monde Diplomatique, 2007, GRID-Arendal, 2005

Present changes, causes and observed impacts 11


The graphic below shows that while natural disas- in trend: while the frequency of earthquakes shows
ters reported have increased globally, some of this little variability, floods and cyclones have occurred
increase can be attributed to the increase in com- more frequently in the last 30 years. However, while
munications: while disasters happened before, few intense tropical cyclones have increased since about
people would have known about them. But the dis- 1970, high variability over several decades and a
tinction between climate-dependent disasters like lack of systematic high quality observation before
tropical cyclones and others not influenced by cli- satellite observations make it difficult to detect long-
mate (such as earthquakes) shows a clear difference term trends.

Number of disasters
per year
450
Trends in number of reported disasters
Much of the increase in the number of hazardous
400 events reported is probably due to significant
All disasters improvements in information access and also to
population growth, but the number of floods and
350 cyclones reported is still rising compared to
All disasters include: earthquakes. Is global warming affecting the
drought, earthquake, frequency of natural hazards?
extreme temperatures,
300 famine, flood, insect
infestation, slides,
volcanic eruption, wave
and surge, wild fires,
250 250
wind storm.

200 200
Earthquakes
versus climatic disasters
150 150
Floods

100 100

Earthquakes
50 50 Cyclones
Earthquakes

0 0
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2010 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Source: CRED Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2006, 2007.

12 Climate in Peril
Reported changes in physical and biological systems between 1970 and 2004

North America:
355, 94%
455, 92%
Europe:
119, 94%
28 115, 89% Asia:
106, 96%
8, 100%

Africa:
5, 100%
2, 100%

Latin America:
53, 98%
5, 100%

Australia and New Zealand:


6, 100%
Marine and freshwater systems
0
1
85, 99%

Note: only the approximate location and


Physical systems Biological systems
number of observations are reproduced. (snow, glaciers, runoff, etc.) (ecosystem alterations, species loss, etc.)
The percentage shows how many of the
observations are consistent with warming. Polar regions:
106, 96%
8, 100% Source: IPCC, 2007.

Natural systems affected of steps to adapt to changing climate, and because of


Observations from across the world show that many factors unrelated to it. They range across areas as dif-
natural systems are being affected by regional climate ferent as planting crops earlier in spring to changes in
changes, especially by temperature increases. allergic pollen distribution in the Northern Hemisphere,
changes in the extension of areas where infectious
Other effects of regional climate change on humans diseases are transmitted or effects on activities de-
and ecosystems than the ones already described are pending for example on snow and ice cover such as
emerging. Many are difficult to pinpoint, both because mountain sports.

Present changes, causes and observed impacts 13


Causes of
change Carbon cycle

121

Plant growth
and Soil-atmosphere
decomposition exchange

0.5
60 Biosphere 60
540 to 610 Changes
Fires
in soil use

1.5
There is no longer much doubt that most of the ob-
served increase in global average temperatures since
Soil and organic matter
the mid-20th century is due to the observed increase 1 580
in greenhouse gases (GHGs) emanating from human
activities. It is likely that there has been significant
human-caused warming over the past 50 years, av-
eraged over each continent except Antarctica. Over
that period the combined effect of natural variations
in solar radiation and volcanic eruptions would have
produced cooler temperatures, not warmer. There has
in fact been a cooling influence on the atmosphere,
caused by aerosols, some of them caused naturally,
for instance by volcanic eruptions, and some by hu- Sources: Philippe Rekacewicz and Emmanuelle Bournay, GRID-Arendal,
man activities, principally emissions of sulphate, or- 2005, based on and updated with: Centre for Climatic Research, Institute
for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin at Madison (USA);
ganic and black carbon, nitrate and dust. These aero- Okanagan University College (Canada), Geography Department; World
sols reflect some of the Sun’s rays back to space or Watch, November-December 1998; Nature; Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, 2001 and 2007.
absorb some of them, in either case preventing them
from reaching the surface of the Earth.

14 Climate in Peril
The figures indicate carbon storage and flows, expressed in Gigatonnes
(1 000 million tonnes) of carbon.
The arrows are proportionate to the volume of carbon.
The figures for the flows express amounts exchanged annually.

Speed of exchange process


Very fast (less than a year)
Fast (1 to 10 years)
Slow (10 to 100 years)
Very slow (more than 100 years)

Fossil fuel 92
related emissions 6 to 8

Atmosphere
750

Ocean-atmosphere
exchange

Marine organisms
3
Surface waters 40
Dissolved 90 1 020
organic 4
carbon Hydrosphere 92
700 38 000
Coalfield 6
50
3 000
Lithosphere:
marine sediment Surface water-ocean
and sedimentary rocks depth exchange
66 000 to 100 million
Oil and gas field
300 100
Sediment
150

Present changes, causes and observed impacts 15


Not only average temperatures but also other aspects
of the climate are changing because of distinguishable
Human activity human influences. Human activities have contributed to
By comparing a number of natural factors and human sea level rise during the second half of the 20th centu-
activities, and their effect on climate, scientists have ry; they have probably helped to change wind patterns
proved that human activity is responsible for part of and increased temperatures on extreme hot nights,
the temperature rise. So computer models which in- cold nights and cold days. In addition, our actions may
clude the human influence on the climate show a clear have contributed to increasing the risk of heat waves,
increase in temperature. This accurately reflects the the area affected by drought since the 1970s, and the
actual pattern of warming we have been experienc- frequency of episodes of heavy precipitation. Human-
ing. In contrast, temperatures predicted by models caused warming over the last three decades has had a
that take into account natural factors alone stay well discernible global influence on the changes observed
below the actual temperatures measured. in many physical and biological systems.

Observed and modelled temperature change between 1906 and 2005

Temperature anomaly 1.5


EUROPE
relative to 1901-1950 average
Celsius degrees 1.0

1.5 0.5
NORTH AMERICA
1.5
1.0 0.0 ASIA
1.0
0.5 -0.5
1906 2000 0.5
0.0
0.0
-0.5
1906 2000 1.5 -0.5
AFRICA 1906 2000
1.0
1.5 0.5 1.5
SOUTH AMERICA AUSTRALIA
1.0 0.0 1.0

0.5 -0.5 0.5


1906 2000
0.0 0.0

-0.5 -0.5
1906 2000 1906 2000

Models using only natural factors influencing the climate (volcanoes and solar activity)
Models using natural and anthropogenic factors
Observed continental average temperature (decadal average)
Source: IPCC, 2007.

16 Climate in Peril
MAIN CLIMATE FEATURES

Climate change Precipitation Water

global processes and effects Ice caps changes temperature

melting Salinity

Ocean
circulation
Cloud upheaval
CLIMATE CHANGE PROCESSES cover
changes

Carbon
cycle Global
disturbances
HUMAN ACTIVITIES
(Enhanced) Warming
(average
Greenhouse temperature rise)
Abrupt
Increase effect Monsoon climate
in sealed disturbances Change
surface
CO2
Gulf Stream
modification
Urbanization
N2O
CH4
Deforestation Land use Sea level
rise
change Greenhouse
Land gas
conversion
to agriculture emissions Traditional lifestyles
endangered Environmental
Subsistence refugees
farming
Chemicals and fishing Coastal wetlands
at stake disappearing
Cement
Agriculture
Fertilizers
Malnutrition
Industry
Drought Wildfire
Cyclone

Power- Diarrhea Tsunami


plants Famine Flood
Burning Disease
spread Disasters
Electricity fossil fuel
Cardio-
respiratory
Energy diseases
Infectious Coastal wetlands
production Cars diseases disappearing
(vector
change)
Heating Transport
Biodiversity
Air Trucking freight Casualties Economic losses
traffic losses Coral
Shipping freight bleaching

MAJOR THREATS

Present changes, causes and observed impacts 17


Greenhouse gases
Global greenhouse gas emissions (2004)
The Kyoto Protocol, the international climate change
F-gases: 1.1% agreement1 lists six greenhouse gases (or groups of
gases) whose emissions signatories to the Protocol
N 2O agree to reduce. There are also other GHGs apart from
7.9% the ones covered by the Protocol. But these six gases/
CH4
groups of gases make up a big chunk of overall GHG
14.3% emissions from human activities and are the most rel-
evant in terms of immediate human responsibility:
Other CO2 2.8%
56.6% Fossil fuel
carbon dioxide (CO2)
use
methane (CH4)
Deforestation 17.3% CO2 nitrous oxide (N2O)
sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)
hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
Source: IPCC, 2007. perfluorocarbons (PFCs)

The last three (SF6, HFCs and PFCs) are sometimes


Global greenhouse gas emissions by sector (2004) known collectively as F-gases.
Waste and
wastewater Global greenhouse gas emissions from human activi-
ties have grown since pre-industrial times, with an in-
Residential and 2.8%
commercial buildings crease of 70 per cent between 1970 and 2004. Global
atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2),
7.9 %
methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) have risen mark-
Transport Energy supply
edly because of human activities since 1750 – the year
13.1 % 25.9 %
1. The Kyoto Protocol sets the rules and procedures needed
Agriculture to achieve the ultimate objective of the Convention, which is:
Industry “(...) to achieve, (...), stabilization of greenhouse gas concentra-
13.5 %
19.4 % tions in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent danger-
Forestry ous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.” Such
17.4 % a level should be achieved within a time frame sufficient to allow
ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change, to ensure that
Source: IPCC, 2007.
food production is not threatened and to enable economic de-
velopment to proceed in a sustainable manner.

18 Climate in Peril
Main greenhouse gases
Pre-industrial Concentration Atmospheric Main human
Gas name concentration in 1998 lifetime GWP **
activity source
( ppmv * ) ( ppmv ) (years)

Water vapour 1 to 3 1 to 3 a few days - -

Carbon dioxide Fossil fuels, cement prod-


(CO2 ) 280 365 variable uction, land use change 1

Methane Fossil fuels, rice paddies


(CH4 ) 0.7 1,75 12 waste dumps, livestock 21

Nitrous oxide Fertilizers, combustion


(N2O ) 0.27 0,31 114 industrial processes 310

HFC 23 (CHF3 ) 0 0,000014 250 Electronics, refrigerants 12 000

HFC 134 a
(CF3CH2F) 0 0,0000075 13.8 Refrigerants 1 300

HFC 152 a
(CH3CHF2) 0 0,0000005 1.4 Industrial processes 120

Perfluoromethane
(CF4) 0,0004 0,00008 >50 000 Aluminium production 5 700

Perfluoroethane
(C2F6) 0 0,000003 10 000 Aluminium production 11 900

Sulphur
hexafluoride (SF6) 0 0,0000042 3 200 Dielectric fluid 22 200

* ppmv = parts per million by volume ** GWP = Global warming potential (for 100 year time horizon).
Present changes, causes and observed impacts 19
World greenhouse gas emissions by sector

Sector End use/activity Gas

Road 9.9%
Transportation 13.5%
Air 1.6%
Rail, ship & other transport 2.3%

Residential buildings 9,9%


Y
G

Commercial buildings 5.4%


Electricity & heat 24.6%
R

Unallocated 3.5%
fuel combustion
E

Iron & steel 3.2%


Aluminium/Non-ferrous metals 1.4% Carbon dioxide
N

Machinery 1%
Pulp, paper & printing 1%
Other fuel Food & tobacco 1% (CO2) 77%
E

combustion 9% Chemicals 4.8%


Cement 3,8%

Industry Other industry 5,0%


10.4%
T&D losses 1,9%
Coal mining 1,4%

Fugitive emissions 3.9% Oil/gas extraction, 6.3%


Refining & processing
Industrial processes 3.4%
Deforestation 18.3% HFCs,
Afforestation -1.5% PFCs,
Reforestation -0.5% SF6
Land use change 18.2%
Harvest/Management 2.5%
Other -0.6% 1%

Agricultural energy use 1.4%


Methane
Agriculture soils 6% (CH4) 14%
Agriculture 13.5%
Livestock & manure 5.1%
Rice cultivation 1.5%
Other agriculture
Landfills
0.9%
2% Nitrous oxide
Waste 3.6% Wastewater, other waste 1.6% (N2O) 8%

All data is for 2000. All calculations are based on CO2 equivalents, using 100-year global warming potentials from the IPCC
(1996), based on a total global estimate of 41 755 MtCO2 equivalent. Land use change includes both emissions and absorptions.
Dotted lines represent flows of less than 0.1% percent of total GHG emissions.

Source: World Resources Institute, Climate Analysis Indicator Tool (CAIT), Navigating the Numbers: Greenhouse Gas Data and
International Climate Policy, December 2005; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1996 (data for 2000).

20 Climate in Peril
Global Warming Potential (GWP) and
Global greenhouse gas emissions since 1970 CO2 equivalence
Gigatonnes of CO2-eq Each of the greenhouse gases affects the atmos-
phere to a different degree, and survives for a dif-
50 F-gases
N2 O
Agriculture ferent length of time. The extent to which a given
and other
GHG is estimated to contribute to global warming
CH4 Agriculture,
40 waste, energy is described as its Global Warming Potential (GWP).
To make the effects of different gases comparable,
Deforestation the GWP expresses the factor by which the gas in
30 CO2
question is more (or less) damaging than the same
mass of CO2 over a given period of time, so the GWP
of CO2 is always 1. Gases which cause much more
20 warming than CO2 may in turn decay faster than it
does, so they may pose a considerable problem for
Fossil fuels a few years but a smaller one later. Equally, others
10 may decay slower and pose a greater problem over a
long period of time.

0 To talk of CO2-equivalent emissions is to take carbon


1970 1980 1990 2000 2004
dioxide as a benchmark and to describe the amount
Source: IPCC, 2007.
of CO2 that would cause the same amount of warming
over a specified timespan as would be caused by one
that commonly marks the beginning of industrial activi- of the other GHGs.
ties – and are now far higher than pre-industrial levels,
as shown by ice cores spanning many thousands of For example, the GWP for methane over 100 years is
years. Levels of the first two gases are far above their 25 and for nitrous oxide 298. This means that emis-
natural range over the last 650,000 years. The global sions of one metric tonne of methane or of nitrous ox-
atmospheric concentration of CO2 before the start of ide are equivalent to emissions of 25 and 298 metric
the Industrial Revolution was around 280 parts per mil- tonnes of carbon dioxide respectively. One of the F-
lion (ppm). By 2005 it had reached 379 ppm. And the gases, HFC23, is 12,000 times more potent than CO2
increase is accelerating: The annual growth rate was over 20 years, becoming even more potent (and thus
larger from 1995 to 2005 than at any time since contin- “dangerous” for the climate) over 100 years, the pe-
uous atmospheric measurements began in the 1950s. riod in which its GWP reaches 14,800.

Present changes, causes and observed impacts 21


Actual and projected energy demand Feedbacks

Thousand million tonnes One factor which complicates climate science – and there-
of oil equivalent fore leads to wide ranges of uncertainty – is the existence of
feedbacks. These are interactions between different parts
Projections
15 of the climate system, which can mean a process or event
sets off changes which in their turn influence the initial trig-
ger. One example is the reduction of ice and snow, both
Oil
12 on land and at sea. Ice, being white, reflects up to 90 per
cent of the Sun’s radiation reaching its surface back out into
space, preventing it from intensifying atmospheric warming.
9 But when it melts it may expose earth, vegetation, rock or
Coal
water, all of which are darker in colour and therefore more
likely to absorb radiation instead of reflecting it. So the ini-
6
tial melting can cause a feedback which helps to quicken
Gas its pace. Another possible feedback is the thawing of the
3 Nuclear permafrost in high northern latitudes. As it melts, it could
Biomass Hydropower release big quantities of carbon dioxide and methane which
Other at the moment are retained below the frozen soil layer. If that
0 renewables
happened, it would accelerate the warming already under
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 way. Another expected feedback: Higher temperatures of
both land and ocean have the tendency to reduce their up-
Note: All statistics refer to energy in its original form (such as coal) before
being transformed into more convenient energy (such as electrical energy). take of atmospheric carbon dioxide, increasing the amount
of CO2 that remains in the atmosphere. These are all posi-
Source: International Energy Agency (IEA), World Energy Outlook 2008.
tive feedbacks because they intensify the original process.
Negative feedbacks, on the other hand, are changes in the
environment that lead to a compensating process and miti-
gate the change itself.

22 Climate in Peril
Feedbacks Low-latitude
Lati
in Climate Processes warming tud
ina
lm
ois
Positive feedback tur
et
Negative feedback Global ra
ns
coupling p

or
t
Increased High-latitude
scrub growth warming
Increased
Less evaporation
Earlier sea ice
snow melt

Decreased
albedo
Terrestrial Atmospheric Marine
Decreased coupling heating coupling
albedo

Increased
net radiation

Increased More
net radiation summer
clouds

Positive feedbacks intensify the original process.


Negative feedbacks lead to a compensating process. Source: Hugo Ahlenius/ GRID-Arendal, Global Outlook for Ice and Snow, 2008.

Present changes, causes and observed impacts 23


Projected climate change
and its impacts

The previous sections have dealt with changes and Backed up by new studies and observations, the
effects happening today. The rest of the guide con- IPCC is more certain of the accuracy of the projected
centrates on what is yet to come. warming patterns and other regional climatic effects
than it was in the Third Assessment Report. These in-
If current policies to mitigate climate change and re- clude wind-pattern changes, precipitation, and some
lated steps towards sustainable development remain changes in weather extremes and sea ice.
unchanged, global GHG emissions will continue to
grow over the next few decades. The growth will not Regional-scale changes include:
be modest, either: The IPCC projects an increase in most warming over land and at the highest northern
global GHG emissions from 25 to 90 per cent between latitudes, and least over the Southern Ocean and
2000 and 2030. (There is a wide margin of uncertain- parts of the North Atlantic;
ty because of the very different assumptions made contraction of the area covered by snow, increases
in each socio-economic scenario considered by the in the depth at which most permafrost will thaw, and
IPCC). It expects the fossil fuels, oil, coal and gas, to a decrease in the extent of sea ice;
continue to dominate the energy mix till beyond 2030, increase in the frequency of extremes of heat, heat
regardless of the scenario. waves and heavy precipitation;
a likely increase in tropical cyclone intensity;
Continued GHG emissions at or above current rates will a shift towards the poles of storms outside the tropics;
cause further warming and induce many changes in the increases in precipitation in high latitudes, and likely
global climate system during this century that would be decreases in most sub-tropical land regions.
larger than those observed during the 20th century.
The IPCC scenarios (often referred to as the SRES scenarios,
Today’s emissions influence the for “Special Report on Emissions Scenarios” published by
atmosphere for years to come the IPCC in 2000) explore alternative development pathways.
They take into account demographic, economic and techno-
Even if GHG and aerosol concentrations were kept logical factors and their resulting GHG emissions. The emis-
constant at today’s levels (2000), some anthropogenic sions projections based on those different assumptions are
warming and sea level rise would continue for many widely used in forecasting future climate change, vulnerability
and impacts. It is open to anyone to decide which of the dif-
centuries. The climate reacts over long periods to in-
ferent scenarios seems most probable, as the IPCC doesn’t
fluences upon it; many GHGs remain in the atmos- take the risk of attaching any probability to any of them.
phere for thousands of years.

24 Climate in Peril
Scenarios
A scenario is a plausible and often simplified description of
how the future may develop, based on a coherent set of
assumptions: a set of working hypotheses about how society MORE
may develop, and what this will mean for the climate.
MARKET-
ORIENTED
The A1 scenario describes a future world of very rapid economic The A2 scenario describes a very heterogenous
growth, a global population that peaks in mid-century and world, based on the preservation of local identities.
declines thereafter, and the rapid introduction of new and Fertility patterns across regions converge slowly,
efficient technologies. Specific regional patterns tend to resulting in a continuously increasing population.
disappear as a result of increased cultural interaction. Economic development is regionally
The gap in per capita income between regions oriented, and per capita economic
is substantially reduced. A1 develops into growth and technological change
three groups that describe alternative more fragmented than in A1.
developments of energy supply:
fossil intensive (A1FI), non-fossil
energy sources, or a balance
A1FI
between all sources (A1B).

A1B A2
MORE GLOBAL MORE REGIONAL

B1 B2
The B1 scenario describes a The B2 scenario describes a
convergent world with a global world with an emphasis on local
population that peaks in mid-century solutions to economic social and
and declines thereafter as in A1, but environmental sustainability rather
with rapid change in economic than the global approach in B1. It is a
structures toward a service and informa- world with a population increasing at a
tion economy. It describes reductions in slower rate than in other scenarios,
consumption and the introduction of clean and intermediate levels of economic development, and
resource-efficient technologies. The emphasis is on slow but diverse technological change. Society is oriented
global solutions to sustainability, including improved equity, towards environmental protection and social equity and
but without additional climate initiatives. focuses on the local and regional level.

MORE
ENVIRONMENTAL Source: GRID-Arendal based on information from IPCC, 2001.

Projected climate change and its impacts 25


Variations in the Earth’s surface temperature: year 1000 to 2100
Deviation in oCelsius (in relation to 1990 value)

Global
instrumental
observations
Observations, Norhern Hemisphere, proxy data Projections
6.0

5.5

5.0

4.5

4.0

3.5

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5
Scenarios
1.0
A1B
0.5 A2
B1
0.0 B2

Bars show
-0.5
the range in
year 2100
-1.0
produced by
several models

1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100
Source: UNEP&GRID/Arendal, Vital Climate Graphics update, 2005. Year

26 Climate in Peril
Sea level rise These ecosystem changes will be accompanied by
Because our understanding of some important caus- shifts in the geographical ranges of both animal and
es of sea level rise is too limited, the IPCC is careful plant species, with mainly harmful consequences
in making predictions: it does not provide a best esti- for the natural world and for the goods and servic-
mate or an upper limit of the rise to be expected. The es which ecosystems provide – like water and food.
range of rise projected for 2090–2099 is from 18 to 59 Many ecosystems are “likely” to exhaust their capaci-
cm relative to 1980–1999, but this does not include ties to cope with changes inflicted on them by climate
the possible acceleration of ice flow from the polar ice change and the upheavals associated with it.
sheets and is therefore not an upper boundary. Other
factors contributing to uncertainty in this area include Ecosystems will probably find their net carbon up-
feedbacks between the climate and the carbon cycle take peak before the middle of the century and then
and the expansion of ocean water due to warming weaken or even reverse, which would amplify climate
(“thermal expansion”). change (a positive feedback).

The shrinking of the Greenland ice sheet is project- Approximately 20–30 per cent of species are at in-
ed to contribute to rising sea levels until after 2100. creased risk of extinction if global average warming
Models suggest a nearly complete melting of the exceeds 1.5–2.5°C. As global average temperature
ice sheet. increase exceeds about 3.5°C, model projections
suggest significant extinctions of 40–70 per cent of
The Antarctic ice sheet is projected to remain too cold known species around the globe. This is one of the
for widespread surface melting: instead, it is expected irreversible impacts of climate change.3
to grow because of increased snowfall. But a net loss
of ice from Antarctica could still be possible, depend- Food security and human health
ing on the extent and pace at which ice moves from The effects of more frequent and intense extreme
the land into the sea. weather events will cause emergencies and reverse
progress towards development. Extreme events cou-
Ecosystems2 pled with sea level rise, are expected to be mainly
Since the IPCC’s Third Assessment Report, confi- adverse for humans. Food is an obvious worry. In
dence has increased that a 1–2°C increase in global higher latitudes there may be an initial slight increase
mean temperature above 1990 levels (about 1.5–2.5°C in crop productivity for temperature rises below 3ºC,
above pre-industrial levels) poses significant risks to to be followed by a decrease in some areas. For
many unique and threatened systems, including many lower latitudes, productivity may decrease for even
biodiversity hotspots. small temperature rises.

2. An ecosystem is a natural unit consisting of all the plants, ani- 3. Many species have evolved to live in a particular and often
mals and micro-organisms in a defined area functioning together narrowly-defined environment. As temperatures rise and other
with all the non-living physical factors of the environment. effects of a changing climate intensify, their environments are
likely to change too quickly for them to either adapt to or to
migrate to somewhere more suitable.

Projected climate change and its impacts 27


Impacts associ-

+1° 3 4 5
o o o o
ated with global
temperature
+ 2 + + +
change Global mean annual temperature change relative to 1980 - 1999

WATER Increased water availability in moist tropics and high altitudes


Decreased water availability and increase in droughts in mid-altitudes and semi-arid low latitudes

People affected: Additional people


with increased
0.4 to 1.7 billion 1.0 to 2.0 billion 1.1 to 3.2 billion
water stress

ECO- Increased amphibian About 20 to 30% of species at increasingly Major extinctions around the globe
extinction high risk of extinction
SYSTEMS
Increased coral bleaching Most corals bleached Widespread coral mortality

Increasing species range shifts and wildfire risk Terrestrial biosphere tends toward a net carbon source
~15% of ecosystems affected ~40% of ecosystems affected

FOOD Low latitutes:


Crop productivity decreases
for some cereals All cereals decrease

Mid to high latitudes:


Crop productivity increases
for some cereals Decreases in some regions

COASTS Increased damage from floods and storms


About 30% loss of coastal wetlands
Additional people at risk
of coastal flooding each year: 0 to 3 million 2 to 15 million

HEALTH Increased burden from malnutrition, diarrhoeal, cardio-respiratory and infectious diseases

Increased morbidity and mortality from heatwaves, floods and droughts

Changed distribution of some disease vectors Substantial burden on health services

SINGULAR Local retreat of Long term commitment Leading to reconfiguration


ice in Greenland to several metres of sea-level of coastlines worldwide and
EVENTS and West Antarctic rise due to ice sheet loss inundation of low-lying areas

Ecosystem changes due to weakening of the meridional


overturning circulation
Impacts will vary by extent of adaptation, rate of temperature change and socio-economic pathway

28 Climate in Peril
The health of millions of people could be at risk from Freshwater supply
increases in malnutrition, extreme weather, more di- Climate change is expected to have a crucial impact
arrhoeal diseases, heart and breathing problems on all sectors and regions. It would worsen current
caused by climate-induced ground-level ozone, and water stress4 caused by population growth and
the spread of some infectious diseases. But there may economic and land-use change.
be some benefits, for instance to those who suffer
from the effects of very cold weather. For other issues, Regionally, glaciers and snow fields are crucial
effects will be mixed. In some places the geographi- sources of fresh water. They have undergone recent
cal range of malaria distribution could contract, while widespread and severe loss from melting, and this is
elsewhere it will expand and the transmission season projected to accelerate this century, reducing water
may be changed. Overall, the negative health effects
of rising temperatures are expected to outweigh the 4. One definition of water stress is the situation that occurs when a
benefits, especially in developing countries. country uses more than 20 per cent of its renewable water supply.

Water stress and climate change

Water stress: ratio between withdrawal and availability (in 2000)


Global regions where
no stress low moderate high very high
climate change is projected
to decrease annual runoff
0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 and water availability Source: IPCC, 2007.

Projected climate change and its impacts 29


availability and the potential for hydropower (often Ocean acidification
a feasible alternative to fossil fuel-based electricity The increased amount of carbon dioxide from human
generation which reduces CO2 emissions). Climate activities that has entered the oceans via the atmos-
change is also expected to change the seasonal flows phere since about 1750 has made them more acidic,
in regions fed by melt water from mountain ranges, with an average decrease in pH (the measure of the
like the Hindu Kush, the Himalayas and the inter-tropi- acidity or alkalinity of a solution) of 0.1 units. Increasing
cal Andes. More than a sixth of the world’s population atmospheric CO2 concentrations are causing further
lives in these regions. Two thousand million people acidification. Today the average ocean surface pH is
depend on the water provided by seven of the major about 8.1. Projections suggest a further acidification
rivers in Asia, all of them originating in the Himalayas. over this century, leading to a reduction in average glo-
bal surface ocean pH of between 0.14 and 0.35 units.
Changes in precipitation and temperature also affect This progressive acidification is expected to harm ma-
run-off and water availability. Run-off5 will increase by rine creatures which form shells, for instance corals,
10–40 per cent by mid-century at higher latitudes and and the species which depend upon them.
in some wet tropical areas, and decrease by 10–30
per cent over some dry mid-latitude and tropical re- Studies published since the 2001 IPCC assessment
gions. Some semi-arid areas, for example around the report allow a more systematic understanding of the
Mediterranean, in the western USA, southern Africa timing and extent of impacts linked to different rates
and north-eastern Brazil, will have less water. Areas of climate change.
affected by drought are projected to increase, threat-
ening food, water, energy production and health by
increasing malnutrition and infectious and respiratory Global ocean acidification
diseases. Large regional increases in demand for ir-
Oceanic CO2 Ocean water
rigation water are projected.
concentration acidity
The negative impacts on freshwater systems will atm pH
outweigh the benefits of climate change. Available 380 8.14
research suggests a future increase in heavy rain-
fall events in many regions and some regions where
average rainfall is projected to decrease. This will 360 8.12
mean an increased flood risk. It is likely that up to
20 per cent of the world’s people will be living in ar-
eas where the river flood potential could increase 340 8.10
by the 2080s. More frequent and severe floods and
droughts will harm sustainable development, rising
temperatures will affect fresh water quality, and in 320 8.08
coastal areas rising sea levels will mean more saline
contamination of groundwater.
300 8.06
5. The water that falls to Earth and does not infiltrate the ground 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
or evaporate but flows over or through the ground to swell sur-
Source: IPCC, 2007.
face or ground water sources.

30 Climate in Peril
Examples of major projected impacts on selected sectors

Climate driven Agriculture, forestry Industry, settlements


Water resources Human health
phenomena and ecosystems and society

TEMPERATURE Increased yields in сolder Effects on water Reduced human Reduced energy demand for
CHANGE environments resources relying on mortality from heating and increased
Decreased yields in snow melt decreased cold demand for cooling
Over most land areas, warmer environments exposure
Effects on some water Declining air quality in cities
warmer and fewer cold days
Increased insect supply Reduced disruption to
and nights, warmer and
outbreaks
more frequent hot days and transport due to snow, ice
nights Effects on winter tourism

HEAT WAVES/ Reduced yields in Increased water Increased risk of Reduction in quality of life
WARM SPELLS warmer regions due to demand heat-related mortality, for people in warm areas
heat stress especially for the without appropriate housing
Frequency increases Water quality problems, elderly, chronically sick,
over most land areas Wildfire danger increases e.g. algal blooms very young and socially Impacts on elderly, very
isolated young and poor

HEAVY Damage to crops Adverse effects on Increased risk of Disruption of settlements,


PRECIPITATION quality of surface and deaths, injuries, commerce, transport and
Soil erosion infectious, respiratory societies due to flooding
EVENTS groundwater
Inability to cultivate land and skin diseases
Contamination of water Pressures on urban and
Frequency due to waterlogging of supply rural infrastructures
increases over most soils
land areas Water stress may be Loss of property
relieved

DROUGHT Land degradation More widespread water Increased risk of Water shortages for
stress malnutrition settlements, industry and
Crop damage and failure societies
Affected areas Increased risk of water-
increase Increased livestock deaths and food-borne Reduced hydropower
Increased risk of wildfire diseases generation potentials

CYCLONES AND Damage to crops Power outages cause Increased risk of Withdrawal of risk coverage
STORM SURGES disruption of public deaths, injuries, water in vulnerable areas by
Windthrow (uprooting) of water supply and food-borne private insurers
Frequency trees diseases
increases Potential for population
Damage to coral reefs Posttraumatic stress migrations
disorders
Loss of property
SEA LEVEL RISE Salinisation of irrigation Decreased freshwater Increased
- risk of deaths Costs of coastal protection
water, estuaries and availability due to and injuries by versus costs of land-use
Increased incidence of freshwater systems salt-water intrusion drowning in floods relocation
extreme high sea-level
Migration-related health Potential for movement of
(excluding tsunamis) effects populations and infrastruc-
ture

Projected climate change and its impacts 31


Where are the most affected and who On land:
are the most vulnerable? At risk are areas that are particularly sensitive to the
In all regions, both with low as well as high average in- warming effect of climate change, including tundra, bo-
comes, some groups such as elderly people, the poor real forests of the North, and mountain regions. Others
and young children, and systems or activities are more will be more affected by the reduced rainfall and chang-
exposed than others. But there are sectors, systems ing precipitation patterns, in particular those with a Med-
and regions specially affected, namely the following: iterranean-type environment and tropical rainforests.

Changes in
Canary-current
Nile-delta
Alexandria

Africa Cairo

Climate change hotspot

Risk of desertification
More precipitation Massawa

Less precipitation
Cotonou
Coral bleaching Lagos
Lomé
Sea-level rise concerns
and affected major cities

Negative agricultural changes Lake


Tanganyika Kilimanjaro
Changes in ecosystems
Impact on fisheries
Increasing frequency or intensity of cyclones
Impact on mountain regions
Melting of glaciers
Changes in
Malaria: Benguela-current

Current distribution
Possible extension by 2050
Sources: IPCC, 2007; World Resources Institute, 2007;
Rogers and Randolph, 2000; Klein et. al., 2002.

32 Climate in Peril
On the coast: Small islands, where people and infrastructure are
Areas facing multiple stresses from climate change highly exposed to projected impacts, including sea
include mangroves and salt marshes. level rise which is the main problem, as well as re-
duced rainfall in summer projected for these regions).
In the ocean: This would reduce freshwater availability which may
Coral reefs are ecosystems that are very vulnerable to leave some unable to meet their demand. Increased
thermal stress and find it hard to adapt. Increases in rainfall in winter is “unlikely” to compensate this de-
sea surface temperature of about 1–3°C are projected velopment due to lack of storage and high runoff
to result in more frequent coral bleaching and wide- during storms. In the Pacific, for example, a 10 per
spread mortality, unless there is thermal adaptation cent reduction in average rainfall (by 2050) would
or acclimatization by corals. They face other climate- lead to a 20 per cent reduction of freshwater on
change related stresses such as increasing acidity
and non climate-related ones (overfishing) in addition.
Sea-ice biomes (communities) are also very sensitive Popu
Popula
lati
tion
on fflo
lood
oded
ed iin
n co
coas
asta
tall ar
area
eas
s in 2
208
080
0
to small changes in temperature, when ice turns to Million people per year (logarithmic scale)
water for example. 1000

Other risk sectors include low-lying coasts, water


100
resources in some dry areas and those that depend
on melting snow and ice, low-latitude agriculture,
and human health in poorer countries. The increased 10
frequency and intensity of extreme weather is “very
likely” to worsen other impacts.
1
Regions expected to be especially hard-hit by climate
change include:
Sea-level rise
0.1
cm
The Arctic, because of the high rates of projected 0 25 50 75 100
warming and its impact on people and the natural no additional efforts undetaken
more protection efforts than today
world. The thickness and extent of glaciers is ex- strong efforts to protect coastal populations against floods
pected to decline, and ice sheets and sea ice will Note: The upper margin of each band shows the amount of people affected in
also be affected. Invasive species may become a the A2 scenario according to which global population will reach 14 thousand
million by 2080 with the lowest GDP of all IPCC scenarios. Therefore little
growing problem. capacity exists to adapt, and more people will be affected by floods. The lower
end of each curve shows the impact for the A1/B1 scenario assuming the
highest per captia income and world population at 8 thousand million,
Africa, with the expected impacts on the continent allowing for higher investments in the protection of the population.
and its low capacity for adaption. Yields from rain-fed
Source: H. Ahlenius, GEO Ice and Snow, 2007, based on Nicholls, R.J. and Lowe,
agriculture, for example, could in some countries fall J.A., 2006.
by half by 2020.

Projected climate change and its impacts 33


Tianjin
Tibetean Plateau Seoul Osaka
Tokyo
Shanghai
Changjiang
-delta

Karachi Dhaka
Kolcata

Mumbai Ganges-
Brahmaputra Red-delta

Asia -delta
Chennai
Bangkok Manila

Permafrost: Coral reefs


Climate change hotspot
Present permafrost Mekong-delta
Coral reefs at risk Permafrost in 2050
Sea-level rise concerns
Malaria:
More precipitation Current distribution Jakarta
Less precipitation Possible extension by 2050
Major cities affected
by sea level rise
Negative agricultural changes
Changes in ecosystems
Impact on fisheries
Increasing frequency or intensity of cyclones
Forest fires
Melting of glaciers
Sources: IPCC, 2007; World Resources Institute, 2007;
Impact on mountain regions Klein et. al., 2002.

34
34 Climate
ClimateininPeril
Peril
Tarawa Atoll, Kiribati. Furthermore, more alien spe- Elsewhere Australia and New Zealand are expected to
cies may take advantage of higher temperatures to face problems from reduced agricultural productivity
settle on some islands, interfering with the natural and damage to species-rich areas, including the Great
ecosystems. Barrier Reef.

Asian and African mega-deltas, where large popula- Southern Europe may experience reduced availability
tions have to face high exposure to sea level rise, storm of water, mountainous areas across the continent will
surges and river flooding. In east, south and south-east face glacier retreat and reduced snow cover, leading
Asia illness and death from diarrhoeal disease caused to higher potential for water shortages, and health
by floods and droughts are expected to rise. risks may increase from heat waves and wildfires.

Australia and New Zealand More precipitation


Less precipitation
Kakadu
wetlands Coral reefs at risk
Queensland wet tropics
and Great Barrier Reef Sea-level rise concerns

Negative agricultural changes


Changes in ecosystems
Increasing risk of cyclones
Impact on fisheries
Forest fires

Murray-Darling Basin and Melting of glaciers


alpine zone
Malaria:
Possible extension by 2050

Northland to
Bay of Plenty

Climate change hotspot

Alpine zone

Sources: IPCC, 2007; World Resources Institute, 2007.

Projected climate change and its impacts 35


Europe

Climate change hotspot

Amsterdam
Rotterdam
Rhine
- delta
London Hamburg

Alps

Venice

Istanbul

Mediterranean basin

More precipitation Malaria: Negative agricultural changes Impact on fisheries

Less precipitation Possible extension Changes in ecosystems Impact on mountain regions


by 2050
Forest fires Melting of glaciers
Permafrost:
Sea-level rise concerns Present permafrost Source: IPCC, 2007; Klein et. al., 2002.
and affected major cities
Permafrost in 2050

36 Climate in Peril
Sharp increase in extinction of
mammals, birds, butterflies,
frogs and reptiles by 2050

Mesoamerica

Latin America

Climate change hotspot


Amazonia
Recife
More precipitation
Lima Loss of 24% of
Less precipitation Cerrado
tree species
ecoregion for a temperature
Severely threatened biodiversity increase of 2
today with trend to continue degrees Celsius
in the future Reduction of suitable
lands for coffee
Risk of desertification
Malaria: Rio de Janeiro

Coral reefs at risk Current distribution


Possible extension by 2050
Sea-level rise concerns
and affected major cities

Negative agricultural changes Buenos Aires


Changes in ecosystems La Plata-delta

Impact on mountain regions


Melting of glaciers

Water availability reduced due to reduction in glaciers


Forest fires
Impact on fisheries

Sources: IPCC, 2007; World Resources Institute, 2007; Rogers and Randolph, 2000; Klein et. al., 2002.

37
North America
More precipitation
Less precipitation

Sea-level rise concerns


and affected major cities
Vancouver
Negative agricultural changes
Changes in ecosystems
Impact on fisheries
Increasing frequency or
intensity of cyclones
Impact on mountain regions
New York
Forest fires

Permafrost:
Present permafrost
Permafrost in 2050 Los Angeles

Malaria:
Possible extension by 2050 New
Orleans
Mississippi
-delta
Sources: IPCC, 2007; World Resources Institute, 2007;
Rogers and Randolph; 2000; Klein et. al., 2002.

Climate change hotspot

38 Climate in Peril
Latin America may have less water, as a consequence population. Current models project that such changes
both of reduced precipitation and retreating glaciers, would occur over very long time scales (millennia) if
significant species loss, and by mid-century it may global temperature were to be sustained at 1.9–4.6°C
expect the gradual replacement of tropical forest by over pre-industrial levels. Complete melting of the
savanna in eastern Amazonia. Yields of food crops may Greenland ice sheet would raise sea level by 7m and
diminish, exposing more people to the risk of hunger. could be irreversible.

North America faces water scarcity, more heat waves,


coastal threats and problems for some crops. Meridional overturning circulation
The possibility which continues to fascinate the media,
The risk of abrupt or irreversible changes where potentially abrupt change could take place, is in
Climate warming could lead to some impacts that are the meridional overturning circulation of ocean water.
abrupt or irreversible, depending upon the rate and Ocean currents have specific patterns that are deter-
magnitude of the change. Abrupt climate change on mined by different water densities. Based on current
time scales of a decade or so is normally thought of model simulations, it is very likely that the meridional
as involving ocean circulation changes (like the me- overturning circulation (MOC) of the Atlantic Ocean (the
ridional overturning circulation – see box). On longer mixing of cold and warm water around the meridian) will
time scales, ice sheet and ecosystem changes may slow down during this century (the Gulf Stream bring-
ing warm water to Northern latitudes of Europe is part of
also play a role.
this circulation system); nevertheless temperatures in the
region are projected to increase. It is very unlikely that
If a large-scale abrupt climate change effect were to the MOC will undergo a large abrupt transition during
occur, its impact could be quite high. Partial loss of the 21st century, and longer-term changes in the MOC
ice sheets on polar land and/or the thermal expan- cannot be confidently assessed. Impacts of large-scale
sion of seawater over very long time scales could im- and persistent changes in the MOC are likely to include
ply metres of sea level rise, with the greatest impacts changes in marine ecosystem productivity, fisheries,
on coasts, river deltas and islands, implying major ocean CO2 uptake, oceanic oxygen concentrations and
changes in coastlines and inundation of low-lying ar- terrestrial vegetation.6
eas. The number of people in the world who live within
100 km of the coast and no more than 100 m above 6. About one-third of anthropogenic CO2 emissions are thought
to be entering the oceans, which form the largest active carbon
sea level has been calculated at 600 millions to 1.2
“sink” – absorber – on Earth.
billion – between 10 and 23 per cent of the world’s

Projected climate change and its impacts 39


Regional impacts associated with global temperature change
Impacts will vary by extent of adaptation, rate of
Global mean annual temperature change relative to 1980 - 1999 temperature change and socio-economic pathway

+1 ° +2 o +3 o +4 o +5 o
Subsaharan species at risk of extinction:
10 to 15 per cent 25 to 40 per cent
AFRICA
Semi-arid/arid areas increase by 5 to 8 per cent
People with increased water stress:
75 to 250 million 350 to 600 million Addtional people affected

Crop yield potential: 5 to 12 per cent decrease rice in China


2 to 5 per cent decrease wheat and maize in India

ASIA Additional people at risk of coastal flooding each year:


Up to 2 million Up to 7 million
People with increased water stress:
0.1 to 1.2 billion 0.2 to 1.0 billion Addtional people affected

3000 to 5000 more heat related deaths per year


AUSTRALIA/ Murray - Darling - 10 per cent - 50 per cent
river flow:
NEW ZEALAND Decreasing water security in south and east Australia and parts of New Zealand

Water availability:
Northern Europe: +5 to +15 per cent +10 to +20 per cent
Southern Europe: 0 to - 25 per cent -5 to -35 per cent
EUROPE
Wheat yield potential:
Northern Europe: +2 to +10 per cent +10 to +25 per cent +10 to +30 per cent
Southern Europe: +3 to +4 per cent -10 to +20 per cent -15 to +30 per cent

Potential extinction of about 25 per cent Potential extinction of about 45


Central Brazilian savanna tree species per cent Amazonian tree species
LATIN
Many tropical glaciers dissappear Many mid-lattitude glaciers disappear
AMERICA
People with addtitional water stress:
10 to 80 million 80 to 180 million Additional people affected

5 to 20 per cent increase


crop yield potential 70 to 120 per cent increase
NORTH forest area burnt in Canada
About 70 per cent increase in
hazardous ozone days
AMERICA 3 to 8 times increase in heat
Decreased space heating and increased space cooling wave days in some cities

20 to 35 per cent reduction of Arctic permafrost area 10 to 50 per cent Arctic


POLAR tundra replaced by forest
Increase in depth of seasonal thaw
of Arctic permafrost: 10 to 15 per cent 15 to 25 per cent 30 to 50 per cent 15 to 25 per cent polar
REGIONS
desert replaced by tundra

Increasing coastal inundation and damage to infrastructure due to sea level rise
SMALL Alien species colonise mid- and high latitude islands
ISLANDS Agricultural losses up to per cent GDP in high terrain islands,
up to 20 per cent losses in low terrain islands

40 Climate in Peril
Adaptation and mitigation
Neither adaptation to climate change (reducing the influence how big the future changes and their ef-
potential impacts by changing the circumstances so fects will be.
that they strike less hard) nor mitigation (reducing the
potential impacts by slowing down the process itself) If nothing was done to slow climate change, it would,
alone can avoid all climate change impacts; however, in the long term, be likely that natural, managed and
they can complement each other and together signifi- even human systems would be unable to adapt and
cantly reduce the risks of climate change. therefore fail to fulfill their purpose. The time at which
such limits were reached would vary between sectors
Adaptation is necessary both in the short and longer and regions. Early mitigation actions create the op-
terms to address impacts resulting from the warm- portunity to develop alternatives for carbon-intensive
ing that would occur even if we make massive cuts infrastructure to reduce climate change and thereby
in emissions. This is because the GHGs emitted also reduce the need (and the cost) for adaptation.
already until today continue to have a warming ef- Reliance on adaptation alone could eventually lead to
fect on the climate, independent from how much the climate change so severe that effective adaptation is
world continues to emit in the future. This was shown not possible, or will be available only at very high so-
in chapter 2. We do however have some options to cial, environmental and economic costs.

Mitigation options
Mitigation of climate change seeks to reduce the rate decline thereafter. The lower the stabilization level we
and magnitude of climate change. Slowing down the seek to achieve, the more quickly this peak and decline
processes of climate change would avoid or at least needs to occur.
delay many of its impacts. If the amount of CO2eq in
the atmosphere is doubled over pre-industrial levels In order to limit global warming to 2-2.4ºC (2 degrees
to around 550 ppm, the IPCC says global average is the target set by the European Union and other
temperatures will most probably rise at least 1.5ºC or countries, a temperature rise where it is believed that
more. It cannot rule out the possibility that they could it would still be possible to adapt to its impacts with
rise beyond 4.5ºC.The next two to three decades will affordable efforts and costs) emissions would need to
be crucial to achieve lower GHG stabilization levels, i.e. peak between 2000 and 2015. In reality, 2007 was a
to stop the increase of GHGs concentrations in the at- year of record increase in global CO2 emissions.
mosphere. If we fail to make the necessary efforts and
investments and emissions reductions are delayed the Economic activities have a substantial potential for
risk of more severe climate change impacts increas- mitigation of GHG emissions over the coming dec-
es. In order to stabilize the concentration of GHGs in ades. This could avoid the projected growth of global
the atmosphere, emissions would need to peak and emissions, or even reduce them below their current

Adaptation and mitigation 41


levels. Some studies suggest mitigation opportunities either existing technology or new technologies that
with net gains. In other words, mitigation can create a will be commercially available in the coming decades
positive financial result for the economy, for example if appropriate framework conditions for their develop-
through the development of new technologies or re- ment are put in place.
duced energy costs.
Positive side-effects of early mitigation
It was estimated that already measures with net gains There is a considerable potential for achieving a dou-
could reduce global CO2eq emissions by 6 gigatonnes ble benefit from measures to mitigate climate change.
per year by 2030. Today, the global fossil fuel emis- Reducing GHG emissions can result in large and rapid
sions are about 27 GtCO2/yr. health benefits from reduced air pollution which may
also offset a substantial part of the mitigation costs.
Equally, there is high agreement among IPCC scien- Energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy of-
tists and much evidence that all stabilization levels fer synergies with sustainable development. In least-
suggested in the table below can be achieved with developed countries for example, changing the source

Stabilization scenarios

CO2 concentration CO2-equivalent Peaking year for Change in global Global average Global average sea level Number of
at stabilization1 concentration CO2 emissions CO2 emissions in temperature increase rise above pre-industrial assessed
at stabilization2 2050 (% of above pre-industrial at equilibrium from thermal scenarios
2000 emissions) at equilibrium expansion only3
ppm ppm year per cent °C metres

350 - 400 445 - 490 2000 - 2015 -85 to -50 2.0 - 2.4 0.4 - 1.4 6

400 - 440 490 - 535 2000 - 2020 -60 to -30 2.4 - 2.8 0.5 - 1.7 18

440 - 485 535 - 590 2010 - 2030 -30 to +5 2.8 - 3.2 0.6 - 1.9 21

485 - 570 590 - 710 2020 - 2060 +10 to +60 3.2 - 4.0 0.6 - 2.4 118

570 - 660 710 - 855 2050 - 2080 +25 to +85 4.0 - 4.9 0.8 - 2.9 9

660 - 790 855 - 1130 2060 - 2090 +90 to +140 4.9 - 6.1 1.0 - 3.7 5

Note: the global average temperature at equilibrium is different from the expected global average temperature at the time of stabilization of GHG concentrations
due to the inertia of the climate system. For the majority of scenarios assessed GHG concentrations are expected to stabilize between 2100 and 2150.
1 - Atmospheric CO2 concentrations were 379ppm in 2005
2 - The best estimate of total CO2-eq concentration in 2005 for all long-lived GHGs is about 455ppm, while the corresponding value including the net effect
of all anthropogenic forcing agents is 375ppm CO2-eq
3 - Equilibrium sea level rise only reflects the contribution of ocean thermal expansion and does not reach equilibrium for many centuries. Long-term
thermal expansion is projected to result in 0.2 to 0.6m per degree Celsius of global average warming above pre-industrial levels.

42 Climate in Peril
Mitigation techniques and strategies today and tomorrow

Strategies available today Strategies available tomorrow*

• hybrid and more fuel-efficient vehicles • second generation biofuels


• cleaner diesel engines • higher-efficiency aircraft
TRANSPORT • biofuels • advanced electric and hybrid vehicles with
• shifts from road to rail and public transport more powerful and reliable batteries
• cycling and walking
• land use and transport planning

• more efficient appliances • integrated design of commercial buildings


• efficient lighting including technologies such as intelligent
• improved insulation meters that provide feedback and control
BUILDINGS • use of daylight • solar photovoltaics integrated in buildings
• passive and active solar design
• alternative refrigeration fluids
• recovery and recycling of fluorinated gases

• more efficient electrical equipment • advanced energy efficiency


• heat and power recovery • CCS for cement, ammonia and iron manufacture
INDUSTRY • material recycling and substitution • inert electrodes for aluminium
• control of non-CO2 gas emissions
• a wide array of process-specific manufacture

• improved crop and pasture management to • Improved crop yields


increase soil carbon storage
• restoration of cultivated peaty soils and
AGRICULTURE degraded land
• improved rice-growing techniques and livestock and
manure management to reduce methane emissions
• improved nitrogen fertilizer

• afforestation and reforestation • tree species improvement to increase biomass


• reducing deforestation productivity and carbon sequestration
FORESTRY • improved management of forest resources • improved remote sensing technology to analyse
• use of wood for bio-energy to replace fossil fuels the carbon sequestration potential of vegetation
and soils, and mapchanges in land-use

• recovering methane from landfills • biocovers and biofilters to optimize methane


• waste incineration with energy recovery oxidization (such technologies improve methane
WASTE • composting organic waste combustion by minimizing carbon emissions).
• controlled wastewater treatment
• recycling and minimising waste

*expected to be available commercially before 2030 according to the IPCC

Adaptation and mitigation 43


of energy from wood to the sun can lower disease and ogies and processes generating few GHG emissions.
death rates by cutting indoor air pollution, reducing the An effective carbon-price signal could realize signifi-
workload for women and children, who have to go out cant mitigation potential in all sectors. Modelling stud-
and collect the fuel wood, and decreasing the unsus- ies show that if global carbon prices were at 20 to 80
tainable use of fuel wood and therefore deforestation. US$ per tonne of CO2-eq by 2030 GHG concentrations
in the atmosphere would stabilize at around 550ppm
The role of policy and lifestyle CO2-eq by 2100. For the same stabilization level, other
Policies that impose a real or implicit price on GHG studies suggest these price ranges could be lowered to
emissions could create incentives for producers and 5 to 65 US$ per tonne of CO2-eq in 2030 as a result of
consumers to invest significantly in products, technol- changes in technologies that will take place by then.

Economic potential for reducing GHG emissions by sector in 2030


Gigatonnes of CO2 equivalent per year
World total
7
The three columns OECD
indicate different levels of 5.3 - 6.7 1 Economies in Transition
6 investment to reduce Other countries
emissions in each sector.
5
2.3 - 6.4 1
2.5 - 5.5 1
4 2.4 - 4.7 1

3 1.3 - 4.2 1
1.6 - 2.5 1

2
0.4 - 1.0 1
1

0
<20 <50 <100 <20 <50 <100 <20 <50 <100 <20 <50 <100 <20 <50 <100 <20 <50 <100 <20 <50 <100
Energy supply 2 Transport 3 Buildings Industry Agriculture Forestry Waste

1. Total range of potential in each sector when investing up to US$100 per tonne of CO2 eq
2. Electricity use is included in end use sectors, not in the energy sector.
3. As transport includes aviation, only global totals are shown. Source: IPCC, 2007.

44 Climate in Peril
There is growing evidence that decisions about macro- ments have not achieved significant emissions re-
economic policy, for example agricultural policy, mul- ductions beyond business as usual. However, some
tilateral development bank lending, insurance prac- recent agreements, in a few countries, have accel-
tices, electricity market reform, energy security and erated the application of best available technology
forest conservation, which are often treated separately and led to measurable emission reductions.
from climate policy, can reduce emissions significantly. Information (for example awareness campaigns)
Similarly, policies not directly linked to climate can af- may improve environmental quality by promoting
fect both the capacity to adapt and vulnerability. informed choices and possibly contributing to be-
havioural change, but the impact on emissions has
General findings about the performance of policies are: not been measured yet.
Integrating climate policies in broader devel- Research, development and demonstration
opment policies makes their implementation eas- (RD&D) can stimulate technological advances, re-
ier and helps to overcome barriers. duce costs and help progress toward the stabiliza-
Regulations and standards generally provide some tion of GHG concentrations.
certainty about emission levels. They may be prefera-
ble to other instruments when information or other bar- Examples of ways to integrate climate change into de-
riers prevent producers and consumers from respond- velopment policies to encourage mitigation include:
ing to price signals. However, they may not encourage changes to taxes and subsidies so as to promote
innovations and more advanced technologies. sustainable development;
Taxes and charges can set a price for carbon, but demand-side management programmes to reduce
cannot guarantee a particular level of emissions. electricity consumption as well as cutting transmis-
They can be an efficient way of internalizing the sion and distribution losses;
costs of GHG emissions. diversifying away from oil imports and reducing the
Tradable permits will establish a price for CO2. economy’s energy intensity;
The volume of allowed emissions determines their providing green incentives in the insurance of build-
environmental effectiveness, while the allocation of ings and transport; and
permits has distributional consequences. Fluctua- using the international finance system’s country and
tion in the price of CO2 makes it difficult to estimate sector strategies and project lending in a way that
the total cost of complying with emission permits. reduces emissions (by favouring low energy-inten-
Financial incentives (subsidies and tax credits) are sity investments, for example).
frequently used by governments to stimulate the devel-
opment and diffusion of new technologies. While eco- Changes in lifestyle and behaviour patterns can con-
nomic costs are generally higher than for the options tribute widely to climate change mitigation. Manage-
above, they are often critical to overcoming barriers. ment practices can also have a positive role. Examples
Voluntary agreements between industry and gov- include changes in consumption patterns, education
ernments are politically attractive, raise awareness and training, changes in building occupant behaviour,
among stakeholders and have played a role in the transport demand management, and management
evolution of many national policies. Most agree- tools in industry.

Adaptation and mitigation 45


National / International scale
High-emitting facilities Cement factories
Set clear priorities in
Power plants Iron and steel manufacturing
Research and Development
Gas processing Chemical industries
allocation of funds
plants Refineries (ammonia, hydrogen, ethylene, ethanol, etc.)

Set performance standards >> The text in boxes indicates


priorities for research.
Control them
Nuclear waste storage not resolved,
Switch to cleaner technologies Carbon Capture and Storage remaining risks of nuclear accidents,
Nuclear uranium mining not clean

Subsidize possibilities of industrial reconversion for sectors emitting too much by nature

Transport
Expand the national public transport network Energy
Freight Increase taxes for trucking freight
Develop rail and river freight alternatives Support
Advocate speed limits for international bunker freight shipping renewable energy projects
Technological improvements in all fields

Vehicle design Plane engines and wings Solar Ocean


Hull shape and propellers of ships Wind
Geothermal Biomass
Engines and exhaust systems of cars
Hydro-energy
Type of fuel
Land use competition with food production, Create incentives for
Biofuels intensive agriculture
energy efficiency
From heavy fuel oil to marine diesel oil for ships
improvement projects
Operational measures for ships and planes Routing and timing for ships
Air traffic management (avoid Awareness-raising /
waiting for landing) educational campaigns
Apply fossil fuel taxes to air traffic and shipping
Equity problem: weighs more
Stop fossil fuel subsidies heavily on poor population
GHG assessments
Increase taxes on vehicle purchase and registration, and on use of roads and car parks
of public sector and
local authorities
Agriculture and forestry
Stop subsidies to intensive farming Limit / control the use of fertilizers and pesticides
Stop deforestation Produce for the local market (”food sovereignty” vs.
Promote sustainable logging (labelling) global market)

Control peat fires Support sustainable farming practices

46 Climate in Peril
Ratify and implement the Kyoto protocol
> Commit to reduce national emissions
Political options
Enforce national reduction targets Controversial
Take part in international coordination Needs international
programmes to reduce emissions coordination Small loops for production,
(in transport, industry, etc.) Carbon sequestration capacity
consumption, waste
management ...
of vegetation will attain maximum
Offset unavoidable emissions in a few decades Priority to rks
o
local netw
Planting trees (carbon sinks) and
ation
diversific y
o f e n e rg
Finance projects in non-Annex I
sources Combine all local possibilities
countries under the Clean for clean energies
Development Mechanism
Local / City scale
Construction Urban planning

Establish sustainability Limit urban sprawl


criteria for buildings Subsidize collective housing in city centres
Subsidize the construction Subsidize the rehabilitation of unused or insalubrious buildings
of low-energy buildings in city centres
Subsidize insulations of existing Discourage real estate speculation in city centres
buildings
High housing tax for non-occupied building (office space in particular)
Promote local and
Use city and or state pre-emption rights to acquire land or buildings
ecological building materials
in town centres, for allocation to affordable collective housing
Set public buildings as an
Make this goal a priority in official urban planning documents
example
Control and limit the use of cars in city centres
Waste management
Develop pedestrian zones
Develop bicycle lanes and parks
“Less waste” policies Build car parks on city outskirts, close to public transport nodes
Support ecodesign projects Widen pavements, making them easy for everyone to use
(easy dismantling and recycling) (handicapped, strollers, etc.)
Support takeback campaigns Decentralize and multiply service hubs (reducing the need for travel)
Organize sorting and recycling Public transport
of waste
Expand the public transport network
Energy recovery from waste Run a reliable, regular service (timetables, punctuality)
To heat buildings Make it affordable (subsidies, reduced prices)
To run industrial processes Make it easy for everyone to use (handicapped, strollers, etc.)

Source: Emmanuelle Bournay, UNEP/GRID-Arendal inspired from the report “Mitigation of Climate Change”,
Working Group III, Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007.

Adaptation and mitigation 47


Kilograms of CO2
Whether one is sensitised or not,
emitted per day the heating consumes often the
9 biggest chunk of energy.

Same comfort level, different emissions .


.
Heating A difference of one degree
equals a reduction of 6%
. (a few degrees colder)
.
In this example, C02 emitted daily by two persons living in Munich are split up .
into the different activities which produce them, showing how easily less CO2 .
could be emitted while enjoying the same level of comfort needs: 38 kg of C02 .
emitted by an average consumer versus 14 kg by a more aware one.
5

Sorted from the biggest


to the smallest difference
between the two consumers 4 Regular vs.
C02 emitted by The difference represents energy-saving bulbs
a regular consumer C02 emissions that can
be avoided without losing
much comfort.
3 On vs. Off at night
With vs.without water- and during
saving shower head lunch hour
Jogging machine
vs. running in
Imported by boat from New
the park
Zealand vs. by lorry from Bavaria
2
Shower
C02 emitted by a “climate-
conscious” consumer
Beef vs.veal 90 vs. 60°C
Lunch Laundry
Laundry 1
drying
Car vs. underground Sports Apple
Dryer vs.
Commuting clothesline snack Dishwasher
Label D vs. label A
Imported by plane from Office devices
South Africa vs. by lorry from Italy
Strawberry snack

24 h
Light
(500 grams) Oven warmed
Bread vs. toaster
6 5 4 3 2 1 0
Electric vs. Dinner Frozen vs.
Note: calculation is based on an average household, fresh vegetables
where one kilowatt per hour accounts for 530 grams of CO2.
hand-wound Alarm clock Fridge
This value can be improved by using renewable energy Electric vs.air dry Drying hair DSL modem
sources for electricity production.
Toothbrush Boiling water Class A vs.
DVD TV Class A++ labelling
Source: Nadeschda Scharfenberg, Süddeutsche Zeitung, March 10, 2007 (primary
sources: Deutsche Energie-Agentur, BUND, Bayerisches Umweltministerium, Münchner Electric vs. regular Standby vs. really Off
Standby vs.
Verkehrsgesellschaft, Volkswagen, Kettler.)
Design: Emmannuelle Bournay, 2008. really Off Electric stove
vs. kettle

48 Climate in Peril
Adaptation options

A wide range of options on how to adapt to a changing ratios can be achieved by implementing some adap-
climate is available, but more adaptation than is hap- tation measures early, compared with retrofitting long-
pening now is needed to reduce vulnerability. Humans, lived infrastructure at a later date.
other species, physical features and natural processes
are all potentially vulnerable to the impacts of a chang- Examples of adaptation strategies include:
ing climate, though to widely differing degrees. Vulner- water: increased rainwater harvesting, water stor-
ability can be intensified by other stresses, for example age and conservation, water re-use, desalination,
poverty, hunger, trends in globalization, conflict, and greater efficiency in water use and irrigation;
diseases like HIV/Aids. The ability to adapt to the con- agriculture: altering planting dates and crop va-
sequences of a warmer climate and thus to reduce its rieties, relocating crops, better land management
vulnerability to those depends closely on social and (for example erosion control and soil protection by
economic development and is unevenly distributed planting trees);
both within and between societies. But even societies infrastructure: relocating people, building sea-
with high adaptive capacity remain vulnerable to cli- walls and storm surge barriers, reinforcing dunes,
mate change, variability and extremes. For example, creating marshes and wetlands as buffers against
a heat wave in 2003 caused high levels of mortality sea level rise and floods;
in European cities (especially among the elderly), and human health: action plans to cope with threats
Hurricane Katrina in 2005 caused large human and fi- from extreme heat, emergency medical services,
nancial costs in the United States. better climate-sensitive disease surveillance and
control, safe water and improved sanitation;
While little is known about the costs and benefits of tourism: diversifying attractions and revenues, moving
adaptation at the global level, studies at the regional ski slopes to higher altitudes, artificial snow-making;
and project levels of impacts on specific sectors such transport: realigning and relocating routes, design-
as agriculture, energy demand for heating and cool- ing roads, railways and other transport equipment
ing, water resources management and infrastructure to cope with warming and drainage;
are growing in number. These studies demonstrate energy: strengthening overhead transmission and
that there are viable adaptation options available at distribution networks, putting some cabling under-
low cost and/or with high benefit-cost ratios. Empiri- ground, energy efficiency and renewable energy, re-
cal research also suggests that higher benefit-cost duced dependence on single energy sources.

Adaptation and mitigation 49


The potential of international and
regional cooperation
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate national level. Successful agreements tend to be
Change (UNFCCC) and its Kyoto Protocol have made environmentally effective and cost-effective, to
notable achievements in addressing the challenges reflect the need for equity, and are institutionally
climate change imposes on humanity. Responding feasible.
globally to the climate change problem, stimulating
an array of national policies, creating an internation- Efforts to address climate change can include diverse
al carbon market and establishing new institutional elements such as emissions targets; sectoral, local,
mechanisms may provide the foundation for future sub-national and regional actions; research, devel-
efforts to slow climate change. But to be more envi- opment and demonstration (RD&D) programmes;
ronmentally effective, future mitigation efforts would adopting common policies; implementing develop-
need to achieve deeper reductions covering activities ment-oriented actions; or expanding financing instru-
with a higher share of global emissions. ments. These elements can be implemented in an in-
tegrated fashion, but comparing the efforts made by
Cooperation provides many options for achieving different countries quantitatively would be complex
reductions of global GHG emissions at the inter- and resource-intensive.

Climate negotiations in the course of time


Kyoto protocol:
Back in time: global GHG emissions target: -5% by 2012
The World Conservation Union Meeting The UN General Assembly principle of GHG emissions trade
declares climate change the planet seems to be warming
in Copenhagen, 1954
a “common humanity concern” human activity seems to be
1st Earth Summit Stockholm, 1972 IPCC created responsible for it the “balance of evidence”
more time is needed to confirm points to a “discernable
Toronto Scientific these two assumptions human influence on the
Conference global climate system”
on the Changing 2nd Earth Summit
Atmosphere Rio de Janeiro 2nd IPCC report
calls for a 20% cut to UNFCC created
1988 GHG emissions The Rio Convention UNFCCC Kyoto
1st World Climate by 2005 calls for a stabilisation COP 1 Conference
Conference of GHG emissions by Berlin (COP 3)
2000
Geneva st
1 IPCC report intensive negotiations

1979 1988 1990 1992 1995 1997


Sources: UNFCC, IPCC, Greenpeace. first published in: GRID-Arendal,Vital Climate Graphics, 2005.

50 Climate in Peril
The limits of adaptation and
mitigation
Once GHG concentrations are stabilized, the rate at its impacts remember the inertia in both climate and
which the global average temperature increases is ex- socio-economic systems.
pected to slow within a few decades. But small temper-
ature increases are expected for several centuries. Sea Adaptation will be ineffective in some cases such as
level rise from the expansion of warmer water would natural ecosystems (e.g. the loss of Arctic sea ice
continue for many centuries at a gradually slowing rate, and marine ecosystem viability), the disappearance of
as the oceans will continue to absorb heat. The result mountain glaciers that play vital roles in water storage
would be an eventual sea level rise much larger than and supply, or sea level rise of several metres. Adapta-
projected for the 21st century. Even if GHG and aero- tion will be more complicated or very costly in many
sol concentrations had been stabilized at the levels they cases for the climate change projected beyond the
had reached in 2000, thermal expansion alone would be next few decades (for example in deltas and estuaries).
expected to lead to further sea level rise of 0.3 to 0.8m. The IPCC has found that the ability of many ecosys-
tems to adapt naturally probably will be exceeded this
This example shows how important it is that efforts to century. In addition, multiple barriers and constraints
reduce the rate and magnitude of climate change and to effective adaptation exist in human systems.

February 16th: the Kyoto protocol Adoption of the Draft for a post -
enters into force Bali Road Map Kyoto
Protocol???
Russia ratifies the Kyoto protocol UNFCCC
UNFCCC COP 10 COP 12 Bali
Marrakesh Accords Montreal Action Plan: UNFCCC
Agreement on COP 14
UNFCCC
post-Kyoto action Copenhagen
Buenos Aires Plan of scientific evidence COP 10
Action: of global warming Buenos Aires UNFCCC
how to reach the targets "warming of the UNFCCC
3rd Earth Summit COP 11 climate system COP 13
UNFCCC COP 4 Johannesburg Montreal is unequivocal" Poznan
Buenos Aires
3rd IPCC report 4th IPCC report intensive negotiations

1998 2000 2001 2002 2004 2005 2007 2008 2009

Adaptation and mitigation 51


Costs of impacts, mitigation and
long-term stabilization targets

Strategic options for climate change mitigation


Global cost curve for greenhouse gas abatement measures
Cost of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 2030
Euros per tonne of CO2 equivalent avoided per year

CCS*, coal retrofit


Coal-to-gas shift
Wind, low penetration CCS*, Industrial Waste
100 new coal motor systems Biodiesel
Industrial
feedstock substitution Co-firing Avoided Industrial CCS*
Livestock/soils biomass deforestation Avoided deforestation
in America in Asia
Nuclear CCS* EOR, Cellulose
ethanol Higher cost abatement
50 Small transit new coal
Small hydro Forestation Soil
Forestation Further potential
Airplane
efficiency
5
0
10 15 20 25 30
Standby losses Abatement beyond “business as usual” by 2030
Thousand million tonnes of CO2 equivalent per year
Sugarcane biofuels

- 50 Fuel-efficient vehicles
Strategies sorted by cost-efficiency
Water heating
Savings
Air conditioning Costs
Lighting systems This graphic attempts to show 'all in one': the various measures for
-100 greenhouse gas reduction with both reduction (in CO2 equivalent)
Fuel-efficient commercial vehicles and cost (in Euros) quantified.
Read from left to right it gives the whole range of strategic options
ranging from low hanging fruit, such as building insulation, in green
(coming with economic savings) to the increasingly higher hanging
-150 ones, such as afforestation, wind energy, in red.
* Carbon Capture and Storage
Building insulation Source: McKinsey Climate Change Special Initiative, 2007.

52 Climate in Peril
The more severe the emission cuts to be made, the
more it will usually cost. There is wide agreement that
in 2050 global average costs for GHG mitigation to-
wards stabilization between 710 and 445ppm of CO2-
eq are between a 1 per cent gain and a 5.5 per cent
decrease in global GDP. This corresponds to slowing
average annual global GDP growth by less than 0.12
percentage points, a rate that is much smaller than
the annual fluctuation of GDP. GDP losses by 2030
are estimated at a cumulated 3 per cent since 2000
for the ambitious stabilization level of atmospheric
GHGs between 445 and 535 ppm CO2-eq. This corre-
sponds to the estimated annual growth rate. If these
predictions are correct, climate change mitigation
would slow down global economic growth by one
year by 2030.

For increases in global average temperature of less


than 1–3°C above 1980–1999 levels, some impacts
are projected to produce market benefits in some
places and sectors while, at the same time, imposing
costs in others. Global mean losses from impacts of
climate change could be 1–5 per cent of GDP for 4°C
of warming, but regional losses could be substantially
higher. The social cost of carbon dioxide is the price
of damages from climate change aggregated world-
wide. This cost was estimated at 12 USD per tonne of
CO2 for 2005 and it is projected to increase over time.
As these estimates do not include non-quantifiable
impacts, they might underestimate real net costs.

Weighing the costs of mitigation against its benefits


(that is, against the avoided impacts) does not as yet
allow us to determine a stabilization level where ben-
efits exceed costs.

Adaptation and mitigation 53


Sustainable development,
environmental protection
and climate change

Climate change could impede nations’ abilities to On the other side, mitigation of climate change can
achieve sustainable development pathways. It is “very create synergies and avoid conflicts with other dimen-
likely” that climate change can slow the pace of progress sions of sustainable development. For example, im-
toward sustainable development either directly through proving energy efficiency and developing renewable
increased exposure to adverse impacts or indirectly energies can improve energy security and reduce lo-
through erosion of the capacity to adapt. Over the next cal pollution. Reducing deforestation will benefit bio-
half-century, climate change could hamper the reali- diversity, and afforestation can restore degraded land,
zation of the Millennium Development Goals. Climate manage water runoff and benefit rural economies, if it
change will interact at all scales with other trends in does not compete with food production.
global environmental and natural resource problems,
including water, soil and air pollution, health hazards, Similarly, sustainable development practices can
disaster risk, and deforestation. Their combined im- enhance both the ability to adapt to and to mitigate
pacts may be compounded in future unless there are climate change as well as reduce vulnerability to cli-
integrated mitigation and adaptation measures. mate change.

54 Climate in Peril
Key vulnerabilities,
impacts and risks –
long-term perspectives

This section presents the essential climate change is- ecosystems), with increasing levels of adverse impacts
sues in brief, and compares recent findings with the as temperatures rise. An increasing risk of species ex-
state of knowledge of the Third Assessment Report tinction and coral reef damage is projected with higher
which in 2001 identified five “reasons for concern” confidence than in the TAR as warming proceeds.
over the long term.
Risks of extreme weather events. Responses to
These “reasons” are judged to be stronger in the some recent extreme events reveal higher levels of
fourth report than previously. Many risks are identified vulnerability in both developing and developed coun-
with higher confidence. Some risks are projected to tries than was assessed in the Third Assessment Re-
be larger or to occur at lower increases in tempera- port. There is now higher confidence in the projected
ture. Understanding about the relationship between increases in droughts, heat waves and floods.
impacts (the basis for “reasons for concern”) and
vulnerability (which includes the (in-)ability to adapt Distribution of impacts and vulnerabilities. There
to impacts) has improved. This is because of more are sharp differences across regions, and those in the
precise identification of the circumstances that make weakest economic position are often the most vulner-
systems, sectors and regions especially vulnerable able to climate change and are frequently the most
and growing evidence of the risks of very large im- susceptible to climate-related damages, especially
pacts on multiple-century time scales. when they face multiple stresses. There is increasing
evidence of the greater vulnerability of specific groups
Risks to unique and threatened systems. There such as the poor and elderly, not only in developing
is new and stronger evidence of observed impacts but also in developed countries. There is greater con-
of climate change on unique and vulnerable systems fidence in the projected regional patterns of climate
(such as polar and high mountain communities and change and in the projections of regional impacts, al-

Key vulnerabilities, impacts and risks – long-term perspectives 55


100
195

Global costs of extreme weather events


90

80
Annual losses
in thousand million U.S. dollars
70

60

Total economic losses

50 Insured losses

40 Average for decade

30

20

10

0
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2007
13 16 29 44 72
Number of events
Source: Munich Re, Geo Risks Research, NatCatSERVICE, 2008

56 Climate in Peril
77.5 mm, one column

lowing better identification of particularly vulnerable


systems, sectors and regions. And there is increased Reasons for concern
evidence that low-latitude and less-developed areas about projected climate change impacts
generally face greater risk, for example in dry areas
and mega-deltas. New studies confirm that Africa is Risks from
one of the most vulnerable continents because of the extreme climate
range of projected impacts, multiple stresses and low
capacity to adapt. Substantial risks from sea level rise Risk to unique
are projected, particularly for Asian mega-deltas and and threatened
systems
for small island communities.
Distribution of
Aggregate impacts. Compared with the third re- impacts
port, the initial market benefits of climate change are
projected to peak at a lower temperature and there- Accumulated
impacts
fore sooner than was assessed in the TAR. But eco-
nomics are not the only way of quantifying the im- Risks from future
pacts of climate change: over the next century it is large scale
singularities
likely to adversely affect hundreds of millions of peo-
ple through increased coastal flooding, reductions in -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
water supplies, increased malnutrition and increased Temperature increase in oC
health impacts. neutral or small negative or positive impacts or risks

negative impacts for some systems or low risks


Risks of large-scale singularities (unique phe- negative impacts or risks that are more widespread and/or greater in
nomena). During this century a large-scale abrupt magnitude
Source: IPCC, 2001.
change in the ocean circulation is very unlikely. Global
warming over many centuries would lead to a sea level
rise contribution from thermal expansion alone that is Antarctic ice sheets may be larger than projected by
projected to be much larger than that observed over ice sheet models and could occur on century time
the 20th century, with the loss of coastal areas and as- scales. This is because ice movements seen in recent
sociated impacts. There is better understanding than observations, but not fully included in ice sheet mod-
in the TAR that the risk of additional contributions to els assessed in the Fourth Assessment Report, could
sea level rise from both the Greenland and possibly increase the rate of ice loss.

Key vulnerabilities, impacts and risks – long-term perspectives 57


Abbreviations and acronyms

AR4 The Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, pub-


lished in 2007.

CO2-eq Carbon dioxide-equivalent, used as measure for the


emission (generally in GtCO2-eq) or concentration
(generally in ppm CO2-eq) of GHGs.

Gigatonne One billion (one thousand million, or 109) tonnes.

GHGs Greenhouse gases. The six whose emissions are


limited by the Kyoto Protocol are: Carbon dioxide
(CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), sulphur
hexafluoride (SF6), HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons), PFCs
(perfluorocarbons).

GtCO2 Gigatonnes (metric) of carbon dioxide.

GWP Global Warming Potential: The combined effect of the


length of time GHGs remain in the atmosphere and their
effectiveness in trapping heat while they are there.

IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

ppm Parts per million (as a measure of GHGs in the at-


mosphere).

TAR The IPCC’s Third Assessment Report, published in


2001.

UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate


Change; see www.unfccc.int.
Glossary

Aerosol process that in turn influences the first one. A positive feed-
A collection of minute airborne solid or liquid particles, either back intensifies the original process, and a negative feedback
natural or anthropogenic in origin, which can affect the climate reduces it.
in several ways.
Meridional overturning cirulation
Anthropogenic A large-scale north-south movement of water. In the Atlantic
Caused by human as distinct from natural activities. such a circulation carries relatively warm near-surface water
north and relatively cold deep water south. The Gulf Stream is
Carbon capture part of this Atlantic circulation.
Also known as carbon sequestration, or CCS: a technology for
trapping carbon and storage emissions and storing them in sub- Mitigation potential
terranean or undersea rocks. The amount of climate mitigation that could be achieved, but so
far is not. Market potential is based on private costs; economic
Carbon cycle potential takes into account social factors; technical potential is
The way carbon flows through the atmosphere, oceans, on land the mitigation achievable by using a technology or process that
and in rocks. has already been demonstrated.

CO2 equivalence Radiative forcing


A way of measuring the climate impact of all greenhouse gases The change (relative to 1750, taken as the start of the industrial
in a standard form. Because they vary in their ability to trap heat era) in the difference between the amount of heat entering the
in the atmosphere, and in the length of time they remain in the atmosphere and that leaving it. A positive forcing tends to warm
atmosphere, the effect of each gas is expressed in terms of an the Earth, a negative one to cool it.
equivalent amount of carbon dioxide.
Scenario
F-gases A plausible and often simplified description of how the future
Three of the six GHGs limited under the Kyoto Protocol: hy- may develop, based on a coherent and internally consistent set
drofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulphur hexafluoride. of assumptions: a set of working hypotheses about how society
may develop, and what this will mean for the climate.
Feedback
An interaction between processes in the climate system, when Singularity
the result of an initial process triggers changes in a second Something singular, distinct, peculiar, uncommon or unusual.
www.unep.org
United Nations Environment Programme
P.O. Box 30552 - 00100 Nairobi, Kenya
Tel.: +254 20 762 1234
Fax: +254 20 762 3927
e-mail: uneppub@unep.org
www.unep.org

ISBN: 978-82-7701-053-3

earthprint.com
The World’s leading Environmental and Agricultural Bookstore
SWEDISH ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY

You might also like