Professional Documents
Culture Documents
the general energy balance equation. It has an efficiency factor for the Reynolds number within a range of 5 to
11 million. The roughness of the pipe is not directly inputted into the equation; however, the efficiency factor is
built into the equation to take into account inefficiencies caused by the roughness of the pipe. This equation
introduces the following transmission factor into the General Flow Equation2:
(A12) The transmission factor is equal to two divided by the square root of the friction factor. This reduces the
equation to the Panhandle A equation for USCS units is2:
(A13)
The Panhandle B Equation is a slight modification of the original equation which allows the equation to be
accurate for a larger Reynolds number range of about 4 to 40 million. It integrates a slightly different
transmission factor into the General Flow Equation2:
(A14)
(A15)
The following chart is the analytical result for pressure drop versus flowrate of natural gas.
The values obtained using the Panhandle Equations were compared to Pro/II in order to determine how
accurate the expression can compute the pressure at various flow rates.
The chart above shows that the Panhandle equation has an error range from 5-10%. The Panhandle Equation
has a higher degree of accuracy for higher flowrates and smaller pipe diameter. The analytical method that was
used in this report allowed the program to use the appropriate version of the equation, A or B, depending on
the size of the Reynolds number. This method of fusing the two equations together reduced the error for the
higher flowrates which require a transmission factor used for the Panhandle B equation.
For consistency, an elevation change of 0.15 km was applied to the Panhandle equation in order to determine
how much elevation can affect the accuracy of the equation. Figure A19: Pressure Drop Comparison with
Elevation -- Panhandle & Pro/II
The values obtained using the Panhandle Equations with a 0.15 km elevation change were again compared to
Pro/II in order to determine how accurate the expression can compute the pressure at various flow rates. Figure
A20: Error Anaylsis with Elevation –Panhandle & Pro/II
The Panhandle Equation actually produced a more accurate answer when incorporating an elevation change. In
fact, there was approximately 2% less error for the 150 MMSCFD flow rate. This implies that the Panhandle
Equation is better suited for systems that have elevation change
PROBLEM: HIGH BEARING TEMPERATURE
CAUSE: INCORRECT ROLLER SLOPES SOLUTION: CHANGE ROLLER SLOPES BY SHIMMING BEARINGS
41
PROBLEM: HIGH TIRE CLEARANCE OR CREEP (CAUSE OF HIGH OVALITY AND BRICK LOSS)
CAUSE: SUPPORT PAD WEAR CAUSED BY INCORRECT ROLLER SLOPE SOLUTION: CHANGE ROLLER SLOPE
CHANGE OR SHIM SUPPORT PADS LUBRICATE TIRE ID
CAUSE: SUPPORT PAD WEAR CAUSED BY TAPERED TIRES/ROLLERS SOLUTION: RESURFACE TIRE/ROLLERS
CHANGE OR SHIM SUPPORT PADS LUBRICATE TIRE ID
CAUSE: IMPROPERLY SIZED TIRE SOLUTION: INSTALL INSULATED SHELL STIFFENER RINGS
CAUSE: DAMAGED KILN SHELL SOLUTION: REPLACE SHELL SECTION SHELL CORRECTION CUT
42
CAUSE: HIGH ROLLER THRUST LOADS SOLUTION: ADJUST SUPPORT ROLLERS FOR MINIMUM THRUST LOADS,
WITH ALL ROLLERS IN THE DOWNHILL POSITION
CAUSE: ROLLER THRUST LOADS ARE TOO HIGH, SOME ROLLERS PUSHING KILN UP AND SOME DOWN
SOLUTION: ADJUST ROLLER BEARINGS
CAUSE: CONSISTENTLY HIGH BACKLASH SOLUTION: REDUCE PINION BACKLASH: PINION ADJUSTMENT OR
GEAR REVERSAL (NOTE: BACKLASH IS MINIMUM WHEN KILN IS COLD)
CAUSE: VARIABLY HIGH BACKLASH SOLUTION: REALIGN MAIN GEAR FOR MINIMUM RADIAL RUNOUT
CAUSE: LOSS OF TOOTH PROFILE SOLUTION: DAMPEN CONTROL RESPONSE TO SPEED CHANGE OR REVERSE
GEAR
CAUSE: LOOSE GEAR (SPRING MOUNTED) SOLUTION: INSTALL OVERSIZED GEAR PINS
CAUSE: MOTOR CONTROL RESPONSE TIME IS IN PHASE WITH TOOTH CONTACT FREQUENCY SOLUTION:
DAMPEN CONTROL RESPONSE
43
CAUSE: BENT KILN AXIS (DOGLEG) SOLUTION: CUT AND REALIGN SHELL
CAUSE: EXCESS INLET/OUTLET SEAL CONTACT SOLUTION: ADJUST SUPPORT ROLLERS CUT, RECENTER AND
REATTACH SEAL
CAUSE: EXCESS FEED PIPE SOLUTION: ADJUST FEED PIPE REMOVE EXCESS BUILDUP
CAUSE: EXCESS GEAR GUARD CONTACT SOLUTION: CUT, RECENTER AND REATTACH GUARD FLANGE
Rotary units of any kind require a large capital outlay and are expensive to operate. When the unit is damaged
to the point of breakdown, the cost of operation is significantly increased. Taking a unit off-line and bringing it
back up again, and repairing or replacing its parts is always costly. Serious damage rarely happens in one day.
Usually it is the accumulation of a series of small problems left unattended or unrecognized that finally causes a
failure. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. With improved skills of recognition it is possible to
exercise preventive maintenance effectively, thereby eliminating, or certainly reducing, expensive and
unexpected shutdowns.
Rotary kilns are a valuable component in many industrial process systems. Protecting them is of the utmost
importance in maintaining process efficiency, prolonging equipment life, and avoiding costly repairs. If
properly maintained and serviced, a high quality rotary kiln should yield very little downtime.
Due to the high heat and process reaction that occurs within a rotary kiln, there are certain wear points to
keep an eye on.