Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Methodology 9teaching Vocabulary PDF
Methodology 9teaching Vocabulary PDF
TEACHING VOCABULARY
For many people, the question “What is vocabulary?” has a simple answer: “Words”. But
which words? Are “am”, “is”, “was”, “had” and “of” vocabulary items, or are they something else?
On the other hand, we may wish to say that such words as “am”, “is”, “was”, “has”, etc. are part
of our vocabulary in a general sense. What is a word? Is “put up with” (“tolerate”) one word or
three? It has three parts, certainly, but only one meaning. “Beat”, on the other hand, has several
meanings; is it one word or more? One way of avoiding this dilemma is to refer to items of
vocabulary with a single meaning as “lexical items”, whether they consist of one word or more.
The term “word” can then be reserved for a group of letters preceded and followed by a space.
However, the word may include the base form with its inflections and derivatives (e.g. makes,
made, making, maker-s). Since the meanings of these different forms of the word are closely
related, it is assumed that little effort is needed to learn them.
However, it should be remembered that vocabulary learning is more than the study of
individual words. A significant amount of the English language is made up of lexical phrases
which range from lexical verbs to longer expressions, and routines. Because these can often be
learned as single units, the same principles of learning apply to them as to individual words. The
notion of a word has been ‘broadened’ to include such lexical phrases and routines, and it has
been suggested that in the initial stages of learning these play a primary role in communication
and acquisition. In addition, access to lexical corpora has made it possible for applied linguists
to identify common patterns of collocation, word formation, metaphor, and lexical phrases that
are part of a speaker’s lexical competence.
Whatever linguistic distinctions we choose to make, however, it is clear that our pupils
need to know both lexical items and grammar words in order to communicate in English.
Vocabulary is a core component of language proficiency and provides much of the basis for
how learners speak, listen, read and write. Without an extensive vocabulary and strategies for
acquiring new vocabulary, learners often achieve less than their potential and may be
discouraged from making use of language learning opportunities around them such as listening
to the radio, listening to native speakers, using the language in different contexts, reading, or
watching television.
By the end of this unit, you should be able to:
• explain what vocabulary is and what role it plays in the system of a language and
its culture
• explain how vocabulary itself is systematic
• set up, apply and monitor a variety of interactive classroom tasks for developing
vocabulary
• offer a theoretical justification for each of these tasks
• explain and illustrate using a dictionary and the phonemic symbols
• integrate vocabulary activities with the development of one or more of the four
skills
• have reconsidered and improved your own repertoire of skills in the area of
language teaching
• assess the learning outcomes of classroom vocabulary activities
• have some ideas for developing pupil autonomy in vocabulary learning.
Anca Cehan 3
The distinction between active and passive vocabulary assigns priority to comprehension.
Comprehension should precede production. The object of a vocabulary lesson is to enhance the
different strategies for comprehension and production. Thus, when considering active and
passive vocabulary, three principles are important to bear in mind:
(i) you need to teach any lexical item either for active production or passive
recognition.
(ii) the memory processes involved in assimilating passive vocabulary are less
demanding than those involved in assimilating active vocabulary.
(iii) pupils can easily learn passive vocabulary independently of both you and the
classroom.
As active vocabulary, you may look for high frequency words, and words with wide
coverage. Such a high-frequency and wide-coverage word is for example “get”. English native-
speaker primary school children are discouraged by their teachers from using “get” because
they tend to use it too frequently: I got up, I got washed, I got dressed, I got ready, I got to the
bus stop, I got punished, I got ill, etc. This simply shows what a very useful word “get” is,
particularly for pupils in the early stages or where ability to communicate is seen as a highly
motivating factor.
However, as Harmer warns, the distinction between active and passive vocabulary is not
always clear cut, particularly at intermediate levels and above. A word that has been active
through constant use may slip back into the passive store if it is not used anymore. On the other
hand, a word that pupils may have in their passive store may become active of the situation or
context provokes its use (Harmer, 1991: 159).
Consequently, you need to spend more time on active vocabulary, with examples and
questions, but to present passive vocabulary briefly and allow pupils to guess the meaning from
context where possible. Not all pupils will start guessing automatically, so you need to invest a
little time in training this skill.
Vocabulary is only learnt if it is understood. Nothing can be learnt unless it can be
incorporated into an existing mental picture of the way things are, a sort of framework of
perceptions and associations. Pupils therefore need careful guidance about the meaning of
lexical items, and about their grammatical use, before they can ‘place’ them in their internal
networks of meaning.
A problem, however, may be one of interference from concepts in Romanian and English
that seem to have associations with the target item. This is unavoidable, and has to be
countered with clear examples of how the English word is used (or not used) in that context and
in comparison with other words.
The vocabulary that pupils encounter will only be assimilated if it has relevance to the
messages they want to understand or to the messages they want to convey. Only those lexical
items are learnt that are perceived as having personal significance for the pupil. Personal
significance can take many forms, e.g. “I need it to understand this text”, “I need it to understand
a letter from my English pen-friend”, “I need it to understand the instructions in my grammar
book”, etc.
Anca Cehan 4
Classroom vocabulary
There are some items of vocabulary that need to be learned to a very high degree of
fluency and as quickly as possible. These include numbers, polite formulas, items for
controlling language use (for example, to ask someone to repeat, speak more slowly and so
on), times and periods of time and quantities. Although it is not always easy to decide which
lexical items should be part of the active vocabulary, it is fairly clear that classroom vocabulary
is a high priority. By this we do not simply mean the names of classroom furniture, although it is
obviously important for the pupils to know and use “desk”, “board”, “wall”, “picture”, “book”,
“chalk” as well as “write”, read”, “draw”. Classroom vocabulary includes the key words we use
in instructions to the learners. Here are some of the more common ones:
true/false get into pairs/groups
tick/cross grid/chart/map/form
regular/irregular fill in/cross out/leave out/underline
gaps/blanks top/middle/bottom
offer/accept/refuse/invite
instructions/description/suggestion/opinion
There are many vocabulary items that need to be learned to a very high degree of
fluency as quickly as possible. These include not only classroom vocabulary but also numbers,
polite formulas, items for controlling language use (ask someone to repeat, speak more slowly),
times, and periods of time and quantities.
Opinions vary on the amount of new vocabulary that pupils can be expected to absorb.
Suggestions range from five to twelve new items in a one-hour lesson. Many teachers might
feel that a number between five and eight would be more reasonable. A great deal depends on
the aims of the lesson, the pupils’ level of ability, motivation, aptitude and so on. Nor can we
expect that the pupils will remember all the vocabulary they are taught. In fact, they will not
remember very much of it unless the items are recycled in later lessons.
Pedagogic considerations
Your decisions about what to teach will be affected by considerations referring to the
pupils, the resources and the linguistic components, but also by pedagogic ones, that is by the
factors that affect how you teach, and which choice you will make. These considerations are:
• teachability/ learnability
You will teach according to the level of your pupils, and to how easy is an item to put
over. Even at low levels, you can teach:
i) international words (e.g. taxi, television, hotel, cinema, weekend)
ii) cognates, that is words which are similar in both form and meaning in the two
languages (e.g. the names of many school subjects like chemistry, geography, biology,
mathematics, etc., or verbs such as obtain, admire, insult, form, etc.). These are obviously very
easy to learn.
Anca Cehan 5
Can you think of any other words of Romanian which are similar
to English words in both form and meaning (cognates), and of any
others which are ‘false friends’ (similar in form, but not in meaning)?
• extendability
Some words allow the use of prefixes and suffixes; others enter various combinations or
include the meaning of other words (their hyponyms):
i) word families: photo –graph, -graphy, -graphic, -grapher.
ii) combinable items: hand bag, home work, guitar string
iii) ‘cover’ words: (at early levels): seat for chair / stool/ sofa / bench, nice with people /
weather / events, house for house / flat / home / building, etc.
• concrete vs. abstract
Those words that show concrete entities are easier to grasp and will be taught before the
more subtle or abstract words, e.g.:
i) beautiful before responsible
ii) can’t stand before not keen on
iii) Could you? / Yes of course before Would you mind –ing? / Not at all.
• amount (learning load)
A rough guide according to level, mood and motivation of the learners is:
maximum 6 for beginners
maximum 9 - 10 for intermediate
for advanced students, it is up to the students themselves.
• teaching for active for for passive vocabulary is a crucial decision which affects your
entire approach. Are the pupils to learn vocabulary in order to recognise it or in order to
produce it?
if only to recognise, concentrate on pronunciation, spelling, context and
meaning;
if to produce, concentrate on pronunciation, spelling, context, meaning and
practice.
• difficulty of concept and pronunciation, etc. will also be factors to consider.
One obvious way of adding to one’s vocabulary store is to search for words in English
which are similar to ones in Romanian. Pupils should be encouraged to do this, but they should
also be warned to watch out for false friends, that is, words which look or sound similar but
which have rather different meanings and uses. For example, the English “library” does not
mean the same as the Romanian word “librărie”.
Anca Cehan 6
Match the following ‘false friends’ with their Romanian equivalents. A
few Romanian words have no English equivalents in this list!
1. accommodation a. compătimire
2. argument b. gol, vid; loc liber; răgaz
3. (to) assist c. a relua, a reîncepe
4. commodity d. spectacol
5. conservatory e. ochelari
6. industry f. vacanţă
7. interest g. marfă, produs
8. (to) resume h. cazare, găzduire
9. spectacles i. hărnicie
10. sympathy j. comoditate
11. vacancy k. a ajuta
l. discuţie, controversă
m. dobîndă
n. seră
Teaching vocabulary
There are three main approaches to the teaching of vocabulary: incidental learning,
explicit instruction and independent strategy development.
Teaching vocabulary means directing the learners’ attention to language items not for
producing or comprehending a particular message, but for gaining knowledge about the item as
a part of the language system. This includes focusing on the pronunciation and spelling of
words; deliberately mlearning the meanings of words; memorizing collocations, phrases and
sentences containign a specific word; and being corrected for incorrect use of a word.
Negotiating vocabulary is also a kind od such instruction if it involves discussing the word’s
spelling or pronunciation, or giving explanation of its meaning.
Anca Cehan 8
• superordinate: using a more general category, of which the new item is a
member / hyponym (e.g. “chair”, “table”, “stool”, “wardrobe”, “sofa “are all hyponyms of the
category “furniture”. “Furniture” is the superordinate term.
• translation: often the simplest way to present a new item is to translate it.
Which techniques you choose will depend upon circumstances and type of item being
introduced. Concrete items are often best introduced through pictures or translation. Asking the
pupils to suggest synonyms and antonyms is a way of extending vocabulary by considering
various shades of meaning and of expanding the range of the pupils’ command of English.
Teaching vocabulary using sets
Think of three different ways in which new words can be
grouped for learning purposes, and write your suggestions in the
space provided below. Look for more ideas as you are reading this
section.
The view that vocabulary is in some way systematic has been partly responsible for the
idea of teaching vocabulary in lexical sets where this is possible and appropriate. Hence, you
may use sets such as:
• types of transport
• English money
• rooms in a house
• professions
• services
• weather, etc.
or sets such as:
• degrees of fear (e.g. anxious / petrified)
• ways of walking (e.g. stagger, tiptoe)
• degrees of raining (e.g. drizzling / bucketing down)
• opposites in food description (e.g. disgusting vs. delicious; savoury vs. sweet), etc.
• personal characteristics concerning people (e.g. sociable)
There are, however, areas of vocabulary where it might not be appropriate to teach in
sets:
1. where a word has multiple meaning, you would want not to teach all the
meanings of that word at the same time;
2. collocations are by nature ‘one-offs’;
3. connotation: for instance, youths is used to mean something different from young
people; and slim is used to mean something different from skinny. The connotational meaning
of words can be taught in contrasting pairs, but other than this they are not systematically
teachable;
4. idioms: these are more likely to occur in informal language than in formal
language. Idiomatic language includes such commonly used phrases as as well (e.g. He took
out an insurance policy as well) and such uncommonly used phrases as between the devil and
the deep blue sea. Clearly, we cannot teach idiomatic language systematically; what we must
do, however, is systematically select what aspects of it are worth teaching to our pupils.
To summarise, the knowledge that lexis does (to a certain extent) have a system should
help you to make decisions about how to select and organise vocabulary for teaching purposes.
Anca Cehan 9
The basic principle of lexical meaning is that: the meaning of a word is in its use and in
its relationship with other words, so, when teaching vocabulary, contexts are better than
definitions and network diagrams of lexical relationships are useful too.
Elaboration
Knowing an English word means a lot more than just its translated meaning or its
English synonyms. There are various aspects of word knowledge such as knowing related
grammatical patterns, affixes, common lexical sets, typical associations, how to use the word
receptively and productively, and so on. Expanding the connections between what the learners
already know and new information involves elaboration. One way to elaborate is to choose
English words from the surrounding context and to explain their connections to the recently
learned word. Also, teachers should create opportunities to meet these useful, recently learned
words in new contexts and provide new collocations and associations. Exercises that can
deepen pupils’ knowledge of words include:
• Sorting lists of words and deciding on the categories;
• Making semantic maps with lists either provided by the teacher or generated by
the learners;
• Generating derivatives, inflections, synonyms, and antonyms of a word;
• Making trees that show the relationships between superordinates, coordinates,
and specific examples;
• Identifying or generating associated words;
• Combining phrases from several columns;
• Matching parts of collocations using two columns;
• Completing collocations as a cloze activity;
• Playing collocation crossword puzzles or bingo.
Much of what has been written about teaching vocabulary contains the assuption that
vocabulary learning should be in context. This assumption is not supported by reasearch and by
what successful learners do. Considerable research shows that (Nation, 271):
• Explicit, decontextualised study of vocabulary is an effective way of rapidly
increasing learnes’ vocabulary size;
• The learning achieved in this way can lasy for a very long time;
• This knowledge can be made available for use;
• There are ways that increase the efficiency of learning vocabulary and they include
the use of mnemonic techniques, using vocabulary cards, the spacing and
organizing of learning, and the deliberate avoidance of interference among items.
The deliberate learning of vocabulary may contribute directly to word knowledge if the
words learned are not complicated and ig the learning is meaningful.
Anca Cehan 10
Other textbooks offer activities requiring pupils to predict which words they are likely to
find in a specified text, or to draw their own pictures as frames for learning and remembering
new words. Yet others use pictures to stimulate vocabulary acquisition. (One such activity
requires the pupils, in groups, to study six pictures of single items and create a narrative which
will include all these items. The stories are then read out to other groups who have to guess
what the six pictures were).
Most textbook writers try in one way or another to make vocabulary learning an
interactive process, using pair, group or teamwork, competitions and games.
Recent approaches to teaching vocabulary do not totally reject rote learning. This is
generally accepted as a valid method of dealing with new lexical items. But it is only one
method, and like any other method, not suitable for all learners at all times.
Penny Ur (1996: 65 – 67) shows that lexical items are learnt more easily if:
• they have clear, easily comprehensible meanings;
• they can be linked to other items though meaning or sound association;
• they are taught and reviewed for brief periods in several different parts of the
lesson;
• they have personal or emotive significance.
Independent strategy development: pupils’ own vocabulary extension
As the emphasis on learner independence deepens, you may also think of the amount of
time and number of activities that you spend on learner training in class, aimed at helping your
pupils to develop autonomy in vocabulary learning. The skills concerned, once acquired, will
enable your pupils to become independent learners of vocabulary outside the classroom. There
are a number of ways of fostering learner independence in the area of vocabulary:
• Brainstorming
A useful technique is getting pupils into the habit of brainstorming around a topic area
that is being focussed on. This helps them to reactivate known vocabulary and also ‘warm’ them
for a particular topic. In class, for example, ask your pupils in groups to note down every item of
vocabulary that relates to, say, bedroom. This can work particularly well at later levels and can
be made competitive.
The visual element in brainstorming can reinforce learning. The pupils may be given a
key word and asked to put it in a box in the middle of a piece of paper. They then think of all the
associated words they can. Each of these branches off on a line drawn out from the key word
and is written in its own circle. Each word may itself become a minor key word with branches
going off it.
If you give them the word “bedroom”, for example, ask them to think first of the large
items in a bedroom, then of the small ones, and finally of the things that surround them.
If you were asked to draw the network of associated words for
bedroom, what words would you contribute, and how would you organize
them? Draw your meaning network for the word bedroom.
The point of the exercise is that the pupils are creating their own word associations, and
the information collected is visually striking and thus they likely to be remembered more easily.
Out of class, they may mentally run through or note down any words they can think of
related to, for example, the topic of a film they are about to watch on TV, or of an article they are
going to read for homework. It can be done in preparation for a task (e.g. writing about a
particular topic; explaining areas of interest or hobbies, etc.)
Anca Cehan 11
• Guessing from context
The context offers clues to the meaning of an unknown word. (Is the word a verb? A
noun? An adjective? Does it refer to a being? A thing? A concept? etc.) The same unknown
word may occur a number of times in the text, and the variety of contexts in which it occurs, the
importance of the word to understanding the text – all these contribute to facilitating or hindering
the use of these clues.
However, guessing from context is a complex and often difficult strategy to carry out
successfully. To guess from context, learners need to know about 19 out of every 20 words
(95%) of a text (Hunt and Beglar, 262), which requires knowing the 3,000 most common words.
Even when one knows these words, unless the context is very constrained, which is a relatively
rare occurrence, or unless there is a relationship with a known word identifiable on the basis of
form and supported by context, there is little chance of guessing the correct meaning. Moreover,
because guessing from context fails to direct attention to word form and meaning, relatively little
learning occurs.
At least in the early stages of the development of the guessing skill, learenrs have to
consciously focus on unknown words, interrupting their normal reading, and systematically
drawing on the avauilable clues to work out the unknown word’s meaning. Guessing from
context focuses on the particular reference of a word as determined by the context rather than
on its underlying meaning. Guessing may also serve to raise consciousness of the word.
(Nation, 271)
Although this strategy often may not result in gaining a full understanding of word
meaning and form, guessing from context may still contribute to vocabulary learning. Just what
is and what is not learned will partly depend on text difficulty as well as learners’ level. More
proficient learners can be expected to use this strategy more effectively than low proficiency
level learners. Although time-consuming, if regularly practised, this strategy may contribute to
deeper word knowledge for advanced learners as long as they pay attention to the word and its
context (collocations, associations, related grammatical patterns). To this, we may add raising
the learners’ confidence in guessing from context, and making learners sensitive to the range of
clues available.
Can you arrange the steps of this strategy from the first to the last?
Use numbers from 1 – 5 to arrange the steps in an order that makes sense
to you:
• guessing the meaning of the unknown word
• checking that the guess is correct
• looking at the relationship between the clause containing the
unknown word and surrounding clauses and sentences
• finding the part of speech of the unknown word
• looking at the immediate context of the unknown word and
simplifying this context if necessary
Anca Cehan 12
• Dictionary work
Bilingual dictionaries have been found to result in vocabulary learning. A bilingual
dictionary may be much more likely to help lower-proficiency learners in reading comprehension
because their lack of vocabulary can be a significant factor in their inability to read.
Bilingual dictionaries have some advantages over monolingual dictionaries, especially if
they provide L2 definitions, L2 sentence examples as well as L1 synonyms.
Electronic dictionaries with multimedia annotations offer a further option, especially when
both pictures and text are available for students. (See CD-ROM dictionaries published by
Collins COBUILD, Longman, and Oxford).
Training in the use of dictionaries is essential. In addition to learning the symbols and
what information a dictionary can and cannot offer, learners may need extra practice for words
with many entries. Furthermore, learners need to be taught to use all the information in an entry
before making conclusions about the meaning of a word. The learners’ attention should also be
directed toward the value of sentence examples which provide collocational, grammatical and
pragmatic information about words. Finally, the teacher should emphasise the importance of
checking a word’s original context carefully and comparing this to the entry chosen, because
context determines which sense of a word is being used.
Pupils must be trained in this and there are such exercises in many textbooks. Once the
pupils have acquired this skill, dictionaries can lend themselves to a number of useful classroom
activities:
Can you remember any classroom activity that involves the use
of the dictionary?
A lot has been said about the use of dictionaries. While all EFL teachers will agree that a
dictionary, properly used, is a valuable tool for the language learner, it is also recognised that
there are potential problems. Sensible use of a good dictionary can lead to learner autonomy;
that is, the learner will be able to continue learning outside the classroom. Over-reliance on the
dictionary, on the other hand, can slow down the learning process. The meanings of many
words can be guessed form the context in which they occur, and if pupils automatically reach for
the dictionary every time they come across a new word, they are denying themselves genuine
learning opportunities.
Dictionary work is helped if pupils are familiar with the names of the parts of speech and
their dictionary abbreviations, as this allows them to become immediately familiar with the new
word’s function in an utterance.
The dictionaries themselves vary in their value to the learner. At one end of the scale are
the small bilingual dictionaries which provide one-word Romanian equivalents. As the meaning
of a word tends to change according to the context in which it is used, the chances of getting
the wrong meaning with this type of dictionary are fairly high. At the other end of the scale, we
find dictionaries where the definition of the word is written in language too complex for the pupil
to understand. It is probably better to choose a dictionary specially produced for pupils, which
recognises this problem and tries to simplify its definitions. In this type of dictionary, definitions
are not reduced to note form: they usually consist of a full sentence showing how a lexical item
is used in a particular situation or for a particular purpose.
By facilitating the pupils’ use of dictionaries and other skills concerning vocabulary, you
are helping them become more independent and more in control of their own learning outside
the classroom.
Anca Cehan 13
• Use of the phonetic script
Another element that most English–English and English– Romanian dictionaries offer is
the phonetic script / transcription of the words. You may think that asking your pupils to learn
the International Phonetics Association (IPA) symbols is asking too much. As with any aspect of
language teaching, there are arguments both for and against this point of view. Here are the
reasons why some attempt to introduce the IPA system should be made:
If knowing a word means, among other things, knowing how to pronounce it
acceptably, then the ability to transcribe it in phonemic symbols is obviously a valuable
teaching/learning aid. The phonemic transcription avoids the perils of English spelling, as here
one symbol equals one sound.
• Although a symbol chart looks rather frightening at first glance, it is really quite
easy to learn the phonemes of English. There are only 44 of them, and half of these are the
normal English letters, with others very close.
• Knowledge of the IPA symbols is extremely helpful to dictionary work. Problems
with awkward words such as cough and bough disappear if the learner can discover in a
dictionary that cough is pronounced /k℘f/ and bough /bau/.
It is worth mentioning that, if the phonetic script is taught imaginatively, pupils enjoy it.
Many see it as a secret code they can use for their messages and become quite proud of their
skill once they have learnt the symbols.
An ability with the phonetic script helps to give you and your pupils a knowledge of what
happens generally to sounds as they move from their decontextualised form to their
contextualised form. This knowledge will help you to appreciate the difficulties your pupils face,
especially in listening. This will benefit the preparation of your lessons and the anticipation of
the difficulties that your pupils are up against. Teaching and practising the phonetic script with
pupils will also facilitate knowledge of the most obvious phonetic differences between Romanian
and English, which will help you in anticipating and dealing with errors (both reception errors
and production errors) in the classroom.
• Awareness of the role played by prefixes and suffixes
The majority of words in English come from French, Latin, or Greek and the majority of
these have word parts, particularly prefixes and suffixes. Knowledge of these word parts can be
used to improve the learning of many words through relating unknown word forms and
meanings to known word parts. This is similar to the effect of mnemonic devices on vocabulary
learning. This can help your pupils to expand their vocabulary store. You can ask pupils, in
groups, to think of as many words as they can which end in –ship but have nothing to do with
water, and then write sentences showing how each word is used. A group scores one point for
each word none of the other groups has thought of, plus one point for each word used correctly
in a sentence.
The effect of such learning is to add to explicit knowledge. This will contribute to implicit
knowledge receptively because it is a very strong form of consciousness-raising, and
productively through the deliberate production of meaning-focused output.
Developing fluency with known vocabulary
Fluency-building activities recycle already known words in familiar grammatical or
organizational patterns so that learners can focus on recognizing or using words without
hesitation.
According to Nation, the following learning conditions favour the development of fluency
(Nation, p. 270):
• The demands of the task are within the experience of the learners; that is, the
learners are working with known language items, familiar ideas, and familiar tasks.
Fluency activities should not involve unfamiliar vocabulary.
• The learners’ focus is on the message;
Anca Cehan 14
• The learners are encouraged to reach a higher level of performance, through the use
of repetition, time pressure, and planning and preparation.
Fluency partly depends on developing sight vocabulary (receptive vocabulary) through
extensive reading and studying high-frequency vocabulary. Fluency exercises include timed and
paced readings. In timed readings, learners may try to increase their speed by sliding a card or
a piece of paper down the page to increase their speed while attempting to comprehend about
80% of a passage. Also, learners need to be given practice in looking at groups or words rather
than each individual word when reading. Teachers can ask learners to practice timed reading
on passage that have already been read.
In paced readings, the teacher determines the time and pushes the learners to read
faster. One type of paced reading is the “reading sprint” in which learners read their pleasure-
reading book for 5 minutes and count the number of pages they have read. Then they try to
read the same number of pages while the time they read decreases from 5 minutes to 4 to 3 to
2 minutes for each sprint. Finally they read for five minutes at a relaxed pace and count the
number of pages they have finished.
• Use of games
Puzzles always entertain, and word puzzles develop vocabulary at the same time. Tell
your pupils you are going to get from “sick” to “well” by changing one letter at a time so that
each new formation is an acceptable word. Demonstrate as follows: “sick” – “silk” – “sill” – “sell”
– “well”. Then ask the pupils in pairs to get from “cold” to “warm” in the same way (“cold” –
“cord” – “word” – “worm” – “warm”).
Ask your pupils to find hidden words in a text. For example, ask them to find six capital
cities in the following text. The answers are highlighted here for easy reference, but would not
be in the pupils’ text, of course.
I needed to call on Donald last week and found the trip a risky one. I went on my horse
and had a mad ride along the street charging at hens and cocks, boys and girls. ‘Go slowly’, I
shouted. Was I brave? A hero? Me? Never.
Young learners also enjoy taking words to pieces and making new words out of the
letters. This is an activity which is simple to prepare and mark, can be made into a competition,
and provides an opportunity for them to experiment and be creative with language in group
interaction. The word “tempo”, for example, yields “met”, “pot”, “toe”, “mop”, “mope” “mote”,
“me”, “pet”, “top” and “poem”.
These are just a few ideas for developing vocabulary. Many others can be found in
methodology books and textbooks. What you need to do is to develop a clear programme for
the systematic development of your pupils’ vocabulary, as vocabulary acquisition is much too
important to be left to chance.
Bear in mind, however, that vocabulary should be taught:
• regularly
• in balance with all the other aims of your syllabus
• whenever the pupils express a desire to know.
It is the teachers’ job to establish priorities and make choices.
Vocabulary teaching cannot account for all the words our pupils actually learn. Some
authors hypothesized that successful learners use a guessing approach: as readers or listeners,
they look for clues in the text and build a mental representation of what they think the text says.
This has been called the top-down model of reading and listening. In contrast to this approach,
the more traditional approaches view reading and listening as decoding of letters into sounds
and ultimately meaning (the bottom-up approach). More recent theories claim that both
approaches are important.
Anca Cehan 15
Typically, pupils are poor decoders (readers and listeners) since their vocabulary is poor.
At the same time, they are already literate in Romanian, and are familiar with top-down
processing. When a pupil’s vocabulary is poor, this needs to make big efforts to recognize
vocabulary. Her/his short-term memory is so taxed that s/he cannot take full advantage of the
context. However, a good reader or listener, who has sufficient command of the language,
recognizes words automatically or in context.
Summary
This lecture explores aspects of the lexicon and vocabulary teaching within the
framework of the communicative approach to language pedagogy. It does not claim to say all
there is to say about vocabulary or vocabulary teaching. In spite of the long history that
vocabulary teaching has, applied linguists and language teachers are paying now renewed
attention to it after decades of relative neglect. There is still much work to be done and many
perspectives to be considered and tried in the classroom. In this unit, we looked at the
difference between active and passive vocabulary and at the pedagogic considerations that you
need to take into account when dealing with vocabulary. We described many techniques for the
teaching of vocabulary, discussing their advantages and disadvantages, including both new and
old activities.
In more traditional textbooks, new vocabulary appears as columns of words to be
learned, with the Romanian translation provided. Often there is no general pattern to the words:
it is simply a matter of rote learning. This does not mean that rote learning is to be condemned.
For many pupils it is a valuable learning tool. We do however need to be aware of its limitations
and introduce a variety of techniques in our teaching.
As learners’ vocabulary expands in size and depth, extensive reading and independent
strategies may be increasingly emphasised. Extensive reading and listening, translation,
elaboration, fluency activities, guessing from context, and using dictionaries all have a role to
play in systematically developing the learners’ vocabulary knowledge.
The vocabulary component of a course can be largely indistinguishable from the
listening, speaking, reading and writing parts of the language programme. The main difference
lies in the deliberate, language-focused learning and in the deliberate planning and
manipulation of the written input to listening, speaking, reading, and writing activities to provide
optimal conditions for vocabulary growth.
Further Reading
Carter, R. and McCarthy M., 1988, Vocabulary and Language Teaching, Longman, pp. 39-60,
62-83, 97-111, 181-201
Hunt, Alan and Beglar, David. “Current research and Practice in Teaching Vocabulary” in
Richards, Jack C. and Renandya Willy A., 2002. Methodology in Language Teaching.
Cambridge: CUP, pp. 258 – 266.
Nation, P., “Best Practice in Vocabulary Teaching and Learning” in Richards, Jack C. and
Renandya Willy A., 2002. Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP, pp. 267
– 272.
Ur, P., 1996, A Course in Language Teaching, CUP, pp. 60-69
Anca Cehan 16