Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SF Substantial Property Transactions v1 PDF
SF Substantial Property Transactions v1 PDF
TRANSACTIONS: TRANSACTIONS
WITH DIRECTORS & DISPOSAL OF
ASSETS OF A SUBSTANTIAL VALUE:
sec 228 & sec 223
Prof Dr Aiman Nariman Mohd Sulaiman
Transaction with directors ,
substantial shareholders or
connected persons- sec 228
scope of section
3
disposes to
director,
company substantial shareholder
or
shares or non-cash assets persons
of a substantial value connected with them
( or director of its
hoding company...)
acquires from
sec 228(1) - ..a company shall not enter into or
carry into effect any arrangement or
4
transaction...
• directors of holding Co
There is prior approval for unlisted shall procure Holding Co’s
of the arrangement or shareholders’ approval
transaction— subsidiary of • in addition to unlisted
a listed sub’s shareholders’
approval procured by its
holding Co, directors
by a resolution of the
company;
A public
company or
by a resolution of the holding • The interested persons ,
company, [if the relevant its holding shall abstain form voting
person is associated with the company or
holding company] its subsidiary
sec 228(4) of CA2016
[= sec132E of CA 1965]
9
In Tan Chee Hoe & Sdn Bhd v Code Focus Sdn Bhd [2014] 3 MLJ
301
Tan to acquire from Code Focus, the shares of CHSB for RM16 million., subject to
certain conditions, including approval of Foreign Investment Committee & Code Focus’
shareholders in an EGM-Tan alleged several conditions not fulfilled, refused to pay
remaining purchase price. CF terminated contract & forfeited deposit. Tan challenged
termination
High Court- contract lawfully terminated, since both parties agreed shareholders’ approval
not needed, (letter issued by Tan to Code Focus)
Court of Appeal- letter waiving compliance from obtaining shareholders’ approval under s
132C, Companies Act 1965 (CA 1965) was void. Transaction voidable at the option of
plaintiff, who was entitled to refund of deposit & to damages.
Federal Court - unlawful to waive compliance with the statutory requirements of s 132C,
CA 1965- clearly states that a contravention of section renders transaction void except
where third party had given valuable consideration and had no actual notice of the
breach. The letter of waiver indicated that the parties were aware that s 132C requires
shareholders’ approval to be obtained and that the company did not obtain such approval
Who can challenge
12
228 CA 2016
(6) The Court may, on the application of
any member or
director of the company…
Similar to sec132E CA 1965
any member or director of the company can apply to court
to restrain the directors from entering into the transaction;
Court may restrain the company from entering or
carrying into effect an arrangement or transaction in
contravention of subsection (1).
injunction
cannot be granted where the transaction has
been entered into or completed.
Pioneer Haven Sdn Bhd v Ho Hup Construction Co Bhd &
Anor & other appeals 3 [2012] MLJ 616.
MUI PLAZA SDN BHD v HONG LEONG
BANK BHD[1998] 6 MLJ 203
13
Acquires
undertaking or property of a
BOD substantial value
Shall not
disposes
223 CA 2016
(4) The Court may, on the application of any member,
restrains the directors from entering or carrying into
effect an arrangement or transaction in contravention
of subsection (1).
Similar to sec132C CA 1965
any member or director of the company can apply to court
to restrain the directors from entering into the transaction;
Court may restrain the company from entering or
carrying into effect an arrangement or transaction in
contravention of subsection (1).
injunction
cannot be granted where the transaction has
been entered into or completed.
Pioneer Haven Sdn Bhd v Ho Hup Construction Co Bhd &
Anor & other appeals 3 [2012] MLJ 616.
enforceability; case law 132C CA 1965 =
26
CA 2016?
Cannot waive compliance with section; it is
unlawful for parties and/or the company to
voluntarily agree not to obtain shareholders’
approval
Tan Chee Hoe & Sdn Bhd v Code Focus Sdn Bhd
[2014] 3 MLJ 301 (FC) followed in
Lau Tiong Ik Construction Sdn Bhd v Lau Chung
Ping [2017] 8 MLJ 509 (HC) –Contracts Act
1950 that party who received any advantage
under void contract must restore it; shares to be
transferred back to plaintiff