Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OptionalChallenge2 PDF
OptionalChallenge2 PDF
In the lecture, Professor Murayama talked about how we can use cosmic ray muons to map
otherwise invisible things. A particularly novel example he discussed was Luis Alvarez looking
for a hidden chamber in an Egyptian pyramid. In this problem we explore the basic idea a bit
further.
Muons, since they are charged, lose energy as they pass through material. Energetic muons
(1000 GeV & E & 1 GeV) are in the so-called “minimum ionizing case” where they lose a
constant amount of energy for most of their passage. Just before they stop, they rapidly lose
their enery (just like the protons of last week’s proton beam therapy question). If you want to
see a plot of energy loss per distance of muons as a function of energy, see figure 30.1 (page 4)
here: http://pdg.lbl.gov/2013/reviews/rpp2012-rev-passage-particles-matter.pdf
dE MeV cm2
≈2
dx g
(don’t worry about the derivative sign—calculus is not required for this problem unless you
want!). What stopping power means is that for a given density of material, ρ × dE
dx is the energy
lost per distance of the muon passing through the material (check the units to make sure this is
the case!).
We will do some warm up in parts (a) and (b) of this problem to make sure we understand how
to work with the quantities given and what they mean. In part (c) we utilize the same concepts
in a more realistic (yet challenging) scenario.
(a) How far will a 100 GeV muon travel through rock? Take the density of rock to be 2.7 g/cm3
and give your answer to two significant figures.
(b) Now imagine you have three different detectors as shown in figure 1. Each detector has an
area of 1 m2 . We will be asking how many muons reach each detector. Imagine the flux
#
of muons (here flux = number per area per time per energy, area time energy ) to be constant
up to 100 GeV, and then zero for energies above that.
(note that this constant flux in energy is not true in the real world—see the optional part
of this problem). How many muons reach detectors (B) and (C) after one hour? As is
often the case, dimensional analysis provides the guidance for setting up the necessary
equation. Give your answer to two significant figures.
Hint: If you do this for detector A, you get Ndetect. A = 3.6 × 107 muons. If you need a
further hint, online in the quiz feedback, I show the steps for calculating the answer for
detector A.
1
Figure 1: Muons impingent on three different detectors. Each detector has an area of 1 m2 . In
(A) there is no material above the detector. Detector (B) is beneath 50 m of rock with a density
of ρ1 = 3 g/cm3 . Detector (C) is beneath a tower of two different types of rock, ρ1 = 3 g/cm3
and ρ2 = 2 g/cm3
(c) Note: below are two variations of the same problem. One requires calculus, the other
doesn’t. Either answer will be graded as correct.
The actual flux is energy dependent, decreasing with energy as φ ∝ E −2.7 . For concrete-
ness, the flux is
( )
100 GeV 2.7
φ= for E > 1 GeV
m2 s GeV E
where E is the energy measured in GeV (so that at E = 1 GeV the flux is the value used
in part (b) of the problem).
Variation of problem requiring calculus: Using the flux equation above, how many
muons with initial energies between 1 and 100 GeV reach detectors (B) and (C) after one
hour? Give your answer to two significant figures.
2
Figure 2: Approximate flux of muons. The height of each block in the histogram is determined
by φ(E) at the points E = 1, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 GeV. The first few values at
E = 1, 10, and 20 are shown in the figure. Use the equation for φ to get the values at the other
points.
To those that have done both ways of the problem, the histogram is an overestimation on
the actual answer using calculus. For a better approximation, you could do the height of
the histogram at the midway points, i.e. take the height as φ(E) at E = 5, 15, 25, 35, . . .
GeV.