America, China and Pakistan

The patriotic political boat is not feeling left out in a positive direction, but its need
is felt intensely because of the economic impact it has on people's lives. Political
instability is not coming to a standstill and the matter has moved on to an
antagonist whose tremendous economic value is paying off. The economic cost
also influences the social hierarchy, and in international affairs, too, your ability to
express your point of view has a huge impact.
At present, SeaPeak plays an important role in Pakistan's economy. In the previous
government of the PML-N, when the economic deal had just begun to rise, it was
quite clear in the country that the United States was disapproving of this move. It
was not the case that Pakistan was sidelined on the anti-Semitic deal in every case
Rather, the real situation was that to reject such a huge investment on the basis of
US pressure or to work with the pretext was not a wise thing for Pakistan and it is
not today. However, the cost of getting rid of this intellectual and patriotic
economic crisis has had to be paid by the previous government of the PML-N and
it has to be done till now.
Changing the political scenario in Pakistan, President Trump did not refuse to
publicly say on the occasion of his meeting with Imran Khan that the Pakistani
government of the past was not cooperating with him as he wanted. It should be
noted that the issues with the previous government were not only disputed with
regard to Afghanistan and Kashmir, but the issue of C-pack was more controversial
than these two issues.

However, the situation in Pakistan overturned, with the idea of the C-pack
reinforcing the perception that work was deliberately slowing down and
creating suspicion in the hearts. The Americans are acting irresponsibly to
the extent that the US Assistant Secretary of State Ellis Welles was sitting
in Islamabad expressing his views on Pakistan and China's bilateral affairs,
C-Peak, and this approach was repeated by the United States. Getting to
see the bar. During his meeting with Imran Khan, President Trump indicated that
he would send his businessmen to Pakistan so that they could evaluate pportunities
for US investment. Be aware that the United States is not just shaky about China
with regard to China, but it sees China's Belt and Road Annuity (BRI) as a
challenge for itself in the world's economic system, which is a pack. Is the
component.
President Trump's statement does not only describe the US strategy in regard to
Pakistan, but the United States has recently introduced the Blood Act, which is
being described as a US product against the BRI. If President Trump's speeches
were made in which he clarified his views on US national security, he also outlined
a strategy to counter economic challenges. China is not only conducting economic
activities in Pakistan or in its proximity countries.
Moreover, its economic activities are progressing rapidly in other countries of the
world, including Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia. There is no passion for
the operation of expelling a government like that of a countryman at all costs, so
his economic partnership with China continues well. And this partnership has
become a challenge to America's economic status. The United States has made
another economic move through the Blood Act. There is a fundamental difference
between the economic model of the US and China.
Whatever investment China is making at the state and state levels, but what the US
is talking about investing in is the process of advancing the private sector and
direct deals with entrepreneurs. The United States is initially funding $ 60 billion
in USIDFC in this regard. Talks with President Trump and business ties are likely
to go ahead in this regard, but the issue is not simply that the United States is
investing too. Rather, it is expected from the United States to invest in this
environment when Pakistan is virtually behind the pack and it is clear that such a
move would have detrimental implications for Pakistan in terms of economic and
national security. My point does not mean that US investment should be rejected,
but that it should be discussed very carefully. The amazing thing would be to make
the US believe that US investment can be in the interest of the US and Pakistan,
even without backing down the pack. Going with a country or talking about a
block will only hurt. All of this is possible, but through those who are capable of it
as well as the world that matters.