Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comparison Report of Packaging Films Ver-01 Dt. 30.04.2020 PDF
Comparison Report of Packaging Films Ver-01 Dt. 30.04.2020 PDF
Cost Moderate High Moderate Low Very high Low Moderate Very high Moderate Moderate
Cost
Yield Very high High High low medium high low very low low Very high
Mechanical Properties Good Fair Fair Excellent Excellent Poor Fair - good Excellent Excellent Good
Optical properties Excellent Good Fair-good Good Good Poor Fair - good Opaque Good Excellent
Moisture barrier Excellent Good Good Poor Very poor Poor-good Poor Outstanding Poor Excellent
Performance
Oxygen Barrier Poor Poor Poor Good Excellent Poor Poor Outstanding Good Excellent
Good-very
Seal strength Moderate Excellent No seal No seal Outstanding Poor No seal No seal Excellent
good
Heat resistance Good Poor Poor High High Poor Poor High Good Excellent
Printability Good moderate Poor Excellent Excellent Poor Excellent Poor Moderate Good
Machinability Good moderate Poor Excellent Excellent moderate moderate Excellent Good Good
Recyclab
ility
Recyclability Excellent Excellent Excellent Poor Poor Excellent Not possible Poor Poor Excellent
2
Comparison of Max Films (Heat Sealable Films)
Transparent Pearlised Solid white Lap Seal Antifog Antiskid
C
at
Propertie
eg
s TS SPL HS HS2 TDS TDQ TDU BOPE PZ PS PSHS2 PDU PDQ WS WSSPL LS TDX AF HCF
or
y
Cost
Density 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.74 0.75 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Gloss 90 95 90 90 90 90 90 90 85 60 60 75 65 50-60 60 95 10 95 90
Haze/Trans
2.5-4 2.5-4 2.5-4 2.5-4 2.5 2 3 4 29-38 30-36 30-36 25 38 40-48 44 2.5 75 2.5 2.5
mittance
COF
0.45 0.3 0.2-0.3 0.15-0.22 0.2 0.3 0.25 0.35 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.25 0.3-0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.25 0.65
(Dynamic)
Moisture
3.5-10 3.5-10 3.5-10 3.5-10 3.5-10 3.5-10 3.5 4.5 6.5-8 6.5-8 6.5-8 6 7.5 4-11 4-11 8-10 3.5-10 4.5-6.5 7-8
barrier
Performance
Seal
Initiation 113 105 105 105 95 85 70 120 113 106 112 75 85 112 105 101 120 119 112
temp
4
Comparison of Max Films (Metallised Heat Sealable Films)
Ca
teg MS MHS MPHS MUS MS MDS MDS MUS
Properties MS MSA1 MS SPL MDQ MDS MDILW3 MHS-C MDHS MOPE
or OB3 OB3 OB3 OB3 OB2 OB2 OB5 OB5
y
Cost
Density 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.82 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.95
Moisture
0.2-0.8 0.8 0.4-0.6 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 5 0.2 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.25 1.5
barrier
Oxygen
60-100 100 80-100 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 10 10 0.2 5 60 100 60 40 50 150
Barrier
Seal Initiation
113 113 105 115 100 95 98 115 95 92 98 85 95 95 105 90 120
temp
Seal strength 250-400 350 350-400 400 1200 900 1500 300 400 400 2000 500 425 400 900 1100 3000
Performance
Hot Tack 100-200 150 150-200 150 450 400 500 150 200 200 600 280 200 200 400 410 Not checked
Mechanical
properties (In
the scale of 5, 4 4 4 5 4 4 3 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 3
5 is the
highest)
Visual
properties (In
the scale of 5, 4 4 4 4 5 3 3 3 3 5 3 5 4 4 4 4 3
5 is the
highest)
Shelf life Application
Category Properties
SL1 SL3 SL5 SL6 SL7 MPTTOWL MPTTI
Cost
Grammage 21.6 16.68 13.65, 16.38 13.65, 16.38 13.65, 16.38 Gsm
Corrosive Yes No No No No ˍ
Cate Heat
Properties
gory Heat Resistant
TI TTI TIC PZTTI H1LD SM2C TTPF TXPF TFTTI
Resistant Oxygen
barrier
Cost
Density 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.69 0.85 0.91 0.91 0.87 0.91
Haze/Transmittance
1.5-2 1.5-2.3 2 2 2 48 75 55 2-2.2 75 1.5-2.3
(%)
COF (Dynamic) 0.4 0.3 0.2-0.3 0.20-0.25 0.20-0.25 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.3
Performance
Moisture barrier 5-8.5 5-8.5 7.5-9.5 8.5 8 12 5-8 8 8.5-12 8.5-12 8.5-12
Oxygen Barrier 2400-3300 2400-3300 2800-3400 2600 120 2600 2400-3000 3000 3000-3800 3000-3800 3000-3800
Special Features (if Glossy One Glossy Both Cold Seal PET PET Both side Glossy Wet Matt Wet Phthalate free
Matt look Silky Matt
any) side treated side treated Release replacement replacement treated lamination lamination for Chocolates
10
Looking Forward. Thank You…!
11