Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Conclusion 14
System users:
Admin - Government or hospital authority who will hire or assign doctor in the
system, can appoint receptionist to a doctor.
Doctor - Prescribed patient, communicate with another doctors, see appointment list.
Pathologist – Arrange test object, Arrange & insert test result, communicate with other
pathologist/pathology assistant.
Patient - Can login, see prescription and see doctor’s information.
Receptionist - Make appointment, provide patients account, collect patient’s previous
medical history from patient and input in the system and take payment from patient.
Objective:
The main purpose/objective of this system is to make easier the whole medical system
which include patient, doctors, administration, pathology, reception all of those problem’s
solution through a single system. By this system all of medical related activity (doctor’s,
patient’s, administrative, receptionist’s, pathologist) become easier and more flexible for
all.
Justification:
My system will be medical (doctor, pathologist, admin, patient) assistant. It will help
doctor when doctor prescribe the patient about disease, suggesting medicine, suggesting
test, suggesting admit to the hospital situation or not. It will help patients to find out the
best doctor according to his/her medical problem, he/she can take an appointment as
his/her selected time.
Stakeholders Analysis:
Stakeholders are those people who involved in the project or affected by project activities
and also include the project sponsor, project team, support staff, customers, users,
suppliers, and even opponents to the project.
Interface Stakeholders - Those who function internally and externally to the Medical
Sector. For example, Govt. (Ministry) for government medical/hospital, Trustees and
Senior Staff for private medical sector who represent the Hospital's interests.
Technical feasibility helps organizations determine whether the technical resources meet
capacity and the team is capable to build the system. Technical feasibility also involves
evaluation of the hardware, software, and other technical requirements of the proposed
system.
Operational feasibility
Operational Feasibility, we consider whether the current system become implemented
using existing human resource or not. To find functional feasibility we determine
whether the proposed solution can participate in existing operations and whether the right
information in the right time is, provide to end users. Operational feasibility of our
proposed system is modularized.
Coefficient
Software Project Type P T
<Effort
Factor>
PM = 2.2*(80) ^1.00[As Coefficient <Effort Factor> = 2.2, SLOC = 50,000/1000 = 50, P = 1.0]
= 110
K Deployment 28th 1 J
Enter
Doctor’s/Patient’s/Pa
thologist ID, password
Enter doctor’s/patient’s
phone number or test
no.
[Matched]
[Not matched]
10 | S o f t w a r e P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n
Risk Analysis:
Risk Check List- These are the types of risks associated with project development
Product size (PS) — risks associated with the overall size of the software
to be built or modified
Business impact (BU) — risks associated with constraints imposed by
management or the marketplace
Customer characteristics (CU) — risks associated with the sophistication of
the customer and the developer's ability to communicate with the customer
in a timely manner
Process definition (PR) — risks associated with the degree to which the
software process has been defined and is followed by the development
organization [autopilot performance fixing with XP]
Development environment (DE) — risks associated with the availability
and quality of the tools to be used to build the product [resource
allocation plan]
Technology to be built (TE) — risks associated with the complexity of the
system to be built and the "newness" of the technology that is packaged
by the system
Staff size and experience (ST) — risks associated with the overall technical
and project experience of the software engineers who will do the work
11 | S o f t w a r e P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n
Risk Table:
12 | S o f t w a r e P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n
RMMM - Risk Mitigation, Monitoring & Management
Plan impact values: -
1) Catastrophic
2) Critical
3) Marginal
4) Negligible
13 | S o f t w a r e P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n
Conclusion:
Project management is very important for the organization to govern the project. So, in
this project a team leader needs to understand project lifecycle, risk and risk
management in order to create the strategy for the project to be successful. Moreover,
applying the proper tool during the process duration estimation by considering the iron
triangle can lead to reach the goal of the project.
However, the team project needs to keep in mind that when the project seems to not
achieve the goal, they have to stop the project before they are going to spend beyond
the budget. And they have to when to stop it(project).
14 | S o f t w a r e P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n