You are on page 1of 6

Wear 255 (2003) 950–955

Communication
An experimental study of the wear performance
of NiCrBSi thermal spray coatings
J. Rodrı́guez a,∗ , A. Martı́n b , R. Fernández c , J.E. Fernández c
a High School of Experimental Sciences and Technology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Tulipán s/n Móstoles, E28933 Madrid, Spain
b Department of Materials Science, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
c Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Oviedo, E.T.S.I. Industriales, Campus Universitario, s/n, 33203 Gijón, Spain

Abstract
The increasingly extreme conditions in which components are required to work have led to the use of thermal coatings in a lot of
industrial applications. Special attention has been paid in NiCrBSi alloys since they provide a high wear and corrosion resistance at high
temperatures. In this communication, an experimental programme has been carried out to analyse the influence of several factors such
as load, temperature, presence of reinforcement particles and the type of thermal spray technique on the wear behaviour of a NiCrBSi
alloy.
Specimens were tested in a reciprocating pin on plate wear machine able to select loads ranging from 50 to 200 N and temperatures up
to 500 ◦ C. Four sets of specimens were tested varying the composition (with the presence or not of WC in the powders) and the type of
thermal spraying technique (plasma or flame + fusion).
A statistical analysis based on the design of experiments methodology was applied to identify the main significative effects and
interactions.
© 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: NiCrBSi alloy; Thermal coatings; Wear behaviour

1. Introduction corrosion resistant coatings. Plasma spray is suitable for hard


and thick coatings and it is used in applications requiring
The demands on performance and lifetime of parts are wear and corrosion resistant surfaces. The NiCrBSi alloys,
continuously increasing. As a consequence of the tribo- subject of this study, present a high bonding strength and ex-
logical requirements of thermally spray coatings for wear cellent resistance to adhesive and abrasive wear at elevated
resistant applications, coating technologies have advanced temperatures. Usual applications are, for example, piston
a lot during the last decades. Thermal spraying is one of the rings or rollers in steel making. (The industrial way to mea-
most versatile process of deposition of coating materials to sure wear losses in these components is hardly compared
enhance the wear and corrosion performances [1,2]. It is a to laboratory tests, but as example 5 mg/h is an acceptable
process with almost no limitation of materials and with the wear rate for piston rings. The wear of rollers is traditionally
ability to deposit coatings with thicknesses ranging from counted as millimetres loss per ton of steel rolled.) An-
several micrometers to tens of millimetres. Additionally, it other remarkable aspects is the possibility of including very
is suitable for a great variety of shapes and sizes and had hard components such as WC in the powders to get harder
the advantage of maintaining the substrate temperature rel- coatings.
atively low. There are a lot of techniques to melt and propel In this communication, an experimental programme
the coating material. Among the most commonly applied has been carried out to analyse the influence on the wear
are flame spraying and plasma spraying. The flame sprayed behaviour of several factors such as load, temperature,
coatings exhibit a high porosity and a bad bonding strength presence of tungsten carbide in the powders and the type
in comparison to other thermal spraying process. Thus, of thermal spray technique used (only plasma spraying
sometimes the coating is subjected to a process of subse- and flame spraying with subsequent fusion were consid-
quent fusion. Flame spraying is widely used in industry for ered). The experimental data are analysed following the
design of experiments methodology, with the aim of find-
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +34-1-488-7159. ing the main effect of the factors studied and their interac-
E-mail address: j.rodriguez@escet.urjc.es (J. Rodrı́guez). tions.

0043-1648/03/$ – see front matter © 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00162-5
J. Rodrı́guez et al. / Wear 255 (2003) 950–955 951

Table 1
Coating characteristics
Flame spray Plasma spray Substrate

Roughness, Ra (␮m) 20–30 (sprayed) 15–25


Roughness, Ra (␮m) 2–4 (fused)
Macrohardness Rc60 (HV700) Rc50–55 (HV520–600) HV200 (before coating) HV170 (after coating)
Thickness (␮m) 300–500 300–500

Fig. 1. Scheme of the experimental device.

2. Experiments of specimens were prepared with the same steel substrate:


a carbon steel (SAE 1045) with the nominal composition
2.1. Materials and thermal spraying processes C, 0.15%; Mn, 0.55%; Si, 0.27%; P, 0.035% maximum; S,
0.035% maximum; and Fe, balance. In the first group the
The specimens studied in this work were in the form specimens were coated with a Ni-based alloy with spray
of 30 mm × 9 mm × 6 mm rectangular pieces. Two groups powders CASTOLIN CPS 1235 (Cr, 15.2%; Fe, 3.6%; Si,

Fig. 2. Effects of the factors analysed on the wear of NiCrBSi coating.


952 J. Rodrı́guez et al. / Wear 255 (2003) 950–955

Table 2
Factorial design 24 and experimental results
T L R P Test Alumina NiCrBSi
cylinder coating
mass loss mass loss
(×10−6 g/s) (×10−6 g/s)
1 − − − − 1 1.47 1.79 0.016 0.010
2 + − − − T 1.19 1.28 −0.022 −0.003
3 − + − − L 5.39 2.88 0.015 0.003
4 + + − − TL 4.83 4.91 −0.001 −0.006
5 − − + − R 2.07 2.55 0.162 0.304
6 + − + − TR 4.03 4.15 0.360 0.372
7 − + + − LR 4.86 4.34 0.077 0.784
8 + + + − TLR 11.4 7.36 1.780 0.890
9 − − − + P 6.95 5.55 0.021 0.013
10 + − − + TP 6.27 6.36 −0.001 −0.007
11 − + − + LP 13.35 16.31 0.173 0.129
12 + + − + TLP 10.76 10.86 −0.028 −0.014
13 − − + + RP 4.38 5.18 0.094 0.167 Fig. 3. Micrograph of a plasma sprayed coating.
14 + − + + TRP 8.30 8.00 0.351 0.290
15 − + + + LRP 15.90 14.10 0.500 0.469 experimental set-up is not described here for the sake of
16 + + + + TLRP 14.98 15.33 0.606 0.577
brevity, but it is given in previous publications [4] and a
scheme is shown in Fig. 1. The alumina counterbodies were
gripped to avoid rolling during the test. The average sliding
4%; B, 3.1%; C, 0.6%; Ni, balance). The second group of speed was kept constant at 0.15 m/s (trapezoidal profile) for
specimens used the spray powders METCO 36C (WC, 35%; all the specimens and test conditions. The test temperature
Cr, 11%; Fe, 2.5%; Si, 2.5%; B, 2.5%; C, 2.5%; Ni balance). was modified by a heating block located below the specimen
The two alloys are very similar, except for the presence of and the temperature was monitored with a thermocouple
tungsten carbide in the composition of the METCO 36C placed inside the specimen, in a drill hole made just below
powders. the contact zone. The true contact temperature (flash tem-
Two thermal spray processes were analysed: plasma spray perature) is not considered in this work. Although it may be
and flame spray plus fusion. Before spraying, the specimens relevant to the wear behaviour of the coating, its influence is
were cleaned, degreased and surface finished. The parame- reduced at low sliding speeds (0.15 m/s in the present case).
ters which control the plasma spray process were: current, During the test nothing was done to clear the debris
400 A; voltage, 75–80 V; spray distance, 100–150 mm; feed from the wear track. After finishing the test, the specimens
rate, 75 g/min. The main parameters associated with the were removed from the machine, cleaned by ultrasound
flame spray process were: oxygen pressure 170 kPa; acety- in acetone, and weighed in an electronic balance with a
lene pressure 100 kPa; oxygen flow 1.7 m3 /h; acetylene flow resolution of 0.01 mg to measure the mass loss. The same
0.93 m3 /h; spray distance 175–200 mm; feed rate 9.1 kg/h. process was applied to the counterbodies. Preliminary tests
After spraying the coated material were fused at 1025 ◦ C, had shown that 1000 m is a sufficient sliding distance to
showing the characteristics of Table 1. reach a steady-state regime for the wear rate.
The METCO 36C powders, with WC, showed the same
values of roughness and macrohardness than CASTOLIN
CPS 1235 powders, without WC. The only appreciable dif-
ference is the microhardness of the WC particles (2000 HV).

2.2. Wear tests

Wear tests were carried out by rubbing a 99.5% pure


alumina cylinder (hardness knoop 100 g, 2300) of 6 mm
diameter and 15 mm length (roughness, Ra < 0.05 mm),
against the specimen surface in an oscillating friction ma-
chine (Cameron Plint TE77) with the axis of the cylinder
perpendicular to the sliding direction. Configuration is sim-
ilar to ASTM G 133-95 [3], but several parameters were
changed: normal force between 50 and 200 N; stroke length
15 mm; oscillating frequency 5 Hz; sliding distance 1000 m;
temperature 20 and 500 ◦ C; lubrication not applied. The Fig. 4. Micrograph of a flame sprayed coating.
J. Rodrı́guez et al. / Wear 255 (2003) 950–955 953

Fig. 5. Effects of the factors analysed on wear of the alumina cylinder.

Fig. 6. Thermally spray NiCrBSi specimen tested at room temperature.


954 J. Rodrı́guez et al. / Wear 255 (2003) 950–955

Fig. 7. Thermally spray NiCrBSi specimen tested at 500 ◦ C.

3. Results and discussion The effects of the other two main factors, temperature
and presence of WC, are much lower, even with less in-
Experimental data were statistically analysed using a 24 fluence than effects associated with the interaction between
factorial design [5]. The factors studied were: load, repre- load and technique, or temperature and presence of WC. It
sented by L, with high level 200 N (+) and low level 50 N is remarkable how temperature is not an important factor in
(−); bulk temperature, represented by T, with high level the range analysed, confirming the idea that NiCrBSi alloys
500 ◦ C (+) and low level 20 ◦ C (−); presence of WC in the have the ability of maintain their wear resistant properties at
powders, represented by R, and high level with WC (+) and elevated temperatures. Another interesting aspect is the role
low level without WC (−); and finally, technique of spray- of the WC inside the powders. The tungsten carbide parti-
ing, represented by P, and high level associated with plasma cles, formed during the spraying process, are not beneficial
spraying (+) and low level associated with flame spraying at all, greatly increasing the mass loss of the counterbodies
(−). The results of mass loss by the specimens and counter- during the tests, while no significant enhancement is pro-
bodies were included in Table 2. To increase the precision vided on the specimen wear resistance. Probably, this lack
of the experiment, duplicate observations for each test con- of enhancement is due to a weak joint between particles and
figuration were performed. matrix which makes easy to pull out the WC reinforcement.
Fig. 2 shows the effects of each factor and combination Fig. 5 shows how the presence of WC is the main factor af-
of factors on the NiCrBSi coating. Those whose effects fecting the counterbody wear. Finally, Figs. 6 and 7 include
were lower than an estimation of the experimental variability tests performed at intermediate levels of load as estimation
should not be considered as statistically significant. As it can of the non-linear effects within the range analysed.
be appreciated in Fig. 2, the thermal spraying technique and
the load were the most influential factors on the specimen
wear. The different wear performance of plasma and flame 4. Conclusions
sprayed specimens lies in microstructural aspects. Fig. 3
From the experiments and analyses performed, some con-
shows a micrograph of a plasma sprayed coating where can
clusions can be drawn:
be appreciated how a considerable number of projected par-
ticles present a boundary clearly defined, probably due to (1) NiCrBSi alloys, deposited by thermally spray tech-
oxidation during the spraying process. These particles will niques, maintain their wear resistant performances up
be detached from the specimen easier than other zones of to bulk temperatures of 500 ◦ C.
the coating, increasing consequently the wear rate. This sit- (2) The spraying technique is a very significant factor in
uation is not observed in the flame sprayed coatings (Fig. 4). the wear behaviour of the NiCrBSi alloys. The alloys
J. Rodrı́guez et al. / Wear 255 (2003) 950–955 955

deposited by flame spraying with fusion have better wear References


resistance than those deposited by plasma spraying.
(3) Load is much more influential than temperature within [1] B.A. Kushner, E.R. Novinski, Thermal Spray Coatings, ASM
the ranges analysed. Handbook, vol. 18, American Society of Metals, Cleveland, OH, 1992,
pp. 829–833.
(4) The presence of tungsten carbide in the powders is not a
[2] K. Holmberg, A. Matthews, Coatings Tribology, Elsevier, Amsterdam,
beneficial factor on the wear performance of thermally 1994.
spray NiCrBSi coatings. [3] ASTM G133-95, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 03.02,
2001.
[4] J. Rodrı́guez, A. Martı́n, J. Llorca, Modeling the effect of temperature
Acknowledgements on the wear resistance of metals reinforced with ceramic particles,
Acta Mater. 48 (2000) 993–1003.
This investigation was supported by Ministerio de Ciencia [5] D.C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley, New
York, 1991.
y Tecnologı́a, Spain, through grants MAT2001-3528-C01
and MAT2001-3528-C03.

You might also like