Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluate the lesson plan according to the following NSW Quality Teaching model elements.
This assessment will review the history LP from VUWS.
Evaluation score – refer to NSW QTM Classroom Practice Guide for each element
Comments incl. evidence for evaluation score (2 sentences)
1 Intellectual quality
1.1 Deep knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: The concept map activity highlights a few key concepts which should be included,
but the teacher does not explore deep meanings of these concepts.
1.2 Deep understanding
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: Although the teacher takes the predominant lead of the class, students still can
demonstrate their understanding in the glossary activity and discussion in both oral and written
ways.
1.3 Problematic knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: The discussion potentially encourages different perspectives, but the teacher fails to
encourage querying and explain the concepts from various perspectives.
1.4 Higher-order thinking
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: The homework task and discussion may generate higher-order thinking.
1.5 Metalanguage
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: Metalanguages in relation to ancient Egypt are frequently used in the learning
activities.
1.6 Substantive communication
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: The concept map activity generates efficient communications between the teacher
and students.
Quality learning environment
2.1 Explicit quality criteria
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: The students are unable to understand their expected outcomes as the lesson does
not clarify the criteria for all activities.
2.2 Engagement
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: The teacher guarantee the student participation by roaming around the classroom
and checking student engagement. However, observation is far from enough.
2.3 High expectations
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: The homework task set the expectation for students, but they are uncertain about
their expected outcomes.
2.4 Social support
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: The class manages to foster a mutual respectful environment by setting students in
pairs and promoting collaboration.
2.5 Students’ self-regulation
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: The lesson plan insinuates the class is self-regulated, but it is uncertain that all
students show great initiative.
2.6 Student direction
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: Students are excluded from the process of planning the lesson. The lesson is
predominantly led by the teacher.
3 Significance
3.1 Background knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: The concept map allows the teacher to assess the prior school knowledge of
students, and integrate it with the classroom knowledge.
3.2 Cultural knowledge
Identify the four NSW QT model elements you are targeting for improvement.
QT model
1) Student direction 2) Knowledge integration
3) Connectedness 4) Explicit quality criteria
2
Modified Lesson Plan
Observation: check
their engagement
with the lesson
Reflection questions:
understand what
students learn from
this lesson
3
Explain what these words mean when students cannot explain the meaning
Conclusion Reflection
55-60 Guide students to look into current issues through the lens of classroom knowledge:
1. What similarities between the environments in Australia and Egypt
2. What we can learn from ancient Egypt to thrive in such environment
HT4-9 uses a range of historical Informal formative assessment in the discussion part to check on
terms and concepts how well students understand and use the concepts in the
when communicating an context of ancient Egypt
understanding of the
past Informal formative assessment in the reflection part to help
students check on how well they use the classroom knowledge to
understand current issues in Australia
4
Academic justification
The modified lesson plan will improve the elements of student direction, knowledge integration,
In the original plan, the scale of student direction is scored one as the lesson is predominantly led
by the teacher while students rarely have an opportunity to suggest how the lesson should be
designated (Ladwig & Gore, 2006). This element is addressed by providing students with some
control over the sequence of concepts to learn in the role-playing game and time spent on
different activities in the modified plan with the purpose of increasing student engagement (Gore,
2007; Tadich, et al., 2007). Meanwhile, the teacher still takes responsibility for student learning
and guarantees the learning quality by determining what key concepts will be taught and what
outcomes will be achieved (Gore, 2007). According to Knowlton (2000), students can benefit from
the modified plan where the teacher serves as a facilitator who collaborates with students in the
role-playing learning activity to explore new knowledge on the geographic map. The knowledge is
no longer transferred from the teacher but developed by students and the teacher together, and
thus students can build up a personal understanding of new knowledge (Knowlton, 2000).