You are on page 1of 4

Please refer to the comments in the attached CRS

Sr. STR. 03-05-20


COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)

Project: PROJECT ALAR HOTEL DEVELOPMENT, LUSAIL, QATAR Incoming Drawing/Document Details

Contractor: Man Enterpise, Qatar Doc. No. PAL-MAN-ZALL-ALL-TS-ST-0005 Docs Rev: 2

Reviewed By (SCG): Name: Mohamed Bahgat Position: Sr. Structural Engineer Title: Structural Calculation Connection Design for Elevator Works Date Rec: 02-Apr-20

Reviewed By (SCG): Name: Position: Discipline: ST Approval


C
Code:
SCG Trans. No. Doc Type: TS

Drawing Part Contractor Response


Item / Doc. Reviewer's Name Reviewer Comments
Section 1st Clarification Shaker Remarks 2nd Clarification Shaker Remarks 3rd Clarification Shaker Remarks Status (O/C)

Complied.
the contractor should include the model, analysis and Kindly refer page number 12 and 13 for car & cwt Kindly refer page number 16~21 staad analysis details.
1. the contractor should provide the mentioned computer analysis and
The model calculation was considered car and counter-
design Staad Pro model and to include input and output diagrams, design of rail bracket directly fixed to the separation bracket staad analysis details. The model
Complied. Please refer to attached this comment related to section 5 the analysis and weight rail brackets Fx and Fy loads acting on fixing area, Moment resulting from connection eccentricity to be
1 showing ultimate factor of safety, actual/allowable stress and deflection steel beam and the other case where counterweight calculation was considered car and cwt rail brackets Open
Staad model calculation. design of rail bracket itself. See attachment also measured the distributed loads into both side wall added
ratios, etc. and attach all reference tables with marking showing the rail together with lift rail is fixed to the steel separation FX and Fy loads acting on fixing area, also brackets. kindly refer page number 10~12 for Factory car
used values. beam. measured the distributed loads into both side wall
and counter-weight brackets details.
brackets.
MAR material document does not include information
Complied.
of the supporting steel framing material properties. in page #6 Description of structure/Materials.
2. provide references to the relevant project specs and IFC drawings, The same grade material used for supporting steel
Complied. Please see attached Material Although, please note that as per specs, All mentioned All members used in the structure are The same grade material used for supporting steel material Material grade S275 JR and sandblasting with Zinc-rich
2 showing compliance or justifications of any deviation. Also, reference material for steel separator beam fixing. Kindly Closed
approval. inaccessible steel shall be properly protected against specified as ASTM A36/Grade S275 JR. please confirm for steel separator beam fixing. epoxy paint coating 40 μ micron
for MAR material approval -if any- should be provided. request to refer page number 17~19 for Design
corrosion for the design life of the Works. Provide a all steel members are galvanized to Minimum of 150 μ
supporting steel model calculation details
description of steel protection.

Kindly refer page number 40 for P1~P4 loads Page numbers inuclded in the Rev-3
details , which is machine bed reaction loads first, the calc. without page numbering. Second, PDF Kindly refer page number 48 for P1~P4 loads details ,
the contractor should show the locations of the
Kindly refer page number 45 for P6~P9 loads page number 40 & 45 are title cover page for section which is machine bed reaction loads
3. the contractor should attache all the manufacturer loading data used Reaction Forces given in Table, where is the location of
3 Noted and complied. details , which is pit buffer reaction loads 8 & 10. third, the comment is asking for the point of Kindly refer page number 57 for P6~P9 loads details , No Further comment Closed
in the calculation with proper highlight to the used values. forces P1 to P10 to recognize the loading on the steel Kindly refer page number 45 for P10 loads details , application of these forces, please highlight the which is pit buffer reaction loads
members. Some forces we can not trace. which is rail reaction load location of the forces on you shop drawings Kindly refer page number 57 for P10 loads details , which is
rail reaction load.

First, the force P10 when safety gear is active should


be considered in the design where it is active in the
emergency case when the running speed exceeds the
please note that reaction forces Fx & Fy applied to the set speed due to any failure reason which may happen
4. for the steel beam connection design, provide analysis and design of P10 load is not required to add in the rail bracket thyssenkrupp already confirmed that the P10 load is not
guide rail which is offsite to the steel separation beam at any level and there is no path for the force to be
steel brackets considering the mentioned two cases of loading and to loads , due to P10 load will act during the safety required to be added in the rail bracket loads, as P10 load Noted, Guide rail base connection to the lift bit should
4 Noted and complied. and produce moment due to eccentricity. Also, the P10 transferred to the RC pit. Second, and again the guide Open
show the factors taken for impact and operating/emergency brake gear activated, which is directly distributed to earth will come into force only ducring afety gear activation be provided accordingly.
reaction must be considered in the design. Also, refer level. rail forces Fx & P10 are eccentric to the steel
forces. which is directly distributed to earth level.
to note #13 & 14 separation beam by 293 to 513 mm and produce
moment due to eccentricity which should be
considered in the design of separation beam and
connections
although the weld calculation is not reflecting the although the weld calculation for separator beam
the contractor Did Not include any welding design connection members, there are many other welds and connection is provided, there are many other welds
5. provide welding size and relevant calculation for all provided Complied. Welding and reference Complied. Please find attached herewith welded
5 calculation and No any identification of any welding connections should be calculated, where is guide rail Rev-3 included. Please refer page numbers 8,9 and 10. and connections should be calculated, like missing Open
weldings for steel brackets calculation is included. details
size. connection welding, where is C-shape frame with guide rail connection welding, missing C-shape frame
counterweight guide welds. with counterweight guide welds.
Complied.
Anchor bolt design calculation made for HY-200 and
the M16 bolt calculated one time as chemical fix the provided calculation is for M16 chemical anchor
please find attached reviseddocument for the same
6. provide the design forces on the anchor bolts and highlight these there are no calculations for M12 bolts, and what Kindly Refer page numbers 10~13 for M12 bolt fixing bolt checked for separator beam fixing. While your
Anchor Rod HIT-V with HY 200 adhesive and again page number 26.
values from the model reactions. Also, M12 & M16 bolts should be HDG about the guide rail connection to concrete, what details from factroy. thyssenkrupp already confirmed that statement ThyssenKrupp already confirmed M12 bolt
6 Complied. followed with marking of mechanical HAS Expansion Open
and bolts resisting capacity should be mentioned and about C-shape bracket connection to RC, where are car and counter weight design made based on EN code fixing for car and counterweight. no calculations for
Anchors M16 & M12. which type of fixing will be used M16 will use for Wall bracket fixing.
properly/specifically highlighted. the details and design/check of anchor bolts. compliance. M12 bolts. Missing guide rail connection to concrete,
and confirm where M12 will be used. M12 bolts will use for car & cwt bracket fixing on
what about C-shape bracket connection to RC
steel beam or wall

Guide Rail steel brackets have Four different framing Complied as noted. maybe the comment is not clear enough, please installation and assembly manual is not a design
types (directly connected to concrete, connected to Kindly Refer the page numbers 10~13 for the design and
The steel separate beam length is verified the size provide the design and details of the Guide Rail steel document, at least provide the worst-case design of
7. provide analysis and design of Guide Rail steel brackets considering details of the Guide Rail steel brackets include the different
separation beam, and joint in one C shape frame with from 2.07m to 3.12m. The maximum steel separate brackets include the different fixing conditions the Guide Rail steel brackets from the different fixing
the mentioned two cases of loading and to show and highlight fixing conditions. (directly connected to concrete,
7 Complied. counterweight guide connected to concrete or beam length is 3.12m (SL1~SL3 Lifts). hence we (directly connected to concrete, connected to conditions (directly connected to concrete, connected Open
manufacturer given applied loads and consider factors taken for impact connected to separation beam, joint in one C shape frame
separation beam). All cases should be addressed in the have considered guide rail bracket calculation based separation beam, joint in one C shape frame with to separation beam, joint in one C shape frame with
and operating/emergency brake forces. with counterweight guide connected to concrete or
calculation considering and mentioning the maximum on service Lifts, which is higher and safe for all Lifts counterweight guide connected to concrete or counterweight guide connected to concrete or
separation beam).
case of SL & PL in the project. Also, refer to note #15 passenger and service lifts separation beam). separation beam).
Complied as noted.
We have followed 200 x 200mm steel beam for all
common shaft lifts and factory calculation made for For Steel separator beams: Kindly refer the page number
again, maybe the comment is not clear enough, the
the contractor Did Not include any calculation for the SL1~SL3 service lifts. the achieved result are meets 15 for steel beam factory calcualtion and page number 16 installation and assembly manual is not a design
8. same comments 5 & 6 are applicable for GuideRail steel brackets, comment is asking for calculation for the different
8 Complied. different steel brackets design, anchor bolts based on the allowed criteria , Hence, all others passenger ~21 for stadd model. document, car and counter weight steel bracket Open
anchor bolts, and welding. steel brackets design, anchor bolts based on reactions,
reactions, or welding size design. Lifts design calculation result will not exceed the For car and counter weight bracket: Kindly refer the page details, welding, and anchors are missing
or welding size design
service lifts results. Also, we have considered same number 10~13
type guide rail (car) T114/B and (cwt) T75 3/B for
all Lifts.
Machine and load details are shown in the contractor Did Not include or comply with any of
the approved shop drawings; Rev.0 comment #9. please provide complete analysis
9. The contractor should provide complete analysis and design for the PAL-MAN-Z1-ALL-SDW-TC-LF-0006- this reply does not help, we are asking for the design
and design for the Machine bed steel members and We have provided all machine bed reaction load Kindly refer the page number 48~51 for machine bed
Machine bed details. Provide machine operating loads, steel framing 002 of the framing system and connections supporting the the design of the machine bed framing system and
9 connections details, analysis & design of steel and not able to provide the machine bed details and factory details and attached letter is stating that the Open
layout and section, analysis & design of steel members inputs/outputs, PAL-MAN-Z1-ALL-SDW-TC-LF-0007- machine. Nothing confidential here, we did not ask connections is still missing.
members inputs/outputs, welding and anchor bolts calculation due to factory confidential documents machine bed design are made based EN code
welding and anchor bolts details as commented before. 002 anything related to the machine itself.
PAL-MAN-Z4-ALL-SDW-TC-LF-0005- details. consider different types of support framing as
002 per SDW for different SL & PL sizes and dimensions.
Noted and Complied.
the pad plate 16mm thk should not be checked for we have provided two type of hoisting hook details,
tension capacity against the hooking force!!!!. The based on site condition where the slab is already
lifting eye itself should be checked for tension capacity completed, will follow any of one method. Kindly
10. The contractor should provide hosting hook design and adequacy to and the plate should be checked for stresses due to refer page number 44 for removing hoisting hook lifting hooks are subject to tension forces of 30kN , Kindly Refer page number 55 for lifting hooks tension
10 Complied. No Further comment Closed
safely carry manufacturer given loads. lifting eye forces and the restraint by the anchor bolts deign details. The another method of fixing hosing please also provide tension capacity check forces of 30 kN details.
which should be designed. moreover, this detail is hook considered HDG 25mm rod. Actually for 30 KN
totally different than the D25mm HDG steel bar hook load enough 20mm diameter mild steel ROD.
Design calculation included in the revised
provided in SDW.
documents page number 42.

ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶϬ
ĂƚĞĚϴƚŚ:ƵůLJϮϬϭϴ
WĂŐĞϭŽĨϮ
COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)

Project: PROJECT ALAR HOTEL DEVELOPMENT, LUSAIL, QATAR Incoming Drawing/Document Details

Contractor: Man Enterpise, Qatar Doc. No. PAL-MAN-ZALL-ALL-TS-ST-0005 Docs Rev: 2

Reviewed By (SCG): Name: Mohamed Bahgat Position: Sr. Structural Engineer Title: Structural Calculation Connection Design for Elevator Works Date Rec: 02-Apr-20

Reviewed By (SCG): Name: Position: Discipline: ST Approval


C
Code:
SCG Trans. No. Doc Type: TS

Drawing Part Contractor Response


Item / Doc. Reviewer's Name Reviewer Comments
Section 1st Clarification Shaker Remarks 2nd Clarification Shaker Remarks 3rd Clarification Shaker Remarks Status (O/C)

Rev 0 tk comments complied based on Lifts all equipment’s


the contractor is kindly requested to clarify how this design are meet with EN 81-20/50 code.
the contractor Did Not mention any statement or comment complied in Rev.0 and in the current Rev.01
11. the contractor shall clearly indicate the vertical and horizontal seismic design be considered in the design of all steel
clarification of that vertical and horizontal seismic Qatar is in zone zero, also please refresh your The QCS2014/Section 01: General/Part 01:
11 seismic design loads considered in the design of all steel brackets and Complied. Qatar is under seismic zone zero brackets and Guide Rail as per specs Section 14 2000 - Open
Guide Rail as per specs Section 14 2000 - Elevators/2.4/D.
design loads as per project specs were considered in information and refer to QCS2014/Section 01: Introduction/1.5.2 Site Conditions/ clause 9.0 said “The
Elevators/2.4/D.
the design General/Part 01: Introduction/1.5.2 Site Conditions/ seismic design for all building structure shall be based upon
clause 9.0 local seismic accelerations recommended as per ASCE 7-
10, IBC 2012 or BS EN 1998-1:2004 ”

Rev 0 tk comments complied based on Lifts all equipment’s


12. the contractor should generally follow as per project specs design are meet with EN 81-20/50 code for all perfromance
Complied all the project requirements including
12 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS for loads and required resistance Complied. comment still valid. nothing to comment !!!!! requirments . No Further comment Closed
performance requirements under section-C
strength.

Factory calculation made 3.12m beam length. The


13. as per the design criteria the mentioned maximum
Complied. Kindly refer page number 8 for steel nothing changed, calculations considered 2.1 m beam indicating E=2.1 x 10 power of 6 is formula of deflation.
13 steel separate beam is 3.12m while calculations No Further comment Closed
beam length 3.12m steel beam factory calculation in the analysis and design. See marking on calcs. The same was clarified during our site meetings on 28-03-
considered 2.1 m beam in the analysis and design. 2020

14. the steel brackets (100x100x10 Angles) connecting


separation beam to the concrete wall should be
verified for weld size checks. Angle checks show wrong Welded details are included in the attached revised
14 refer to comments 5 Rev-3 included. Please refer page numbers 8,9 and 10. No Further comment Closed
units of Mcap as kN.m while it should be M=1.2375 document, page no 20.
N.mm and accordingly the angle is unsafe for applied
Mu=0.10 kN.m.

15. the steel brackets (Angles) connecting guide rail to


separation beam should be verified for dimensions,
kindly refer above point number 7 and 8. Factory details installation and assembly manual is not a design
15 stresses, deflections, welding size checks and bots size kindly refer above point number 7 and 8 refer to above comments Open
included. document, refer to the reply of comment 7
and checks considering the Table of Reaction Forces by
the manufacturer.
16. calculations for steel base plate, anchor bolts, and MAN shall verify with MZP and ThyssenKrupp is kindly
steel vertical members for lift pits designed for the we have given required pit reaction loads, main requested to reply "calculations for steel base plate,
MZP has included in their calculation lifts loads at raft and
16 loads P1 & P3 given by the manufacturer as per SDW contactor to considered pit slab as per thessenkrupp anchor bolts, and steel vertical members for lift pits No Further comment Closed
at RC walls.
should be included. Also to verify the adequacy of the requirement. MAN to reply designed for the loads P1 & P3 given by the
RC pit slab against all applied pit loads. manufacturer as per SDW should be included."

Kindly note that pit lader doest have any static loads. This
17. the contractor should provide full material the refered SDW is the one missing the required
is used only during maintenance. As per the details shown Full Details to to be provided in shop drawings and
17 information, design calculation, fixing details for the pit Kindly refer page number 47 pit ladder details material information, design calculation, fixing details Closed
in the approved Shop drawings installation will carry out material
ladder. (nothing added here)
during the handing over of elevators.

18. as the project spec 14 2000/PART 3 Kindly refer the page number 48~51 for machine bed
this reply does not help, please provide evidence or
details with fixing details from factory. The isolation rubber vibration isolation design to comply with project
execution/3.1/D/1/c. The elevator Contractor shall Complied. provide all equipment with vibration isolation to
18 to be fixing under the machine bed for reduce the vibration. acoustic requirement shall be provided within this Open
provide all equipment with vibration isolation to ensure No vibration transmitted to building structure. ensure no vibrations are transmitted to building
The all vibration and jerk criteria design based EN code submittal or separatly
03-05-20 no vibrations are transmitted to building structure structure as per the project specs.
compliance.
19. please note that the resolution of some tables,
HILTI design, blow-up details are not clear enough to
recognize numbers, figures or dimensions. Please
please make sure, table figures, sketches within the
19 make sure the submittal is readable with acceptable Noted and Complied. Noted and Complied. No Further comment Closed
calculations are not clear to read
resolution. Also, please provide attachment section for
clear SDW with highlights when needed for easy
reference.

20. the calculation should be stamped by 3rd party Noted. tkEQ already provided the stamped
20 structural design consultant same like Rev.0, not to calculation but as per MAN request we were asked stamp required after resolving the above comments Noted to be complied Open
stamp the cover page only. to use the rev0 documents to revise.

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

Contractor shall attach completed CRS with next submission with responses to the Reviewers Comments.

______________________________________ _______________________________________________
SHAKER REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATUR CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE
Resident Engineer POSITION

ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶϬ
ĂƚĞĚϴƚŚ:ƵůLJϮϬϭϴ
WĂŐĞϮŽĨϮ

You might also like