Professional Documents
Culture Documents
=) S. 9 (5): any developer who fails to comply =) S. 106: a person who filed a claim in
shall be punishable … (refer Act) Tribunal cannot make a claim in any other
court unless the proceeding in court is
=) S. 11: developer to establish sinking fund commenced before the claim is filed in
account. Tribunal / the claim in Tribunal was
withdrawn / struck out
=) S. 12 (1): compulsory for purchaser to pay
maintenance charges & sinking fund =) S. 107: persons entitled to filed claim
=) S. 12 (2): developer shall pay the =) Hong Leong Finance v Sun Projects Sdn
maintenance charges and sinking fund for Bhd
unsold units
obligation to pay the service charges lay on
=) S. 15: a developer shall before the the 1st purchaser notwithstanding the deed
developer’s management period expires; of assignment as only the rights, title and
interests in the SPA were assigned to the
transfer all money in maintenance account
bank
and sinking fund account to JMB
it is the duty of 1st purchaser to clear all the
hand over JMB: … (refer Act)
dues to developer, not the subsequent
establishment of JMB purchaser
=) S. 17 (4): JMB shall comprise the developer held: in the interest of justice, it would be
and the purchasers ideal to maintain the status quo of the parties
pending the determination of the other
strata management after the existence of issues at hand by allowing the injunction to
MC continue
=) S. 57 (1): it is the duty of the developer to =) Kiaramas Development Sdn Bhd v
convene the first AGM of MC within 1 month Perbadanan Pengurusan Kiaramas
after the expiration of initial period
issue: whether pursuant to Clause 19 of
=) S. 57 (2): punishment (refer Act) Schedule H, it is mandatory for a developer
to collect monthly service charges from a
=) note: the initial period in relation to a MC of a
purchaser for the maintenance &
strata development = the period
management of common property prior to
commencing on the day the MC is formed
the establishment of a JMB & MC and
and ending the day on which there are
whether the developer has the discretion to
proprietors excluding the original proprietor
waive such monthly service charges for any
of the lot who is registered as proprietor a
period without the prior written consent of the
parcel
Controller of Housing
=) S. 58: agenda for first AGM (refer Act)
held: Clause 19 show that:
~purchasers were only obliged to pay the held: there is no evidence to show that the
service charges which is fair and justifiable car park bays are ‘accessory parcels’, in
for the maintenance and management of such situations, the car park bays must be
the common property and for the services treated as common properties
provided by the developer, and
since the cark park bays are common
~amount to be collected by the developer properties, it does not belong to developer,
must be the amount sufficient for the actual further, the House Rule attached to SPA
maintenance and management of the showed that the shop lots were meant to
common property provide common facilities to the residents,
since the shop lots from part of the common
Clause 19(4) also provides that the monthly
property, they do not belong to the developer
service charges were only due and payable
by the purchases upon a notice of payment therefore, the developer had in breach of
given by the developer duties as it did not deliver the shop lots to
the JMB, instead, the shops were used for
in other words, enables the developer to
commercial purposes & leased out for its
choose not to claim from the purchases any
monthly service charges. (developer may
waive monthly charge)
=) Tan Ong Ban
issue: whether the principle of beneficial
ownership applied to the statutory contract
prescribed by the HDA (yes) and whether S.
340 (1) of NLC applied to strata property in
which the individual title is yet to be issued
(no)
held (FC): according to the principle of
beneficial ownership, when a purchaser has
performed his contractual obligation upon
the full settlement of the purchase price,
equity accords him with all the rights of a
legal owner even though he has yet to
become its registered owner
in such situation, vendor becomes a bare
trustee for purchaser, while the purchaser is
the beneficial owner having right in rem over
the property
principle of beneficial ownership applies to
the purchaser immediately after the
purchaser entered into a SPA of property,
which includes statutory contract prescribed
by HDA
S. 340 (1) of NLC only speaks of registered
title or interest. Therefore, the proviso to S.
340 (3) of NLC did not apply to the instant
case as the strata title was yet to be issued
at the material date
=) Ken Property Sdn Bhd v Badan Pengurusan
issue: whether the car parks and shop lots
formed part of the common property or
owned by developer.