You are on page 1of 3

Strata Titles =) S.

17A: the MC may create 1 or more


subsidiary MC to represent the different
interests parcel owners
-Strata Titles Act:
=) S. 19A: the transfer of strata title shall be
=) S. 4: ‘accessory parcel’, ‘parcel’, ‘original executed within 30 days from the date of
proprietor’, ‘proprietor’, ‘strata title’, ‘super issuance of strata title
structure stage’
=) S. 6 (1): any building having 2 or > storeys
-Strata Management Act:
held as one lot under final title (whether
Registry or Land Office title) shall be capable =) note: to be read together with STA
of being subdivided into parcels
=) repealed Building and Common Property
=) S. 34: rights of proprietor in his parcel and (Maintenance and Management) Act 2007
common property
=) S. 6 (1): a developer intended for subdivision
into parcels shall not sell any parcel unless a
Schedule of Parcel has been filed with
-notable 2013 amendments of STA:
Commissioner of Building
=) S. 2: extended the application of STA to the
=) S. 6 (3): Schedule of Parcel shall contain: …
Federal Territory of Labuan
(refer Act)
=) S. 4B: introduce the Electronic Land
=) S. 6 (5): a copy of the Schedule of Parcel
Administration System of Strata Titles shall
shall be exhibited at a spot in the office/
come into operation in any Land Registry
other places where the sale of strata
upon notification in the Gazette
property is conducted
=) S. 7: the original proprietor may apply for
=) purpose: to promote transparency
subdivision of a building or land
strata management before existence of MC:
=) S. 8: the application for subdivision shall be
made within 3 months from the date of the =) application:
issuance of the documents certifies the
super structure stage S. 7 (1): Part V shall apply to development
area where:
=) S. 8A: the procedure of the application for
subdivision is now divided into 2 phases: ~vacant possession of a parcel has been
delivered by developer to a purchaser, and
original proprietor of any alienated land
shall apply for a certificate of proposed strata ~at the time of delivery of vacant
plan (CPSP) to the Director of Survey, then, possession, the MC has not come into
the Director of Survey shall check and upon existence
satisfaction issues a CPSP under S. 8A (8) S. 7 (2): ‘developer’s management period’ =
(a) the period from the date of delivery of vacant
under S. 8 (3), upon receive of CPSP, the possession of parcel to purchaser until 1
original proprietor shall apply for subdivision month after the establishment of JMB
within 1 month from the date of issuance of developer’s management period before
CPSP JMB is established
=) S. 17 (3): upon opening of book of strata =) S. 9 (2): duties and powers during the
register, there must be having a developer’s management period (refer Act)
Management Corporation (MC) which
consisting all the parcel proprietors. Such =) S. 9 (3): powers of the developer during the
MC shall apply for a certificate from developer’s management period (refer Act)
Registrar which certifying the establishment
=) S. 9 (4): during the developer’s management
of MC as a body corporate
period, developer shall:
ensure an area is set aside out of common =) S. 59: duties and powers of MC
property for an administration office
strata management tribunal
not enter into any contract relating to the
maintenance and management of building or =) S. 105: the Strata Management Tribunal
land intended for subdivision into parcels shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine
and the common property for any period any claims specified in Part I of 4th Schedule
after the expiration of the developer’s (pg 166 SMA) where the total amount of
management period award sought does not > RM 250,000

=) S. 9 (5): any developer who fails to comply =) S. 106: a person who filed a claim in
shall be punishable … (refer Act) Tribunal cannot make a claim in any other
court unless the proceeding in court is
=) S. 11: developer to establish sinking fund commenced before the claim is filed in
account. Tribunal / the claim in Tribunal was
withdrawn / struck out
=) S. 12 (1): compulsory for purchaser to pay
maintenance charges & sinking fund =) S. 107: persons entitled to filed claim
=) S. 12 (2): developer shall pay the =) Hong Leong Finance v Sun Projects Sdn
maintenance charges and sinking fund for Bhd
unsold units
obligation to pay the service charges lay on
=) S. 15: a developer shall before the the 1st purchaser notwithstanding the deed
developer’s management period expires; of assignment as only the rights, title and
interests in the SPA were assigned to the
transfer all money in maintenance account
bank
and sinking fund account to JMB
it is the duty of 1st purchaser to clear all the
hand over JMB: … (refer Act)
dues to developer, not the subsequent
establishment of JMB purchaser

=) S. 17 (1): a JMB shall be established upon =) John Denis De Silva


the convening of the firsts AGM within 12
P. was the owner and resident of a
months of handing vacant possession
condominium unit, MC cut off the water
=) S. 17 (2): JMB shall be a body corporate supply to his unit, alleging that P. owes
having perpetual succession and a common maintenance & water charge, in fact, P. had
seal, may sue and be sued in its name paid all the charges

=) S. 17 (4): JMB shall comprise the developer held: in the interest of justice, it would be
and the purchasers ideal to maintain the status quo of the parties
pending the determination of the other
strata management after the existence of issues at hand by allowing the injunction to
MC continue
=) S. 57 (1): it is the duty of the developer to =) Kiaramas Development Sdn Bhd v
convene the first AGM of MC within 1 month Perbadanan Pengurusan Kiaramas
after the expiration of initial period
issue: whether pursuant to Clause 19 of
=) S. 57 (2): punishment (refer Act) Schedule H, it is mandatory for a developer
to collect monthly service charges from a
=) note: the initial period in relation to a MC of a
purchaser for the maintenance &
strata development = the period
management of common property prior to
commencing on the day the MC is formed
the establishment of a JMB & MC and
and ending the day on which there are
whether the developer has the discretion to
proprietors excluding the original proprietor
waive such monthly service charges for any
of the lot who is registered as proprietor a
period without the prior written consent of the
parcel
Controller of Housing
=) S. 58: agenda for first AGM (refer Act)
held: Clause 19 show that:
~purchasers were only obliged to pay the held: there is no evidence to show that the
service charges which is fair and justifiable car park bays are ‘accessory parcels’, in
for the maintenance and management of such situations, the car park bays must be
the common property and for the services treated as common properties
provided by the developer, and
since the cark park bays are common
~amount to be collected by the developer properties, it does not belong to developer,
must be the amount sufficient for the actual further, the House Rule attached to SPA
maintenance and management of the showed that the shop lots were meant to
common property provide common facilities to the residents,
since the shop lots from part of the common
Clause 19(4) also provides that the monthly
property, they do not belong to the developer
service charges were only due and payable
by the purchases upon a notice of payment therefore, the developer had in breach of
given by the developer duties as it did not deliver the shop lots to
the JMB, instead, the shops were used for
in other words, enables the developer to
commercial purposes & leased out for its
choose not to claim from the purchases any
monthly service charges. (developer may
waive monthly charge)
=) Tan Ong Ban
issue: whether the principle of beneficial
ownership applied to the statutory contract
prescribed by the HDA (yes) and whether S.
340 (1) of NLC applied to strata property in
which the individual title is yet to be issued
(no)
held (FC): according to the principle of
beneficial ownership, when a purchaser has
performed his contractual obligation upon
the full settlement of the purchase price,
equity accords him with all the rights of a
legal owner even though he has yet to
become its registered owner
in such situation, vendor becomes a bare
trustee for purchaser, while the purchaser is
the beneficial owner having right in rem over
the property
principle of beneficial ownership applies to
the purchaser immediately after the
purchaser entered into a SPA of property,
which includes statutory contract prescribed
by HDA
S. 340 (1) of NLC only speaks of registered
title or interest. Therefore, the proviso to S.
340 (3) of NLC did not apply to the instant
case as the strata title was yet to be issued
at the material date
=) Ken Property Sdn Bhd v Badan Pengurusan
issue: whether the car parks and shop lots
formed part of the common property or
owned by developer.

You might also like