Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Aim
13. The contribution of fish and fisheries sector to our GDP (gross
domestic product) is about 4.37 per cent (2012-13) which can be increased
significantly if we can add sea resources. But for this, special training is
required since fishing techniques need to be upgraded to exploit sea
resources. Even though about 1.71 million people are engaged in this
sector, human resources, infrastructure and institutions are still lacking
because fishing industrial trawlers and skilled manpower are required to
take care of long line fishing. The National Fisheries Policy (1998) covers
policy for procurement, preservation and management of fisheries
resources in open water bodies; fish culture and management in closed
freshwater bodies; culture of shrimps in coastal regions; and exploitation,
conservation and management of marine fisheries resources. The policy
should be revisited and improved in order to better exploit the sea
resources.
14. Besides fish resources, there are mineral resources in the seabed.
Salt is one of the important resources that meet our daily needs. However,
Bangladesh's salt production has remained stagnant at 350 TH MT since
2003, as per United States Geological Survey (USGS) Minerals Resources
Program (2009). Salt industries have been set up in the coastal areas and
there area about 300 refining units. Production of industrial salt can be
done using advanced technologies and eventually it can become an export
product. Other mineral resources beneficial to Bangladesh, as mentioned
at the BoI seminar, are gas, copper, magnesium, nickel and precious
metals, including cobalt. Like many developed countries, Bangladesh can
also utilise the sea for producing renewable electricity. In addition, some
industrial sectors such as ship-building and ship-breaking industries
andpharmaceuticals can also benefit from the sea resources.
16. Given the increasing number of in-bound and outbound tourists in the
Cox's Bazar and St. Martin's beaches, sea water recreational facilities can
be increased to attract more tourists.
Conclusion
The Bay of Bengal and the coastal regions provide the backbone of the
economy in Bangladesh. As highlighted in this paper (see Table 1), there
are several sectors of the blue economy that offer potential objectives for
development to achieve food security and economic development. The
blue economy related economic activities could generate jobs and bring
about significant tangible benefits to change the economics status and
livelihoods of millions of people living in the coastal areas. However, this
can only be achieved with a government strategy in line with UNEP blue
economy objectives, also with support from the international arena to
protect the national interests and objectives of blue economy development
in Bangladesh. Integrated and inter-sectoral/inter-ministerial coordination
including academia-industry, publicprivate, resource-responsibility, and
time-space are essential to bring forward the relevant issues related to blue
economy development in Bangladesh. Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) can
designate ocean spaces for specific uses such as marine cage farming,
fishing zones for artisanal and industrial fishers, navigation routes for
international and domestic shipping, marine protected areas (MPAs),
marine fishing grounds, breeding groundsof valuable and important
species, and migration routes of marine species to generate strong
foundation for economic earnings and social benefits. Lessons can be
learnt from developed nations such as the EU in pursuit of MSP to ensure
that developments in the blue economy lead to sustainable outcomes in
line with the country’s development objectives.
Recommendation
8. Key Messages for Future Action The different pathways toward the
blue economy depend on national and local priorities and goals.
Nevertheless, there are common steps that will be required by all countries
aiming to adopt this approach to managing their oceans. These include:
h. The private sector can and must play a key role in the blue
economy. Business is the engine for trade, economic growth and
jobs, which are critical to poverty reduction.
INTRODUCTION
AIM
(3) KSY has so far repaired over 1800 vessels; out of these,
about 50% were man of war. Bangladesh Navy, Bangladesh
Coast Guard, Bangladesh Army, Bangladesh Rifles,
Bangladesh Railway, Bangladesh Inland Water Transport
Corporation, Sugar Mills, Power Development board are KSY's
regular customers. Khulna Shipyard is one of the well laid out
shipyard of this region with 549 miters River front having total
area of 68.97 acres. 5
(a) DEW Ltd can build ocean going, coastal and river
going Coaster, Tanker, Containership, Ro-Ro Ferry, Launch,
Survey vessel, Cargo vessel, Hospital vessel, Pleasure
Boat, Tug, PC, LCT, LCVP, etc. This shipyard is capable of
making steel, aluminium, fiber, Glass Reinforced Plastic and
wooden boats. DEW Ltd builds thousand of vessels since its
journey.
Banglade Indi Chin Singapo S.Kor Japa Ital Fran Norw Finla
sh a a re ea n y ce ay nd
0.5 1.0 1.5 3.0 6.0 12.0 13. 13.0 14.0 15.0
0
18. South Korea, China and Japan have been leading the world
shipbuilding for the past few decades. The total world production share by
some shipbuilding nations in 2008 is shown here.
S KOREA 12.4
CHINA 8.4
EUROPE 1.4
JAPAN 0.9
OTHERS 1.4
19. In recent times, more connectivity among different nations has led to
increase in international shipping. As a result, shipbuilding demand is
increasing annually. Also, the replacement requirement of a large number
of small ships operating around the globe, enforcement of use of double
skin ships, a strong desire of fuel efficient and environmentally friendly
ships will keep the demand growing for the world market. The internal
demand in national and regional waterways in the areas of service and
support craft, supply vessels, port servicing craft, fishing fleets, smaller
ships for feeder services etc has been also consistent. As a result,
Bangladesh may lookout for the market segment of small and medium sea
going vessels for the international market and war ships and patrol boats
for indigenous use, as traditional shipbuilding nations like Japan, Korea and
even China are losing interest in this section of market.
20. Availability of cheap human input is the main strength of this country
and this is one of the main determinants in allowing this labor intensive
industry to flourish. Also, easily trainable workers can provide this country
with a decisive edge over other prospective countries. Shipbuilding lifecycle
around the world has shifted from Europe to Asia and the single most
driving force behind this phenomenon is lower labor cost. Bangladesh is in
very much an advantageous position in this respect as labor cost is the
cheapest among other shipbuilding countries around the world.
21. The demand in the areas of service & support craft, supply vessels
port servicing g crafts, vessels playing in national waters, fishing f fleets as
well as smaller ships and vessels for short haul and feeder services has
been consistent. The replacement requirement of a large number of small
ships operating in European waters will create a growing demand.
Enforcement o of use of double skin tankers strong desire of fuel efficient
ships and restriction including emission limits to hold good environment and
usual need of replacement will keep the demand growing.
Thus a safety wing, size of which may vary upon the complexity of
the activities, needs to be incorporated in the organization. Its role
1
would be to advise the management on the technical and legal
aspects of safety, to formulate purposeful training programs and
safety campaigns for the improvement of the performance.
CONCLUSION
31. Bangladesh may lookout for the market segment of small & medium
sea going vessels for new building and repair and vessels operating in
national waters in many countries. This market is more than US$ 100.00
Billion and a US$ 10.00 Billion portion of this market is not difficult to be
secured by Bangladesh (Annex E). Cherishing the firm goal of Bangladesh
to be the 4th largest ship exporters and repair services rendered in 10
years and the number one in the field in 30 years, It can be foreseen taht
the required investments from home and abroad in shipbuilding and repair
industries as well as in forward and backward linkage industries in
Bangladesh. Bangladesh has all the ingredients for labour intensive
shipbuilding and allied industries. With the encouragement of Government,
dynamic entrepreneurship, infrastructural advantages shipbuilding may
take the lead and stand out as the flagship sector of our economy. Soon,
Bangladesh will enjoy the ripple effect of shipbuilding in the form of
expansion in heavy industries. A change in lives of our people, through
industrial employment generation, is expected and inevitable.
RECOMMENDATIONS
33. To compete with other Asian shipbuilding giants in the sector, Govt.
may allow Bangladesh ships exporters a subsidy to the tune of 20%.
Subsidy will help to get a foothold in the international market.
34. Bangladesh today is paying billions of dollars as freight for her sea
borne commerce, less than 6% of which only is carried by Bangladeshi
ships. Both import and export trades are growing nearly 8% annually but
often under various undue pressures from foreign shipping companies.
India, to its shipping, has been supporting local shipbuilding as well as
shipping by financing 30% of ships’ prices by providing 30% cash
incentives to local shipyards for building any ship longer than 80m.
Introduction
Despite the US' tremendous clout as the only global superpower, it was
disappointed with the reaction to its dual containment policy, especially by
its allies in the European Union (EU) as well as the Gulf and Asian states,
including Japan, sparking off a debate about whether the policy was
successful in containing the states it was directed at. The policy was
especially targetted at Iran, as it was perceived by the Clinton
Administration as the chief perpetrator of Muslim fundamentalist terrorism
worldwide, and worse still, was, according to Israeli intelligence reports,
nearing success in its quest for weapons of mass destruction.
Therefore, on April 10, when a Berlin court implicated the leaders of the
Iranian regime--the Supreme leader Ayatollah Syed Ali Khamenei,
President Hojatoleslam Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and Intelligence
Minister Ali Fallahian--for the 1992 assassination of Iranian Kurdish leader
Sadiq Sarafkindi and his three colleagues, in Germany, and, in a knee-jerk
reaction, most of the EU member states decided to recall their
Ambassadors from Tehran for "consultations" the next day, the US was
overjoyed. The Clinton Administration welcomed the EU's stand and even
sent the Assistant Secretary of State, Peter Tarnoff, to various EU capitals
to work out a common strategy and to strengthen their resolve against Iran.
But the US was soon disappointed when barring some half-hearted political
measures, the EU did not impose any economic sanctions against Iran.4
The Iranian Intelligence Minister Ali Fallahian accused the US and Israel of
applying pressure on Germany to implicate Iran. Under pressure from the
former countries to get information from Iran regarding the whereabouts of
Israeli pilot Ron Arad whose plane was shot down over South Lebanon in
1986, and who was supposedly now in the custody of the Shia militant
group Hizbollah, Germany had asked Iran for help. When Iran had denied
knowledge of Arad's whereabouts, Germany had implicated the Iranian
government in the Mykonos murder trial. According to Fallahian, "The US
and Israel aimed at securing the release of the Israeli pilot, preventing
Iran's aid to the Lebanese Hizbollah, bringing (Iran) into agreement with the
Middle East peace process and establishing links and negotiations with
Iran...In order to achieve the above objectives, the US, Israel and Europe,
in a concerted move, levelled unfounded accusations against Iran, and
based on the testimony of some counter-revolutionary figures who have
committed acts of terrorism in Iran, launched a smear campaign against
(Iran). It is evident that the Berlin court has been prompted by political
motives to deal with the Mykonos case and conduct the trial. Thus we
attach no validity to it."6
But what was probably more damaging for Iran was the fact that the
Luxembourg declaration emphasised that "under present circumstances
there is no basis" for the continuation of the "critical dialogue" which the EU
member states, under the leadership of the French and the Germans, had
been conducting for the last four years with Iran, despite strident US
objections.7
However, the verdict also showed up the schisms within the EU member
states, which had to struggle to come up with a common agenda against
Iran as well as the difference in policies between the US and its Western
allies. While Britain and Germany took the lead in pushing for something
more than words, supported by Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden,
France, which has of late shown a marked unwillingness to submit to US
leadership in the Middle East, emphasised the need to maintain contact
with Iran, pointing out that it is a key regional power. Greece, which was the
only EU country not to withdraw its Ambassador after the verdict, and Italy
also support the French position, which led an EU diplomat to comment,
"There is a lot of noise about the need for action, but in the end the
economic relationship is what counts."8
And with good reason. In 1995, the EU exported $11.5 billion worth of
goods to Iran. Germany was in the lead ($1.5 billion), while France ($500
million), Italy and the UK ($400 million each) also exported substantial
amounts.
Iranian exports to the EU stood at $17.5 billion, consisting mainly of oil and
gas. The state-wise break-up was as follows: Italy imported goods worth
$1.35 billion, France--$1.1 billion, Germany--$600 million and the UK—
$200 million over the same period.9
The EU decision not to impose sanctions on Iran has been treated with
contempt by the Iranian government. A week after the verdict, President
Rafsanjani had said that the EU member states would soon go back to
doing business with Iran and this was vindicated by the fact that the
European states chose the least painful of the options they could have
exercised. Iran had banked on the fact that its own internal dynamics are at
such a stage that no state doing business with it would break off an
engagement at this time. With Iran heading for what is probably the most
crucial presidential election since 1979, no country with diplomatic ties with
Iran would like to break off just at this moment, especially with the Majlis
Speaker and the most favoured candidate for the premiership, Ali Akbar
Nateq-Nouri expected to win the election, which in turn is expected to mark
the beginning of a phase where Iran could make radical political
changes.10
Therefore, in the absence of any strong measures against Iran, the EU's
position continues to be at variance with that of the US. Also, though the
EU has also decided to extend its arms embargo on Iran, and has said that
it will refuse visas to Iranian intelligence or security officials, it has also
given its members the freedom to send back their emissaries who had
been "recalled." In the Iranian assessment, this relatively mild response by
the EU has been conditioned by the recognition that there will not be just
one loser if diplomatic ties are cut off. The Iranian media has pointed out
that while the EU accounts for half of Iran's international trade, it could
easily shift its focus of trade to Asia.11
Before the verdict, besides EU states like France, Greece and Italy, even
countries like Australia and Japan had refused to cut off trade ties with Iran.
Now, post-verdict, the Australian Trade and Deputy Prime Minister, Tim
Fischer, insisted that his government was not considering trade sanctions
against Iran and rejected fears that up to $390 million of grain export to Iran
could be threatened. Japan too announced on April 16 that though it was
suspending high level exchanges with Iran, it would not recall its
Ambassador from Tehran. The Hashimoto government is keen on taking an
independent position on Asia-related matters, and Japanese Foreign
Minister Yukihiko Ikeda said that though Japan in essence agreed that Iran
should cut its ties with terrorism, "the method of bringing this about differs
from country to country," and it has constantly been Japan's stated policy to
keep the channels of communication open with Iran.12
Japan has also taken note of the fact that beyond the measures adopted at
Luxembourg, none of the EU members have declared any intention to
adopt sanctions against Tehran despite pressure from the Clinton
Administration. Japan too had refused to support the US law requiring
sanctions against companies that invest $40 million or more in any project
in Iran, even though no Japanese company intends to pump in that much
money into Iran. In fact, for the past three years, Japan has suspended the
disbursement of follow-on tranches of a loan to Iran for the Karun dam
project.13
When Iran came out of the debilitating eight-year war with Iraq from 1980 to
1988, the situation was grim and its economic woes far worse than those of
its Arab neighbours. Though President Rafsanjani tried to open up the
economy by attracting foreign investments and technology, he has not met
with much success, partly because of the US policy and partly because of
internal opposition from anti-West radicals who consider themselves
Ayatollah Rohullah Khomeini's true heirs. Therefore, the power struggle
that has ensued ever since Khomeini's death in 1989 has tended to
paralyse the government between orthodoxy and reform.14
In fact, there are as yet few takers for the US and Israeli view that Iran's
nuclear weapons programme is in an advanced stage, though its biological
and especially its chemical weapons programmes are at a more developed
stage. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors have visited
sites where Iran's nuclear programme is being conducted and are even
said to have visited sites which the Iranian Opposition had claimed were
being used for clandestine weapons programmes. So far, the IAEA and
almost every other neutral body says that there is no hard evidence that
Iran has progressed in the weaponisation of its nuclear programme or has
even embarked on one. But critics say that the IAEA had not discovered
Iraq's weaponisation programme till its defeat in 1991.15
Ever since the Islamic revolution ousted the pro-US Shah in 1979, Iran and
the US have been in political conflict, and more so after militant students
seized the US Embassy and its diplomats. The US argues that Iran's
acquisition of submarines, long-range combat aircraft and a whole range of
missiles along with armour and artillery go far beyond the needs of
defensive planning. The tension and mutual distrust is heightened by US
military presence in the region and constant round of exercises with
regional forces. Perhaps the following statement of Colin Powell, former
Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, puts the US' perception of Iran in
a nutshell: "In the Middle East and South West Asia, radical politicised
Islam and a politically and militarily resurgent Iran threaten regional stability
and directly challenge a number of US interests, including access to Gulf
oil, political reform and democratic development and settlement of the
Arab-Israeli dispute."
For their part, the Iranians point to the vast sales of arms to US allies in the
Gulf, which far outstrips Tehran's arms spending. Between August 1990
and September 1992, the US sold arms worth $32 billion to its Gulf allies,
justifying Tehran's perception that it is being targetted by the US to avenge
the humiliation of the US hostage crisis in 1979-80, the killing of 250 US
Marines in Beirut in 1983, and the subsequent years of hostage crisis and
last, but not the least, the political havoc wreaked by the Irangate scandal.
And after the bomb blast at the US base in Dhahran in Saudi Arabia last
June, which killed 19 US servicemen, conservative politicians in the US are
demanding that the government takes unilateral military action against
Tehran if it is found to have been involved. So far, there has been no
evidence that Iran was indeed responsible, directly or indirectly.
But it is in the economic sphere that Iran has been hit hardest. Despite
denials by the government, according to Mohsen Yahyavi, Deputy
Chairman of the oil sub-committee of Iran's Parliament, the US sanctions
were succeeding in preventing foreign companies from responding to
tenders for oil exploration and development and consequently a lack of
investment was hindering the country's oil production. In August 1995, Iran
had brought out tenders for 12 projects. Though Oil Minister Gholamreza
Aghazadeh said that about 130 companies from 19 countries had
responded positively to the tender by October 1996, only two big contracts
for Sirri and South Pars had gone to a foreign company, Total of France. A
third, the 60,000 barrels per day (b/d) Soroush oil field is expected to be
awarded to the Iranian Offshore Engineering and Construction Co (IOEC),
a joint venture between the state-owned National Iranian Oil Co and the
Heavy Industries Ministry. However, IOEC will need international financial
backing if it is to fulfill the contract, after a German company backed out
because of the recent diplomatic problem with Iran. Washington is also
examining agreements signed by Turkey and Turkmenistan to build a
pipeline to Iran, to see if they merit sanctions.16
Rethinking of US Policy?
Advocates of a more open policy towards Iran also cite Iran's growing
relations with both Russia and China as a possible counter-balance to its
isolation as another reason for dropping the dual containment policy. In
fact, as the EU was downgrading its relations with Tehran, the Iranian
Speaker Nateq-Nouri was cordially received by Russian President Boris
Yeltsin, who said Russia enjoyed "good positive cooperation with Iran
which shows a tendency to improve," and the Chairman of the Russian
Duma even denounced the latest EU moves.
The Chinese Foreign Minister, Qian Qichen, also announced that his
country would maintain close ties with Tehran despite the verdict and said
that Iran and China "share a tradition of friendship" and that China is "ready
to work with Iran to further develop bilateral relations."19
The US is alarmed over the latest signs of Russian and Chinese military
cooperation with Iran and have accused China of supplying Tehran with
anti-ship missiles and the material for chemical weapons while Russia has
been accused of providing anti-aircraft missiles. They argue that in courting
Iran, Moscow is trying to cultivate its traditional partners in the east,
perhaps even as a reaction and counterweight to the expansion of the
North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) which it is against. Iran is an
important commercial and defence partner for Moscow. Tehran already
buys most of its defence equipment from Russia and there is speculation
that it may also buy the famous Russian S-300 anti-missile system to
protect the four nuclear reactors that Russia is building in Iran despite US
objections.21
Russia and Iran also have a common view on sharing the Caspian Sea's
resources, opposing their unilateral exploitation by Azerbaijan and
Kazakhstan. Some analysts have even gone as far as to suggest that
Moscow is trying to build a political axis with Armenia, Iran, India and China
to counter-balance US expansion in the region and point to then Indian
Prime Minister Deve Gowda's visit just prior to Nateq-Nouri's followed by
the Chinese Premier's historic visit to Moscow.
Experts on Iran say that the US has already begun the process of
maintaining or renewing contacts with Iran. According to a former Iranian
Premier till 1981 and a leading witness at the recent Berlin trial, Abolhasan
Bani-Sadr, the US, like its European allies, has been conducting talks with
Iran but secretly and through mediators to study the possibility of
normalising relations with Tehran, on condition that Iran stops terrorism and
its nuclear weapons programme. He said that his sources are informants in
the Iranian government and he even goes so far as saying that discussions
on those issues and others have taken place in the German cities of
Hamburg and Frankfurt.
Till the Shah's fall in 1979, Iran was close to Pakistan and, therefore,
somewhat inimical to India. But after the Islamic revolution, and especially
since the 1990s, both Iran and India seem to have taken a concerted step
towards forming warmer bilateral relations. For India, with its large Muslim
minority, the advantages of sharing warm relations with a theocratic state
like Iran are obvious and its policy towards Iran has more or less been
consistent. But for Iran, there has been a distinct change in attitude,
especially since the last couple of years or so.
Till 1992, Iran seemed to have more or less backed Pakistan, especially on
its stand on Kashmir, but from 1993 onwards, especially since the then
Prime Minister, P.V. Narasimha Rao's visit, when he was treated with
elaborate hospitality, there has been a change, and Iran has even openly
said that it recognises Kashmir as a political issue within India's internal
jurisdiction. The Iranians are unhappy with Pakistan mainly over its
Afghanistan policy as well as the recent outbreak of sectarian violence in
Pakistan. Another point of overriding concern for both is the competition for
influence in the newly independent, energy-rich but underdeveloped states
of Central Asia.
The US view of Iran and its policy of containment does not really affect
India, as both countries have their own reasons for moving towards each
other. Where India is concerned, its interest in Iran is more economic than
political. Iran's large energy reserves--both oil and natural gas--makes it a
very attractive trade partner, given India's large energy deficiency.
On the other hand, India's industrial and managerial strengths and the huge
market potential is of great value and interest to Iran. As an Iran expert
recently pointed out, "India is significant for Iran in the Asian and Central
Asian perspective, much more than China which is a lot less reliable."22
The recently signed tripartite agreement between Iran, India and
Turkmenistan, providing India with a gate- way to Central Asia and giving
Iran a powerful regional ally at a time when it finds itself getting more
isolated internationally, is beneficial for both.
Conclusion
The new direction in Iran's foreign and economic policy towards Russia,
China and India is seen as a move to counter the US bid to isolate it. As far
as these countries are concerned, as well as many countries in Europe and
West Asia, Iran has not shown any indication of becoming the expansionist
regional threat that the US had predicted it would. On the other hand, since
the end of the Iran-Iraq war, Tehran's efforts to rebuild its armed forces and
develop its nuclear weapons programme have not been compulsive.
According to US intelligence estimates, Iran probably spends less than $1
billion a year on its military--less than half of what it announced in 1992 that
it would spend.23
On April 22, Iran staged one of its largest ever exercises in the waters of
the Persian Gulf and the Straits of Hormuz. Half of Iran's 400,000-strong
force of Revolutionary Guards, took part in exercises which had an
emphasis on the naval aspect. During these exercises, Iranian
commanders had said that though they were not intended as a threat to
anyone, it was a warning that Iran possessed the capability to choke off the
Gulf by closing the straits. Iran is known to have stationed missile batteries
along its coast as well as on the islands of Qeshm, Abu Musa and Sirri. For
some time now, Iran has also been acquiring fast attack missile boats and
is building up its submarine arm through acquisition of three Kilo-class
submarines from Russia.
Of late, many incidents have also taken place between the US and Iranian
Navies which show the potential for conflict these two Navies with different
military perspectives and interests have, and who regard each other as
competitors for the hegemony over a strategic body of water like the Straits
of Hormuz and, in fact, the entire Persian Gulf area.24
Those in the US Administration and analysts who realise Iran's potential for
damage, call for a different approach towards Iran as well as handling
Tehran differently from Iraq. They advocate a clear differentiation between
the regime of Saddam Hussein which poses a "clear and relatively simple
immediate threat" and Iran, which they describe as a more complex geo-
political factor. While they agree that Iran's sponsorship of terrorism and its
nuclear ambitions pose a threat, they advise that these problems "can be
addressed by specific policy instruments rather than by current crude and
counterproductive attempts to cordon off the entire country." Worse still,
they say that isolating Iran has hurt the US' efforts to gain access to energy
resources in Central Asia. Iran is the geographical key to exporting large
amounts of oil from the region and the US policy of isolation has only
succeeded in hampering efforts to wean the new Central Asian Republics
away from Russian influence.25
THE TRAGIC ATTACK OF HOLEY ARTISAN
INTRODUCTION.
6. The whole incident by the attackers displayed the motive and aim of
them. Their motive was to spread the significance of Islam whereas their
aim was to eradicate all non-muslims from the society. They were
motivated so wrongly by their perpretrators that being educated they had
gone blind.
Casualties
8. Among the dead were seven Japanese citizens – five men and two
women – who were associated with the Japan International Cooperation
Agency (HICA). One of the women was pregnant at the time. Tarishi Jain, a
19-year-old female student of the University of California, Berkeley, of
Indian nationality, was also killed.
Rescue operation
11. BD police carried out continue raid in different places of the country.
On 16 July 2016, Police arrested three people for renting out a flat to the
attackers in Bashundhara Residential Area. The other two were his nephew
Alam Chowdhury and the manager of the building Mahbubur Rahman
Tuhin. Police found sand-filled cartons, which police suspect to be used to
carry grenades thrown during the attack and used clothes in the flat. Police
also suspect that the attackers and their associates stayed in the flat
during Ramadan, and the attack plan was drafted there. On 26 July 2016,
police raided an apartment in Kallyanpur, killing nine and arresting two, all
of whom are believed to be part of the same group that carried out the
Holey Artisan Bakery attack, and who were planning another attack. It is
reported that the police were directly assisted by vigilantes organized as a
"citizen's committee" by the local MP for Dhaka-14, Aslamul Haque.
Participants included members of the Awami League, Jubo
League and Chhatra League.
Attackers Background
13. The attackers for this attack was the ISIL and the JMB. According
to The New York Times, citing Bangladesh police, the attackers were
named Akash, Badhon, Bikash, Don, and Ripon. ISIL referred to the five
men which were Abu Omar al-Bengali, Abu Salmah al-Bengali, Abu Rahim
al-Bengali, Abu Muslim al-Bengali and Abu Muharib al-Bengali. According
to The New York Times, pictures of the bodies of the five men, released by
Bangladeshi police, matched five photographs of the men released by ISIL.
But the former home minister of Bangladesh, Asaduzzaman Khan, stated
that the perpetrators belonged to Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen and were not
affiliated with ISIL. They were well-educated and mostly from rich families.
Bangladeshi politicians also blamed opposition groups, like those within
the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, of plotting to destabilize the country by
supporting Islamic extremists like the Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen.
14. The attackers, all in their late teens or early 20s, were identified as
wealthy men from Bangladesh's elite, having attended top private schools
and universities in Bangladesh and abroad. It was revealed that three of
the attackers came from a privileged background, educated with western
curriculam. Police named the five gunmen who attacked the restaurant as
Nibras Islam, Rohan Imtiaz, Meer Saameh Mubasheer, Khairul Islam and
Shafiqul Islam. One of them Nibras Islam was known as a "fun-loving, in
and out of love, and keen on sport". He attended Monash University in
Malaysia and returned because "he didn't like it in Monash". Nibras' father
was a businessman with two houses in Dhaka, and one of his uncles was a
Deputy Secretary to the Bangladesh Government. It was revealed that
Nibras was following a Twitter account belonged to an Islamic State
propagandist named Mehdi Masroor Biswas, who was arrested
in Bangalore in 2015.
15. Two gunmen were identified as Meer Sameh Mubashir and Rohan
Imtiaz. Both went to Scholastica School which follows Cambridge
International Examinations curriculum. Local newspapers reported that
both of them had gone missing long before the attack. Rohan Imtiaz has
been identified as the son of a politician in Bangladesh's ruling party Awami
League. Police then identified another gunman, named as Shafiqul Islam
Ujjal from Koiyagarhi village, Bogra District. He enrolled at Government
Azizul Haque College in Bogra for graduation after passing higher
secondary examinations. He had left the college later and took up a
teaching job at a kindergarten school in Shajahan Market area in Dhaka.
On 6 July 2016, a video was released by IS from Syria through SITE
intelligence website, where three Bengali speakers warned the
Bangladeshi Government saying "What you witnessed in Bangladesh was
a glimpse. This will repeat, repeat and repeat until you lose and we win and
the sharia is established throughout the world. The jihad that is waged
today is a jihad under the shade of the Caliphate.”
ROHINGYA CRISIS
Introduction
Aim
3. The aim of this journal is to analyze and find out an easy way out to
solve the Rohingya crisis in Bangladesh.
Impacts On Bangladesh
Challenges
11. In dealing with Rohingya crisis the following challenges are found
randomly:
Conclusion
Recommendations
INTRODUCTION
Requirement
The Padma Bridge will be built to provide road and rail links between
the relatively less developed Southwest region (SWR) of the country and
the more-developed eastern half that includes the capital of Dhaka and the
port city of Chittagong. By facilitating transportation across the river, the
bridge is expected to lead to a greater integration of regional markets within
the Bangladeshi national economy.
Phases
The Project comprises two phases. Phase 1 of the Project includes the
Design Phase leading through procurement action to the award of
construction contracts. Phase 2 is the Construction Phase. Phase 1 of the
project commenced on the 29 January 2009. A dedicated Project Office
was set up in Dhaka in March 2009. A key feature of the detailed design
was the integration of Bangladesh counterparts into the design team, which
allowed the successful training of a significant number of Bangladesh
personnel in all aspects of the project and the subsequent transfer of the
high level of technology involved in this large and complex project.
Regular meetings were also held during the course of the detailed design
with the potential co-financiers for Phase 2 of the project – the World Bank,
Asian Development Bank, Japanese International Cooperative Agency and
Islamic Development Bank - to assist these agencies in obtaining the
necessary approvals within their organisations for loan implementation.
e. Firms may also relocate to the region to reduce the transport costs.
CONCLUSION
The new Padma Multipurpose Bridge will provide a vital missing link in the
transport network of Bangladesh. The bridge will provide significant travel
time savings, particularly between the Dhaka Division to the southeast of
Bangladesh and possibly onto India. The operation of the Padma Bridge,
with its large step change intransport costs, will result in significant
economic changes to the southwest region.
To reduce the amount and the cost of borrowing, the following are some of
the options:
n The Padma Bridge project may be converted into a limited company with
provision for 49 per cent shareholding by the public with preferential
allotment for migrant workers who will send their subscription in foreign
exchange. It will give the people of the country a sense of pride for
participation in the nation-building process.
n Local currency taka bonds may be issued for subscription by the public
with provision for payment of interest at a little higher than that for
comparable government obligations.
I visualise that there would be lots of financial experts eager to put too
many 'ifs' and 'buts' to the suggested or any other financing arrangement.
Regardless of whichever is chosen by the government, it is important that
the work must start before the onset of monsoon.
INTRODUCTION
2. The current nuclear crisis centre upon the development of nuclear weapons and
missile technology by North Korea. The progress poses a direct threat to the region
through the democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) ballistic missile program.
Since the Koran War began in 1950, the North Korean dictatorship has presented
continuous initiatory and economic challenges to its neighbor. The potential proliferation
of knowledge and components also poses a threat to the international community
recent missile test by DPRK, which is capable of carrying nuclear warhead and
deployment of Terminal High Altitudes Area Defense (THAAD) System in South Korea
has increased the tension in the region and also in the international community.
3. Keeping this context in mind, this paper will initially highlight the genesis of crisis
in North Korean peninsula subsequently it will discuss the cases and impair of the crisis
finally the paper will conclude with the suggestive measures to resolve the crisis.
AIM
4. The aim of this paper is to discuss the genesis of crisis in Korean Peninsula, its
causes and impacts on the global and way forward.
7. The Road to a Cold War. Tensions were never far from the surface and various
factions sought to unify the country. A widely accepted version of the story says that on
June 25 1950, armed with Soviet weapons, North Korea crossed the 38th parallel
border in an attempt to take over the whole territory. However, it is probable that the
eventual outbreak was the result of a gradualescalation of hostilities by both sides over
time. In 1950, with the Soviets boycotting the UN Security Council over a decision to
exclude China from membership, Harry Truman, the US president, was able to secure a
resolution to use force against North Korea and the war began. In many ways this was
the official start of the Cold War, in which the US and Russia used others to engage in
conflicts because of fears that a direct war between the two sides would escalate to all-
out nuclear war.
8. Effects of the Cold war and Casualities . The conflict was bloody, with the US
carpet bombing its opponent’s cities and civilians with more than 635,000 tons of
explosives, including 32,557 tons of napalm. By comparison, in the Second World War,
it had used 503,000 tons in the South Pacific over a much larger area. As well as
setting the template for later Cold War tensions such as the Cuban Missile Crisis of
1962 and the Vietnam War of 1965-73, the Korean War left a visible divide between the
two halves of Korea in the Demilitarized Zone, a heavily fenced and land-mined 4
kilometer separation strip guarded on both sides. Following the armistice, the Republic
of Korea, known as South Korea, and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea,
North Korea were created. Both were officially admitted into the UNGeneral Assembly in
1991. But the conflict left feelings of anger and hatred on both sides as many families
were forcibly separated, some never to be reunited, while in the North the blanket
bombings of the Korean War and the imperialist Japanese rule are still sources of
rancor. Many North Koreans still view the US bombings as war crimes.
9. The Tensions Continues. While the US, Japan and their allies helped to
rebuild South Korea, the North turned to Russia, China and the nations in the
Communist sphere of influence, which between them supplied almost 880 million
rubbles as well as manpower and technological input. The result, according to historian
Charles K Armstrong, was that: “In the late 1950s North Korea’s growth rate of total
industrial output (averaging 39% between 1953 and 1960) was probably the highest in
the world.” But tensions, which even today run broadly on the lines established in the
Cold War, have always kept the US and North Korea at loggerheads.
10. Unresolved Outcome of Korean War. The primary cause of the crisis is the
unresolved issue of Korean War (1950-1953). After 65 years since the end of the war a
peace agreement is still not being signed. Only one armistice agreement exists.
Moreover there are no diplomatic relations between the main warring parties, the USA
and North Korea.
11. Influence of the Super Powers. The super powers have greatly influenced the
fate of Northand South Korea. China and Russia have influenced the activities of North
Korea who chooses the bargaining model of relations with the international community.
On the other hand, US has it’s all out support for South Korea. Moreover Japan has
also become a stack holder for its very geographical location in Korean Peninsula.
12. Sense of Insecurity By North Korea. The deployment of US troops in the main
land of South Korea has been always a matter of great concern for North Korea. North
Korea in included in the list of ‘Axis of Evil’ by US. Again the continuation of joint
exercise between South Korea and US has deepen the issue. After the end of Cold War
the influence of Russia over North Korea has significantly reduced.
13. Dimension in the Regime. North Korea wants to dominate the Korean
Peninsula as a military might. North Korea has drastically altered the military balance in
its favor of the peninsula and has gained immunity against the action of the South. But
South Korea also decides to derail the issue seriously because of the stubborn attitude
of North Korean’s Young Leader. Such attitudes are now wide spread and consequently
supported by South Korean public opinion.
14. Economic Break Down of North Korea. The economic condition of North
Korea has always been an issue since the Cold War. As a result Pyongyang has
prepared itself as a bargaining chip in front of international community. On the other
hand the economic condition of South Korea has improved drastically crating a huge
difference with North Korea. To gain sound economy stability North Korea crates unrest
in the Peninsula.
15. North Korea's Nuclear Weapons Program. On 2nd January, 2017, Kim Jong-
un, the leader of North Korea, said that the country was in the "last stage" of
preparations to test-fire an intercontinental ballistic missile. On May 3, North Korea issued
a rare and harshly worded criticism of its chief ally, China, stating that "One must clearly
understand that the DPRK.'s line of access to nukes for the existence and development
of the country can neither be changed nor shaken and that the DPRK. will never beg for
the maintenance of friendship with China, risking its nuclear program which is as
precious as its own life, no matter how valuable the friendship is. China should no
longer try to test the limits of the DPRK's patience. China had better ponder over the
grave consequences to be entailed by its reckless act of chopping down the pillar of the
DPRK-Chinarelations." The harsh commentary also accused the Chinese media (which is
tightly controlled by the government) of dancing to the tune of the US. In early August
2017, the Washington Post reported an assessment, made by the US.
16. Sanctions on North Korea; Trade with China. Since North Korea's first nuclear
test in 2006, the UN Security Council had passed a number of resolutions that imposed
various sanctions on the DPRK, including restrictions on economic activity.
Nevertheless, North Korea's gross domesticproduct grew by an estimated 3.9 percent in
2016, to about $28.5 billion, the fastest pace in 17 years; the progress was largely
attributed to continued trade with China, which accounted for more than 90% of North
Korea's international trade. In April 2017, China said that its trade with North Korean
had expanded. In 2017, North Korea was sanctioned several times by the UN Security
Council. The most recent ones were introduced on December 22, 2017. According to
this resolution, oil supplies to the DPRK are prohibited, and all countries have decided
to expel North Korean labor migrants from the territories of the countries where they
work within 24 months. China has been opposed to secondary sanctions that may be
imposed on Chinese firms that do business with North Korea.
17. THAAD in South Korea. Ostensibly to counter North Korea′s missile threat,
United StatesForces Korea (USFK) had been planning deployment of the Terminal High
Altitude AreaDefense (THAAD) in South Korea, which is designed to detect and destroy
intermediate-and medium-range ballistic missiles (not intercontinental ballistic missile).
The deployment had faced strong oppositions from China, Russia, and North Korea. In
late April 2017, it was reported that while THAAD had originally been scheduled to
become operational by the end of 2017, this could occur sooner. According to US
Forces Korea′s announcement, THAAD stationed in South Korea had reached initial
operating capability (IOC) on May 1, 2017.
18. USS Carl Vinson's movements: April 2017. On 5 April 17North Korea′s test-
firing of a medium-range ballistic missile from its eastern port of Sinpointo the Sea of
Japan increased tensions as U.S. president Donald Trump had said the U.S. was
prepared to act alone to deal with the nuclear threat from North Korea. On April 9, the
U.S. Navy announced it was sending a navystrike group headed by the USS Carl Vinson
super carrier to the West Pacific. On April 24 the Japanese destroyers Ashigaraand Sa
mid are participated with the USS Carl Vinson in tactical training drills near the
Philippines; North Korea threatened to sink her with a single strike.
21. Missile test over Japan on September 15. On September 14, North Korea
issued a threat to “sink” Japan, and turn the US to “ashes and darkness”. The next day,
an IRBM was fired from near Pyongyang and flew over Hokkaido, Japan before
splashing down in the western Pacific about two thousand kilometers off Cape Erimoat
about 7:16 am local time. The missile travelled 3,700 kilometers (2,300 mi) achieving a
maximum apogee of 770 kilometers (480 mi) during its 19-minute flight. It was the
furthest any North Korean IRBM missile has gone above and beyond Japan. On
September 18, North Korea announced that any further sanctions would only cause
acceleration of their nuclear program.
22. US and China Agree on "Pressure". On September 18, the White House said
PresidentDonald Trump and Chinese president Xi Jinping had discussed North Korea's
continued nuclear weapons and ballistic missile tests and committed to "maximizing
pressure on North Korea through vigorous enforcement" of UN Security Council
resolutions on North Korea; North Korea said the sanctions would accelerate its
nuclear program.
23. Trump’s speech at UN GA, and Kim Jong-un’s response. On September 19,
Donald Trump, in his first address to the United Nations General Assembly, said that the
United States: “if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to
totally destroy North Korea.” US president Donald Trump signed an executive order that
further toughened U.S. sanctions against North Korea: the U.S. Treasury was thereby
authorized to target firms and financial institutions conducting business with NK . On
September 21, responding directly for the first time to President Trump’s threat , North
Korea’s leader Kim Jong-un in his capacity of Chairman of State Affairs of DPRK called
Trump “the mentally deranged US dotard” and vowed the “highest level of hard-line
countermeasure in history.” Foreign Minister Ri Yong-ho likewise alluded to Trump as a
barking dog, and furthermore remarked that North Korea might be considering the
largest test of a hydrogen bomb ever in the Pacific Ocean, which would constitute the
first atmospheric nuclear test in the world since 1980 (last performed by China).
24. Third ICBM test. On November 28, North Korea conducted its third
intercontinental ballisticmissile test. The missile was said to have flown to a record
altitude of 2,800 miles and landed in the Sea of Japan into the exclusive economic
zone, a distance of 600 miles. Initial assessments, if fired on a normal trajectory, would
be able to reach anywhere in the continental United States.
25. 2018 State of the Union Address. In his first State of the Union address,
President Trump devoted much time to North Korea, stoking fears that an American
strike was under serious consideration and not mere saber-rattling, particularly given
[151]
the withdrawal of Dr. Victor Cha as Ambassador to the Republic of Korea and its
similarity to George W. Bush’s Axis of Evil 2002State of the Union Address.
27. Inter-Korean Summit. On April 27th, the two leaders met at the Joint Security
Area, with Kim Jong Un crossing the MDL in South Korean territory, the first time a
North Korean leader has done so. President Moon also briefly crossed into the North's
territory. Both Moon and Kim signed the Panmunjom Declaration, declaring the Korean
conflict over and to sign a proper peace treaty by the end of the year. With that, Moon
agreed to visit Pyongyang in the fall.
29. Quest of Recognition. According to North Korea the US targets the North Korea
survival and developing itself beyond its nuclear weapon. Secondly the US hostile policy
towards the DPRK is an extremely risky policy. This attitude of US has forced North
Korea to be recognized by world community. However, North Korea attempts to
establish it by using the military might instead of dealing the issue diplomatically.
30. Shifting the Balance of Power. The crisis in the Korean Peninsula remains as a
source of deep concern for the global security. China, Russia, US and Japan are
directly involved with the issue. US has already deployed the THAAD system in South
Korea. Russia is acting as a silent agent. China the old friend of North Korea sometimes
speaks against the nuclear projects. Japan is also coming into play because of its
economic stability.
31. Threat to Nuclear War. Despite multiple efforts to curtail the explosion of
nuclear project Pyongyang has conducted five nuclear tests recently. North Korea has
already launched its sixth missile successfully to provoke the world community specially
US. This is really posing a threat to nuclear war.
32. Threat to Neighboring Countries. Apart from South Korea, North Korea also
has issues with Japan with missile tests perform by Pyongyang in March 2017 causing
four military projectiles to enter the economic zones of Japan. Shinzo Abe, the
Japanese Prime Minister reacted by calling the move ‘An extremely Dangerous Action’.
33. Probability of a Second Korean War. United States and North Korea both are
adamant. USA may take the inspiration from CUBA that by employing military pressure
any entity can be forced to abandon its plan. On the other hand, Korea may take lesson
from Lybia, when Guddafi was brought down two years after he made an agreement
with USA. Kim wants to protect regime as well as the image of the country in the world
community. To make matter worse Pyongyang has repeatedly threatened to attack
mainland America with its intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of delivering a
nuclear warheads.
34. Effect on World Economy. The crisis of Korean Peninsula has a great impact
on World economy. One of the first Signs that investors in the Asian markets are lacking
confidence is a rise in demands and therefore the price of the Japanese Yen. Investors
look to the Japanese Yen as a safe heaven US trade relations with China is also
affected by the crisis.
35. Effects on World Peace. The world is now burdened with lots of problems. The
crisis is Middle East, rising of terrorism, religious extremism, climate change Electra
have taken foots on global peace and stability. The issues of conflicts in the South
China Sea and Brexit also very pronounced now a days. The crisis in the Korean
Peninsula has added new dimensions in the problems infected world. So the world
community is deeply concerned about the security situation.
36. Role of United Nations. The United Nations Security Council already gave
sanction of oil. United Nations has to be more active to bring the stake holders in the
same table to solve the issue as quickly as possible.
37. Role of the Super Powers. The Super Powers have major role to play in order
to the restrain North Korea from unstabling the global Peace. Donald Trump wants a
complete freeze on North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs. On the hand North
Korea wants to be treated as a nuclear armed power. It would be wrong for USA to
compare North Korea situation to that of Iraq in 1991. Iraq was virtually and completely
isolated both diplomatically and geographically. On the contrary North Korea has one of
the powerful countries in the world as its ally, which is China. Russia should also extend
the helping hand to solve the issue in order to maintain global peace and stability.
39. Guarantee of Bilateral and Regional Security.The first and foremost step
should be bilateral and regional security guarantees to the North Korean Government
ensuring that the country would not be attacked and that its sovereignty would be
respected. This could be done with confidence building measures. US and South Korea
should halt their joint military exercises in the vicinity of the North Korea. In addition, US
and Japan could offer North Korea additional benefits, foods, medicines and clean
energy technology. China could play a positive role by hosting the negotiations,
including possibly inviting the leader of North Korea to participate.
CONCLUSION
40. The Crisis in the Korean peninsula has become a matter of great concern for the
world community. In the year 2017 North Korea carried out sixth nuclear test and
number of missile test. It is also developed the technology to create miniaturized
nuclear devices and an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching us
mainland. If things go on this way, it is predicted that north Korea will have an Arsenal of
over 100 nuclear weapons by 2020. The first nuclear crisis on the Korean peninsula
development, the second crises ensued one the country's uranium enrichment program
was exposed in 2002, and now the world is witnessing the third crisis are Pyongyang's
nuclear program.
41. No doubt, problems and even crisis in the world that go away on the own. The
North Korean nuclear issue is not one of them. Alarmingly, tensions between the United
State and North Korea have again reached crisis proportions the United State wants
North Korea to curtail any further development of its Nuclear Weapon programs as well
as to stop testing its missiles, North Korea evidently seeks to bolster its security by
acquiring a sufficiently robust deterrent capability of discourage on attack by us. The
unpredictable leaders of both countries are passing extremely pro vocative and
destabilizing patterns of behavior. The crisis has devastating impact on the peace and
stability of the world. There is a possibility of power and disrupt the smooth function of
world economy.
Bibliography:
Author’s Biography