Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTERNAL MEMORANDUM
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
ACTORS IN IR
There are a number of actors or participants in IR. These include the following:
In Zambia the law defines a trade union as, ‘any group or organization of
employees registered under the industrial and labor relations Act, whose principal
objectives are the representation and promotion of interests of the employees and
regulation of relations between employees and employers and includes a
federation of trade unions’.
Whilst the overall role of a trade union is seen as representing sectional needs and
interests, there are six distinct aspects of their function.
1) Power – to protect and support individual by providing a collective strength to
act as a countervailing force to the employer and as a pressure group within
society. Without an organization to represent them, individual employees are
at a serious power disadvantage in their relationships with management.
However, by employees acting in concert, management is less able to treat
employees as individual, replaceable units of commodity but rather is required
to regard them as one collective and indivisible. This union power is exercised
in three directions – within the labor movements, towards government and
towards employers.
2) Economic regulation – to maximize the wages and employment of their
members within the framework of the wage/work contract of employment.
3) Job regulation – to establish a joint rule making system that protects
members from arbitrary management actions and allows them participate in
decision making.
4) Social change – to express the social cohesion, aspirations or political
ideology of their membership and seek to develop a society which reflects this
view.
5) Member services – to provide a range of benefits or services to the individual
member.
6) Self-fulfillment – to provide a mechanism whereby individuals may develop
outside the immediate confines of their jobs and participate in decision-
making processes.
Employees who are dissatisfied with their wages, job security, benefits, the
treatment they receive from management, and their chances for promotion are
likely to vote for union representation.
Some reasons may be sociological, psychological, or economical. While wages,
benefits, working conditions, and job security are the main issues contributing to
the decision to join the union.
Other factors include employees’ desire for:
i) Better communication with management
ii) Higher quality of management and supervision.
iii) Increased democracy in the workplace.
iv) Opportunity to belong to a group where they can share experiences and
fellowship
v) Respect for others and society.
vi) Independence in, and control over, one’s own affairs.
vii) The degree of comfort and economic security.
i) Occupational Unions
These are trade unions organized by workers who perform a particular craft, trade
or grade of skill, irrespective of industry in which they happen to be engaged.
There is a notion of possession of a skill, by training or experience on the part of
members of such union and this provides the basis for eligibility for membership.
Examples of occupational unions include the following:
a) Craft unions – these are distinguished from other occupational unions on the
basis of a qualitative difference resulting from their exercise of control over
entry into the trade and their concern for the skill basis of that trade.
b) Promotion union – referring to unions in industries such as iron and steel and
cotton spinning which were developing at the same time as craft unions but
covered skilled manual workers who were not apprenticed-served craftsmen.
The skill was acquired not from a formal apprenticeship but from on-the-job
experience and a system of internal promotion.
c) Semiskilled/unskilled union – these came about in the late 19 th Century and
concentrated on organizing semiskilled and unskilled workers.
d) Non-manual (white collar) unions – these are unions whose area of
recruitment is confined to non-manual categories of workers.
The Constitution of Zambia Cap 1 Article 21 (i) states “Except with his own
consent, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of assembly
and association, that is to say, his right to associate with other person and in
particular to form or belong to any political party, trade union or other association
for protection of his interests”.
Further, in accordance with the provisions of the freedom of Association and
Protection of the Right to Organize Convention No. 87 of 1948 which Zambia
ratified on 2nd September, 1966, the ILR Act has laid down the following rights:
i) The right to take part in the formation of a trade union.
ii) The right to be a member of a trade union of one’s choice.
iii) The right to take part at an appropriate time in the activities of a trade union;
Hold office, seek selection or accept appointment and hold office in the union.
iv) The right to seek leave of absence in order to participate in union affairs.
v) The right not to be prevented, dismissed, victimized or discriminated against.
vi) The right not to be a member of a trade union or be required to relinquish
membership of a trade union.
vii) The right not to do work done by an employee who is lawfully on strike or
who is
Locked out, unless such work constitutes essential service. Section 5(2) of the
ILR Act gives the right to any employee to lay a complaint before the IR court
(IRC), if he has reasonable grounds to believe that he has been victimized.
50
Any group of employees not less than 50 or any lesser number as prescribed by
the Minister of Labor, may sign an application to be registered as a trade union.
The application for registration must be accompanied by two duly certified copies
of the constitution of the proposed union and any other documents as may be
required by the Labor Commissioner.
The Constitution must include the following:
i) The name of the union and its registered office address
ii) Its principal objectives and class(es) of employees it shall represent.
iii) The purpose to which its funds may be applied, which must include “the
advancement of workers education and their participation in national
development programmes in Zambia”.
iv) The organization structure, the powers and duties of the office bearers and
how they are appointed and removed.
v) The amount and collection methods for subscriptions, and the grounds for
refusing a member his vote on any matter.
vi) Arrangements for safe custody, banking and investments of funds and
property; and for accounting and regular auditing.
vii) Disqualification or removal from offices involving the funds of the union;
persons that are:
a) Convicted of dishonesty
b) Insolvent or un discharged bankruptcy/of unsound mind
viii) The election of office bearers within 6 months, and then regularly at least
every 4 years.
ix) The appointment of 2,3 or 4 trustees
x) Procedure for amending the constitution.
a) Upon being satisfied with the application, the Commissioner is then
under obligation to register the group as a trade union. The
Commissioner then issues it with a certificate of registration in the
prescribed form upon payment of the fee.
1.9.4 Union Organization Structure
2) The Branch
Every member of a union becomes automatically a member of a branch. He may
be a member of the branch where he lives or where he works.
The main duties of the branch are;
- To collect subscriptions via shop stewards.
- To distribute benefits.
- To appoint delegates to certain local organizations such as trades council and
the local branch of the political party.
- To vote for executive members or national officials.
- To formulate resolutions which are passed up to the national executives
- No direct authority to deal with local labor disputes.
3) The District
This level is sometimes called the divisional area or regional committee or
council. It has a full time paid district secretary who attends district committee
meetings composed of delegates elected by local branches.
1.12 DE-RECOGNITION
This event may occur when either party terminates the agreement when the other
party is deemed not to be following the agreed conduct of IR.
Generally, it is management which revokes the agreement.
1.13 FACTORS INFLUENCING RECOGNITION OR DE-RECOGNITION
The perceived value or lack of value of having a process for regulating collective
bargaining.
If there is an existing union, the extent to which management has freedom to
manage, for example, to change working arrangements and introduce flexible
working or multiple skilling.
The history of its relationship with the union.
The proportion of employees who are union members and the degree to which
they believe that they need protection from their union that it provides.
This situation pertains to the existence and recognition of only one union within
one organization.
A multiplicity of unions within the same organization is often citizen for the
complexity of the bargaining arrangements and the union – demarcation for
disputes.
Take the example of the Ministry of Education. It is easy to see disunity in the
teaching sector arising from the power struggle amongst the various trade unions.
There are more unions in this sector organization on the same shop-floor as
compared to one teacher’s union that existed before the labor market was
liberalized.
The obvious result is the weakened bargaining positions of the trade union(s) vis-
à-vis management. The above scenario shows that the Ministry of Education has
taken advantage of the weakened employee’s bargaining position.
2.1 Definition
- Their origin is a defensive mechanism for the protection of employers from the
pressures of trade unions, with the need for the provision of countervailing
powers.
- Some employers organizations were formed for collective determination of wages
before trade unions came into existence.
- Some employers’ organizations were formed specifically to cooperate with trade
unions in the improvement of industrial relations, e.g. Gas Industry in the UK.
- Some employers organizations were formed purely as defensive measures against
labor, e.g. cotton and shipbuilding in the UK.
- In general employers association were formed to provide machinery for the
collective determination of wages and working conditions and for protection
against strikes. These remain as the main functions of the associations. However,
once established they soon developed arrangements for the exchange of ideas and
information on a wide range of subjects in the industrial relations field and the
promotion of common services for the benefits of their members.
2.2 Functions
3.1 Definition
In the context of IR, management style is defined as the existence of distinct set of
guiding principles, written or otherwise, which set parameters to and signposts for
management action in the way employees are treated and particular events
handled.
Management style in IR can be related to two dimensions – individualism and
collectivism
The Individualism dimension is defined as the extent to which personnel policies
are focused on the rights and capabilities of individual workers, and in particular,
the extent to which the organization gives credence to the feelings and sentiments
of each employee and seeks to develop and encourage each employee’s capacity
and role at work. Individualism is developed along three stages:
i) Commodity status - the employee is regarded as an individual unit of
production to be hired and fired in the light of operational requirements
giving rise to low employee job security and the justification of direct
overt managerial control of the employee in the achievement of profit.
ii) Paternalism – the employee is regarded as a natural subordinate
deferential role whose freedom is limited by well meant regulation –
management accepts a degree of social responsibility to provide
benevolent welfare care for employees.
iii) Resource status – employee is regarded as a potential resource to be
developed and nurtured (career development, strategies); the management
focus is on communication and employee involvement to secure
commitment.
The Collectivism dimension is defined as the extent to which management policy
is directed towards encouraging the development of collective representation by
employees and allowing employees a collective voice in management decision-
making. This dimension, is reflected in two ways:
i) The existence of democratic structures through which employee interests
may be expressed and pursued (this may be based on independent trade
unions or other forms of employee representation such as works councils
and may range from consultation through bargaining to full participation,
including worker-directors.
ii) The degree to which management opposes or accepts, and thereby gives
legitimacy to, the collective processes.
Again the development of collectivism is along three stages:
i) Unitary – management overtly or covertly opposed to collective
relationship;
ii) Adversarial – management focus is on stability, control and
institutionalization of conflict; containment of collective relationships to
limited and clearly identified areas of operational decision making;
reluctance to concede or compromise even within areas of bargaining.
iii) Cooperative – management focus is on ‘constructive’ beyond simple
bargaining of terms and conditions of employment, greater incorporation
of employees and their representatives into organizational structures and
in strategic discussions; openness and preparedness to modify
plans/decisions in light of discussions.
The government is defined as the politically based body which directs and
controls the institutions of regulation within an organized society. Government
determines the direction, policies and actions of the state machinery.
Its importance, as far as IR is concerned, stems from the fact that it is the only
actor in the situation which can change the rules of the system by virtue of its law
making role and the judiciary’s interpretive role.
However, the role of government in IR is unwelcomed by both trade unions and
employers. Both are opposed to government or legal intervention in the regulation
of IR and that the government, irrespective of its political persuasion has
supported this principle of voluntarism in IR.
However, the government has constantly intervened in regulating both individual
and collective employment relationship.
In this respect there are two observations to make:
i) Government’s legislation has represented a series of ad hoc responses
rather than a planned strategy of legal intervention in IR.
ii) Trade unions and employers are not opposed to legislation per se –
certainly not when it is perceived to support their interests.
Government interventions and strategies are based on the ruling party’s ideology
which may include:
a) The corporatist ideology – this supports trade unions and collective
bargaining, promotes the use of conciliation and arbitration process to resolve
disputes, regulate incomes, promote employee participation and enhance
employee protection during and at the end of the contract period.
b) The liberalist/laissez – faire ideology – this redresses the perceived power
imbalance in favor of trade unions and allows management to re-exert its
prerogative, promote ‘responsible’ trade unionism and protect individual
members against union ‘tyranny’ and promote employment opportunities and
labor flexibility through deregulating employment.
Government implements both corporatist and liberalist strategies through methods
of influencing or intervening in IR systems: principally as an employer, law
maker ‘umpire’ and regulator.
Government is the largest public sector employer. Consequently, its policies and
actions have a significant impact on the IR systems as a whole
Privatization, self management boards and setting up of independent agencies
such s ZRA, have contributed to a decrease in government’s ability to control or
influence IR in these sectors.
The government’s concept of a good public employer has changed. Previously, in
the 2nd Republic, government held good IR in the public sector as stability based
on implicit understanding that as long as government discharged its responsibility
of a ‘good’ employer, then employees and their unions would accept a reciprocal
obligation to avoid industrial conflict.
Today the public sector has become as the major source of instability in IR. This
is attributed to:
i) Pay increases within the public sector are perceived to be setting the level
of annual wage agitation and thereby significantly contributing to general
wage inflation.
ii) An increasing need to reduce the growth of public sector expenditure to
redirect resources to the private sector as a necessary precursor of
economic growth.
iii) A tighter application of incomes policy within the public sector and a
consequent increase in industrial conflict.
iv) Disputes generated within the public sector seriously affect the public.
The principal purpose of labor law is to regulate, to support, and to restrain the
power of management and the power of organized labor. Government’s activities
is in three areas:
Government is always concerned about the level of incomes as part of its role in
managing the economy. Regulation is not only indirectly through fiscal and
monetary policies (incomes management) but also directly through regulating the
results of collective bargaining (incomes policy).
Incomes policy is defined as a package of measures, which seek to intervene
directly in the process of income determination and the working of labor markets
for the purpose of moderating the rate of price inflation, and which also seeks to
contribute to greater equality in the distribution of pay and improvements in labor
market efficiency.
Acceptability of incomes policies depends on key issues such as:
i) Criteria to be used as the norm for pay increases – these must: make some
sort of economic sense; they must be simple enough to be easily
understood and; they must also be flexible enough to encompass accepted
notions of fairness.
ii) Exceptions to the norm – the range of exceptions must be broad enough to
allow flexibility and the correction of anomalies, but not so broad as to
undermine the goal of restraining income growth.
iii) Control and enforcement – must be a voluntary one based on the support
of those affected and must be largely administered by the concerned
parties themselves.
iv) Cooperation – the effectiveness of an income policy depends on the
cooperation of both employers and trade unions. Management is in the
forefront of policing the income policies. Unions are wary of being seen or
perceived as party to policing as this may erode their credibility with their
members.
These have power to enter any workplace at anytime to inspect, carry out any
examination, test or enquiry which they may consider necessary regarding that
workplace.
END