Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
India ranks sixth in the world in the term of energy demand accounting for 3.5 % of world
commercial energy demand .It is expected to grow at 4.8%. The growth in energy demand in all
forms is expected to continue unabated owing to increasing urbanization ,standard of living and
expanding population with stabilization not before mid of the current century .The demand of
diesel (HSD) is projected to grow from 52.33 millions of tons in 2006-07 to 61.55 millions of
tons in 2009-10. Our crude oil production as per the tenth plan working group is estimated
around 33-34 million metric tons per annum .The increasing gap between demand and
oil will increase in the foreseeable future .The import bills are rising to $ 15.7 billion or so which
is a huge amount for a country like ours. Consumption of diesel can be minimized by
implementing biodiesel program expeditiously. More research work in this field will help the
country in saving precious foreign currency, which otherwise is wasted in purchasing petroleum
products instead of helping poor for their pure drinking water and meals.
1.1 Energy Crisis and Need for Alternate Fuel for IC Engines
Fossil fuels are one time energy gift to the human race; once they are gone they are gone
forever, alternate non-petroleum fuels yield energy security and environment benefits. They have
been with us in one form or another for more than one hundred years. Before the introduction of
gasoline as a motor fuel in late 1800s, vehicles were often powered by what are now considered
alternate fuels [a]. The first Internal Combustion Engine designed, built and demonstrated by
1
Rudolf Diesel at the 1900 Paris World fair ran on peanut oil. This was his dream to power an
efficient Internal Combustion Engine with crude oil or vegetable oil .The early 1900s witnessed
another similar event when Henry Ford built one of his first automobile fuelled by ethanol,
which was often called “Farm alcohol” because it was made from corn.
India is a net importer of crude oil; self-reliance on crude oil has dropped dramatically over
the last couple of years (Table 1.1) known crude oil reserves are expected to last only for the
30
2001-02 32.03 107.27
2
1.2 Alternate Fuels
feasibility of using a variety of alternate fuels such as hydrogen, CNG, alcohol; biogas producer
gas and various types of edible and non- edible oils. However in Indian context, the biomass-
based fuels like alcohol, vegetable oils and biogas can contribute significantly towards the
Biofuel offer several distinct advantages over petroleum diesel. Since plants, capture Carbon
dioxide when they are growing and release when the oil is burnt. Vegetable oil fuels are nearly
CO neutral, an important characteristic in the effort to combat green house gas emissions.
Biofuels are virtually free of sulfur and will not run out ever while other sources of energy are
finite and will be depleted Bio-diesel is an eco-friendly, alternative diesel fuel prepared from
domestic renewable resources i.e. vegetable oils (edible or non- edible oil) and animal fats.
These natural oils and fats are made up mainly of triglycerides. These triglycerides when react
with striking similarity to petroleum derived diesel and are called "Bio-diesel". As India is
deficient in edible oils, non-edible oil may be material of choice for producing bio diesel. For
this purpose Jatropha curcas considered as most potential source for it. Bio diesel is produced by
3
1.3 Bio-diesel
Biodiesel consists of mono alkyl esters produced from vegetable oils, animal or old
cooking fats. Coconut biodiesel is fuel alternative produced from soybean oil. Biodiesel
Biodiesel is a clean burning, Eco-Friendly natural fuel obtained from tree born oils by a
Plant. Transesterfication is an age old chemical process and is a time tested method of
Transforming Vegetable oils or fats into Biodiesel (Alkyl Esters of Fatty Acids) and Glycerin
The chemistry lies in transforming the fatty acid chains into Alkyl Esters of respective fatty
acids present in different feed oils used and isolation of glycerol present in the Triglyceride
molecule in the oils and fats. Industrial production of Biodiesel consists of the following three
Biodiesel fuel burns up to 75% cleaner than diesel fuel made from fossil fuels. Bio diesel
exhaust fumes. Sulphur dioxide emissions are 100% eliminated (bio diesel contains no
sulphur). This alternative fuel is plant-based and adds absolutely no CO2 to the atmosphere.
Biofuel exhaust is not offensive and doesn't cause eye irritation. Vehicles do not spew out vile
black fumes/particulates. In fact if you make your fuel from used cooking oil it may even smell
4
of chips. Biodiesel is environmentally friendly: it is renewable, "more biodegradable than sugar
and less toxic than table salt" (US National Biodiesel Board).
Biodiesel is the first renewable fuel to successfully complete the EPA-required Health Effects
testing under the Clean Air Act. Mutagen city studies show that biofuel dramatically reduces
Biodiesel helps preserve natural resources. For every unit of energy needed to produce biodiesel,
3.24 units of energy are gained - nearly four times more than diesel.
Biodiesel does not have any toxic emissions like mineral diesel
Biodiesel is made from any vegetable oil such as Soya, Rice bran, Canola, Palm, Coconut,
Biodiesel is made through a chemical process which converts oils and fats of natural origin
Biodiesel is intended to be used as a replacement for petroleum diesel fuel, or can be blended
5
1.6 Organic Chemistry
The major components of vegetable oils are triglycerides. Triglycerides are esters of
glycerol with long-chain acids (fatty acids). The composition of vegetable oils varies with the
plant source. The fatty acid profile describes the specific nature of fatty acids occurring in fats
and oils. The chemical and physical properties of fats and oils and the esters derived from them
vary with the fatty acid profile.Transesterification is the process where an alcohol and an ester
react to form a different alcohol and a different ester. For biodiesel, an ethyl ester reacts with
methanol to form a methyl ester and ethanol. These ethyl esters react with methanol to form
biodiesel and glycerol. As mentioned above, the purpose of transesterification is to reduce the
viscosity of the oil so that it has properties closer to that of regular diesel used in CI engines.
Methanol is the preferred alcohol for obtaining biodiesel because it has the 14 lowest cost and it
is readily available. However, for the reaction to occur in a reasonable time, a catalyst must be
added to the mixture of the vegetable oil and methanol to accelerate the speed of a reaction.
Below is a figure showing the endothermic (requiring heat) chemical reaction behind the
transesterification process.
Transesterification Reaction
R represents a mixture of various fatty acid chains and therefore must be defined based on
the oils in use. The subscript 3 indicates the number of moles needed to satisfy the formation of
the methyl esters. This model only states the molar ratios of starting materials and products
however; the molar ratios may need to be varied to obtain a more complete reaction. Typically,
6
6 moles of alcohol are used for every mole of triglyceride so that the reaction proceeds in the
„forward‟ direction. Not all reactions complete quickly and for some it takes considerable time
before the starting materials and reaction products are present in constant amounts, indicating
equilibrium has been reached. A reaction can also occur in the reverse direction (from right to
left), so to force the equilibrium in the direction of the desired products, one or more
parameters of the 15 reaction may need to be changed. These include the molar ratio,
1.6.1 Feedstock
Feedstocks for production of biodiesels are vegetable oils (soybean, canola, palm, and
rapeseed), animal fats (beef, tallow, lard, poultry fat, fish oils) or recycled grease (mix of the
above two). All of the above feedstocks contain triglycerides, free fatty acids (FFAs) and other
contaminants. The proportions vary in level depending on the feedstock and these variables
affect the chemical reactions needed to transform the primary raw materials (feedstock and
alcohol) to create the biodiesels. Commercially available vegetable oils are made up of a small
percentage of FFAs, but crude vegetable oil may contain more FFAs and phospholipids, which
are removed in two processes: refining and degumming, respectively. The technology required
depends on whether the vegetable oils are refined, degummed, or crude. Animal fats and
recycled grease have high levels (up to 15% concentration) of FFAs. The FFA content affects
the process and yield associated with the final product, and thus these feedstock’s (greater that
1% concentration) must be pretreated before the reaction can begin. Other contaminants also
affect the feedstock preparation necessary before it can be used in the reaction.
1.6.2 Alcohol
7
In order to form the biodiesel, a primary alcohol is coupled with the feedstock to form the
esters. The most common alcohol is methanol but ethanol, isopropanol and butyl (derived from
butane) can also be used. The key quality parameter associated with the 16 process of
transesterification is the water content. If the water content is high, it results in low yields, high
alcohols, since the weaker ones are hygroscopic (absorb water from the air). Some alcohols
also require higher operating temperatures, longer mixing times, and lower mixing speeds
which result in higher operation costs and lower throughput. The decision of which alcohol to
use with each process is determined by cost; amount needed, and ease of recycling. Quality
requirements on fuel and water content in ethanol make methanol the most popular choice
among alcohols. Conventionally, methanol is not renewable since it is normally generated from
either natural gas or coal gas and steam however methanol can now be produced from
renewable biomass materials (like wood, and black liquor from pulp and paper mills).
1.6.3 Catalyst
Catalysts are required to promote an increase in solubility which allows the reaction to
occur at a faster rate. These include base, acid or enzyme catalysts. The most common catalysts
are sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and potassium hydroxide (KOH). Most base catalyst systems
use vegetable oil as the feedstock, but base catalysts are highly hygroscopic, so absorption of
8
chemical water occurs when the catalyst is dissolved in the alcohol. This leads to poor quality
biodiesel that may not meet the ASTM standard. Typically, base catalysts are used for
vegetable oil processing plants because FFA and water content is low and the reaction is fast.
1.6.4 Neutralizer
A neutralizer is used to remove the base or acid catalyst from the biodiesel/glycerol
products. If using a base catalyst, the neutralizer must be acidic, and if using an acid catalyst,
the neutralizer must be a base. Neutralization may occur when the base catalyst is added to
convert the remaining triglycerides, or if the biodiesel is being washed, the base catalyst may
be added to the wash water. Hydrochloric acid is typically used as the acid neutralizer because
it is cheap, but one advantage of using phosphoric acid is that the resulting salt may be sold as a
chemical fertilizer.
1.6.5 Glycerol
Glycerol is not a component in making biodiesel but it is the primary byproduct of the
Glycerol in its pure form is a sweet-tasting, clear, colorless, odorless, viscous liquid. It is
completely soluble in water and alcohol. Potential customers include pharmaceutical and
cosmetic manufacturers, and many others. It can be used as a solvent, sweetener or in the
manufacturing of dynamite, cosmetics, liquid soaps, candy, liquors, inks, and lubricants.
Usually about 10% of the resulting mixture from the reaction can be recovered as glycerol.
9
All Tree Bearing Oil (TBO) seeds - edible and non edible
Edible seeds can't be used for bio-diesel production in our country, as its indigenous
Biodiesel is better for the environment - Coconut biodiesel is better for the environment
because it is made from renewable resources and has lower emissions compared to petroleum
10
diesel. The use of biodiesel in a conventional diesel engine results in substantial reduction of
unburned hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and soot. The use of biodiesel does not increase the
Consumes also CO2. Biodiesel is also more biodegradable than conventional diesel. Studies
at the University of Idaho have illustrated biodiesel degraded for 95 percent after 28 days
biodiesel.The properties of coconut oil are also very close to diesel. Its density is 0.884 kg/l at
21 1C. The cetane number of coconut oil is 70, and calorific value is 42.5 MJ/kg and the cetane
no. of methyl ester is 46–67 and calorific value is 42MJ/kg, while the cetane number of diesel
is 48–50 and calorific value is 42-45MJ/kg. The flash point of the ester is higher than that of
diesel, which requires higher compression ratio and modifications in fuel injector to ignite the
Engelmann et al. [18] used a mixture of coconut oil and diesel fuel blends in diesel engines
with a ratio of 10–50%. They tested the engine for 50 h and reported that carbon build-up in the
combustion chamber was very small. For the fuel blends studied, it was reported that vegetable
oils could be used as a fuel source in low concentrations. The BSFC and power measurements
11
for the fuel blends only differed slightly from pure diesel fuel. Fuel blends containing 60% or
higher concentrations of vegetable oil caused the engine to sputter. Engine sputtering was
They concluded that waste coconut oil could be used as a diesel fuel extender with no
performance of direct injection and indirect injection engines when fueled with 30% coconut
oil, 70% diesel fuel. The results showed that the engines having indirect injection, using
blended fuel could be operated satisfactorily. The problems were observed in the engines
working on the direct injection system; which were engine choking and sticking of piston rings.
Barsic and Humke [19] used crude soybean oil, a 50:50 mixture of crude coconut oil and
diesel, and degummed soybean oil in a direct injection engine for a short term of 25 h. They
published their results which indicated engine’s performance and emissions for diesel and
vegetable oils resulted in lower thermal efficiency, lower NOx, more carbon monoxide, more
hydrocarbons and more particulates for the vegetable oil. The crude and degummed coconut oil
resulted 6% and 1% lower thermal efficiency as compared to diesel. The choking of nozzles in
both cases increased the emissions, with the crude soybean giving a greater increase in total
emissions than the degummed oil. Braun and Stephenson [20], in the Pennsylvania State
University carried out short term tests on blends of degummed soybean oil, ethanol and diesel
with the ratios of: 40:20:40, and 40:30:30. They tested the engine for 25 h on each blend. No
given here. There are many methods that can be used to make biodiesels with multiple
combinations of catalysts, neutralizers, and feedstock. After reviewing the general and most
popular methods, the ones used to create our test samples will be explained in greater detail.
100 ml 15 ml 3 gm 11 ml 95 ml
13
Figure1. b. Diagram for Making Biodiesel
hydrolysis.
II. Vegetable Oil i.e. the triglyceride can be easily trans-esterifies in the presence of alkaline
excess of methanol.
III. If 100 gm of vegetable oil is taken, 1 gm of the alkaline catalyst (Potassium Hydroxide), and
14
IV. As a first step, the alkaline catalyst is mixed with methanol and the mixture is stirred for half
V. This mixture is mixed with vegetable oil and the resultant mixture is made to pass through
VIII. The upper layer of bio-diesel (a methyl ester) is washed to remove entrained glycerin.
X. This reaction works well with high quality oil. If the oil contains 1% Free Fatty Acid (FFA),
then difficulty arises because of soap formation. If FFA content is more than 2% the
XI. Methanol is inflammable and Potassium Hydroxide is caustic, hence proper and safe
15
PROPERTIES Coconut bio-diesel Diesel
Density at 15ºC (kg/L) Table 1.3. Properties
0.910 of coconut biodiesel 0.8450
Viscosity
Manyat 40C (mm2/s)
other edible and non edible 2.656 3.0
oils available in the Indian subcontinent and across the
globeIndex
Cetane are also used as feed stock for Biodiesel.
60 54.2
Flash Pointoilseeds
Edible (°C) 107 and were cultivated for global
ruled the roost for centuries 85 consumption and
trade.
Pour PointNon
(°C)edible oils were mostly wildly
-11 grown or cultivated in very -10
nominal quantities for
other purposes. With the beginning of the Biodiesel era, there is a tremendous thrust all over
Conradson Carbon Residue 0.18 0.17
the(wt %) in cultivating Non edible oil seeds particularly JATROPHA CURCAS which has
globe
been identified as the most commercially viable oil seed for Biodiesel Industry. Jatropha is a
plant of TROPICS and hence tropical countries like India and Africa with huge land mass
emerged as the green field for Jatropha, Karanj, Madhucha, Sal, Neem and some other Non
CHAPTER 2
Literature Review
This chapter expresses a through literature survey connected to biodiesel, SVOs and
performance of various CI engines with these biofuels .Performance with prolonged service are
2.1 Biodiesel
16
Biodiesel, which is defined as the monoalkyl esters, mainly methyl esters (FAME), of long-
chain fatty acids derived from renewable biological sources, such as vegetable oils or animal
used to run the CI (Compression Ignition) engines. Because of its good lubrication properties,
Biodiesel is simple to use, biodegradable, nontoxic, and essentially free of sulfur and aromatics,
biodegradable replacement of the petroleum diesel. Biodiesel is a clean burning alternative fuel,
produced from domestic, renewable resources. Biodiesel contains no petroleum, but it can be
blended at any level with petroleum diesel to create a Biodiesel blend. It can be used in
vary somewhat depending on the oil feedstock and alcohol used but it can always be used as a
direct substitute for diesel fuel. Biodiesel has a higher cetane number than diesel fuel, no
biodiesel reduce the emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon (HC), and particulate
matter (PM) in the exhaust gas compared to petroleum based diesel fuel.
17
Figure 2.a. Coconut and Coconut Biodiesel
Cetane index which is very close to cetane number is calculated based on 10, 50, 90%
Fuels with high auto ignition temperatures are more likely to cause Diesel knock.
Distillation Range
deposits.
Specific gravity
Required for the conversion of measured volumes to volumes at Standard temperature of 158
degree Centigrade.
Heat of combustion
Flash point
19
Measures the tendency of oil to form a flammable mixture with air.
Viscosity
Contamination (water/sediment).
Petroleum
Diesel 45.3 Gross 45 - 55 4 @ 40 C -9 - -
Coconut
Oil 42.0 Gross 60 20 @ 40 C 24 10 268
Rapeseed
Oil 39.7 Gross 38 37 @ 40 C -10 125 175
Soybean
Oil 39.6 37.9 33 @ 40 C -16 130 191
Linseed
Oil 39.7 - 29 @ 40 C -24 179 190
20
2.2 Application of Biodiesel
On-Road Vehicles
All Vehicles having Diesel Engine can be powered by Biodiesel without any hassle.
Off-Road Vehicles
Natural Biodiesel fuel can be used for construction, mining, and farm machinery.
Marine Vessels
Natural Biodiesel can be used in marine engines safely. Marine use is especially attractive due
With new power generation capacity coming online, natural biodiesel makes an attractive choice
to meet the regulations. Many stationary applications are permitted sources requiring exhaust
emission control system, which will work well with biodiesel but will not work with diesel fuel.
Boiler Fuel
With natural gas prices rising high, biodiesel can be substituted easily for natural gas with minor
changes necessary to the burner train.
Hybrid Vehicles
21
Hybrid With many states now mandating electric vehicles (including the fuel cell hybrid),
biodiesel will make excellent reforming fuel.
Lubricity Agent/Additive
especially useful in marine applications where water contamination with petroleum lubricity
agents can create problems. With the low-sulfur fuel regulation of future, biodiesel can be used
as a lubricity additive. A 1-2% biodiesel added to diesel fuel can increase diesel lubricity by
65%.
Fuel Additive
Biodiesel can also be used as a diesel fuel additive for the purpose of keeping the injectors,
pumps and their combustion components clean. A 1-2% blend should be sufficient for this
purpose.
22
Water, ppm by wt 0.05 % max.
Carbon, wt % 77
Hydrogen, wt % 12
Oxygen by difference wt % 11
Sulphur wt % 0
Cloud Point, °C -3 to 12
1. Easy to use
Biodiesel can be used in existing engines, vehicles and infrastructure with practically no
changes. Biodiesel can be pumped, stored and burned just like petroleum diesel fuel, and can be
used pure, or in blends with petroleum diesel fuel in any proportion. Power and fuel economy
using biodiesel is practically identical to petroleum diesel fuel, and year round operation can be
The degree to which fuel provides proper lubrication is its lubricity. Low lubricity
petroleum diesel fuel can cause premature failure of injection system components and decreased
23
performance. Biodiesel provides excellent lubricity to the fuel injection system.
2. Emissions & Greenhouse Gas Reduction
compared with petro diesel. When blended with petroleum diesel fuel, these emissions
reductions are generally directly proportional to the amount of biodiesel in the blend.
3. Blends up to 20% biodiesel with petroleum diesel can be used in unmodified diesel engines.
Biodiesel can be used in its pure form but many require certain engine modifications to
5. It was stated that about half of the biodiesel industry can use recycled oil or fat, the other
half being coconut oil, or rapeseed oil according to the origin of these feed stocks.
6. The higher cetane number of biodiesel compared to petro-diesel indicates potential for
higher engine performance. Tests have shown that biodiesel has similar or better fuel
consumption, horsepower, and torque and haulage rates as conventional diesel the high
cetane numbers of biodiesel contribute to easy cold starting and low idle noise.
7. The use of biodiesel can extend the life of diesel engines because of its superior lubricating
properties and, furthermore, power output are relatively unaffected by biodiesel. Biodiesel
1. Biodiesel has a lower energy density than petro diesel and because it is denser fuel.
Roughly speaking the reductions are in the vicinity of 10%. Viscosity at low temperatures is
24
2. Sometimes making cold-weather starting difficult; biodiesel can be at a disadvantage in
this respect. We have read of occasional use of dual tank vehicles where petro diesel is used
to start and shut down but switched to biodiesel for main running. This is a technique for the
over zealous, not for the typical motorist. A more practical solution is to introduce some
3. High cost of production: will eventually solve itself when large-scale production and use
starts. Also the price of petro-diesel does not take into account its actual cost (when
4. Modifications are required to the automobiles for use of biofuel: many automobile brands
5. High CFPP (cold filter plugging point) values and hence solidification and clogging of
the system at low temperatures: this problem occurs only in places where the temperature
goes down to around 0°C, even here the problem is currently solved by adding additives.
7. Biodiesel has excellent solvent properties. Any deposits in the filters and in the delivery
systems may be dissolved by biodiesel and result in need for replacement of the filters.
8. There may be problems of winter operatibility. Spills of biodiesel can decolorize any
25
Mahua Madhuca indica
Undi C. inophyllum
Jojoba S.chinensis
Nahor Mesuaferrea
Thumba C. coloiynthis
indication of the degree of success with which it is doing its assigned job i.e. the conversion of
the chemical energy contained in the fuel into the useful mechanical work) of an engine with
alternate fuels. Blended fuels and compare this performance with performance of engine
working with neat fuel. Study of performance is done on the basis of some basic performance
parameters they are following [16, 2]. Power and Mechanical Efficiency. Mean Effective
pressure and Torque Specific Output, Volumetric Efficiency Fuel- Air ratio Specific fuel
consumption Thermal Efficiency and Heat Balance Exhaust Smoke and other emission Specific
Weight. It is already illustrated that the alternate fuels are being used in day to day use of a
common man so it is desperately needed to analyze the effect of a competent alternate fuel like
service.
26
2. Mean Effective pressure and Torque
3. Specific Output
4. Volumetric Efficiency
5. Fuel- Air ratio
6. Specific fuel consumption
7. Thermal Efficiency and Heat Balance
8. Exhaust Smoke and other emission
9. Specific Weight
prolonged service will reveal that how the engine made for working with neat diesel, will
perform say after a decade of running with biodiesel, at the same time the maintenance
problems arising because of alternate fuelling during this time will also be studied and
Studies connecting performance with years of service i.e. evaluation of performance with
prolonged use are not popular, the reason is simple recently with very fast speed these fuels are
gaining ground and more futuristic studies are needed Though some literature connected to long
term tests is available and being presented here. Long tern, tests were carried out with 3
different modern injection systems on the test bench. 3 fuel qualities, rape seed oil methyl ester
with a low, a standard and a high stability were used. Furthermore, two long-term bench tests
were carried out with modern passenger car engines equipped with a common rail injection
system. Biodiesel with a low and a high stability was used in the tests. Four cars were operated in
27
Though many workers have conducted performance tests with different biodiesel fuels like
Coconut oil , Peanut oil , Palm oil Rapeseed oil ,Sunflower oil ,Soya bean oil ,Cotton seed oil,
Linseed oil, Caster oil etc .A brief literature survey will be presented .
A study revealed [17] that Methyl ester of coconut oil can substitute diesel fuel partially for
existing conventional diesel engine without any major modifications in engine components.
Engine performance with blended fuel up to 40% methyl ester of coconut oil don’t differ to great
extent from that of diesel fuelled engine performance. Fuel consumption rate, break specific fuel
consumption and break specific energy consumption are low in case of methyl ester of coconut
oil blending compare to neat diesel. Long term performance and endurance test to evaluate the
durability of the engine with prolonged operation with this blending was not done .It is difficult
to make assumptions about the effects of long-term use of biodiesel, as there is only limited
experience of its use. Beer etal. And Hitchcock et al. both reported problems of the softening or
failure of rubber engine components but this trouble can be avoided by the replacing of selective
Studies conducted in the U.S. and Europe generally indicate that blends of Biodiesel and
petrodiesel result in small decreases in overall power output of engines. Only two studies have
been conducted with marine engines, one by a German scientist (Dr. Claus Breuer) at the
Technical University in Hannover (Ph.D. thesis in 2001) and the other by Alvin Womac’s
The German study involved a Deutz 4 cylinder marine diesel engine (direct injection) found
on fishing boats in Europe and the Tennessee study evaluated a 110 HP Volvo marine diesel
engine, also used in work boats and fishing boats. Volvo also makes smaller single and double
28
The German study confirmed similar results obtained by Mercedes Benz showing that the
maximal torque curve for an engine under load remains essentially unchanged for rapeseed
methyl esters relative to pure petro diesel. Despite the lower volumetric heating value and the
consequent lower maximum power output of Biodiesel, the practical results are roughly the
same. At a 20% blend, there would probably be no noticeable difference in power output. Good
performance in fuel combustion with Biodiesel and its blends resulted in a smooth running
engine. In the Volvo marine diesel engine study in Tennessee (110-HP, 2.39 L, 4-cylinder, direct
injection engine), a tractor dynamometer was used to measure power outputs under selected
loads through an engine-mounted reverse drive gear. Exhaust emissions were also tested along
with fuel consumption tests under various loads. The conclusions of these tests were that power
produced from 100% soy methyl ester Biodiesel was from 2 to 7 percent less than produced from
petro diesel, depending on the load-speed point. However, at or near maximum throttle (3,800
rpm), the two fuels performed the same. Interestingly, at the lowest engine speed (1855 rpm) at
full throttle under heavier load, there was a 13% increase in power with Biodiesel as compared to
petro diesel. The Tennessee study indicated that using 100% Biodiesel in marine direct-injection
diesel engines, with design and construction similar to the Volvo test engine, could be
Study at the Southwest Research Institute in 2003, on Biodiesel effects on diesel engine
performance, engine power in the 2001 Cummings truck engine operating on the B-20 blend was
at 98.5% of the power attained with low sulfur No. 2 diesel. At 100% Biodiesel, the engine
generated 92% of the power. For a Detroit Diesel truck engine (2001), the power was 98% with
29
Biodiesels are mono-alkyl esters containing approximately 10% oxygen by weight. The oxygen
improves the efficiency of combustion, but it takes up space in the blend and therefore slightly
increases the apparent fuel consumption rate observed while operating an engine with Biodiesel.
In the Southwest Research Institute study (2003), the fuel consumption was found to increase by
only 2% for a B-20 blend with methyl esters, and by 14% when methyl ester Biodiesel was used
at 100% in the Cummins test engine operated under transient heavy loads. The brake-specific
fuel consumption was 0.43 lb./HP-Hr for regular petro diesel no. 2, 0.44 lb./HP-Hr for the B-20
blend, and was 0.50 lb./HP-Hr for the neat RME Biodiesel
In testing Biodiesel in the CytoCulture Mercedes Benz diesel station wagon over the past 4
years, there was about a 15% net decline in the mileage obtained using neat Biodiesel vs. petro
diesel. No change in power, acceleration or engine temperature was observed, but the engine was
quieter and smoother at idle when fueled with Biodiesel. At a 20% blend with petroleum diesel,
These local observations were confirmed by the 2004 engine performance studies at the
Southwest Research Institute. Fuel consumption in a1995 Cummings B-5.9 truck engine
increased by 9% with the B-20 blend, and by 18% with the neat Biodiesel. Better fuel economy
was noted for a 1997 Cummings N-14 truck engine with a 3% drop in fuel consumption using B-
The oxygenated methyl esters of vegetable oil cause Biodiesel to have surprisingly strong
solvent properties with respect to natural rubber and several soft plastics. As a result, old rubber
fuel lines and some seals or gaskets on fuel tanks may slowly deteriorate in the presence of
higher concentrations of Biodiesel. Fortunately, few of these solvent effects are noticed at a B-20
blend, and most of the problems associated with the solvent effects occurred with boats using
30
100% neat Biodiesel. When fuel lines or gaskets are affected, they usually get sticky over time
and soften or swell, causing fuel to drip from connections. In one case, the rubber fuel line
between the primary filter and the fuel pump on a Yanmar sailboat engine became tacky, but did
not leak, after 4 years of operating on 100% Biodiesel. The best solution is to replace affected
lines and gaskets with modern synthetic hoses and seals. Conventional US Coast Guard approved
fuel lines are resistant to Biodiesel (neat) and proven in sailboat testing over the past 3 years. In
California, an approved fuel hose readily available in marine stores is:"Trident Barrier Fuel
In bench top studies conducted at Cyto Culture, the Trident hose proved to be resistant to neat
Biodiesel over a period of months, although the hose did absorb Biodiesel and swell slightly
(tightens under hose clamps). With 20% blends, there have been no reports of any problems with
these new fuel hoses. Even at 100% Biodiesel, we have observed only minor swelling on the
Trident Barrier fuel hoses used on test engines operating on neat Biodiesel for several years.
Studies conducted for the National Biodiesel Board on the materials compatibility of Biodiesel
concluded that the only hose and gasket material that was truly resistant to the solvent effects of
methyl esters was Viton. Viton fuel hoses (Goodyear) can be special ordered for boats (usually
expensive at over $5.00/ft for 5/16" line), but we know of only one boat in the San Francisco
area that converted to Viton fuel lines as a precaution. In CytoCulture’s 1997 survey of 100
boaters using Biodiesel in the San Francisco Bay area, 2% of the respondents had trouble with
drips caused by swelling gaskets and seals, usually at the fuel filter. Again, replacing these
gaskets with modern synthetic materials appeared to solve the problem. Raycor filters, for
example, have functioned normally with 100% Biodiesel and have had no gasket problems in
engines operated with neat Biodiesel over the past 4 years. (The 1997 boater survey is on the
31
CytoCulture web site). In the survey, 5% of the boaters reported minor problems with the
Biodiesel if they spilled it on decks, on their engine or into their bilges. The solvent properties of
the esters in Biodiesel can loosen old paint on engines or on painted surfaces in the bilge.
Besides staining raw wood surfaces, the Biodiesel is particularly harmful to teak decks with
polysulfide seams (use extra caution when filling tanks via deck ports). The Biodiesel could also
harm rubber engine mounts if it were spilled and not cleaned up immediately. Use paper towels
or absorbent pads to remove spilled Biodiesel and then clean the surfaces thoroughly with warm
February 2006, R.J. Crookes reported his work on Comparative bio-fuel performance in internal
combustion engines in Elsevier International Biomass and Bioenergy journal. Engines used for
study were single-cylinder laboratory-type engines having variable speed and load capability Fo.
Brake power and specific fuel consumption changed little and carbon monoxide was
predominantly affected by air: fuel ratio. Equivalent effects were demonstrated with nitrogen
replacing carbon dioxide in the simulated bio-gas and similar trends were evident as compression
ratio was increased. Seed-oil bio-fuel gave similar performance to diesel fuel without major
disadvantages, other than increased specific fuel consumption. Tests with cetane and rape-seed
methyl ester bio-diesel are also presented for comparison. Specific fuel consumption was about
the same and specific NOx emissions were lower with bio-fuel than results from the spark-
32
CHAPTER 3
3. Experimental Setup
A hundred Liters Per Day capacity Bio-Diesel generating setup was installed in RGPV
A single cylinder 4-stroke diesel Engine was purchased & Installed in Thermal Engg. Lab of
In this chapter a detail description of procedure of making biodiesel in energy park of RGPV is
mentioned, along with the complete technical specifications and of CI engine test kit used for
performance testing is also written here. Procedure followed for conducting experimentations is
Making of Biodiesel
33
The production of biodiesel, or alkyl esters, is well known. There are three basic routes to ester
Conversion of the oil to fatty acids, and then to alkyl esters with acid Catalysis.
Making biodiesel from the waste cooking oil & grease which contain higher value of
FFA.
3.2 Transesterification
another alcohol in a process similar to hydrolysis. This process has been widely used to reduce
If methanol is used in the above reaction, it is termed methanolysis. The reaction of triglyceride
another alcohol in a process similar to hydrolysis except that an alcohol is used instead of water
34
(Murugesan et al., 2009). This has been widely used to reduce the viscosity of the triglycerides.
Triglycerides are readily trans-esterified in the presence of alkaline catalyst (Lye) at atmospheric
pressure and temperature of approximately 60-70 0C with an excess of methanol. The mixture at
the end of reaction is allowed to settle. The excess methanol is recovered by distillation and sent
to a rectifying column for purification and recycled. The lower glycerol layer is drawn off while
the upper methyl ester layer is washed with water to remove entrained glycerol. Methyl esters of
The filtered oil was heated up to a temperature of 50°C in water bath to melt coagulated oil. It
is important not to overheat the oil above 65°C, because at that temperature alcohol would boil
away easily. The heated oil of 100 ml was measured and transfered into a conical flask
35
containing catalyst-alcohol solution. The reaction was considered to start at this moment, since
heated oil assisted the reaction to occur. The reaction mixture was then shaken by using shaker at
The product of the reaction was exposed to open air to evaporate excess methanol for 30 min.
The product was then allowed to settledown overnight. Two distinct liquid phases: crude ester
phase at the top and glycerol phase at the bottom were produced in a successful
transesterification reaction.
The top ester phase (biodiesel) was separated from the bottom glycerol phase by transferring
to a clean 250 ml conical flask. The biodiesel was then purified by washing with distilled water
to remove all the residual by-products like excess alcohol, excess catalysts, soap and glycerine.
The volume of distilled water added was approximately 30% of the biodiesel volume. The flask
was shaken gently for 1 min and placed on the table to allow separation of biodiesel and water
layers. After separation, the biodiesel was transferred to a clean conical flask. The washing
process was repeated for several times until the washed water became clear. The clean biodiesel
was dried in an incubator for 48 h, followed by using sodium sulphate. The final product was
36
analyzed to determine its ester content (that is purity of product) and also other equipments were
Single Cylinder 4 stroke (CI) Engine test kit was purchased and installed in the thermal
Engineering Lab of University Institute of Technology, RGPV Bhopal. Details along with
37
Figure 3.a Experimental Setup
a) All nut bolts are tight. The universal joint is safely connected.
38
g) All electrical connections and sensors are tight and protected and not in Contact with
water any rotating part; otherwise it will damage costly Electronic equipments.
A) DIESEL ENGINE
MODEL: - SV1
TYPE: - Vertical, Totally Enclosed, Compression Ignition Four Stroke Cycle, Water cooled
engine.
BORE: - 87.5 mm
STROKE: - 110 mm
RPM: - 1800
RATE OF OUTPUT: - 8 HP
3.6.3 Instrumentation
1. Temperature Sensors: Cr-Al Sensors are used to sense the temperature at various points.
2. Speed Sensor: Speed sensors used for the measure rpm of the engine along with external
tachometer.
3. Calorimeter
39
4. Orificemeter
1) Displacement Air Fuel Ratio: - It is the ratio of mass of delivered air to the mass of
delivered fuel.
2) Brake Horse Power: - Brake Horsepower is the power available at the output member or
3) Net Horse Power: - Net Horse Power is the power output of Fully Equipped engine.
3.8 Procedure
1) First start all the water pumps and check supply to the engine.
5) Start the engine at no load condition then taking readings in different load condition.
7) These processes continue done for different fuel like-diesel/biodiesel at different ratio.
Brake Power
3) Brake mean effective pressure: Pm= L×A×N
fuel consumption
4) Brake Specific Fuel Consumption: BSFC= Brake power
Va
η vol =
6) Volumetric Efficiency:
Vs
Va=volume of air
Vs=swept volume
Brake power
ηmech = ×100
7) Mechanical Efficiency : Indicated power
41
These are to be entered every time engine testing has to be done. First load is selected and set
then its results like temperature, fuel consumption ration, RPM etc for corresponding load to be
entered Manually/Automatically.
Parameter Description
Load
Actual Speed
3- Specific Output
4- Volumetric Efficiency
42
7- Thermal Efficiency and Heat Balance
9- Specific Weight
CHAPTER 4
Repeated experimental work was done by using this single cylinder 4-stroke diesel engine
and data were recorded at different loads for neat diesel, and by mixing different ratio of diesel
and biodiesel, using lean blends all data was collected and represent in the graphs which are
shown below.
43
4.1 Graphs:
LOAD Vs SPEED
790
780
770
pure diesel
760 5%bio-diesel
10%bio-
SPEED(RPM)
750
diesel
740
15%bio-
730 diesel
20%bio-
720 diesel
710
700
690
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
LOAD(kg)
Fig.1 Variation of speed with load for pure diesel and diesel blends with biodiesel
44
LOAD Vs FUEL CONSUMPTION
1
FUEL CONSUMPTION (kg/hour)
0.9
0.8
0.7 PURE DIESEL
0.6 5% BIO-DIESEL
0.5 10% BIO-DIESEL
0.4 15% BIO-DIESEL
0.3 20% BIO-DIESEL
0.2
0.1
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
LOAD( kg)
Fig.2 Variation of fuel consumption with load for pure diesel and diesel blends with
biodiesel
LOAD Vs BSFC
12.2
10.2
BSFC (kg/kw.hour)
2.2
0.2
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
LOAD(kg)
Fig.3 Variation of BSFC with load for pure diesel and diesel blends with biodiesel
45
BRAKE POWER VsLOAD
2000
1800
1600
Pure diesel
1400
BRAKE POWER (W)
5% Bio-biesel
1200 10% Bio-
1000 diesel
15%Bio-diesel
800
20% Bio-
600 diesel
400
200
0
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
LOAD(kg)
Fig.4 Variation of Brake power with load for pure diesel and diesel blends with biodiesel
20
BRAKE THERMAL EFFIENCY
PURE DIESEL
15 5% BIO-DIESEL
10% BIO-DIESEL
10 15% BIO-DIESEL
20% BIO-DIESEL
5
0
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
LOAD(kg)
Fig.5 Variation of brake thermal efficiency with load for pure diesel and diesel blends with
biodiesel
46
LOAD Vs VOLUMETRIC EFFICIENCY
95
94
VOLUMETRIC EFFIENCY
93 PURE DIESEL
92 5% BIO-DIESEL
10% BIO-DIESEL
91 15% BIO-DIESEL
20% BIO-DIESEL
90
89
88
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
LOAD(kg0
Fig.6 Variation of volumetric efficiency with load for pure diesel and diesel blends with
biodiesel
25 5% BIO-DIESEL
20 10% BIO-DIESEL
15% BIO-DIESEL
15
20% BIO-DIESEL
10
5
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
LOAD(kg)
Fig.7 Variation of air fuel ratio with load for pure diesel and diesel blends with biodiesel
47
BMEP Vs SPEED
780
770
760
PURE DIESEL
750 5% BIO-DIESEL
SPEED(RPM)
Fig.8 Variation of speed with BMEP for pure diesel and diesel blends with biodiesel
Fig.9 Variation of fuel consumption with BMEP for pure diesel and diesel blends with
biodiesel
48
BMEP Vs BSFC
0.5
0.45 Y-Values
Column1
BSFC(kg/kw.hour)
0.4
Column2
0.35 Column3
Column4
0.3
0.25
0.2
2.41 2.61 2.81 3.01 3.21 3.41 3.61 3.81 4.01 4.21
BMEP(bar)
Fig.10 Variation of BSFC with BMEP for pure diesel and diesel blends with biodiesel
Pure diesel
1200 5% Bio-diesel
1000 10% Bio-diesel
800 15% Bio-diesel
20% Bio-diesel
600
400
200
0
2.41 2.61 2.81 3.01 3.21 3.41 3.61 3.81 4.01 4.21
BMEP(bar)
Fig.11 Variation of BSFC with BMEP for pure diesel and diesel blends with biodiesel
49
BMEP Vs BRAKE THERMAL EFFICIENCY
25
20
BRAKE THERMAL EFFIENCY
PURE DIESEL
5% BIO-DIESEL
15
10% BIO-DIESEL
15% BIO-DIESEL
10
20% BIO-DIESEL
0
2.41 2.61 2.81 3.01 3.21 3.41 3.61 3.81 4.01 4.21
BMEP(bar)
Fig.12 Variation of brake thermal efficiency with BMEP for pure diesel and diesel blends
with biodiesel
94
PURE DIESEL
VOLUMETRIC EFFIENCY
93
5% BI0-DIESEL
92
10% BO-DIESEL
91 15% BIO-DIESEL
20% BIO-DIESEL
90
89
88
-0.6 -0.1 0.4 0.9 1.4 1.9 2.4 2.9 3.4 3.9 4.4
BMEP(bar)
Fig.13 Variation of volumetric efficiency with BMEP for pure diesel and diesel blends with
biodiesel
50
BMEP Vs AIR FUEL RATIO
40
35
30
PURE DIESEL
AIR FUEL RATIO
25 5% BIO-DIESEL
20 10% BIO-DIESEL
15 15% BIO-DIESEL
Column4
10
5
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
BMEP(bar)
Fig.14 Variation of air fuel with BMEP for pure diesel and diesel blends with biodiesel
BMEP Vs LOAD
4.5
4
3.5 Pure diesel
5% Bio-diesel
3 10% Bio-
BMEP( bar)
2.5 diesel
15% Bio-
2 diesel
20% Bio-
1.5 diesel
1
0.5
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
LOAD( KG)
Fig.15 Variation of BMEP with load for pure diesel and diesel blends with biodiesel
51
HEAT BALANCE SHEET FOR 8 KG LOAD
B.P. Heat to coolant
Heat to exhaust and other losses
52
HEAT BALANCE SHEET FOR 12 KG LOAD
B.P. Heat to coolant
Heat to exhaust and other losses
53
4.2 Interpretation of Graphs
In Fig.No.1 speed is plotted against the load for neat diesel and blends of bio-diesel speed
decreases as load increases. In the beginning speed is nearly same for neat diesel and for blends
Fig.2 fuel consumption vs load is plotted for neat diesel and blends of bio-diesel, fuel
consumption increases as load increases. In the graph fuel consumption is nearly same for neat
diesel and blended diesel and has low value at all loads. At 12 kg of load for 20% blended of bio-
diesel have 10% more fuel consumption as observed in comparison to neat diesel.
Fig.3 BSFC is plotted against the load for neat diesel and blends of bio-diesel, BSFC increases as
load increases. In this graph BSFC is nearly same for neat diesel and blended diesel at all load
Fig.4 brake thermal efficiency is plotted against the load for neat diesel and blends of bio-diesel,
brake thermal efficiency increases as load increases. In the graph brake thermal efficiency is
nearly same for neat diesel and blended diesel at all loads and has low values at all loads for 20%
bio-diesel and has 11% lower value at 12kg load than neat diesel.
Fig.5 volumetric efficiency is plotted against the load for neat diesel and blends of bio-diesel,
volumetric efficiency increases as load increases.In the graph volumetric efficiency is nearly
same for neat diesel and blended diesel at all loads and have low value at all loads for neat diesel,
at 15kg load volumetric efficiency for 20% blended bio-diesel have maximum difference of 2%
54
Fig.6 air fuel ratio is plotted against the load for neat diesel and blends of bio-diesel, air fuel ratio
decreases as load increases. In the graph air fuel ratio is nearly same for neat diesel and blended
diesel at all loads and air fuel ratio for 20% bio-diesel blend have 13% lower value than neat
diesel at 12 kg load, and neat diesel have greater air fuel ratio than blended biodiesel at all loads.
Fig.No.7 speed is plotted against the BMEP for neat diesel and blends of bio-diesel, speed
decreases as BMEP increases. In the beginning speed is nearly same for neat diesel and blended
diesel at all BMEP and have lower value at 20% blend of bio-diesel.
Fig.8 fuel consumption vs BMEP is plotted for neat diesel and blends of bio-diesel and fuel
consumption increases as BMEP increases. In the graph fuel consumption is nearly same for neat
diesel and for blends at all BMEP and have lowest value at all BMEP for neat diesel.
Fig.9 BSFC is plotted against the BMEP for neat diesel and blends of bio-diesel, BSFC increases
as BMEP increases. In the graph BSFC is nearly same for neat diesel and blended diesel at all
BMEP and have lower BSFC value at all BMEP for neat diesel.
Fig.10 brake thermal efficiency is plotted against the BMEP for neat diesel and blends of
biodiesel, brake thermal efficiency increases as BMEP increases. In the graph brake thermal
efficiency is nearly same for neat diesel and blended diesel at all BMEP and have lower value at
Fig.11 volumetric efficiency is plotted against the BMEP for neat diesel and blends of bio-diesel,
volumetric efficiency increases as BMEP increases. In the graph volumetric efficiency is nearly
same for neat diesel and blended diesel at all BMEP and have same volumetric efficiency value
at all BMEP for neat diesel and 5% blended diesel, and for 20% blends of bio-diesel have
55
Fig.12 air fuel ratio is plotted against the BMEP for neat diesel and blends of bio-diesel, air fuel
ratio decreases as BMEP increases. In the graph air fuel ratio is nearly same for neat diesel and
blended diesel at all BMEP and have lowest value at 12 kg load for 20% bio-diesel blends, and
Fig.No.13,14,15,16 are bar charts of heat balance sheet which are drawn for neat diesel and
blend of bio-diesel at different loads and heat to exhaust and other losses is more at higher load.
56
CHAPTER 5
5.1 CONCLUSION
On the basis of the analysis of graphical plots following conclusions are drawn-
1 In the beginning for smaller values of Brake Power and Load blended biodiesel
consumption is higher than the neat diesel consumption which narrows down with higher
values of brake power and load.
2 BSFC values for smaller load is higher for blended bio-diesel and this gap reduces later
for higher value of load.
3 Brake power for neat diesel have higher values than blended bio-diesel at all loads and
difference of brake power between neat diesel and blended bio-diesel decreases as load
increases and brake power is minimum for 20% blend.
4 Brake thermal efficiency is higher for neat diesel at all loads and lowers for 20% blends
of biodiesel and difference of brake thermal efficiency between neat diesel and blended
bio-diesel decreases as load increases.
5 Volumetric efficiency variation with load is nearly same for these fuels. Volumetric
Efficiency values are found always lower for blended biodiesel fuel for all the loads.
6 Air fuel ratio is higher for blended bio-diesel and increases as percentage of bio-diesel
increases. Air fuel ratio decreases with increase of load.
7 Fuel consumption is nearly same for neat diesel and blended diesel at all BMEP and have
lower value at all BMEP for neat diesel.
8 BSFC Values for smaller values of BMEP where much higher for biodiesel blends, this
gap reduces later for higher values of BMEP.
9 Brake power with diesel fuel for all values of BMEP is found higher than that of blended
biodiesel and nearly same for 5% blend of bio-diesel.
10 Brake thermal efficiency is higher for neat diesel at all BMEP and lower for 20% blend
and difference decreases as load increases and brake power is minimum for 20% blend.
57
11 Volumetric efficiency variation with BMEP is nearly same for these fuels. Volumetric
Efficiency values are found always lower with blended biodiesel fuel for all BMEP.
12 Air fuel ratio is higher for blended bio-diesel and increases as percentage of bio-diesel
increases. Air fuel ratio decreases with increase of BMEP.
13 Up to 20% blended biodiesel can substitute mineral diesel without any modification in
the engine. Hence, these lean blends of biodiesel may be considered as diesel fuel
substitutes.
1. Analysis of composition of exhaust emission can be done with prolonged service with
neat bio-diesel.
2. Performance of engine can be compared for various blends of biodiesel with neat diesel;
present study is focused only to blend biodiesel fuels.
3. By computation analysis performance parameters can be extrapolated and compared with
experimental results.
4. Performance can be measured after with preheating fuels and/or mixing additives in
them.
5. Design changes can be studies and can be proposed after studying the problems
encountered after prolonged service of engines with these alternate fuels.
6. Emission studies can also be done.
58
Annexure 1
Select Data for Neat Diesel and Blend of Bio-diesel
Neat Diesel
5% Blend of Bio-diesel
Annexure 2
Observed Data
PROPERTIES Coconut bio-diesel Diesel
Density at 15ºC (kg/L) 0.8830 0.8450
60
Cetane Index 60 54.2
(wt %)
61
REFERENCES:
1. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural gas Gazette Dated Sept 12th 2003, part 1.page 230.
2. Mathur and Sharma, A Course in Internal Combustion Engines. 2005 page 517.
3. G.Konthe, R.O. Dunn, and M.O. Bagby,”Biodiesel”: The use of vegetable oils and their
derivatives as alternative diesel fules,” Fules and Chemicals from Biomass, American
chemistry Society (1977), 1-42.
4. F. Karaosmanoglu, A. Isigigur, F. Hamdullahpur, O.L Gulder and H.A. Aksoy,”Used Canola
oil as a diesel fuel alternative”, Renewal Energy (Tech and Environment), Proceeding of the
2nd world energy congress (Sept.1992), 13-18.
5. Chandra shekhar Tewari, Rajiv Choudhry, Ramesh Chandra Singh, M-Tech Dissertation of
University of Delhi on Some Experimental Studies upon use of biodiesel made form
coconut oil in small capacity diesel engine. June 2004 Page No. 81 to 88. & 94 to 96.
62
14. Deepak Agarwal.Lokesh Kumar,Avinash Kumar Agarwal : Performance evaluation of a
vegetable oil uelled compression ignition engine ,Science Direct ,Elsevier ,Journal of
Renewable energy , June 2007, Page No 4.
15. Prof. E. Schrimpff, Fachhochschule Weihenstephan, University of Applied Sciences,
"Comparison of pure plant oil and bio diesel as fuel”, Germany"(2004) page 12.
16. R.K. Rajput, a Textbook of Internal Combustion Engines second edition .2007 page No. 537-
611.
17. Charles L Peterson and Daryle Reecee, Production and Testing of Ethyl and Methyl Esters,
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, Dec
1994.
18. Barsic NJ, Humke AL. Vegetable oils: diesel fuel supplements? Automotive Eng 1981;
89(4):37–41.
19. Braun DE, Stephenson KO. Alternative fuel blends and diesel engine tests. Proceedings of
the international conference on plant and vegetable oils as fuels. American Society of
Agricultural Engineers 1982; August: 294–9.
20. Calais P*, Clark AR (Tony). Waste Vegetable Oil as a Diesel Replacement Fuel,
Environmental Science, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia, pcalais@ieee.org (Western
Australian Renewable Fuels Association Inc, tony.clark_NO-SPAM@arach.net.au).
On Line Resources:
a. www. petroleum.nic.in
b. www. osc.edu
c. www.rtol.com
d. www.sri.org.
e. www.sciencedirect.com
f. www.elsevier.com/locate/aptherm.ing
g. www. elsevier.com/locate/peca
h. www. fuelfirst.com
63
64